Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

27

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

27 results for “cultural ecosystem services”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Point, polygon, or marker? In search of the best geographic entity for mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services using the online PPGIS tool, "My Green Place."

<p>Excel files include the raw database and the processed data that led to the quadrat analyses. The &quot;Matrix_raw data&quot; file includes the raw data as downloaded from the server. This data was cleaned and organized for its posterior use. &quot;Quadrat analyzes &quot;file includes all the quadrat analyses resulting in each research question in the paper except question four. Question 4 can be seen in the file &quot;Water analysis_Blaarmeersen.&quot; All excel files come with a &quot;CODE&quot; tab that describes each of the codes used, their meaning, and ways that were calculated where necessary. Two zip files include all the GIS files. The first one includes the GIS files from which &quot;Matrix_raw data&quot; was built from. The second folder includes the resulting maps from the quadrat analyses. In order to visualize them as in the paper, configure the symbology tab at the GIS software in quantile and the categories number, as shown in the paper.</p> <p>The production of the files in the &quot;GIS_Processed data&quot; folder was done via a repetitive line of commands in ArcGIS pro. The same process was followed for each one of the quadrat analysis described in the paper. Refer to &quot;<a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/72403e0b-78a9-4bbf-8dca-ed9b8702e3ae/Reproduction%20commands%20and%20parameters.pdf">Reproduction commands and parameters.pdf</a>&quot; for further information.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Rural Landscape Simplification and Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services. A Case Study in the Argentine Pampas

<p>This supplementary material consists of the <strong>survey questionnaire</strong> and the <strong>data set </strong>that gave rise to the article: <em>Rural Landscape Simplification and Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services. A Case Study in the Argentine Pampas </em>publicado en el journal&nbsp;EARN Econom&iacute;a Agraria y Recursos Naturales. Agricultural and Resource Economics&nbsp;<a href="https://economiaagroalimentaria.es/en/earn-journal/">https://economiaagroalimentaria.es/en/earn-journal/</a></p> <p><a href="https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2023.01.01">DOI: https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2023.01.01</a></p> <p><em>.</em></p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space

1. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) encompass a range of social, cultural and health benefits to local communities, for example recreation, spirituality, a sense of place and local identity. However, these complex and place-specific CES are often overlooked in rapid land management decisions and assessed using broad, top–down approaches. 2. We use the Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to examine a novel approach to rapid assessment of local CES provision using inductive, participatory methods. We combined free-listing and participatory geographic information systems (GIS) techniques to quantify and map perceptions of current CES provision of an urban green space. The results were then statistically compared with those of a proposed alternative scenario with the aim to inform future decision-making. 3. By identifying changes in the spatial hotspots of CES in our study area, we revealed a spatially-specific shift toward positive sentiment regarding several CES under the alternative state with variance across demographic and stakeholder groups. Response aggregations in areas of proposed development reveal previously unknown stakeholder preferences to local decision-makers and highlight potential trade-offs for conservation management. Free-listed responses revealed deeper insight into personal opinion and context. 4. This work serves as a useful case study on how the perceptions and opinions of local people regarding local CES could be accounted for in the future planning of an urban greenspace and how thorough analysis of CES provision is important to fully-inform local-scale conservation and planning for the mutual benefit of local communities and nature.

opencc-zeroDec 2019View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Can avian functional traits predict cultural ecosystem services?

<ol> <li><span>The functional trait diversity of species assemblages can predict the provision of ecosystem services such as pollination and carbon sequestration, but it is unclear whether the same trait-based framework can be applied to identify the factors that underpin cultural ecosystem services and disservices. </span></li> <li><span>To explore the relationship between traits and the contribution of species to cultural ecosystem services and disservices, we conducted 404 questionnaire surveys with birdwatchers and local residents in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.</span></li> <li><span>We used an information-theoretic approach to identify which of 20 functional traits for 199 Costa Rican bird species best predicted their cultural ecosystem service scores related to birdwatching, acoustic aesthetics, education and local identity, as well as disservices (e.g., harm to crops). </span></li> <li><span>We found that diet was the most important variable explaining perceptions of cultural ecosystem service and disservice providers. Aesthetic traits such as plumage colour and pattern were important in explaining birdwatching scores. We also found people have a high affinity for forest-affiliated birds. </span></li> <li><span>The insight that functional traits can explain variation among cultural perspectives on values derived from birds offers a first step towards a trait-based system for understanding the species attributes that underpin cultural ecosystem services and disservices.</span></li> </ol>

opencc-zeroDec 2018View details →
dryad36/100

Survey results for: Public perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provided by beach nourishment and eelgrass restoration in southern Sweden

<p>Ecosystem-based protection is becoming a viable adaptation option to conventional engineered solutions to rising sea levels and coastal erosion. While the environmental and biological ecosystem services provided by ecosystem-based adaptation measures such as beach nourishment and/or seagrass plantations are being acknowledged and analysed, less attention has been paid to the social or cultural dimensions of these services. This paper builds upon the emerging body of research that explores cultural ecosystem services in coastal areas and how they are perceived by the people who live, work and recreate in these areas. The aim of the paper is to take stock of and understand public and stakeholder perceptions of the cultural ecosystem services that may accrue through eelgrass (<em>Zostera marina</em>) restoration in tandem with beach nourishment in Southern Sweden. The empirical research is based on an online open-ended questionnaire in the coastal municipalities of Båstad, Trelleborg, Ystad and Kristianstad. The results demonstrate that virtually all respondents had noticed a change in the coastline in recent years, mainly that the coastline had retreated. While beach nourishment measures were recognized among respondents to counter the shoreline erosion, there was very little understanding of the role that eelgrass plantations can play in creating biodiversity and benefits for society. Still, most acknowledged the importance of making room for water and biodiversity at the coast, stating how the coastline was valued for primarily health and spiritual reasons. This knowledge will help local, regional, and national decision-makers and regulatory authorities to make evidence-based choices for coastal protection, by complementing the analysis of environmental and physical ecosystem-services with cultural and socio-economic considerations. Nature-based solutions such as eelgrass reintroduction or beach nourishment should be tailored to the values, perspectives, and perceptions of the local communities to help ensure their continued contribution to biodiversity.</p>

opencc-zeroOct 2022View details →
zenodo36/100

Classification of pictures taken from Flickr and iNaturalist for cultural ecosystem services in Minho Region Portugal

<p>This is classification dataset of photographs&nbsp;from&nbsp;Flirck and iNaturalist applied&nbsp;to buffer 500 meters of main cours rivers&nbsp;Minho, Lima and C&aacute;vado in Minho Region (NW Portugal), in between the years 2018- 2019 for cultural ecosystem services&nbsp;studies. Four categories&nbsp;assigned as follows: i) landscape; ii) historical heritage; iii) recreation and river beaches; iv) biodiversity.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2019View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Can avian functional traits predict cultural ecosystem services?

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2019View details →
dryad36/100

Survey results for: Public perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provided by beach nourishment and eelgrass restoration in southern Sweden

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Osawa T, Ueno Y, Nishida T, Nishihiro J (2020) Do both habitat and species diversity provide cultural ecosystem services? A trial using geo-tagged photos. Nature Conservation 38: 61-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.38.36166

: Explanation note: Table S1. All plants and main habitats in the study area. Table S2. All birds and main habitats in the study area. Table S3. All butterflies and main habitats in the study area. Table S4. All dragonflies and main habitats in the study area. Table S5. List of threatened plants in the study area. Table S6. Picture objects list which took in area with threatened species from spring to autumn.

opencc-zeroMar 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Garcia Rodrigues J, Conides A, Rivero Rodriguez S, Raicevich S, Pita P, Kleisner K, Pita C, Lopes P, Alonso Roldán V, Ramos S, Klaoudatos D, Outeiro L, Armstrong C, Teneva L, Stefanski S, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Kruse M, Lillebø A, Bennett E, Belgrano A, Murillas A, Sousa Pinto I, Burkhard B, Villasante S (2017) Marine and Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services: knowledge gaps and research priorities. One Ecosystem 2: e12290. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290

Correspondence between our classification and labels for marine and coastal CES as found in the literature

opencc-by-4.0May 2017View details →
dryad32/100

Harnessing Artificial Intelligence technology and social media data to support Cultural Ecosystem Service assessments

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Osawa T, Ueno Y, Nishida T, Nishihiro J (2020) Do both habitat and species diversity provide cultural ecosystem services? A trial using geo-tagged photos. Nature Conservation 38: 61-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.38.36166

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-zeroMar 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Osawa T, Ueno Y, Nishida T, Nishihiro J (2020) Do both habitat and species diversity provide cultural ecosystem services? A trial using geo-tagged photos. Nature Conservation 38: 61-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.38.36166

: Explanation note: All objects were not the threaten species itself.

opencc-zeroMar 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Capriolo A, Boschetto RG, Mascolo RA, Bulckaen A, Balbi S, Villla F (2022) How regulating and cultural services of ecosystems have changed over time in Italy. One Ecosystem 7: e83214. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.7.e83214

ANNEX B

opencc-zeroSep 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Capriolo A, Boschetto RG, Mascolo RA, Bulckaen A, Balbi S, Villla F (2022) How regulating and cultural services of ecosystems have changed over time in Italy. One Ecosystem 7: e83214. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.7.e83214

ANNEX A

opencc-zeroSep 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Capriolo A, Boschetto RG, Mascolo RA, Bulckaen A, Balbi S, Villla F (2022) How regulating and cultural services of ecosystems have changed over time in Italy. One Ecosystem 7: e83214. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.7.e83214

ANNEX C

opencc-zeroSep 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 4 from: Garcia Rodrigues J, Conides A, Rivero Rodriguez S, Raicevich S, Pita P, Kleisner K, Pita C, Lopes P, Alonso Roldán V, Ramos S, Klaoudatos D, Outeiro L, Armstrong C, Teneva L, Stefanski S, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Kruse M, Lillebø A, Bennett E, Belgrano A, Murillas A, Sousa Pinto I, Burkhard B, Villasante S (2017) Marine and Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services: knowledge gaps and research priorities. One Ecosystem 2: e12290. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290

Overview of the methods and indicators used to assess marine and coastal CES

opencc-by-4.0May 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Garcia Rodrigues J, Conides A, Rivero Rodriguez S, Raicevich S, Pita P, Kleisner K, Pita C, Lopes P, Alonso Roldán V, Ramos S, Klaoudatos D, Outeiro L, Armstrong C, Teneva L, Stefanski S, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Kruse M, Lillebø A, Bennett E, Belgrano A, Murillas A, Sousa Pinto I, Burkhard B, Villasante S (2017) Marine and Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services: knowledge gaps and research priorities. One Ecosystem 2: e12290. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290

List of papers included in the literature synthesis

opencc-by-4.0May 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Garcia Rodrigues J, Conides A, Rivero Rodriguez S, Raicevich S, Pita P, Kleisner K, Pita C, Lopes P, Alonso Roldán V, Ramos S, Klaoudatos D, Outeiro L, Armstrong C, Teneva L, Stefanski S, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Kruse M, Lillebø A, Bennett E, Belgrano A, Murillas A, Sousa Pinto I, Burkhard B, Villasante S (2017) Marine and Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services: knowledge gaps and research priorities. One Ecosystem 2: e12290. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290

PRISMA checklist

opencc-by-4.0May 2017View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record