Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
17
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
17 results for “digital objects”
Digital models of test objects captured by RFSAT Ltd using 3D photogrammetry
<p>This data set contains a number of digital models produced via 3D photogrammetric scanning as part of the SCAN4RECO project, funded by the European Horizon'2020 program. Scanning and processing of models was done with Pix4D Mapper and Autodesk ReMake software from images captured with Canon 5DS camera in 50 Megapixel image resolution. Example objects include Byzantine icons painted on wood, oil paintings on canvas and painted Venetian carnival paper masks.</p> <p>Second version of the data set includes historical icons of Saint DImitrios and Saint Archangel Michael, an icon of Saint Mary painted specially for testing SCAN4RECO technologies, as well as models of an original high-relief sculpture from OPD and of its 3D printed copy (made by Fraunhofer-IGD and hand painted by RFSAT)..</p> <p>Selected models can be also seen in the SCAN4RECO Virtual Museum developed by CERTH-ITI:<br> http://scan4reco.eu/scan4reco/content/scan4reco-virtual-museum</p>
User participation in digital accessibility evaluations: reviewing methods and objectives
<p><span>Although laws and standardization bodies promote user participation in digital accessibility evaluations, people with disabilities still consider themselves excluded from this process. One reason could be the lack of systematized knowledge about evaluation methods involving users. This article seeks to understand how and for what purpose digital accessibility evaluations with user participation were conducted in the scientific literature from 2018 to 2021. Three types of user participation emerged: 1) user-based usability testing to evaluate task accomplishment, user reactions and interface qualities; 2) interviewing users to assess the local and social factors impacting digital service accessibility; 3) using questionnaires or crowdsourcing to check the compliance of certain interfaces with accessibility standards. Participants are primarily chosen based on their functional impairments and, to a lesser degree, their project-related skills, biographical information, technology habits, among other criteria. The comprehensive user insights gained with these methods are judged to be positive whereas the lack of representativeness of the selected user samples is found to be regrettable. The article finally discusses the definitions of accessibility and disability that underpin these methodologies.</span></p>
African Red Slip Ware Digital (ARS3D) - Images (Objects)
<p>Characteristic of the North African bowls, plates, and jugs are their pictorial decorations applied mainly by appliqués and stamps. As mass-produced image carriers and everyday objects, the ARS spread throughout the empire.</p> <p>The range of motifs includes mythological scenes as well as scenes from the Old and New Testament, circus, arena and hunting scenes as well as fish and plant motifs. The appliqués-decorated pottery thus provides insights into Late Antique imagination and its changes, as well as into the economic history of the period between the 3rd and 5th centuries AD in North Africa.</p> <p>Previous documentation methods were not able to capture the objects and their decoration in an adequate way. The digital recording of the RGZM's collections by 3D scans allows to compare potentially identical appliqués and to assign them to their negative forms and the corresponding stamps.</p> <p>Whereas vessel curvature previously falsified the assignment of appliqués and models, 3D analysis and visualisation tools now allow a comparison . Metadata created for each object increases the effectiveness and accuracy of determining image context and content. Issues related to the production of the ARS and the process flows within the workshops can be investigated through the analysis of the 3D data.</p>
Preserving and sharing born-digital and hybrid objects from and across the National Collection (Decision-Making Model)
<p>When considering the complex challenges faced by cultural heritage organisations in collecting, preserving and sharing born digital and hybrid objects, it becomes clear that the process of defining solutions as a community of practice is in its early probing phase: characterised as tentative, exploratory, questioning, experimental. The workshops within this Preserving and sharing born-digital and hybrid objects from and across the National Collection project, which examined the case studies from multiple angles, yielded a richly discursive examination of the main considerations.</p> <p>This Decision Model represents an attempt to create a structured representation of those main considerations and the discourse from the workshops, to codify the main decision-making processes that an organisation may go through when assessing an acquisition of such an object, categorised into high level areas. It attempts to create a traversable system that could be used by collections professionals in their work - policy makers, managers, collections management or digital preservation practitioners, conservators.</p>
Preserving and sharing born-digital and hybrid objects from and across the National Collection (January 2022)
<p>This report is one of a set of outputs from the Arts and Humanities Research Council funded project ‘Preserving and sharing born-digital and hybrid objects from and across the National Collection’. It has been designed to provide an extensive account of the project research activities and findings, to be useful to museum, heritage, and preservation professionals, as well as to scholars interested in born-digital materials.</p>
Born Digital, Born Slippery - Data Modelling for Born Digital/Hybrid objects (March 2022)
<p>The report Preserving and sharing born-digital and hybrid objects from and across the National Collection discusses the challenges for cultural heritage institutions in cataloguing, preserving, and providing access to four born digital and hybrid objects/projects. This response looks at the issues brought up by those discussions, in particular for the purpose of cataloguing, and the extent, within existing cataloguing standards, they can be supported. Where there does not appear to be support within current standards, model development activity is proposed to allow the expansion of the current `born physical` focused cataloguing standards to also handle born digital and hybrid object cataloguing.</p>
Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data
<p>RO-Crate and tables from the paper "<em>Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems</em>" <a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.07436">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.07436</a></p> <p>We systematically evaluate FDO and its implementations as a global distributed object system, by using five different conceptual frameworks that cover interoperability, middleware, FAIR principles, EOSC requirements and FDO guidelines themself.</p> <ul> <li>table1.html<br> Considering FDO and Web according to the quality levels of the Interoperability Framework for Fast Data (Delgado 2016)</li> <li> <p>table2.html<br> Mapping the Metamodel concepts from the Interoperability Framework for Fast Data (Delgado 2016) to equivalent concepts for FDO and Web.</p> </li> <li> <p>table3.html<br> Checking FDO guidelines (Bonino et al. 2019; Anders et al. 2023) against its current implementations as DOIP (DONA 2018) and Linked Data Platform (LDP) (Bonino da Silva Santos, Guizzardi, and Sales 2022), with suggestions for required additions</p> </li> <li> <p>table4.html<br> Comparing FAIR Digital Object (with the DOIP 2.0 protocol (DONA 2018)) and Web technologies (using Linked Data) as middleware infrastructures (Zarras 2004)</p> </li> <li> <p>table5.html</p> <p>Assessing RDA’s FAIR Data Maturity Model (FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group 2020; Bahim et al. 2020) (first 2 columns) against the FDO guidelines (Bonino et al. 2019), FDO implemented with the protocol DOIPv2 (DONA 2018), Linked Data Platform (LDP) (Bonino da Silva Santos, Guizzardi, and Sales 2022) and examples from Linked Data practices in general. (— indicates Unspecified, may be possible with additional conventions)</p> </li> </ul> <p>A web rendering of this RO-Crate is available at <a href="https://w3id.org/ro/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8075229">https://w3id.org/ro/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8075229</a></p>
FAIR Digital Object and DiSSCo Research Infrastructure Design
<p>This presentation is about how <a href="https://dissco.eu">DiSSCo</a> (Distributed System of Scientific Collections) is using the FAIR Digital Object as the cornerstone of a research infrastructure design. DiSSCo -- a new Research Infrastructure currently in the preparation phase -- will digitally unify European natural science assets under common curation and access and will ensure that data is Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR). DiSSCo will integrate a fragmented landscape of natural science collections, transforming it into a unified, robust, quality ensured knowledge base of unprecedented scale for bio- and geodiversity.</p> <p>With a brief historical context of FAIR Digital Object, this presentation introduces the concept of Digital Specimen. Then it highlights the incorporation of outputs from several <a href="https://rd-alliance.org/">RDA</a> (Research Data Alliance) interests and working groups in the design decision.</p>
Figure 1 from: Conte M, Flynn AJ, Barrison P, Boisvert P, Landis-Lewis Z, Friedman C (2023) Digital objects to make computable biomedical knowledge FAIR: an infrastructural approach to knowledge representation, dissemination and implementation. Research Ideas and Outcomes 9: e109307. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e109307
Figure 1 Conceptual model of a Knowledge Object (KO) containing a payload, machine-actionable service and deployment specifications, metadata and a unique persistent identifier. We are exploring aligning our conceptual model with emerging best practices for FAIR Digital Objects. Derived from Wittenburg et al's Digital Objects as Drivers towards Convergence in Data Infrastructures (Wittenburg et al. 2019).
Figure 3 from: Conte M, Flynn AJ, Barrison P, Boisvert P, Landis-Lewis Z, Friedman C (2023) Digital objects to make computable biomedical knowledge FAIR: an infrastructural approach to knowledge representation, dissemination and implementation. Research Ideas and Outcomes 9: e109307. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e109307
Figure 3 This figure illustrates the dual nature of Knowledge Objects: knowledge-as-resource and knowledge-as-service. A KO can be curated and maintained in a repository, pass metadata to a knowledge graph or deployed into applications. Different to other digital objects, the methods to deploy the KO to applications via custom or generic runtimes called by microservices are built into the KO.
Figure 2 from: Conte M, Flynn AJ, Barrison P, Boisvert P, Landis-Lewis Z, Friedman C (2023) Digital objects to make computable biomedical knowledge FAIR: an infrastructural approach to knowledge representation, dissemination and implementation. Research Ideas and Outcomes 9: e109307. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e109307
Figure 2 (L) Sample KO as viewed from the KGrid Library, from which the KO can be implemented in a hosted runtime environment or downloaded. (R) Sample output results from deploying the KO.
Supplementary material 1 from: Niehues A, de Visser C, Hagenbeek FA, Karu N, Kindt ASD, Kulkarni P, Pool R, Boomsma DI, van Dongen J, van Gool AJ, `t Hoen PAC (2022) A Multi-omics Data Analysis Workflow Packaged as a FAIR Digital Object. Research Ideas and Outcomes 8: e94042. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e94042
Members of the ACTION Consortium
Supplementary material 1 from: Agosti D, Bénichou L, Casino A, Nielsen L, Ruch P, Kishor P, Penev L, Mergen P, Arvanitidis C (2024) Liberate the power of biodiversity literature as FAIR digital objects. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e126586. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e126586
Liberate the power of biodiversity literature as FAIR digital objects
Keynote speaker Simone Natale What is life to digital objects Luxembourg meeting 2020
<p>Keynote speaker Simone Natale What is life to digital objects Luxembourg meeting 2020</p>
A Usability Validation of the MuCopilot Mobile Application, a Digital Tool for the Unsupervised Objective Assessment of Cystic Fibrosis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06132048. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Novel Objective Digital Biomarkers for Assessing Sub-clinical Mood Disturbances in the Singaporean Population
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06115590. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Performances and Safety of MuCopilot, a Digital Tool for the Unsupervised Objective Assessment of Cystic Fibrosis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06147778. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.