Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
975
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
975 results for “colonoscopy”
NON-ANESTHESIOLOGIST ADMINISTERED PROPOFOL SEDATION IN SCREENING COLONOSCOPY
<p> </p> <p>These data came from a. prospective cohort study about cardiorespiratory complications in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy, comparing two sedation schemes: traditional sedation with fentanyl and midazolam, versus combined Propofol sedation administered by non-anesthesiologists. These screening colonoscopies were performed between 2018 and 2019. We used the ASA and Ramsay scales to evaluate comorbidities and sedation levels. Cardiopulmonary adverse events were defined as: systolic blood pressure<90 mmHg, oxygen saturation <90% or disrrythmia lasting for more than 60 seconds..We recorded the management and outcomes of all these unplanned events. Other data as age, gender and body mass index were recorded as well., We have stored our data as a csv fyle. </p> <p> </p>
A multicenter randomized phase 4 trial comparing Sodium Picosulphate plus Magnesium Citrate vs Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid for bowel PREparation before COLonoscopy. The PRECOL trial.
<p>This is the database for final analysis of the PRECOL clinical trial, whose abstract follows</p> <p>Background<strong>.</strong> Adequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy is crucial. Unfortunately, up to 25% of all colonoscopies have inadequate bowel cleansing. From a patient perspective, bowel preparation is a main obstacle for colonoscopy. Several low-volume bowel preparations have been formulated to provide more tolerable purgative solutions without loss of efficacy.</p> <p>Methods: In this phase 4, randomized, multicenter, two-arm trial, adult outpatients undergoing colonoscopy received either Sodium Picosulphate plus Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) or Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid (PEG-ASC) for bowel preparation. The primary aims were to test quality of bowel cleansing (primary endpoint, scored according the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale) and patient’s acceptance (measured with 6 visual analogue scales). The study was open as for treatment assignment, and blinded for primary endpoint assessment that was done independently on videotaped colonoscopies by 2 endoscopists not aware of study arm. A sample size of 525 patients was calculated to recognize a difference of 10% in the proportion of successes between the arms with a two-sided alpha error of 0·05 and 90% statistical power.</p> <p>Findings: overall 550 subjects (279 assigned to PEG-ASC and 271 assigned to SPMC) represented the analysis population. There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate according to BBPS: 94·4% with PEG-ASC and 95·7% with SPMC (P=0·49). Acceptance and willing to repeat were significantly better for SPMC with all the scales. Compliance was less than full in 6·6% and 9·9% of cases with PEG-ASC and SPMC, respectively (P=0·17). Nausea and meteorism were significantly more bothersome with PEG-ASC than SPMC. There were no serious adverse events in either group.</p> <p>Interpretation. SPMC and PEG-ASC are not different in terms of efficacy, but SPMC is better tolerated than PEG-ASC. SPMC could be used as alternative to low-volume PEG based purgative solutions for bowel preparation.</p> <p>Funding. This research had no financial support.</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01649674; EudraCT 2011—000587—10.</p>
Cap Assisted Colonoscopy Enhances Quality Based Competency in Colonoscopy Among Trainees
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02472730. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 15.
Standard Colonoscopy Versus Colonoscopy With Endocuff Vision
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03361917. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Prospective Trial to Compare the Clinical Efficiency of G-EYE™ HD Colonoscopy With Standard HD Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01917513. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 8. Publications: 1.
Polyethylene Glycol Versus Low Volume Solutions Prior to Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02956057. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Multiple Dose Safety and Efficacy Study Evaluating CNS 7056 Versus Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01145222. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Study on the Feelings of Euphoria Caused by Remimazolam During Gastroscopy and Colonoscopy and Their Related Factors
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06721195. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Prospective RCT Of Water Exchange (WE) vs. WE Plus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03160859. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 24.
Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06621225. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Propofol and Dexmedetomidine Versus a Propofol Only Regimen for Sedation During Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03139279. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 12.
Split Dose Golytely With Amitiza Pretreatment Versus Split Dose Golytely Plus Placebo in Outpatient Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00611442. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
Yoga and Bolus Lukewarm Saline as Rapid Colonoscopy Preparation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01547130. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Impacts of Inspection During Instrument Insertion on Colonoscopy Quality
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03444090. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Gatorade/Miralax With or Without Bisacodyl Versus NuLytely for Colonoscopy Preparation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01063049. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Abdominal Binder in Colonoscopies Performed by Trainees
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05617521. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Polyp Detection With the EndoRings™: A Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01955122. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 3. Publications: 1.
Comparison of Oxygenation and Ventilation With a Novel Nasal Mask Versus Standard of Care During Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03139448. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Eziclen®/Izinova® Versus Klean-prep® on Bowel Cleansing in Adolescents Undergoing Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03008460. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 6. Publications: 1.
Cap-assisted Water Immersion Versus Water Immersion Colonoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01547247. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.