Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
85
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
85 results for “community of practice”
Artisanal and farmer bread making practices differently shape fungal species community composition in French sourdoughs
<p>Datasets describing the fungal species diversity, microbial density and acidity of French sourdoughs, phenotypic variation of Kazachstania bulderi and Kazachstania humilis strains as well as the diversity of bread-making practices of 40 bakers and farmers-bakers.The data were collected, analyzed, and reported within the following publication :</p> <p>Elisa Michel, Estelle Masson, Sandrine Bubbendorf, Léocadie Lapicque, Thibault Nidelet, Diego Segond, Stéphane Guézenec, Thérèse Marlin, Hugo deVillers, Olivier Rué, Bernard Onno, Judith Legrand, Delphine Sicard and the participating bakers: <strong>Artisanal and farmer bread making practices differently shape fungal species community composition in French sourdoughs</strong>. PCI Evol. Biol.</p> <p> </p>
Community Established Best Practice Recommendations for Tephra Studies-from Collection through Analysis
<p>Tephra is a unique volcanic product with an unparalleled role in understanding past eruptions, long-term behavior of volcanoes, and the effects of volcanism on climate and the environment. Tephra deposits also provide spatially widespread, extremely high-resolution time-stratigraphic markers across a range of sedimentary settings and are used in a range of disciplines (e.g., volcanology, climate science, archaeology, ecology, and impact assessment). Nonetheless, the study of tephra deposits is challenged by a lack of standardization that often inhibits data integration across geographic regions and across disciplines.</p> <p>Here we present comprehensive recommendations for tephra data gathering and reporting that were developed by the tephra science community to serve as guidelines for future investigators and to ensure that sufficient data are gathered for transparency and interoperability. Recommendations include standardized field and laboratory data collection along with reporting and correlation guidance. These are organized as tabulated lists of key metadata with their definition and purpose. They are system independent and usable for template, tool, and database development. This new standardized framework promotes consistent tephra documentation and archiving, fosters interdisciplinary communication, and improves effectiveness of data sharing among diverse communities of researchers. Wider adoption will help to expand the applicability and usability of tephra data and facilitate scientific collaboration and data reuse.</p> <p>For additional details, see the accompanying manuscript:</p> <p>Wallace, K.*, Bursik, M. Kuehn, S., Kurbatov, A., Abbott, P., Bonadonna, C., Cashman, K., Davies, S., Jensen, B., Lane, C., Plunkett, G., Smith, V. Tomlinson, E., Thordarsson, T., and Walker, D. Community established best practice recommendations for tephra studies—from collection through analysis. <em>Sci Data</em> <strong>9, </strong>447 (2022). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y</a></p> <p>*corresponding author: Kristi Wallace, <a href="mailto:kwallace@usgs.gov">kwallace@usgs.gov</a></p> <p>Open access article is available online here <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y</a> or as a PDF here <a href="https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fs41597-022-01515-y.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Ckwallace%40usgs.gov%7C673f9f39fd3e4122dd9b08da6f3b9667%7C0693b5ba4b184d7b9341f32f400a5494%7C0%7C0%7C637944598967375940%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2BKVfwK2FbUKAoJf2gMerCmBMEQE1rvMDkS6xIk3DGKY%3D&reserved=0">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01515-y.pdf</a>.</p>
Mapping practices of online community management
<p>Results of an online survey conducted during the period 13-31st March 2018. Responses were collected through a Google form; instructions and context were made available on a <a href="http://www.cottica.net/2018/03/13/mapping-online-community-management-practices-can-i-have-a-little-help-with-my-thesis/">web page</a>, the link of which was disseminated through Facebook, Twitter and on the e-mint mailing list (dedicated to professional online community managers on Yahoo. </p> <p>Each row of the file represents one questionnaire; each column represents one question.</p> <ul> <li>The first 9 questions are all of the format "To manage your online community, which of these courses of actions do you take, and how often?". The answers were given on a Likert-4 scale.</li> <li>The 10th question was "Do you want to add any other activity that uses up significant chunks of your community management time?". The answers were given in free form text.</li> <li>The 11th question was "How old is the community you manage? If you manage more than one, refer to the oldest." The answers were given as multiple choice, with three possible choices.</li> <li>The 12th question was "How large is the community you manage? If you manage more than one, refer to the largest.". The answers were given as multiple choice, with five possible choices.</li> </ul> <p>This work is part of my PhD Thesis.</p>
Fig. 1 in Saproxylic beetle (Coleoptera) communities and forest management practices in coniferous stands in southwest Nova Scotia, Canada
Fig. 1. Map of Bowater Mersey Paper Company Ltd land in Nova Scotia. Bowater Mersey lands highlighted. Site descriptions: 1 & 2 – 40-80 yr, CT; 3 & 4 – 40-80 yr, none; 5 – 80-120 yr, US; 6 & 7 – 80- 120, none; 8 – 120+ yr, S; 9 – 120+ yr, S/SH; 10 & 11 – 120+ yr, none. CT = Commercial thinning; US = Uniform selection harvest; SH = Shelterwood harvest; S = Selection harvest.
Fig. 2 in Saproxylic beetle (Coleoptera) communities and forest management practices in coniferous stands in southwest Nova Scotia, Canada
Fig. 2. Overstory composition for dominant tree species based on importance value (Importance Value = Relative Density + Relative Dominance + Relative Frequency). Site descriptions: 1 & 2 – 40-80 yr, CT; 3 & 4 – 40-80 yr, none; 5 – 80-120 yr, US; 6 & 7 – 80-120, none; 8 – 120+ yr, S; 9 – 120+ yr, S/SH; 10 & 11 – 120+ yr, none. CT = Commercial thinning; US = Uniform selection harvest; SH = Shelterwood harvest; S = Selection harvest.
Fig. 7 in Saproxylic beetle (Coleoptera) communities and forest management practices in coniferous stands in southwest Nova Scotia, Canada
Fig. 7. Mean species richness of beetles in different forest stand age classes, including standard deviation from both the present study and Bishop (1998).
Fig. 5 in Saproxylic beetle (Coleoptera) communities and forest management practices in coniferous stands in southwest Nova Scotia, Canada
Fig. 5. Rarefaction curve demonstrating projected species richness for number of individuals based on Bishop (1998), and the present study (Dollin et al.) beetle collections.
Fig. 8 in Saproxylic beetle (Coleoptera) communities and forest management practices in coniferous stands in southwest Nova Scotia, Canada
Fig. 8. Mean species richness across harvest treatment, including standard deviation, for 11 stands in southwestern Nova Scotia.
Fig. 3 in Saproxylic beetle (Coleoptera) communities and forest management practices in coniferous stands in southwest Nova Scotia, Canada
Fig. 3. Volume of coarse woody debris (CWD) by decay class for 11 stands in southwestern Nova Scotia as measured by Thompson (2004). Decay classes are summarized as follows: "1" is freshly dead, little to no rot; in "2", the bole is mostly sound; "3" has well-established rot and significant bark loss; "4" is advanced decay; and "5" is rotted through but still of wood character. Site descriptions: 1 & 2 – 40-80 yr, CT; 3 & 4 – 40-80 yr, none; 5 – 80-120 yr, US; 6 & 7 – 80-120, none; 8 – 120+ yr, S; 9 – 120+ yr, S/SH; 10 & 11 – 120+ yr, none. CT = Commercial thinning; US = Uniform selection harvest; SH = Shelterwood harvest; S = Selection harvest.
Supplementary Material for Work Practices and Perceptions from Women Core Developers in OSS Communities
<p>Supplementary Material for Work Practices and Perceptions from Women Core Developers in OSS Communities which allows to reproduce and extend the results presented in the paper study.</p>
Data for: The impacts of bioenergy pine plantation management practices on bee communities
<p>1. Cultivation of bioenergy feedstocks is a growing land-use worldwide, yet we have a poor understanding of how bioenergy crop management practices affect biodiversity. This knowledge gap is particularly acute for candidate cellulosic bioenergy feedstocks, such as tree plantations, and for organisms that provide important ecosystem services, such as pollinators.</p> <p>2. We examined bee communities in 83 sites across three states in the southeastern USA—Alabama, Florida and Georgia. We compared bee abundance and diversity in 66 pine plantation sites that reflect management with and without potential bioenergy feedstock production. At least three bioenergy feedstock production methods have been proposed for this region: 1) converting conventional timber stands to short-rotation bioenergy plantations; 2) harvesting feedstock by thinning conventional plantations; and 3) harvesting of woody debris residues after plantations have been clear-cut.</p> <p>3. We found that bioenergy-associated management practices including younger plantations (relative to older) and woody debris removal (relative to debris unremoved) in clear-cut plantations were associated with reduced bee diversity. Removing ground debris in clear-cut plantations also drastically increased bee abundance, though this effect was largely driven by strong dominance of just two bee species. Clear-cut plantations had lower beta diversity than standing plantations.</p> <p>4. Synthesis and applications. Management practices associated with bioenergy feedstock production can have negative effects on bee community diversity. In particular, harvesting of debris in clear-cut plantations dramatically reduces bee diversity. Large-scale bioenergy feedstock production that increases the prevalence of young and clear-cut stands may cause landscape-level beta diversity to decline. Nevertheless, bioenergy pine plantations likely support higher bee diversity than corn fields, an alternative bioenergy feedstock.</p>
Data from: cultural attraction in pottery practice: group-specific shape transformations by potters from three communities
<p>Pottery is a quintessential indicator of human cultural dynamics. Cultural alignment of behavioral repertoires and artifacts has been considered to rest upon two distinct dynamics: selective transmission of information and culture-specific biased transformation. In a cross-cultural field experiment, we tested whether community-specific morphological features of ceramic vessels would arise when the same unfamiliar shapes were reproduced by professional potters from three different communities who threw vessels using wheels. We analyzed the details of the underlying morphogenesis development of vessels in wheel throwing. When expert potters from three different communities of practice were instructed to faithfully reproduce common unfamiliar model shapes that were not parts of the daily repertoires, the morphometric variation in the final shape was not random; rather, different potters produced vessels with more morphometric variation among than within communities, indicating the presence of community-specific deviations of morphological features of vessels. Furthermore, this was found both in the final shape and in the underlying process of morphogenesis; there was more variation in the morphogenetic path among than within communities. These results suggest that the morphological features of ceramic vessels produced by potters reliably and nonrandomly diverge among different communities.</p>
Data from: Building communities of teaching practice and data-driven open education resources with NEON faculty mentoring networks
<p>With the growing availability and accessibility of big data in ecology, we face an urgent need to train the next generation of scientists in data science practices and tools. One of the biggest barriers for implementing a data-driven curriculum in undergraduate classrooms is the lack of training and support for educators to develop their own skills and time to incorporate these principles into existing courses or develop new ones. Alongside the research goals of the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), providing education and training are key components for building a community of scientists and users equipped to utilize large-scale ecological and environmental data. To address this need, the NEON Data Education Fellows program formed as a collaborative Faculty Mentoring Network (FMN) between scientists from NEON and university faculty interested in using NEON data and resources in their ecology classrooms. Like other FMNs, this group has two main goals: 1) to provide tools, resources, and support for faculty interested in developing data-driven curriculum, and (2) to make teaching materials that have been implemented and tested in the classroom available as open educational resources for other educators. We hosted this program using an open education and collaboration platform from the Quantitative Undergraduate Biology Education and Synthesis (QUBES) project. Here, we share lessons learned from facilitating five FMN cohorts and emphasize the successes, pitfalls, and opportunities for developing open education resources through community-driven collaborations.</p>
Data from: Local and landscape scale woodland cover and diversification of agroecological practices shape butterfly communities in tropical smallholder landscapes
<p>The conversion of biodiversity-rich woodland to farmland and subsequent management has strong, often negative, impacts on biodiversity. In tropical smallholder agricultural landscapes, the impacts of agriculture on insect communities, both through habitat change and subsequent farmland management, is understudied. The use of agroecological practices has social and agronomic benefits for smallholders. Although ecological co-benefits of agroecological practices are assumed, systematic empirical assessments of biodiversity effects of agroecological practices are missing, particularly in Africa.</p> <p>In Malawi, we assessed butterfly abundance, species richness, species assemblages and community life-history traits on 24 paired woodland and smallholder-managed farmland sites located across a gradient of woodland cover within a 1 km radius. We tested whether habitat type (woodland vs. farmland) and woodland cover at the landscape scale interactively shaped butterfly communities. Farms varied in the implementation of agroecological pest and soil management practices and flowering plant species richness.</p> <p>Farmland had lower butterfly abundances and approximately half the species richness than woodland. Farmland butterfly communities had, on average, a larger wingspan than woodland site communities. Surprisingly, higher woodland cover in the landscape had no effect on butterfly abundance in both habitats. In contrast, species richness was higher with higher woodland cover. Butterfly species assemblages were distinct between wood- and farmland and shifted across the woodland cover gradient.</p> <p>Farmland butterfly abundance, but not species richness, was higher with higher flowering plant species richness on farms. Farms with a higher number of agroecological pest management practices had a lower abundance of the dominant butterfly species, but not of rarer species. However, a larger number of agroecological soil management practices was associated with a higher abundance of rarer species. </p> <p><em>Synthesis and applications</em>: We show that diversified agroecological soil practices and flowering plant richness enhanced butterfly abundance on farms. However, our results suggest that on-farm measures cannot compensate for the negative effects of continued woodland conversion. Therefore, we call for more active protection of remaining African woodlands in tandem with promoting agroecological soil management practices and on-farm flowering plant richness to conserve butterflies whilst benefiting smallholders.</p>
Increasing HPV Vaccination in Community-Based Pediatric Practices
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03399396. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Human-centered Design and Communities of Practice to Improve Home-based Tuberculosis Contact Investigation in Uganda
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05640648. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Implementing a Virtual Tobacco Treatment for Cancer Patients in Community Oncology Practices
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03808818. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Data from: Local and landscape scale woodland cover and diversification of agroecological practices shape butterfly communities in tropical smallholder landscapes
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Grazing and mowing practices drive complex dynamics in the structure of butterfly communities in semi-natural grasslands
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: cultural attraction in pottery practice: group-specific shape transformations by potters from three communities
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.