Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
21
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
21 results for “comparative meta-analysis”
Comparative host transcriptomics as a tool to identify candidate biomarkers for immune reactions in leprosy: A meta-analysis study
<p>The dataset consists of R source code for the individual dataset analysis of the studies and their meta-analysis. It also contains supplementary tables and figure.</p>
A Meta-Analysis on the Reliability of Comparative Judgement Data
<p>This is the data and R analysis script with the article "A Meta-Analysis on the Reliability of Comparative Judgement"</p>
The efficacy of hemoglobin spray in wound management: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of comparative studies
<p>PRISMA flow</p>
The influence of thin as compared to thick peri-implant soft tissues on esthetic outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
<p>Dataset for all analyses in the paper.</p>
The efficacy of hemoglobin spray in wound management: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of comparative studies
<p>Dataset</p>
Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems achieve comparable crop yields to specialized systems: a meta-analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Comparing traditional and Bayesian approaches to ecological meta-analysis
<p>1. Despite the wide application of meta-analysis in ecology, some of the traditional methods used for meta-analysis may not perform well given the type of data characteristic of ecological meta-analyses.</p> <p>2. We reviewed published meta-analyses on the ecological impacts of global climate change, evaluating the number of replicates used in the primary studies (ni) and the number of studies or records (k) that were aggregated to calculate a mean effect size. We used the results of the review in a simulation experiment to assess the performance of conventional frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis methods for estimating a mean effect size and its uncertainty interval.</p> <p>3. Our literature review showed that ni and k were highly variable, distributions were right-skewed, and were generally small (median ni =5, median k=44). Our simulations show that the choice of method for calculating uncertainty intervals was critical for obtaining appropriate coverage (close to the nominal value of 0.95). When k was low (<40), 95% coverage was achieved by a confidence interval based on the t-distribution that uses an adjusted standard error (the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman, HKSJ), or by a Bayesian credible interval, whereas bootstrap or z-distribution confidence intervals had lower coverage. Despite the importance of the method to calculate the uncertainty interval, 39% of the meta-analyses reviewed did not report the method used, and of the 61% that did, 94% used a potentially problematic method, which may be a consequence of software defaults.</p> <p>4. In general, for a simple random-effects meta-analysis, the performance of the best frequentist and Bayesian methods were similar for the same combinations of factors (k and mean replication), though the Bayesian approaches had higher than nominal (>95%) coverage for the mean effect when k was very low (k<15). Our literature review suggests that many meta-analyses that used z-distribution or bootstrapping confidence intervals may have over-estimated the statistical significance of their results when the number of studies was low; more appropriate methods need to be adopted in ecological meta-analyses.</p>
raw data - Effect of the decompression only compared to decompression with on lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: A meta-analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Comparing traditional and Bayesian approaches to ecological meta-analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Comparative Efficacy of various Procedures of eccentric exercises for Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
<p>supplementary materials<span><span> </span><span> 补充材料</span></span></p>
Statistical Analysis Plan for an Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Three, International Trials Comparing Protocolised With Usual Resuscitation in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02030158. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 6.
Lumbar Fusion Compared With Conservative Treatment in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: a Meta-analysis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01780194. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Data from: Meta-analysis of variance: an illustration comparing the effects of two dietary interventions on variability in weight
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys: a meta-analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing antithrombotic agents for the prevention of stroke and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
A Meta-analysis Comparing Toothbrushes on Plaque Removal and Gingival Health
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05594004. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Comparative parallel meta-analysis of cells undergoing reprogramming to pluripotency and trophectoderm states
GEO Series GSE171127. Mus musculus. 184 samples. Type: Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing; Methylation profiling by high throughput sequencing; Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing; Genome variation profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Cross-Platform Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array CGH) Meta-Analysis
GEO Series GSE5051. Homo sapiens. 167 samples. Type: Genome variation profiling by array; Genome variation profiling by genome tiling array.
A meta-analysis of the frequency of genital infection in human immunodeficiency virus-infected females compared with uninfected females
<p>supplemental Figure 1-8</p>
Comparative efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions over global cognition in people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
<p>This database contains information on 122 RCT which compared the effect of different nonpharmacological interventions over global cognition in dementia and mild cognitive impairment. </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.