Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
175
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
175 results for “ecosystem modeling”
Spartina alterniflora marsh vegetation data along the Georgia coast used in the Belowground Ecosystem Resiliency Model version 2.0
Study plots (1-m2) were established in eight Spartina alterniflora-dominated marshes (7 on Sapelo Island, Georgia, and 1 on Skidaway Island, Georgia). At three sites, plots were sampled once each during May, July, August, September, and October of 2016. At all sites, plots were sampled once each during June, August, and November of 2021, February, May, August, and November of 2022, and February of 2023. One long-term (quarterly 2013 to 2023) GCE LTER sampling site is also included. Nine replicate plots were placed in vegetated marsh along transects that spanned 3 Landsat-8 and -9 pixel footprints, with 3 plots per pixel footprint. In each plot, measurements included plant biomass, plant species, stem density, and height. Aboveground biomass was calculated using allometric relationships between plant height and mass from plant clipping studies. During these surveys, destructive core sampling was also performed in the proximity of the plots (n = 1 per plot) to measure above and below ground biomass. Chlorophyll, foliar N, and Leaf Area Index measurements were taken in the proximity of the plots. This dataset reflects an update to the "PLT-GCED-2106" dataset (doi: 10.6073/pasta/03f4f78c6498aecca34faf4339591129). This project also utilized data from the "PLT-GCEM-1610" dataset doi: 10.6073/pasta/9746c71b35e9f8c544ea12c601c33949). Those data utilized in this project are duplicated here for completeness.
Spartina alterniflora above- and belowground biomass predictions and inundation intensity as estimated by the Belowground Ecosystem Resiliency Model for U.S. Georgia marshes from 2014 to 2023.
We applied the Belowground Ecosystem Resiliency Model (BERM) to estimate monthly aboveground biomass (AGB) and belowground biomass (BGB) in U.S. Georgia Spartina alterniflora marshes from 2014 to 2023 at 30 m scale. This application involved BERM version 2.0 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13306821), which was built using data in the PLT-GCET-2308 dataset (https://dx.doi.org/10.6073/pasta/4a0b715104849d98320fcc34e7cd63a4). Data sources for BERM application included Landsat-8/9, NOAA CO-OPS Station ID: 8670870, Daymet, and USGS 3DEP 2018 DEM. Download and processing steps are described in the BERM code and in metadata methods section. Specific descriptions of data processing are available in model code: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13306821. Data provided here include model output of AGB estimates, BGB estimates, and calculated inundation intensity. See "Data reporting" method in the metadata for description of data files. For logisitical purposes here we present only select data from the model input and output. All model input data sources as listed in the abstract are publicly available. Model calibration data and code are published as well. Additional predictions not published here include foliar chlorophyll, foliar nitrogen, and leaf area index.
Code for Random Forest models that predict pharmaceutical and water chemistry measurements in Baltimore Ecosystem Study streams
This file contains code to model the relationship between the water chemistry measurements and discharge measured as part of BES routine sampling and the pharmaceuticals measured in WY 2018. We use Random Forest models to predict 1) total (i.e., summed) concentration of the pharmaceuticals for which we screened, 2) total nutrient concentrations (TN & TP), 3) whether or not the antibiotic trimethoprim was detected in a given sample, and 4) whether or not nitrate and TP were above or below environmentally-relevant threshold concentrations. We also use RF models to predict N and P concentrations over a longer period, in order to compare models for nutrients to pharma. Code and analyses here rely on data processed in the file "BESPharma_WY2018.Rmd", published on EDI (doi:10.6073/pasta/610cb67fcbc8982c2af8ed946dce8ea5) and BES water chemistry data published on EDI (doi:10.6073/pasta/ce7f30e6013e003bfe28c5fd7d4aed23 )
Ecosystem metabolism and associated modeling parameters for 6 oligotrophic lakes and ponds in a single watershed
This dataset was collected as part of a watershed-scale study to assess impacts of smoke cover on water temperature and rates of ecosystem metabolism in small lakes and ponds. We measured thermal and metabolic responses to smoke in six waterbodies within a high-elevation watershed (watershed area 1908 ha; elevation range 2800-3229 m.a.s.l) located in Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Park in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. All lakes and ponds are oligotrophic, and range in maximum depth from 1.5m to 10m. The dataset includes: time series data of dissolved oxygen, water temperature, and environmental parameters relevant to modeling ecosystem metabolism; estimated rates of ecosystem metabolism using the Kalman filter method; descriptive site information including location, size, and depth.
Nearshore high-frequency temporal water quality observations and process-based modeling of aquatic ecosystem metabolism in Lake Tahoe completed by members of the Blaszczak Lab at the University of Nevada Reno, 2021-2023
The overarching goal of this project was to develop a process-based understanding of how watershed-to-lake connections drive nearshore productivity dynamics in a large oligotrophic mountain lake (Lake Tahoe). We addressed this goal through a combined approach of high-frequency sensor deployment and maintenance, ecosystem metabolism modeling, laboratory incubations, and routine monitoring of water chemistry and other parameters. The data we collected as part of this project and the ecosystem metabolism estimates we generated demonstrate how variable ecosystem productivity is in time and space in the nearshore of Lake Tahoe. Although maintenance of the sensor arrays during the exceptional winter of 2023 was challenging, we were able to capture the data necessary to estimate a complete time series of metabolic activity across two years with very different hydroclimatic conditions. Throughout this project we accomplished the following: 1. We generated over two years of daily estimates of ecosystem metabolism (gross primary productivity, ecosystem respiration, and net ecosystem productivity) from multiple locations on both the east and west shores of the lake and from areas in close proximity to and far away from stream water inflows. 2. We measured ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) concentrations in surface water samples from both Glenbrook and Blackwood creeks and the nearshore of Lake Tahoe for over two years. 3. We quantified rates of NH4+ and NO3- uptake in benthic samples of the dominant substrate type collected during peak streamflow, the receding limb, and baseflow conditions in 2023 from multiple locations in the nearshore using established laboratory incubation methods. 4. Finally, we used a combination of time series models and structural equation modeling to integrate our results and improve understanding of the direct and indirect effects of hydroclimatic variability on observed patterns in ecosystem metabolism in the nearshore. See this git code repository
Modeling the effect of explicit vs implicit representation of grazing on ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling in response to elevated carbon dioxide and warming in arctic tussock tundra, Alaska - Dataset A
We use a simple model of coupled carbon and nitrogen cycles in terrestrial ecosystems to examine how explicitly representing grazers versus having grazer effects implicitly aggregated in with other biogeochemical processes in the model alters predicted responses to elevated carbon dioxide and warming. The aggregated approach can affect model predictions because grazer-mediated processes can respond differently to changes in climate from the processes with which they are typically aggregated. We use small-mammal grazers in arctic tundra as an example and find that the typical three-to-four-year cycling frequency is too fast for the effects of cycle peaks and troughs to be fully manifested in the ecosystem biogeochemistry. We conclude that implicitly aggregating the effects of small-mammal grazers with other processes results in an underestimation of ecosystem response to climate change relative to estimations in which the grazer effects are explicitly represented. The magnitude of this underestimation increases with grazer density. We therefore recommend that grazing effects be incorporated explicitly when applying models of ecosystem response to global change.
Modeling the effect of explicit vs implicit representation of grazing on ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling in response to elevated carbon dioxide and warming in arctic tussock tundra, Alaska - Dataset B
We use a simple model of coupled carbon and nitrogen cycles in terrestrial ecosystems to examine how explicitly representing grazers versus having grazer effects implicitly aggregated in with other biogeochemical processes in the model alters predicted responses to elevated carbon dioxide and warming. The aggregated approach can affect model predictions because grazer-mediated processes can respond differently to changes in climate from the processes with which they are typically aggregated. We use small-mammal grazers in arctic tundra as an example and find that the typical three-to-four-year cycling frequency is too fast for the effects of cycle peaks and troughs to be fully manifested in the ecosystem biogeochemistry. We conclude that implicitly aggregating the effects of small-mammal grazers with other processes results in an underestimation of ecosystem response to climate change relative to estimations in which the grazer effects are explicitly represented. The magnitude of this underestimation increases with grazer density. We therefore recommend that grazing effects be incorporated explicitly when applying models of ecosystem response to global change.
Monthly Spartina alterniflora marsh vegetation data for additional sites along the Georgia coast used in the Belowground Ecosystem Resiliency Model
Study plots (1-m2) were established in three Spartina alterniflora-dominated marshes - 2 on Sapelo Island, Georgia, and 1 on Skidaway Island, Georgia, and sampled once each during May, July, August, September, and October of 2016. Nine replicate plots were placed in vegetated marsh along transects that spanned 3 Landsat-8 pixel footprints, with 3 plots per pixel foot print. In each plot, measurements included plant biomass, plant species, stem density, and height. Aboveground biomass was calculated using allometric relationships between plant height, flowering status and mass from plant clipping studies. During these surveys, destructive core sampling was also performed in the proximity of the plots (n = 1 per plot) to measure above and below ground biomass. Chlorophyll, foliar N, and Leaf Area Index measurements were taken in the proximity of the plots.
FluxDataKit v3.4.2: A comprehensive data set of ecosystem fluxes for land surface modelling
<p>The Flux data kit is an effort to expand upon the existing work by Ukkola et a. (2022) to synthesize various sources of ecosystem flux data (i.e. the PLUMBER2 data set, gathered from all major networks). We further expand upon the original data set by integrating data which was either expanded upon (temporally) or where sites were added (e.g. the integration of ICOS data).</p> <p>The effort uses the FluxnetLSM package by the above mentioned authors, as well as their general workflow. In contrast to the PLUMBER2 data set we do not apply stringent quality control, and all quality control on the availability of variables and/or their duration <em>should be done by the user</em>. Furthermore, we include both leaf area index (LAI) and Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR) in the netcdf output, where PLUMBER2 only provided LAI. On all other parts the formatting and naming conventions as well as quality control specifications remain the same as in PLUMBER2. We therefore refer to Ukkola et al. (2022) for details.</p> <p><strong>Data included</strong></p> <p>The data included consists of the following files, containing different versions of the same data and site meta information.</p> <ul> <li><code>FLUXDATAKIT_LSM.tar.gz</code> file contains compressed NetCDF files compatible with the ALMA scheme for land surface modelling. </li> <li><code>FLUXDATAKIT_FLUXNET.tar.gz</code> file contains data in a CSV format according to the FLUXNET specifications.</li> <li><code>rsofun_driver_data_v3.3.rds</code> file is a compressed serialized R file containing data formatted for use with the {rsofun} R package.</li> <li><code><a href="../api/records/11370417/draft/files/fdk_site_info.csv/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fdk_site_info.csv</a></code> contains site meta information in tabular form</li> <li><a href="../api/records/11370417/draft/files/fdk_site_fullyearsequence.csv/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><code>fdk_site_fullyearsequence.csv</code></a> contains information about complete sequences of good-quality data by site (see also <a href="https://geco-bern.github.io/FluxDataKit/articles/04_data_use.html">here</a>).</li> </ul> <p><strong>Data generation</strong></p> <p>Data is generated using the FluxDataKit project. Although this project is not meant for continuous releases, and no support is provided in using this code with data provided AS IS, it might still be useful to some:</p> <p><a href="https://github.com/geco-bern/FluxDataKit">https://github.com/geco-bern/FluxDataKit</a></p> <p>The data can be further complimented using the FluxnetEO dataset, which is accessible through the package with the same name as found here:</p> <p><a href="https://github.com/geco-bern/FluxnetEO">https://github.com/geco-bern/FluxnetEO</a></p> <p><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></p> <p>The flux data kit is part of the LEMONTREE project and funded by Schmidt Futures and under the umbrella of the Virtual Earth System Research Institute (VESRI).</p> <p><strong>References:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Ukkola, Anna M., Gab Abramowitz, and Martin G. De Kauwe. "A flux tower dataset tailored for land model evaluation." Earth System Science Data 14.2 (2022): 449-461.</li> </ul>
Review of existing modelling studies focusing on specific soil-based ecosystem services (SES) and threats (ST) including climate change, management and land use change scenarios.
<p><span>We </span><span>reviewed existing modelling studies focusing on soil ecosystem services (SES) and soil threats (ST) including climate change, land use change and management scenarios. A publication has been submitted and is currently being reviewed. The title of the manuscript is: </span><span>Assessing and mapping soil ecosystem services and soil threats changes in agroecosystems through scenario-based approaches – a systematic review. </span></p> <p><span>Work was split between various authors. All Co-authors were working on either one or more SES or one ST. Excel sheets were prepared by INRA and BFW to ensure the comparability of results that members extracted from the papers found. Literature search was done in Scopus and Web of Science. The final list of related publications is reported here. <br></span></p>
Surrogate-based optimization using an artificial neural network for a parameter identification in a 3D marine ecosystem model
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong></p> <p>Parameter identification for marine ecosystem models is important for the assessment and validation of marine ecosystem models against observational data. The surrogate-based optimization (SBO) is a computationally efficient method to optimize complex models. SBO replaces the computationally expensive (high-fidelity) model by a surrogate constructed from a less accurate but computationally cheaper (low-fidelity) model in combination with an appropriate correction approach, which improves the accuracy of the low-fidelity model. To construct a computationally cheap low-fidelity model, we tested three different approaches to compute an approximation of the annually periodic solution (i.e., a steady annual cycle) of a marine ecosystem model: firstly, a reduced number of spin-up iterations (several decades instead of millennia), secondly, an artificial neural network (ANN) approximating the steady annual cycle and, finally, a combination of the both approaches. Except for the low-fidelity model using only the ANN, the SBO yielded a solution close to the target and reduced the computational effort significantly. If an ANN approximating appropriately a marine ecosystem model is available, the SBO using this ANN as low-fidelity model presents a promising and computational efficient method for the validation.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <ul> <li>SQLite database including the data of the different optimization runs</li> <li>Structure and weights of the used artificial neural network</li> <li>Tracer concentrations obtain from the high-fidelity model for the different optimization runs</li> </ul>
Automatic time step adjustment for shortening the runtime of the simulation of marine ecosystem models
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong></p> <p>In investigating the global carbon cycle, shortening the runtime of the simulation of marine ecosystem models is an important issue. More specifically, steady annual cycles mostly are used to assess and validate the models against<br> observational data and to identify relevant biogeochemical processes. Offline simulations based on the transport matrix method already reduce the high computational effort significantly. Furthermore, they facilitate the application<br> of larger time steps in a simple way. In this paper, we present two different methods that automatically adjust the time step during the simulation of a steady state using transport matrices. The algorithms use either an adaptive<br> step size control or decreasing time steps. Their aim is to apply always the time step as large as possible but without any manual selection. We applied the methods for a variety of ecosystem models of different complexity, using Latin<br> hypercube samples of size 100 for the model parameters of each model. We showed that both methods computed an approximation of the steady annual cycle that was of the same accuracy as solutions obtained with a fixed time step. Both algorithms lowered the runtime of the steady annual cycle computation significantly. The performance gain depended on the complexity of the models. Moreover, the adaptive method has a certain overhead that might lead to higher computational cost in special cases.</p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Tracer concentrations of a reference solution for all parameter vectors and biogeochemical models</li> <li>SQLite database including the results using the decreasing time steps algorithm</li> <li>Tracer concentrations of the results using the decreasing time steps algorithm</li> <li>SQLite database including the results using the step size control algorithm</li> <li>Tracer concentrations of the results using the step size control algorithm</li> </ul>
Dataset and scripts for the paper with title Evaluating Programming Models for the HPC GPU Ecosystem
<p>Dataset and scripts for the paper with title Evaluating Programming Models for the HPC GPU Ecosystem</p>
Model codes and simulation data for "Modeling demographic-driven vegetation dynamics and ecosystem biogeochemical cycling in NASA GISS's Earth system model (ModelE-BiomeE v.1.0)"
<p>ModelE-BiomeE v1.0 model codes and data This folder contains the simulation data and model codes that were used in the paper ‘Modeling demographic-driven vegetation dynamics and ecosystem biogeochemical cycling in NASA GISS’s Earth system model (ModelE-BiomeE v.1.0)’ (https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-72). We included the data simulated by ModelE-BiomeE v.1.0 with settings of full demography (folder FullDemography) and single cohort (folder SingleCohort), and initial settings of land grids and vegetation data (folder GlobalVegetation). The codes include the full ModelE 2.1, module BiomeE files in ModelE, and the standalone BiomeE. In the folder FullDemography, we have 4 netcdf files for global output and 25 files for single grids output. The files ‘FullDM_2588_JAN.nc’ and ‘FullDM_2588_JUL.nc’ are the original model output of January and July in the year 2588. The file ‘FullDM_2588_Annual.nc’ is the yearly summary of model simulations. The file ‘FullDM_Selected.nc’ is an annual summary of 588 years of model simulation only with selected variables. The csv files are for single grids output at the time steps of daily and yearly. The last digit 1~8 represents the sites of 'BNC','MNT','HF','OKR','KZ','SV','WGK','TPJ', respectively (Table 1). Table 1 Site ID and file number ['BNC', 'MNT', 'HF', 'OKR', 'KZ', 'SV', 'WGK', 'TPJ'] ['8991', '8992', '8993', '8994', '8995', '8996', '8997', '8998'] ['8971', '8972', '8973', '8974', '8975', '8976', '8977', '8978'] ['8961', '8962', '8963', '8974', '8965', '8966', '8977', '8968'] Please refer to Table 2 in the paper for the detail of these 8 sites. ‘DailyLAIGPP.csv’ is a summary of all ‘DailyEcosystem’ files with LAI and GPP data. We included the Python scripts that can be used to generate the figures in out paper (Plotting-BiomeE-MsTMIP.py, Plotting-Scatter-Comparison.py, PlottingBiomeEMaps.py, and PlottingGridOutput.py). For the convenience of readers (in reproducing our figures), we included the summary of reanalysis of the data from observations and MsTMIP in folder ‘Sum-Obs-Simu’. Please refer to the original sources listed in our paper for the detail of these data.</p>
MOM6-COBALTv2 model result for ecosystem response to marine heat waves
<p>0.5 × 0.5 resolution, Northeast Pacific ocean (184.8-120.2W, 28.06-64.97N). Monthly results from 1958-2019, all detrended with linear trend over full period removed. </p>
New woody plant functional types and parameters for the SAVANNA ecosystem model
<p>New woody plant functional types (PFTs) are defined and parameterised for use in the SAVANNA ecosystem model (Coughenour, 1992, 1993). Supplementary material used in creating the PFTs and parameters are included. Details of the methods are available from the authors on request. The new woody PFTS are defined in terms of growth form, leaf size and defences in relation to large mammal herbivores.</p> <p>1. shrub types are <4 m (Zizka et al., 2014),</p> <p>2. fine-leaf types have bipinnate leaves with leptophyllous- or nanophyllous-sized leaflets (<225 mm2) according to Raunkaier’s leaf size classes (Fuller and Bakke, 1918) given that leaflets of compound leaves are separate morphological units analogous to simple leaves (Milla, 2012; Mo et al., 2022),</p> <p>3. high chemical defence investment (CDI) types have either nitrogen:acid detergent fibre (N:ADF) <0.10 (Wallis et al., 2012) or condensed tannin (CT) >5% (Cooper and Owen-Smith, 1985) when expressed in sorghum tannin or leucocyanidin equivalents as determined by the acid-butanol assay,</p> <p>4. all types, except fine_highcdi and fine_lowcdi, have the square-root of Charles-Dominique et al.'s (2017) "investment in structural defence" (ISD) < 13.</p>
The role of the intraspecific variability of hydraulic traits for modelling the plant water use in different European forest ecosystems: scripts, model output, and parameter files
<p>This repository contains the model outputs and R scripts used to process the data to analyze the impact of the plant hydraulic parameterization of the manuscript: "The role of the intraspecific variability of hydraulic traits for modelling the plant water use in different European forest ecosystems". The following is a detailed description of the content of this repository:</p> <p>model_output.zip: This compressed file contains the results of all the individual numerical experiments per experimental site as produced by the Comunity Land Model version 5. The files are stored in NETCDF format per year. The folder is arranged with subfolders containing the individual results from each experimental site as follows:</p> <ul> <li>rc: model output with the results of the resistant configuration of experiment 1 (RC)</li> <li>vc: model output with the results of the vulnerable configuration of experiment 1 (VC)</li> <li>k_dc: model output with the results of the default configuration used for experiments 1 and 2 (DC or DC<em>k</em><sub>max</sub>)</li> <li>k_rc: model output with the results of the low plant hydraulic conductance (L<em>k</em><sub>max</sub>) for experiment 2</li> <li>k_irc: model output with the results of the intermediate low plant hydraulic conductance (IL<em>k</em><sub>max</sub>) for experiment 2</li> <li>k_vc: model output with the results of the high plant hydraulic conductance (H<em>k</em><sub>max</sub>) for experiment 2</li> <li>k_ivc: model output with the results of the intermediate high plant hydraulic conductance (IH<em>k</em><sub>max</sub>) for experiment 2</li> <li>k_iirc: model output with the results of the additional intermediate low plant hydraulic conductance (IIL<em>k</em><sub>max</sub>) for experiment 2</li> <li>ko_dc: model output with the results of the best <em>k</em><sub>max</sub> and the default configuration of the PVC used in experiment 3</li> <li>ko_rc: model output with the results of the best <em>k</em><sub>max</sub> and the resistant configuration of the PVC used in experiment 3</li> <li>ko_vc: model output with the results of the best <em>k</em><sub>max</sub> and the vulnerable configuration of the PVC used in experiment 3</li> </ul> <p>The scripts were written for use in RStudio, and each contains a detailed description of the data requirements and outputs. Each script was developed to read directly the netcdf files of the model output and the csv files containing the transpiration estimates calculated from the SAPFLUXNET per experimental site (script 1).</p>
Modeling biogeochemical responses of tundra ecosystems to temporal and spatial variations in climate in the Kuparuk River Basin , Alaska, 1921 to 2100.
Output data set of the MBL-GEM III model run for tussock tundra in the Kuparuk River Basin, Alaska, described in detail in Le Dizès, S., B. L. Kwiatkowski, E. B. Rastetter, A. Hope, J. E. Hobbie, D. Stow, and S. Daeschner, Modeling biogeochemical responses of tundra ecosystems to temporal and spatial variations in climate in the Kuparuk River Basin (Alaska), J. Geophys. Res., 108(D2), 8165, doi:10.1029/2001JD000960, 2003. We ran the model at a 10 km x 10 km resolution for 123 cells at a yearly time step for 180 years, from 1921 to 2100. Two scenarios enabled the investigation of the effects of two opposing climate change scenarios for the 2001-2100 future period: warmer and wetter ("wet scenario" or Scenario 1) and warmer and drier ("dry scenario" or Scenario 2). These 246 files contain all simulation results for each scenario for individual cells in the Kuparuk River basin.
Model output, drivers and parameters for Ecosystem Recovery from Disturbance is Constrained by N Cycle Openness, Vegetation-Soil N Distribution, Form of N Losses, and the Balance Between Vegetation and Soil-Microbial Processes
Files used to generate the data for figures in: Rastetter, EB, Kling, GW, Shaver, GR, Crump, BC, Gough, L. Ecosystem Recovery from Disturbance Is Constrained by N Cycle Openness, Vegetation-Soil N Distribution, Form of N Losses, and the Balance between Vegetation and Soil-Microbial Processes. Ecosystems (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-020-00542-3. This paper present a framework for assessing biogeochemical recovery of terrestrial ecosystems from disturbance. We identify three recovery phases. In Phase 1, nitrogen is redistributed from soil organic matter to vegetation, but the ecosystem continues to lose nitrogen because the recovering vegetation cannot take up nitrogen as fast as it is released from soil. In Phase 2, the ecosystem begins re-accumulating nitrogen and converges on a quasi-steady state in which vegetation and soil-microbial processes are in balance. In Phase 3, vegetation and soil-microbial processes remain in balance and the ecosystem slowly re-accumulates the remaining nitrogen.
Configuration files for model stations presented in the manuscript "Sensitivity of shelf sea marine ecosystems to temporal resolution meteorological forcing"
<p>This repository contains configuration files for running GOTM-FABM-ERSEM at stations L4 and CCS to produce results presented in the manuscript "Sensitivity of shelf sea marine ecosystems to meteorological forcing" in addition to meteorology files for running the sensitivity analysis presented in the manuscript. Ncfiles containing model results for all scenarios presented in the manuscript are also included within the zip files for both stations</p> <p><br> GOTM code is freely available from: <br> https://github.com/gotm-model/code</p> <p><br> FABM code is freely available from:<br> https://github.com/fabm-model/fabm.git</p> <p><br> ERSEM code is freely available from:</p> <p><a href="https://www.pml.ac.uk/Modelling_at_PML/Access_Code">https://www.pml.ac.uk/Modelling_at_PML/Access_Code</a><br> </p> <p>Instructions for compiling GOTM-FABM-ERSEM can be found in the ERSEM git repository after registering for the code using the link above. </p> <p>Versions/commits for the model code used to create results presented in this manuscript are:</p> <p>GOTM: commit 38e5d5b77adc7b3b5364aed7d7e4921b04b1781f </p> <p>FABM: commit 69da88c87ec59a51d1e2143c1f76111526ed6498 </p> <p>ERSEM: Version 19.04</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.