Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
10
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
10 results for “coherent scattering”
COHERENT Collaboration data release from the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on argon
<p>Release of COHERENT collaboration data from the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) on argon. This data release corresponds with the results of "Analysis A" published in arXiv:2003.10630[nucl-ex]. The data release enables further studies of CEvNS.</p> <p>Use of the data release is presented in the accompanying pdf document within this submission. Example code is included within the release as part of this submission. The materials here are also available at http://coherent.ornl.gov/data/, which preserves the directory structure used within the accompanying document. Note the use of the example code in this release expects the directory structure written within the accompanying pdf document.</p>
COHERENT Collaboration data release from the first observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering
<p>Release of COHERENT Collaboration data associated with the first observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS), as published in Science (DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0990">10.1126/science.aao0990</a>) and also available as arXiv:1708.01294[nucl-ex].</p> <p>This data set should enable researchers to extend the study of CEvNS as desired. Future COHERENT Collaboration results will have similar data releases.</p> <p>Example code can be accessed at https://code.ornl.gov/COHERENT/codeExamples_dataRelease_april2018.<br> The full data-release package, including data, code examples, and a descriptive accompanying document can be found at http://coherent.ornl.gov/data.</p>
Experimental data for "Exact inversion of partially coherent dynamical electron scattering for picometric structure retrieval"
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Scanning dynamic light scattering optical coherence tomography for measurement of high omnidirectional flow velocities
<p>This repository contains raw data and analysis routines of the publication <strong>“<em>Scanning dynamic light scattering optical coherence tomography for measurement of high omnidirectional flow velocities</em>”</strong> in Optics Express (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.456139">doi.org/10.1364/OE.456139</a><em>). </em>The reader is free to use the scripts and data in this depository if the manuscript is correctly cited in their work. For further questions, feel free to contact the corresponding author. Python 3.7 was used for programming. Keep in mind that running files with larger time series length may take up to 5-10 minutes.</p> <p>For ideal scanning alignment each dataset includes diffusion, focus (beam waist) calibration, and flow measurements (using both M-scan and B-scan methods) for all used sample lengths. The names “M-scan” and “A-scan” are used interchangeably. The analysis process is as follows: firstly, the diffusion coefficient is determined for every sample size (time series length) to be analyzed using the script ‘Diffusion.py’. Secondly, the beam waist (focus) calibration is performed using the script ‘Beam Waist.py’. Since the beam waist should be constant for each dataset, choose the value obtained from the file with a largest time series length for minimizing the statistical uncertainty and fix it for a given dataset. Beam scanning for our setup is not exactly perpendicular to the optical axis. Therefore, for B-scan Doppler flow measurements the calibration parameter v_d, quantifying the axial scan bias, must be used. This calibration parameter varies with time series length and needs to be obtained for each sample size. This is done with the same script as the beam waist calibration. Thirdly, the Doppler angle is determined using M-scan measurement with the lowest discharge rate using the script ‘Angle.py’. Finally, the flow profiles are obtained both for M-scan and B-scan methods with predetermined calibration parameters using the script ‘Flow.py’. All file names are sufficiently descriptive, showing sample size, scan mode, measurement type and discharge rate. The number on the file name represents the time series length.</p> <p>For arbitrary scanning alignment, the dataset includes one diffusion and one focus (beam waist) measurements for calibration purposes. The diffusion measurement is used only for the beam waist calibration and not for flow measurements. It also contains several B-scan flow measurements (with different scan speeds) for every discharge rate. The analysis process is same as before but without the angle calibration step. Use the script ‘Omnidirectional.py’ for this step.</p> <p>The table below summarizes all datasets and Python scripts uploaded to this repository.</p> <table align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Applicability</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Dataset, 12-04-2021.zip</p> </td> <td> <p>Ideal scan alignment</p> </td> <td> <p>Dataset for Doppler angle of 0.39 deg and alignment angle of 0 deg.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Dataset, 16-04-2021.zip</p> </td> <td> <p>Ideal scan alignment</p> </td> <td> <p>Dataset for Doppler angle of 0.94 deg and alignment angle of 0.94 deg.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Dataset, 20-04-2021.zip</p> </td> <td> <p>Ideal scan alignment</p> </td> <td> <p>Dataset for Doppler angle of 1.58 deg and alignment angle of 2.26 deg.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Dataset, 18-05-2021.zip</p> </td> <td> <p>Arbitrary alignment</p> </td> <td> <p>Dataset for alignment angle of 2.7 deg.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Chirp.data</p> </td> <td> <p>Both methods</p> </td> <td> <p>File containing k-interpolation data</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ReadOCTFile.py</p> </td> <td> <p>Both methods</p> </td> <td> <p>Written by Jos de Wit, this module reads and imports spectra from raw OCT files.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>DataProcessing.py</p> </td> <td> <p>Both methods</p> </td> <td> <p>This module contains all analysis and processing routines.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Diffusion.py</p> </td> <td> <p>Both methods</p> </td> <td> <p>This script determines diffusion coefficient from raw OCT spectra.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Beam Waist.py</p> </td> <td> <p>Both methods</p> </td> <td> <p>This script determines focus beam waist from raw OCT spectra.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Angle.py</p> </td> <td> <p>Ideal scan alignment</p> </td> <td> <p>This script determines Doppler angle from raw OCT spectra.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Flow.py</p> </td> <td> <p>Ideal scan alignment</p> </td> <td> <p>This script determines M-scan and B-scan flow profiles from raw OCT spectra.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Omnidirectional.py</p> </td> <td> <p>Arbitrary alignment</p> </td> <td> <p>This script determines flow profiles for arbitrary scan alignment.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
Data and code associated with the paper 'Measurement-induced collective vibrational quantum coherence under spontaneous Raman scattering in a liquid'
<p>Data and code associated with the following paper <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38483-9">V. Vento, S. Tarrago-Velez et al., Nat. Commun. (2023)</a></p> <p>A thorough explanation of the experiment performed is available there.</p> <p>The name of each sub-folder and file in <strong>CS2_data_code.zip</strong> indicates the corresponding figure number ("FIG #") and the type of content ("Data", "Analysis" or "Model").</p> <p> </p>
Precision and bias in dynamic light scattering optical coherence tomography measurements of diffusion and flow
<p>This repository contains raw data and analysis routines of the publication <strong>“<em>Precision and bias in dynamic light scattering optical coherence tomography measurements of diffusion and flow</em>”</strong> in Biomedical Optics Express (doi.org/10.1364/BOE.505847<em>). </em>The reader is free to use the scripts and data in this depository if the manuscript is correctly cited in their work. For further questions, feel free to contact the corresponding author. Python 3.7 was used for programming. Kindly note that simulating autocorrelation functions from extensive time series data, especially with a high repetition rate, can be time-consuming, often requiring more than 5-10 minutes. Despite parallelized processing routines for the measurement data, the full analysis may still take up to an hour. Please restart the kernel and run the code again if the parallelization fails.</p> <p>For the diffusion measurement under static conditions, there is only one file. However, for experiments involving both flowing and diffusing particles, the dataset comprises diffusion calibration, focus (beam shape) calibration, and flow measurement files. Due to the upload size limitations of the Zenodo repository, only the flow measurements corresponding to one discharge rate have been uploaded. Furthermore, only the non-dilute flow dataset has been uploaded for the same reason. However, for the dilute flow, the analysis logic remains the same, but users will need to utilize the complete g2 formula outlined in Section 2.2 of our article. All file names are sufficiently descriptive, showing whether it is diffusion, focus (waist) calibration or flow measurement. To conduct the analysis, it's essential to have information regarding the time series length (number of A-scans), the number of repeats (B-scans), and the acquisition rate.</p> <p>The results are plotted at the end of our analysis routines. The parameters are displayed as a function of depth. Users can readily compute the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at each depth by utilizing the fitted autocorrelation amplitudes. Occasionally, the fitted amplitudes may surpass unity. In such instances, users can assume an extremely high (even infinite) SNR.</p> <div> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Parameters</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Diffusion_03032023.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Diffusion measurement file.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=4096, Nb=1100, 5.5 kHz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Diffusion_07032023.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Diffusion calibration file for flow measurement.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=4096, Nb=10, 36 kHz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Waist_07032023.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Beam waist calibration file for flow measurement.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=4096, Nb=40, 36 kHz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Q=2_07032023.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Flow measurement file for a discharge rate of 2 ml/min.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=4096, Nb=1000, 36 kHz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Chirp.data</p> </td> <td> <p>File containing k-interpolation data.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ReadOCTFile.py</p> </td> <td> <p>Written by Jos de Wit, this module reads and imports spectra from raw OCT files.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Data_processing.py</p> </td> <td> <p>This module contains all analysis, simulation and processing routines.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Simulation_diffusion.py</p> </td> <td> <p>This script is for simulating and fitting g1 and g2 from diffusive particles.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Simulation_flow.py</p> </td> <td> <p>This script is for simulating and fitting g1 and g2 from flowing and diffusive particles.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Diffusion_parallel.py</p> </td> <td> <p>This script is for analyzing static diffusion measurements performed using Thorlabs Ganymede OCT system.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Flow_parallel.py</p> </td> <td> <p>This script is for analyzing flow measurements performed using Thorlabs Ganymede OCT system.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p> </p>
Wavenumber-dependent dynamic light scattering optical coherence tomography measurements of collective and self-diffusion
<p>This repository contains raw data and analysis routines of the publication <strong>“<em>Wavenumber-dependent dynamic light scattering optical coherence tomography measurements of collective and self-diffusion</em>”</strong> in Optics Express (doi.org/10.1364/OE.521702)<em>. </em>The reader is free to use the scripts and data in this depository if the manuscript is correctly cited in their work. For further questions, feel free to contact the corresponding author. Python 3.11 was used for programming. Kindly note that simulating autocorrelation functions from extensive time series data, especially with a high repetition rate, can be time-consuming, often requiring more than 20-30 minutes. Despite parallelized processing routines for the measurement data, the full analysis may still take up to an hour. Please restart the kernel and run the code again if the parallelization fails. Also, keep in mind the significant RAM usage.</p> <p>We've conducted measurements using both a custom-built OCT system and the Thorlabs OCT system. The custom setup specifically focused on measuring diffusion in concentrated suspensions, while the Thorlabs OCT system was used to analyze both concentrated and dilute suspensions. To analyze the data from the custom setup, we require an additional dark measurement file. Conversely, analyzing the Thorlabs measurements necessitates a chirp interpolation file. All filenames, whether for raw data or analysis files, are sufficiently descriptive. Files obtained with the Thorlabs OCT system are easily identifiable as they contain “Thorlabs” in their names. To conduct the analysis of Thorlabs measurements, it's essential to have information regarding the time series length (number of A-scans), the number of repeats (B-scans), and the acquisition rate. The results are plotted at the end of our analysis routines, with the parameters displayed as a function of depth or wavenumber. Raw measurement files and analysis routines are described below.</p> <div> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Parameters</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10050, 10 us.mat</p> </td> <td> <p>Interference intensity from the custom setup for the concentrated Kostrosöl 10050 sample.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=8192, Nb=20, 4.5 kHz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>CS50-28, 10 us.mat</p> </td> <td> <p>Interference intensity from the custom setup for the concentrated Levasil CS50-28 sample.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=8192, Nb=20, 4.5 kHz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Mix, 10 us.mat</p> </td> <td> <p>Interference intensity from the custom setup for the concentrated mixed sample.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=8192, Nb=20, 4.5 kHz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Dark, 10 us.mat</p> </td> <td> <p>Background interference intensity from a custom setup.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=2048, Nb=5, 4.5 kHz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concentrated 8050, Thorlabs.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Interference intensity from the Thorlabs OCT for the concentrated Kostrosöl 8050 sample.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=65536, Nb=10, 36 Khz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concentrated 9550, Thorlabs.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Interference intensity from the Thorlabs OCT for the concentrated Kostrosöl 9550 sample.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=65536, Nb=10, 36 Khz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concentrated mix, Thorlabs.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Interference intensity from the Thorlabs OCT for the concentrated mixed sample.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=65536, Nb=10, 36 Khz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Dilute 8050, Thorlabs.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Interference intensity from the Thorlabs OCT for the dilute Kostrosöl 8050 sample.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=32768, Nb=20, 36 Khz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Dilute 9550, Thorlabs.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Interference intensity from the Thorlabs OCT for the dilute Kostrosöl 9550 sample.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=32768, Nb=20, 36 Khz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Dilute mix, Thorlabs.oct</p> </td> <td> <p>Interference intensity from the Thorlabs OCT for the dilute mixed sample.</p> </td> <td> <p>Na=32768, Nb=20, 36 Khz</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Chirp.data</p> </td> <td> <p>File containing k-interpolation data for the Thorlabs OCT measurements.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ReadOCTFile.py</p> </td> <td> <p>Written by Jos de Wit, this module reads and imports spectra from raw Thorlabs OCT files.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Data_processing.py</p> </td> <td> <p>This module contains all analysis functions.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Custom_concentrated.py</p> </td> <td> <p>The script is for analyzing raw concentrated measurement files from the custom setup.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Thorlabs_concentrated.py</p> </td> <td> <p>The script is for analyzing raw concentrated measurement files from the Thorlabs setup.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Thorlabs_dilute.py</p> </td> <td> <p>The script is for running analysis of raw dilute measurement files from the Thorlabs setup.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p> </p>
ICEBEAR 3D coherent scatter radar data for 2020, 2021
<p>Daily ICEBEAR 3D data for 2020, 2021, organized in nx12 matrices where n is the number of observations (echoes) in any given day. The columns are</p> <ol> <li>Year (UT)</li> <li>Month (UT)</li> <li>Day (UT)</li> <li>Hour (UT)</li> <li>Minute (UT)</li> <li>Second (UT)</li> <li>Longitude [degrees]</li> <li>Latitude[degrees]</li> <li>Altitude [km]*</li> <li>Doppler velocity [m/s]</li> <li>SNR [dB]</li> <li>Beam number (1 = east, 2 = center, 3 = west)</li> </ol> <p>* The west-beam altitudes are anomalous.</p> <p> </p>
ICEBEAR 3D coherent scatter radar data for 2020, 2021
<p>Daily ICEBEAR 3D data for 2020, 2021, organized in nx12 matrices where n is the number of observations (echoes) in any given day. The columns are</p> <ol> <li>Year (UT)</li> <li>Month (UT)</li> <li>Day (UT)</li> <li>Hour (UT)</li> <li>Minute (UT)</li> <li>Second (UT)</li> <li>Longitude [degrees]</li> <li>Latitude[degrees]</li> <li>Altitude [km]*</li> <li>Doppler velocity [m/s]</li> <li>SNR [dB]</li> <li>Beam number (1 = east, 2 = center, 3 = west)</li> </ol> <p>* The west-beam altitudes are anomalous.</p>
The COherence of Scatter Identification and Exclusion Algorithm Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06975579. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.