Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
54
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
54 results for “editorial”
Improvement of editorial quality of journals indexed in DOAJ
<p>In 2013, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) completely changed the inclusion criteria and journal evaluation process, starting to remove journals that not comply with these criteria. The present dataset contains 12.577 journals included in DOAJ since the launch of the Directory in 2002 until May 15th, 2016 that was examined and enriched with other data, in order to examinatethe results of the new process and its capability to improve the quality of the directory and the reliability of the contained information.</p>
Extended data of the project "A survey exploring biomedical editors' perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines"
<p>Figure S1: Survey questionnaire</p> <p>Table S2: Barriers, facilitators and possible improvements of the interventions included in the survey</p>
Multilingual Coarse Political Stance Classification of Media. The Editorial Line of a ChatGPT and Bard Newspaper
<p>Corpora used in the publication:</p> <ul> <li>Cristina España-Bonet. 2023. <strong>Multilingual Coarse Political Stance Classification of Media. The Editorial Line of a ChatGPT and Bard Newspaper. </strong>In <em>Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023</em>, Singapore. Pages 11757–11777. Association for Computational Linguistics.</li> </ul> <p>Three corpora are included:</p> <ol> <li>Newspaper articles extracted from the OSCAR corpus in English, German, Spanish and Catalan automatically annotated for political stance (left vs right) and topic</li> <li>Newspaper-like article generations by different versions of ChatGPT for 101 topics in the 4 languages</li> <li>Newspaper-like article generations by Bard for 101 topics in the 4 languages</li> </ol> <p>See the README file and the original article for further details.</p>
SCOPING REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL LITERATURE ON EVALUATION OF EDITORIAL POLICIES SUPPORTING OPEN SCIENCE PRACTICES IN SCHOLARLY JOURNALS
<p>Excel file containing the description of methods & materials used in the scoping review, the whole dataset of included studies, and respective descriptive metadata.</p>
Text-fig. 5. Vegetation zones in P. R. China (Editorial Committee of Vegetation Map of China, The Chinese Academy of Sciences 2007), and assumed location of extant reference vegetation type of Wiesa fossil assemblage (rectangle), as revealed from qualitative floristic analysis. Extant reference vegetation type present in southern belt of zone of subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest, with minor overlap into zone of tropical forest. in Assessment Of Phytogeographic Reference Regions For Cenozoic Vegetation: A Case Study On The Miocene Flora Of Wiesa (Germany)
Text-fig. 5. Vegetation zones in P. R. China (Editorial Committee of Vegetation Map of China, The Chinese Academy of Sciences 2007), and assumed location of extant reference vegetation type of Wiesa fossil assemblage (rectangle), as revealed from qualitative floristic analysis. Extant reference vegetation type present in southern belt of zone of subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest, with minor overlap into zone of tropical forest.
Challenge or Empower: Revisiting Argumentation Quality in a News Editorial Corpus
<p>The Webis-Editorial-Quality-18 corpus is a novel corpus with 1000 news editorials. The aim of this Corpus is to study a new notion for news editorials quality. It contains the quality assessments of 1000 news editorials, each annotated by three liberals and three conservatives. The annotators also reported free-text reasons for the effects they observed.</p>
Webis-Editorials-16
<p>Newer Version of this corpus in the 2018 version can be found here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1340629</p> <p>The Webis-Editorials-16 corpus is a novel corpus with 300 news editorials evenly selected from three diverse online news portals: Al Jazeera, Fox News, and The Guardian. The aim of the corpus is to study (1) the mining and classification of fine-grained types of argumentative discourse units and (2) the analysis of argumentation strategies pursued in editorials to achieve persuasion. To this end, each editorial contains manual type annotations of all units that capture the role that a unit plays in the argumentative discourse, such as assumption or statistics. The corpus consists of 14,313 units of six different types, each annotated by three professional annotators from the crowdsourcing platform <em>upwork.com.</em></p>
Underlying data of the project "A survey exploring biomedical editors' perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines"
<p><em><strong>Survey dataset.xlsx</strong></em> contains the anonymised responses to the survey.</p>
F I G U R E 1 in Inaugural editorial: Biological Diversity
F I G U R E 1 Number of scientific publications of biodiversity‐related research during the years 1987–2023. "Biodiversity" was used as topic for search in Web of Science.
Fig. 4 in EDITORIAL The Natal Museum and its journals: celebrating a century of publication, 1906-2005
Fig. 4. Number of natural science pages (upper curve) and nomenclatural acts (lower curve) counted by 5-year clusters.
Figures for RAE Editorial 'What Teachers and Researchers in the Area of Business Management Need to Know About Open Science'
<pre>This set of figures is related to an Editorial dedicated to Open Science, published by <a href="https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/index">Revista de Administração de Empresas (RAE)</a>: </pre>
Gender inequalities on editorial boards of indexed pediatrics journals
<p>These raw data belong to the study “Gender inequalities on editorial boards of indexed pediatrics journals”. </p> <p>The presence of women in decision-making positions, such as on editorial committees of biomedical journals, is not the same as that of men. This paper analyzes the gender composition of editorial committees (EBMs) and editor-in-chief (ECs) positions of pediatric journals. The gender of EBMs and ECs of 125 journals classified in the pediatrics area of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) were analyzed. The following indicators were calculated: gender distribution of ECs and EBMs by journal, publisher, subject speciality, country, quartile of the journal in JCR and country of affiliation of the members. The total number of EBMs was 4,242. The distribution by sex of the ECs was 19.44% women and 80.56% men, while the EBMs were 33.05% women and 66.95% men. Twenty journals exhibited a greater representation of women than men, and in four there was parity. Journals with greater participation of women specialized in nursing, physical therapy and were related to nutrition (lactation and breastfeeding). Only one-fifth of ECs and one-third of EBMs are female. Women's participation is higher in journals related to nursing, physical and occupational therapy, and nutrition. The United States has the highest number of EBMs, followed by the European Union. </p> <p>This file contains the following variables: Rank, Full Journal Title,Editorial Board Members (EBM), First Name, Gender, Country, Country Code, Geographical Area, Editor-in-Chief (EC), Country Editor-in-Chief, Gender Editor-in-Chief, Url Journals.</p>
Data from: A persistent lack of international representation on editorial boards in environmental biology
The scholars comprising journal editorial boards play a critical role in defining the trajectory of knowledge in their field. Nevertheless, studies of editorial board composition remain rare, especially those focusing on journals publishing research in the increasingly globalized fields of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Using metrics for quantifying the diversity of ecological communities, we quantified international representation on the 1985–2014 editorial boards of 24 environmental biology journals. Over the course of 3 decades, there were 3,827 unique scientists based in 70 countries who served as editors. The size of the editorial community increased over time—the number of editors serving in 2014 was 4-fold greater than in 1985—as did the number of countries in which editors were based. Nevertheless, editors based outside the "Global North" (the group of economically developed countries with high per capita gross domestic product [GDP] that collectively concentrate most global wealth) were extremely rare. Furthermore, 67.18% of all editors were based in either the United States or the United Kingdom. Consequently, geographic diversity—already low in 1985—remained unchanged through 2014. We argue that this limited geographic diversity can detrimentally affect the creativity of scholarship published in journals, the progress and direction of research, the composition of the STEM workforce, and the development of science in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and much of Asia (i.e., the "Global South").
International Journal of Social Research Methods: 25th Anniversary Editorial bonus material (methods and data)
<p>This dataset accompanies the 25th Anniversary Editorial bonus material (methods and data) of the International Journal of Social Research Methods.</p> <p>https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/tsrm20/collections/TSRM_25th_Anniversary_SI</p>
Metaphors in News Editorials
<p>Metaphorical language is a pivotal element in the realm of political framing. Existing work from linguistics and the social sciences provides compelling evidence regarding the distinctiveness of conceptual framing for political ideology perspectives. However, the nature and utilization of metaphors and the effect on audiences of different political ideologies within political discourses are hardly explored. To enable research in this direction, in this work we create a dataset, originally based on news editorials and labeled with their persuasive effects on liberals and conservatives and extend it with annotations pertaining to metaphorical usage of language. To that end, first, we identify all single metaphors and composite metaphors. Secondly, we provide annotations of the source and target domains for each metaphor. As a result, our corpus consists of 300 news editorials annotated with spans of texts containing metaphors and the corresponding domains of which these metaphors draw from. Our analysis shows that liberal readers are affected by metaphors, whereas conservatives are resistant to them. Both ideologies are affected differently based on the metaphor source and target category. For example, liberals are affected by metaphors in the Darkness & Light (e.g., death) source domains, where as the source domain of Nature affects conservatives more significantly.</p>
Figure 1 in Editorial: Anniversary Issue "A 10-Year Journey of Ecologica Montenegrina"
Figure 1. The numbers of papers published in Ecologica Montenegrina from 2014 to 2023.
Fig. 3 in EDITORIAL The Natal Museum and its journals: celebrating a century of publication, 1906-2005
Fig. 3. Geographic source of published articles.
Fig. 2 in EDITORIAL The Natal Museum and its journals: celebrating a century of publication, 1906-2005
Fig. 2. Cordylus warreni described by Boulenger (1908) from Ubombo.
ERRATAS database of editorial principles and practices in printed editions of historical correspondence
<p>The ERRATAS database is the primary output of the ERRATAS project, which surveyed all the sources of the <a href="http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/"><em>Corpora of Early English Correspondence</em></a> (CEEC-400) in order to investigate their editorial principles and practices. These sources are mostly printed editions of English historical correspondence.</p> <p>The data in the ERRATAS database consists of surveys of:</p> <ul> <li>editorial principles (explicit statements or anything resembling such);</li> <li>editorial practices (textual features that can be found in the edited texts);</li> <li>editorial work (evidence of contributors other than the stated editor(s)).</li> </ul> <p>This updated release of the database is in the form of <strong>two MS Excel files</strong>, one of which includes data entry forms for surveying editorial principles and practices.</p> <p>This release also comes with documentation, in the form of <strong>three pdf files</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>A <strong>manual</strong> to the database, containing a brief history of the project, and a section demonstrating with several graphs what kinds of data can be extracted from the dataset;</li> </ul> <p>and two documents which place the database into the context of its development, but more importantly facilitate the application of the ERRATAS method to survey further material:</p> <ul> <li>A <strong>checklist</strong> of textual features (<a href="https://zenodo.org/record/1187074">an earlier version can be found here</a>); and</li> <li><strong>Guidelines</strong> for surveying editorial principles and edited texts following the ERRATAS system.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Related material:</strong></p> <ul> <li><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3855451"><em>Corpus of Editorial Principles (in CEEC-400 Sources)</em></a> – pdfs of the editorial principles in the editions surveyed</li> <li><a href="https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4134471">Editions and other sources used in the <em>Corpora of Early English Correspondence</em> (CEEC-400)</a> – detailed bibliography of the sources surveyed for the ERRATAS database</li> <li>Sairio, Anni, Samuli Kaislaniemi, Anna Merikallio & Terttu Nevalainen. 2018. “Charting orthographical reliability in a corpus of English historical letters”. <em>ICAME Journal</em> 42: 79–96. DOI: <a href="http://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2018-0005">doi.org/10.1515/icame-2018-0005</a>. Open access.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Version history:</strong></p> <p>26.5.2020 Version 0.9 – Database unfinished (due to coronavirus restrictions). The current data has been checked twice. Material to be added in v1.0: database manual; database survey guidelines.</p> <p>14.4.2023 Version 1.1 – Database finished, after conversion to MS Excel. Dataset checked, corrected, amended, edited, and cleaned for release. Documentation created. Survey guidelines and data survey forms included in release.</p>
Análise realizada durante a pesquisa "Diagnóstico editorial dos periódicos hospedados no portal da Universidade Federal do Amazonas"
<p>Quadros gerados a partir da análise realizada durante a pesquisa "Diagnóstico editorial dos periódicos hospedados no portal da Universidade Federal do Amazonas".</p> <p>Apresenta o mapeamento de revistas ativas no portal, bem como as quais que aplicam as boas práticas para qualificação de periódicos parametrizadas no estudo de Santos (2021).</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.