Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
69
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
69 results for “ecosystem service assessment”
Data and R Code from "A novel approach to sustainability assessment of food supply chains using networks of ecosystem services"
<p>Data and R code from this paper applying network analysis (iGraph) to two case studies pre and post agroecological transitions in Central America and Tanzania, Africa from the IPES-Food report. Further descriptions of this data and code can be found within the extended manuscript. R Code relies on the data from the scenarios (e.g., Nodes and Relations CSVs) and creates the output network metrics (e.g., Node Metric CSVs). </p>
Fig.1 in Preliminary Biophysical Assessment Of Forest Ecosystem Services: Two Model Area Examples
Fig.1. Ecosystem service class: biomass energy products. Indicator: potential energy wood supply within felling limits.
Fig. 2 in Preliminary Biophysical Assessment Of Forest Ecosystem Services: Two Model Area Examples
Fig. 2. Ecosystem service class: global climate regulation by reduction of GHG concentration. Indicator: Estimated carbon stock in live above-ground tree biomass.
Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the Intergovernmental SciencePolicy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Figure SPM.1
<p>The purpose of Figure SPM.1 is to support the statement that land degradation occurs just about everywhere in the world (i.e. it is ‘pervasive’), takes many forms, and that examples of successful restoration are also widespread. The figure consists of a backdrop map of the world from a multiple land degradation perspective, showing the level of uncertainty between studies, overlaid with dots representing all the places specifically mentioned in the eight chapters of the main Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration, including case studies of both degradation and restoration. Around the map are brief notes regarding the main forms of degradation encountered.</p>
Multi-disciplinary survey data for the assessment of regulating and recreational ecosystem services in urban parks under heat and drought conditions
<p>The research group GreenEquityHEALTH provides quantified knowledge on how urban green spaces contribute to the mitigation of climate change induced challenges and challenges from urbanization to improve health, well-being and environmental justice. The project identifies the mediating pathways or direct effects of divers urban green spaces that act to either promote health, encourage healthy behaviours like social interaction or physical activity, or to decrease risk factors such as air pollution or urban heat.</p> <p>Here we present core data of our interdisciplinary multi-method campaigns that included in-situ stationary and aerial (remote sensing-based) environmental measurements, mobile air quality measurements, and social science-informed surveys, namely, park vistor observations and countings and a questionnaire survey.</p> <p><strong>List of data and content</strong></p> <ul> <li>Aarial_survey: digital surface model, orthophoto and thermal infrared images as raster files (*.tif); flight and processing report (*.pdf)</li> <li>Air_quality: stationary PM measurement data (*.csv); coordinates (*.txt)</li> <li>Meteorology: stationary air temperature and humidity data (*.csv), sensor meta data (*.csv)</li> <li>ParkVisitor_Surveys: survey data and questionnaire replies (*.csv), survey sheets (*.docx), questionnaire form (*.pdf)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Data acquisition and processing</strong></p> <p>For details on the data (e.g. sensors, calibration, survey settings) please refer to the linked publication, incl. Supplementary Material.</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgments</strong><br> We would like to thank the City of Leipzig, Department for Urban Green and Waters, for supporting the project. We would like to thank Henrique Miguel Pereira (Head of Research Group Biodiversity Conservation of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig) for providing equipment for the meteorological field campaigns. We also thank Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Geoinformation and Surveying with Lutz Bannehr for conducting the airborne campaigns, Marco Pohle and Helko Kotas (both Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ) for technical support, and Judith Rakowski for support during the field surveys. This work was carried out within the research project ‘Environmental-health Interactions in Cities<br> (GreenEquityHEALTH) – Challenges for Human Wellbeing under Global Changes’ (2017 to 2022) funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), funding code: 01LN1705A.</p> <p><strong>Related publication</strong><br> Kabisch, N. et al. (2021). A methodological framework for the assessment of regulating and recreational ecosystem services in urban parks under heat and drought conditions. <em>Ecosystems and People</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1958062">doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1958062</a></p>
Data from: A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space
1. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) encompass a range of social, cultural and health benefits to local communities, for example recreation, spirituality, a sense of place and local identity. However, these complex and place-specific CES are often overlooked in rapid land management decisions and assessed using broad, top–down approaches. 2. We use the Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to examine a novel approach to rapid assessment of local CES provision using inductive, participatory methods. We combined free-listing and participatory geographic information systems (GIS) techniques to quantify and map perceptions of current CES provision of an urban green space. The results were then statistically compared with those of a proposed alternative scenario with the aim to inform future decision-making. 3. By identifying changes in the spatial hotspots of CES in our study area, we revealed a spatially-specific shift toward positive sentiment regarding several CES under the alternative state with variance across demographic and stakeholder groups. Response aggregations in areas of proposed development reveal previously unknown stakeholder preferences to local decision-makers and highlight potential trade-offs for conservation management. Free-listed responses revealed deeper insight into personal opinion and context. 4. This work serves as a useful case study on how the perceptions and opinions of local people regarding local CES could be accounted for in the future planning of an urban greenspace and how thorough analysis of CES provision is important to fully-inform local-scale conservation and planning for the mutual benefit of local communities and nature.
Geospatial dataset for Cumulative Impact assessment, Sea Use conflict analysis and Marine Ecosystem Services assessment in the Adriatic Ionian Region
<p>Geospatial dataset for Cumulative Impact assessment, Sea Use conflict analysis and Marine Ecosystem Services assessment in the Adriatic Ionian Region (reference year 2014).</p> <p>The datasets are derived from ADRIPLAN Portal (http://data.adriplan.eu/).</p>
Fig. 4 in Preliminary Biophysical Assessment Of Forest Ecosystem Services: Two Model Area Examples
Fig. 4. Ecosystem class: mediation of noise impacts, indicator: Estimated noise reduction.
Data from: A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Future projections of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe with two integrated assessment models
<p>Projections of future changes in biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES) are of increasing importance to inform policy and decision-making on options for conservation and sustainable use of BES. Scenario-based modelling is a powerful tool to assess these future changes. This study assesses the consequences for BES in Europe under four socio-environmental scenarios designed from a BES perspective. We evaluated these scenarios using two integrated assessment models (IMAGE-GLOBIO and CLIMSAVE IAP, respectively). </p> <p><strong>Veerkamp, C. J</strong>., Dunford. R. W., Harrison, P. A., Mandryk, M., Priess, J. A., Schipper, A. M., Stehfest, E., & Alkemade, R. (2020). Future projections of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe with two integrated assessment models. <em>Regional Environmental Change,</em> 20, 103. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01685-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01685-8</a> </p>
Supplementary material 1 from: Trégarot E, Failler P (2021) Adequacy of ecosystem services assessment tools and approaches to current policy needs and gaps in the European Union Overseas entities. One Ecosystem 6: e74170. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.6.e74170
Selection of MAES tools and approaches to facilitate the uptake of Ecosystem Services in EU Overseas entities
Supplementary material 2 from: Polce C, Maes J, Brander L, Cescatti A, Baranzelli C, Lavalle C, Zulian G (2016) Global change impacts on ecosystem services: a spatially explicit assessment for Europe. One Ecosystem 1: e9990. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.1.e9990
Key between LUISA (Baranzelli et al., 2014) and CORINE LULC types, and scores for the potential contribution of each LULC type to provide relevant ES. Scores are based on the ES potential matrix by Burkhard et al. (2014), after appropriate rescaling. See main text for additional details.
Supplementary material 1 from: Palo T, Lagercrantz K, Bramryd T, Johansson M, Beery T, Jönsson K, Wamsler C, Brink E, Schubert P, Ekelund N (2016) Priority areas in municipality planning: ecosystem services, environmental impact assessments and research areas. One Ecosystem 1: e9869. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.1.e9869
Performed EIA and biological assessments in region of Skane, Sweden. Data from Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, http://www.naturskyddsforeningen.se/om/dokument-media/rapporter
Supplementary material 1 from: Nedkov S, Zhiyanski M, Dimitrov S, Borisova B, Popov A, Ihtimanski I, Yaneva R, Nikolov P, Bratanova-Doncheva S (2017) Mapping and assessment of urban ecosystem condition and services using integrated index of spatial structure. One Ecosystem 2: e14499. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499
Figure representing examples of catalogues used during the identification built and land cover types.
Supplementary material 2 from: Nedkov S, Zhiyanski M, Dimitrov S, Borisova B, Popov A, Ihtimanski I, Yaneva R, Nikolov P, Bratanova-Doncheva S (2017) Mapping and assessment of urban ecosystem condition and services using integrated index of spatial structure. One Ecosystem 2: e14499. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499
Table representing all combinations of the integrated index of spatial structute in urban ecosystems in Bulgaria
Supplementary material 1 from: Maes J, Liekens I, Brown C (2018) Which questions drive the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy? One Ecosystem 3: e25309. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e25309
This supplement contains three tables with policy (Table1), business (Table 2) and societal (Table 3) questions.
Summary for Policymakers of the Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Africa: Chapter 5 Systematic Review Database
<p>Systematic review database: results of the classification and analysis of scientific papers and reports, published between 2005 and 2016, that deal with scenarios of biodiversity and/or ecosystem services in Africa.</p>
Summary for Policymakers of the Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Africa: Appendix 1.1 Methodology for Figure SPM.2
<p>Appendix 1.1 Methodology for Figure SPM.2</p>
Figure 9 in Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services - unedited advance version
Figure 9. Transformative change in global sustainability pathways. Collaborative implementation of priority governance interventions (levers) targeting key points of intervention (leverage points) could enable transformative change from current trends towards more sustainable ones. Most levers can be applied by a range of actors such as intergovernmental organizations, governments, non-governmental organizations, citizen and community groups, indigenous peoples and local communities, donor agencies, science and educational organizations, and the private sector, at multiple leverage points, depending on context. Implementing existing and new instruments through place-based governance interventions that are integrative, informed, inclusive and adaptive, using strategic policy mixes and learning from feedback, could enable global transformation.
Figure 7 in Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services - unedited advance version
Figure 7. Summary of recent status of, and trends in, aspects of nature and nature's contributions to people that support progress towards achieving selected targets of the Sustainable Development Goals. Selected targets are those where current evidence and target wording enable assessment of the consequences for target achievement of trends in nature and nature's contribution to people. Chapter 3 Section 3.3 provides a goal-level assessment of the evidence of links between nature and all Sustainable Development Goals. Scores for targets are based on systematic assessments of the literature and quantitative analysis of indicators where possible. None of the targets scored 'Full support' (that is, good status or substantial positive trends at a global scale); consequently, it was not included in the table. 'Partial support': the overall global status and trends are good or positive but insubstantial or insufficient, or there may be substantial positive trends for some relevant aspects but negative trends for others, or the trends are positive in some geographic regions but negative in others; 'Poor/Declining support': poor status or substantial negative trends at a global scale; "Uncertain relationship": the relationship between nature and/or nature's contributions to people and achieving the target; "Unknown": insufficient information to score the status and trends.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.