Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
95
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
95 results for “deception”
Generalized Deception Dataset
<p>We took labeled datasets from five different deception-detection tasks with no licensing issues and converted them to a standard format. We inspected each dataset for quality and generated new cleaned versions. </p> <table> <thead> <tr> <th scope="col">Task</th> <th scope="col"># Deceptive</th> <th scope="col"># Truthful</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Product Reviews</td> <td>10493</td> <td>10481</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Phishing</td> <td>6134</td> <td>9202</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Job Scams</td> <td>608</td> <td>13735</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Political Statements</td> <td>5669</td> <td>7167</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Fake News</td> <td>27486</td> <td>34615</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Our data is structured as five jsonlines files (one for each task) with a text to classify and a Boolean is_deceptive label. </p> <p>Sample data point: </p> <pre><code>{ "text":"the Annies List political group supports third-trimester abortions on demand.", "is_deceptive":true } </code></pre> <p> </p> <p>Changelog</p> <p><strong>1.1</strong></p> <ul> <li>Fixed flipped labels in the job scams dataset. </li> </ul>
Air/Snow temperature vertical profiles at different sites in Deception Island, Antarctica (2008-2023)
<p>Air or seasonal snow temperature data collected at different heights above the ground (2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 cm), generally recorded every 3 hours between 2006 and 2023, using an array of temperature micro-loggers (iButton models by Maxim) mounted along a vertical wooden mast. These measurements were taken at various stations of the PERMATHERMAL network, managed by the University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain, to monitor the thermal dynamics of frozen soils on Deception Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica.</p>
Air/Snow temperature vertical profiles at different nodes of the 'Crater Lake' CALM site in Deception Island, Antarctica (2012-2023)
<p>Air or seasonal snow temperature data were collected at different heights above the ground between 2012 and 2023 using an array of temperature micro-loggers (iButton models by Maxim) mounted on vertical wooden masts. These measurements were conducted at various nodes within the 100x100 m 'Crater Lake' CALM site (A16) grid of the PERMATHERMAL network, managed by the University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain, to monitor active layer thickness in Deception Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica.</p> <p>In 2012, nine arrays were installed at nodes with relative coordinates (00,00), (00,05), (00,10), (05,00), (05,05), (05,10), (10,00), (10,05), and (10,10). Measurements were taken at heights of 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 40 cm above the ground surface using DS1921G iButton loggers, which recorded air/snow temperatures every 4 hours. This experiment, referred to as 'Mini', was active until early 2021.</p> <p>Between 2017 and 2023, four arrays were installed at nodes (00,010), (05,05), (06,00), and (10,00). These arrays measured air/snow temperatures at heights of 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 120, 140, and 160 cm above the ground surface using DS1922L iButton loggers, which recorded temperatures every 3 hours. Three of the arrays of this experiment, referred to as 'HR', has also been discontinued in early 2021, althought one of them was active until early 2024.</p>
Ground surface temperature data 2007-2021 at different sites of the PERMATHERMAL monitoring network in Livingston and Deception Islands, SouthShetland Archipelago, Antarctica.
<p>Ground Surface Temperature (GST) corrected data adquired between 2007 and 2021 at different stations of the PERMATHERMAL monitoring network at Livingston and Deception Islands, South Shetland Archipelago, Antarctica.</p> <p>(To be completed)</p>
A-ERT and ground temperature data- 2010- Deception Island/Antarctica
<p>Climate induced warming of permafrost soils is a global phenomenon, with regional and site-specific variations, which are not fully understood. In this context, a 2D automated electrical resistivity tomography (A-ERT) system was installed for the first time in Antarctica at Deception Island, associated to the existing Crater Lake site of the Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring Network (CALM-S). This set-up aims to I) monitor subsurface freezing and thawing processes on a daily and seasonal basis and to map the spatial and temporal variability of thaw depth, and to II) study the impact of short-lived extreme meteorological events on active layer dynamics. In addition, the feasibility of installing and running autonomous ERT monitoring stations in remote and extreme environments such as Antarctica was evaluated for the first time. Measurements were repeated at 4-hour intervals during a full year, enabling the detection of seasonal trends, as well as short-lived resistivity changes reflecting individual meteorological events. The latter is important to distinguish between (1) long-term climatic trends and (2) the impact of anomalous seasons on the ground thermal regime.<br> The A-ERT.txt file contains all ERT surveys which were performed using Wenner electrode configuration. 20 copper plates, which are connected by buried cables to the active boxes, with an electrode spacing of 0.5 m were used in this experiment. This setup yields 56 individual data points for each monitoring data set at six data levels. All data were saved in the Res2Dinv format.<br> The temperature. xlsx file contains air and ground temperatures data during the experiment period. The Air temperature was measured at 160 cm above the surface and ground temperatures in the shallow borehole S3,3 were measured with ibutton-sensors at depths 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 cm.</p>
figure 17 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 17 Doryphoribius monstruosus (Maucci, 1991) comb. nov. (PCM, holotype): A – the buccal apparatus (arrowhead indicates ventral lamina); B – claws I; C – claws IV. Scale bars in micrometres
figure 16 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 16 Buccal apparatus morphology of Doryphoribiidae fam. nov. and Hexapodibiidae members equipped with ventral lamina (arrowheads): A – Apodibius nuntius Binda, 1984; B – Doryphoribius korganovae Biserov, 1994; C – Doryphoribius bindae Lisi, 2011; D – Hexapodibius micronyx; E – Parhexapodibius castrii (Ramazzotti, 1964); F – Parhexapodibius ramazzottii Manicardi & Bertolani, 1987. Scale bars = 10 µm
figure 15 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 15 Hexapodibius micronyx, the buccal apparatus: A – habitus (ventral view, the arrowhead points the ventral lamina); B – habitus (dorsal view); C – buccal crown and ventral lamina (ventral view); D – furca; E – pharynx. Scale bars in micrometres
figure 14 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 14 Thulinius ruffoi, the buccal apparatus: A – habitus; B – mouth opening (the incised arrowhead indicates the first band of teeth, whereas the empty incised arrowhead – the second band of teeth); C – buccal crown (dorsal view); D – furca. Scale bars in micrometres
figure 13 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 13 Grevenius pushkini comb. nov., the buccal apparatus: A – habitus; B – mouth opening (the incised arrowhead indicates the first band of teeth, whereas the empty incised arrowhead – the second band of teeth); C – oral cavity armature; D – buccal crown (dorsal view); E – buccal crown (lateral view); F – pharynx (dorsal view); G – pharynx (lateral view). Scale bars in micrometres
figure 12 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 12 Hypothesised claw evolution scheme within the class Eutardigrada. Common Eutardigrade Ancestor (CEA) exhibited asymmetric (anisonych/heteronych) claws. Most significant changes in the overall morphology of claws are marked with numerals: (1) – secondary branch elongation; (2) – claw reduction, basal portion indistinctly merged with cuticle; (3) – branch curving; (4) – miniaturisation; (5) – evolution of true lunulae; (6) – claws tripartite; (7) – claw symmetry, claws bipartite; (8) – primary branch elongation, secondary branch reduction, lunulae transformed into longitudinal bars, exclusively aquatic. Drawings are based on SEM and/or PCM microphotographs. Phylogenetic relationships are based on the consensus results from recent published works (Bertolani et al., 2014a; Cesari et al., 2016; Guidetti et al., 2016) and the present study
figure 2 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 2 The phylogeny of Isohypsibioidea Sands et al., 2008 based on concatenated 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA seqences. New families and genera are marked in bold. Values above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probability values (BI), whereas those under branches show bootstrap values (ML). Branches with support below 0.9 in BI (70% in ML) were collapsed. Scale bar and branch lengths refer to the Bayesian analysis
figure 11 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 11 Claws of aquatic isohypsibioids, i.e. Doryphoribiidae fam. nov. (PCM): A – Grevenius granulifer comb. nov.; B – Grevenius pushkini comb. nov.; C – Grevenius sismicus (Maucci, 1978) comb. nov.; D – Grevenius karenae (Zawierucha, 2013) comb. nov.; E – Grevenius monoicus (Bertolani, 1981) comb. nov.; F – Grevenius longiunguis (Pilato, 1974) comb. nov.; G – Thulinius ruffoi; H – Pseudobiotus megalonyx. Note singular bars (incised arrowheads) and pseudolunulae (empty incised arrowheads). Asterisks indicate evident internal and anterior claw primary branch widening, the claw curvature forms an obtuse angle (A–C, E) or the expansion is knob-like (D, F). Scale bars = 10 µm Downloaded from Brill.com 12/12/2023 02:59:51PM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the prevailing CC-BY license at the time of publication. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
figure 3 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 3 Nominal species for the recently transferred or newly erected genera of Isohypsibioidea (PCM): A – Fractonotus verrucosus (Richters, 1900) (Isohypsibiidae); B – Dianea sattleri (Richters, 1902) comb. nov. (Isohypsibiidae); C – Ursulinius pappi (Iharos, 1966) comb. nov. (Isohypsibiidae); D – Grevenius granulifer (Thulin, 1928) comb. nov. (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.). Scale bars = 50 µm
figure 9 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 9 Modified Isohypsibius type claws (Isohypsibiidae, PCM): A – Fractonotus gilvus (Biserov, 1986), note weakly developed pseudolunulae (empty incised arrowheads); B – Dianea sattleri comb. nov.; C – Eremobiotus ovezovae Biserov, 1992; D – Eremobiotus sp. nov. Scale bars = 10 µm
Figure 1 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
Figure 1 Schematic presentation of the oral cavity armature (OCA) in Isohypsibioidea, the first and/or the second band of teeth are marked by Roman numerals: A – a continuous peribuccal lamina, two bands of teeth (Apodibius, Grevenius gen. nov., Halobiotus, Hexapodibius); B – a continuous peribuccal lamina, the first band of teeth (Fractonotus, Isohypsibius, Ursulinius gen. nov.); C – six convex peribuccal papulae, the first band of teeth (Eremobiotus); D – rectangular peribuccal lamellae, the first band of teeth with lateral toothless intervals (Pseudobiotus); E – rectangular peribuccal lamellae, two bands of teeth (Thulinius); F – six large peribuccal lamellae, two bands of teeth (Haplomacrobiotus). Both bands of teeth contain variable number of rows, depending on the genus
figure 8 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 8 Isohypsibius type claws (Isohypsibiidae, PCM): A – Isohypsibius prosostomus; B – Isohypsibius arbiter Binda, 1980; C – Isohypsibius coulsoni; D – Isohypsibius wilsoni (Horning et al., 1978); E – Isohypsibius dastychi Pilato et al., 1982; F – Isohypsibius chiarae Maucci, 1987. Note singular bars (incised arrow- Downloaded from Brill.com 12/12/2023 02:59:51PM heads) and weakly developed or vialacking Open Access. pseudolunulaeThis is(an emptyopenincised access article arrowhead). Scale distributedbars = under 10 µmthe terms of the prevailing CC-BY license at the time of publication. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
figure 4 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 4 Cephalic region of various members of Isohypsibioidea (SEM): A – Isohypsibius prosostomus Thulin, 1928 (Isohypsibiidae); B – Ursulinius pappi comb. nov. (Isohypsibiidae); C – Halobiotus crispae Kristensen, 1982 (Halobiotidae fam. nov.); D – Doryphoribius dawkinsi Michalczyk & Kaczmarek, 2010 (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.); E – Apodibius confusus Dastych, 1983 (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.); F – Pseudobiotus megalonyx (Thulin, 1928) (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.); G – Grevenius granulifer Downloaded from Brill.com 12/12/2023 02:59:51PM comb. nov. (DoryphoribiidaeviafamOpen. nov.); AccessH –. This Hexapodibius is an open micronyx accessPilato article, 1969 (distributed Hexapodibiidaeunder). the terms Asterisks indicate frontal lobes or cephalic of papillaethe. Scale prevailingbars = 10 CC-BYµmlicense at the time of publication. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
figure 7 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 7 (Cont.) I – Halobiotus arcturulius Crisp & Kristensen, 1983 (Halobiotidae fam. nov.); J – Halobiotus crispae (Halobiotidae fam. nov.); K – Doryphoribius dawkinsi (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.); L – Thulinius ruffoi (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.); M – Pseudobiotus megalonyx (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.); N – Pseudobiotus megalonyx (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.), modified male claws I; O – Grevenius granulifer comb. nov. (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.); P – Grevenius pushkini comb. nov. (Doryphoribiidae fam. nov.); Q – Hexapodibius micronyx (Hexapodibiidae), reduced claws with undeveloped bases. Scale bars in micrometres
figure 7 in Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence
figure 7 Claw types of various members of Isohypsibioidea (SEM): A – Isohypsibius prosostomus (Isohypsibiidae); B – Isohypsibius coulsoni (Isohypsibiidae); C – Ursulinius pappi comb. nov. (Isohypsibiidae), claws I –III; D – Ursulinius pappi comb. nov. (Isohypsibiidae), modified claws IV (arrowheads indicate evident pseudolunulae); E – Eremobiotus sp. nov. (Isohypsibiidae), external side of claws I–III (incised arrowheads indicate longitudinal internal bar, empty incised arrowheads – the furbelow structure covered with minute granulation, the empty arrowhead – pedal gibbosity); F – Eremobiotus sp. nov. (Isohypsibiidae), internal side of claws I–III; G – Fractonotus verrucosus (Isohypsibiidae); H – Dianea sattleri comb. nov. (Isohypsibiidae); (Cont. on next page)
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.