Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-zeroJun 2012View details →

FIG. 1 in First record of stegosaur dinosaur tracks in the Lower Cretaceous (Berriasian) of Europe (Oncala group, Soria, Spain)

FIG. 1. — Geographical and geological situation of Valloria in Las Aldehuelas, Soria, Spain: A, geological sketch of Iberian Peninsula with the geographical position of the Cameros Basin; B, geological Map of the Cameros Basin; C, detail of the geology of Valloria locality. Based on Moratalla & Hernán (2005). Abbreviation: DS, depositional sequence.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

FIGURE 8. Molfetta dinosaur tracks, photogrammetry derived 3D in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 8. Molfetta dinosaur tracks, photogrammetry derived 3D models and interpretations; 1-2, DEM and contour line map of a theropod footprint (contour lines have an interval of 0.2 cm); 4-5, DEM and contour line map of an ornitischian footprint; 3 and 6, interpretative outline drawings of the studied tracks.

FIG. 7 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 7. — Batrachopus deweyi (Hitchcock, 1843) Hitchcock, 1845: A-C, trackway ULB-04C10_E, photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C); D-F, pes/manus set 04C10_A_1 (holotype of "B. gilberti" that is here invalidated), photograph (D), DEM and false-colour depth map (E) and interpretative sketch (F); G-I, pes/manus set 04C14_C, photograph (G), DEM and false-colour depth map (H) and interpretative sketch (I); J-L, pes/manus set 04C14_C, photograph (J), DEM and false-colour depth map (K) and interpretative sketch (L). Scale bars represent: A-C, 10 cm; D-L, 1 cm.

FIG. 8 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 8. — Tracks ascribed to Dahutherium sp. by Lapparent & Montenat (1967) and that are here reinterpreted: A-C, two superimposed tridactyl grallatorid footprints, ULB-04C18_B, photograph (A), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967) (B), and our interpretation (C), showing a small footprint (dark grey) and larger footprint (light grey); D-F, Batrachopus isp., ULB-04C15_A, photograph (D), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967) (E), and our interpretation (F). Scale bars: A-C, 5 cm; D-F, 2 cm.

FIG. 11 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 11. — Plaster cast of one footprint from the type trackway of "Saltopoides igalensis", that is here invalidated: A-C, track ULB-04C01_B, photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C). Scale bars: 5 cm.

FIG. 3 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 3. — Grallator olonensis Lapparent & Montenat, 1967: A, B, slab ULB-04D19 bearing the trackway T1-Go, as well as T2-Go; photograph (A) and interpretative sketch (B); C-E, track 04D19_A_4 (syntype) of the trackway T1-Go, photograph (C), DEM and false-colour depth map (D) and interpretative sketch (E); F-H, ULB- 04C11_A_6, photograph (F), DEM and false-colour depth map (G) and interpretative sketch (H). Scale bars: A, B, 20 cm; C-H, 2 cm.

FIG. 6 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 6. — "Anatopus palmatus" Lapparent & Montenat, 1967, that is here invalidated: A-C, ULB-04C15_B (holotype of "A. palmatus"), photograph (A), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967: fig. 16A and pl.XII.3) (B), and our interpretation (C); D-F, ULB-04C15_C, photograph (D), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967: fig. 16B1) (E), and our interpretation (F). Scale bars: 5 cm.

FIG. 13 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 13. — Other problematic tracks in Lapparent & Montenat 1967: A-C, Batrachopus isp., ULB-04C14_I, photograph (A), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967) (B) ("Unnamed track n°1" in Lapparent & Montenat 1967: fig. 18), and our interpretation (C); D-F, Grallator cf. variabilis, ULB-04D22_A, photograph (D), interpretative sketch of Lapparent & Montenat (1967) (E) ("Unnamed track n°2" in Lapparent & Montenat 1967: fig. 18 and pl. XIII.5), and our interpretation (F). Scale bars: A-C, 1 cm; D-F, 5 cm.

FIG. 4 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 4. — Footprints from Le Veillon compared to tridactyl tracks from the Early Jurassic of the Causses Basin (based on data from Demathieu et al. 2002; Moreau et al. 2021) and the Early Jurassic of the eastern United States (based on data from Weems 1992, 2019; Gand et al. 2018): A, bivariate diagram L vs (L–D)/D; B, bivariate diagram L vs L/W. L in metres.

FIG. 2 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 2. — Measurements taken on tracks from the Lapparent collection: A, for crocodylomorph manus imprint; B, for crocodylomorph pes track; C, for dinosaur footprint. Abbreviations: L, length of footprint (for dinosaur tracks); LM, LP, length of manus and pes tracks, respectively (for crocodylomorph tracks); W, width of footprint (for dinosaur tracks); WM, WP, width of manus and pes tracks, respectively (for crocodylomorph tracks); LI, LII, LIII, LIV, LV, lengths of digits I, II, III, IV and V, respectively; D, length of the free part of digit III; I-V, I-IV, II-IV, divarication angles between digits I and V, digits I and IV, then digits II and IV, respectively.

FIG. 12 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 12. — Kayentapus isp.: A-C, track ULB-04C02_A (holotype of "Talmontopus tersi" that is here invalidated), photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C). Scale bars: 10 cm.

FIG. 9 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 9. — Eubrontes giganteus Hitchcock, 1845: A-C, track ULB-04D21_A (plaster cast of the holotype of "E. veillonensis" that is here invalidated), photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C). Scale bars: 10 cm.

FIG. 10 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 10. — Grallator minusculus (Hitchcock, 1858), Demathieu, Gand, Sciau & Freytet, 2002: A-C, track ULB-04C13_B (plaster cast of the holotype of "G. maximus" that is here invalidated), photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C); D-F, track ULB-04C10_B, photograph (D), DEM and false-colour depth map (E) and interpretative sketch (F). Scale bars: 10 cm.

FIG. 5 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 5. — Grallator variabilis Lapparent & Montenat, 1967: A-C, plaster cast of the holotype, ULB-04C08_D, photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C); D-F, paratype, ULB-04C05_A, photograph (D), DEM and false-colour depth map (E) and interpretative sketch (F); G-I, track ULB- 04C13_A, photograph (G), DEM and false-colour depth map (H) and interpretative sketch (I). Scale bars: 5 cm.

Figure 5. Skenes Creek Track 2, NMV P208232 in A close look at Victoria's first known dinosaur tracks

Figure 5. Skenes Creek Track 2, NMV P208232 (shared with Track 1). a. Overall top view of track in collected slab, with rock saw cuts evident on five sides and fracture cutting across anterior part of track; scale (left) in centimetres and millimetres. b. Close-up of track, showing raised relief and thin, laminated "platform" above ripple marks; scale = 5 cm. c. Outline of track and parameters measured, with anterior triangle indicated (see Figure 2 for key); scale = 5 cm.

Figure 6. Skenes Creek Track 1 in A close look at Victoria's first known dinosaur tracks

Figure 6. Skenes Creek Track 1 (left) and Knowledge Creek track (right) together, allowing for a side-by-side comparison. The slab holding the Knowledge Creek track is slightly thicker (~10 mm) than the Skenes Creek slab, hence they are not being viewed on exactly the same horizon; scale = 10 cm.

Figure 3. Knowledge Creek track, NMV P159790. a in A close look at Victoria's first known dinosaur tracks

Figure 3. Knowledge Creek track, NMV P159790. a. Overall top view of track in collected slab, with bedding and chisel marks evident along edge; scale = 5 cm. b. Outline of track and parameters measured, with anterior triangle indicated (see Figure 2 for key), B = invertebrate burrows; scale = 5 cm. c. Posterior-edge view of track, showing full relief of track, thin fill of coarse sand, and possible small burrow below (arrow); scale = 1 cm. D. Anterior-oblique view of track, showing gradually thicker sand fill toward distal ends of digits; scale = 1 cm.

Figure 4. Skenes Creek Track 1, NMV P208232. a in A close look at Victoria's first known dinosaur tracks

Figure 4. Skenes Creek Track 1, NMV P208232. a. Overall top view of track in collected slab, with rock saw cuts evident on three sides, as well as symmetrical and parallel ripple marks below track; scale = 5 cm. b. Close-up of track, showing raised relief and thin, laminated "platform" above ripple marks; scale = 5 cm. c. Outline of track and parameters measured, with anterior triangle indicated (see Figure 2 for key); scale = 5 cm.

Figure 2 in A close look at Victoria's first known dinosaur tracks

Figure 2. Track parameters measured in this study. Key: TW = total width; TL = total length; L1-L3 = digit lengths; W1-3 = digit widths; IA1-IA2 = interdigital angles. Anterior triangle defined by total track width (base of the triangle) and middle-digit length measured from that base.

Figure 1 in A close look at Victoria's first known dinosaur tracks

Figure 1. Locality and outcrop map for Early Cretaceous dinosaur tracks found thus far in Victoria, with the three tracks described in this study coming from Knowledge Creek and Skenes Creek. Key and latitude-longitude coordinates for each of the tracksites, from east to west: Flat Rocks (FR), S38° 45.3', E145° 40.9'; Skenes Creek (SC), S38° 42.9', E143° 44.4'; Dinosaur Cove (DC), S38° 46.9', E143° 24.3'; Knowledge Creek (KC), S38° 45.3', E143° 20.9'; Milanesia Beach (MB), S38° 45.3', E143° 19.3'.