Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
34
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
34 results for “emotion perception”
Emotion Category and Face Perception Task Optimized for Multivariate Pattern Analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Visual and auditory brain areas share a representational structure that supports emotion perception: fMRI data
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Perception and Experience of Appraisals and Consumption Emotions in Reviews (PEACE-Reviews) Pilot Dataset
<p>This pilot dataset contains review text responses and associated emotional ratings about the usage of particular products by participants (USA) recruited from a crowdsourcing platform called Prolific. This pilot study is part of a larger project of constructing a dataset that has people's review text of particular products labelled with emotional variables such as cognitive appraisals, and emotional intensity. The aim of this pilot is to pilot different methods that elicit participants to write their emotional experiences when using a product. </p> <p><strong>Variables</strong></p> <p>Column A- condition that the participant was assigned to. [1- presence of emotion prompts, review format; 2- presence of emotion prompts, question format; 3- absence of emotion prompts, review format; absence of emotion prompts, question format]</p> <p>Column B- product reviewed</p> <p>Column C- cost of product reviewed</p> <p>Column D- emotion felt while using the product (this only applies to condition 1 and 3)</p> <p>Columns E - K are the text responses from participants.</p> <p>Column E- review text responses of the product (this only applies to condition 1 and 3)</p> <p>Column F- how important is the product in text (this only applies to condition 2 and 4)</p> <p>Column G- how did the participants feel when using the product in text (this only applies to condition 2 and 4)</p> <p>Column H- Why did the participants feel the way they are feeling when using the product in text (this only applies to condition 2)</p> <p>Column I- whether the product is consistent with what the participants' wanted in text (this only applies to condition 2 and 4)</p> <p>Column J- whether using the product was pleasant in text (this only applies to condition 2 and 4)</p> <p>Column K- whether the participants' understood what was happening when they were using the product in text (this only applies to condition 2 and 4)</p> <p>Columns L - AE are the rating of the cognitive appraisals on a Likert scale of 1-7. (7 means that the participants endorse more on that appraisal). These ratings correspond to how the participants' perceive the situation of using the product that they have talked about. Missing data correspond to the participants' rating as 'not applicable'. </p> <p>Column L- self-control- To what extent did you think you had control over the situation?</p> <p>Column M- pleasantness- To what extent did you think that the situation was pleasant?</p> <p>Column N- goal congruence- To what extent was the situation consistent with what you wanted?</p> <p>Column O- expectedness- To what extent did you expect the situation to occur?</p> <p>Column P- fairness- To what extent did you think the situation was fair?</p> <p>Column Q- certainty- To what extent did you understand what was happening in the situation?</p> <p>Column R- coping potential- To what extent were you able to cope with any negative consequences of the situation?</p> <p>Column S- goal relevance- To what extent did you think that the situation was relevant to what you wanted?</p> <p>Column T- other-agency- To what extent did you think that someone else other than you was responsible for what was happening in the situation?</p> <p>Column U- difficulty- To what extent did you think that the situation was difficult?</p> <p>Column V- self-agency- To what extent did you think that you were responsible for what was happening in the situation?</p> <p>Column W- attentional activity- To what extent did you think that you needed to attend to the situation further?</p> <p>Column X- circumstances-control- To what extent did you think that circumstances beyond anyone's control were controlling what was happening in the situation?</p> <p>Column Y- positive future expectancy- To what extent did you think that the situation would get better?</p> <p>Column Z- other-control- To what extent did you think that other people were controlling what was happening in the situation?</p> <p>Column AA- effort- To what extent did you think that you needed to exert effort to deal with the situation?</p> <p>Column AB- problems- To what extent did you think that there were problems that had to be solved before you could get what you wanted?</p> <p>Column AC- external normative significance- To what extent did you think that the situation was consistent with external and social norms?</p> <p>Column AD- circumstances-agency- To what extent did you think that circumstances beyond anyone's control were responsible for what was happening in the situation?</p> <p>Column AE- familiarity- To what extent did you think that the situation was familiar?</p> <p>Columns AF - AH are some variables pertaining the participants' experience of using the product on a Likert scale of 1-7.</p> <p>Column AF-How much effort did you put into researching about the product/service before purchasing it?</p> <p>Column AG- To what extent would you recommend the product/service that you have recalled to someone else?</p> <p>Column AH- To what extent would you purchase again the product/service that you have recalled?</p> <p>Columns AI - AP are the emotional intensity rated for each emotion on a Likert scale of 1-7 (7 means that the participant strongly felt that emotion when using the product)</p> <p>Columns AQ - AW are demographic variables (note that participants are recruited from USA)</p> <p>Column AQ- gender</p> <p>Column AR- age group</p> <p>Column AS- race</p> <p>Column AT- whether the participant is of Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino origin</p> <p>Column AU- native language</p> <p>Column AV- highest education level</p> <p>Column AW- total household income before tax during the past 12 months</p>
Age-dependent positivity bias in children's perception of emotion terms
<p>Data set of Bahn, D., Vesker, M., Garcia Alanis, J. C., Schwarzer, G., & Kauschke, C. (in press). Age-dependent positivity bias in children’s perception of emotion terms. <em>Frontiers in Psychology</em>. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01268</p>
Data from: The perception of caricatured emotion in voice
<p>Data for Whiting et al. (2020, Cognition): "The perception of caricatured emotion in voice". Raw behavioural data and sound stimuli.</p>
Perception of valence and arousal in German emotion terms – A comparison between 9-year-old children and adults
<p>Two major semantic features of emotion concepts have been shown to impact performance in<br> emotion perception tasks: valence and arousal. To design psycholinguistic experiments with<br> emotion terms as stimuli, norms are required which indicate valence and arousal values for<br> individual words. Although such norms are usually obtained from ratings of adults, they are<br> often also used in developmental studies. This procedure raises the question of whether<br> children and adults perceive emotional valence and arousal of words in the same way, and<br> consequently, whether adults’ ratings are adequate when constructing stimulus sets for<br> children. The present study obtained valence and arousal ratings for 48 German emotion<br> terms from three different groups: 9-year-old children and adults tested in a controlled<br> laboratory setting, and adults tested via online survey. Results demonstrate high correlations<br> for valence and arousal across settings. The comparison between children and adults also<br> revealed high correlations, suggesting that children at the age of 9 already display adult-like<br> behavior in their evaluation of emotion terms. A small difference was found for absolute<br> rating values of arousal, with children rating words less arousing than adults. Overall, using<br> adults’ norms in developmental studies on word processing seems to be a valid procedure.</p>
Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotion Perception, Recognition, Learning, and Memory
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00458432. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Relationship Between Kinesthetic Perception, Motor Competence, Physical Fitness and Emotional Intelligence in Children
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06504563. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Data from: The perception of caricatured emotion in voice
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Cerebellar contribution to emotional body language perception: a TMS study
<p>Consistent evidence suggests that the cerebellum contributes to the processing of emotional facial expressions. However, it is not yet known whether the cerebellum is recruited when emotions are expressed by body postures or movements, or whether it is recruited differently for positive and negative emotions. In this study, we asked healthy participants to discriminate between body postures (with masked face) expressing emotions of opposite valence (happiness vs anger, Experiment 1), or of the same valence (negative: anger vs sadness; positive: happiness vs surprise, Experiment 2). While performing the task, participants received online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over a region of the posterior left cerebellum and over two control sites (early visual cortex and vertex). We found that TMS over the cerebellum affected participants’ ability to discriminate emotional body postures, but only when one of the emotions was negatively valenced (i.e. anger). These findings suggest that the cerebellar region we stimulated is involved in processing the emotional content conveyed by body postures and gestures. Our findings complement prior evidence on the role of the cerebellum in emotional face processing and have important implications from a clinical perspective, where non-invasive cerebellar stimulation is a promising tool for the treatment of motor, cognitive and affective deficits</p>
Emotion Regulation and Emotion Perception
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03790878. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Modulation of Emotion Perception in Humans Via Amygdala Stimulation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05292183. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Effect of Intranasal Neuropeptide on Emotion Perception in Trait Anxiety
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01551303. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The perception of emotional cues by children in artificial background noise
<p>This repository contains the necessary resources to replicate the experimental results presented in the article entitled "The perception of emotional cues by children in artificial background noise" published in the International Journal on Speech Technology on January 22, 2020.</p>
The Impact of the Perception of Primary Facial Emotions on Corticospinal Excitability
<p>Introduction</p> <p>This database includes the raw data linked with the paper “ The impact of the perception of primary facial emotions on corticospinal excitability” published on Brain Sciences. In this paper, we reported healthy individuals’ motor-evoked potentials (MEP) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while<span> </span>viewing faces expressing the primary emotions. The present paper investigates whether the increase in MEP amplitude while participants view emotional stimuli depends on the specific emotional meaning conveyed by the stimulus.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used single-pulse TMS to elicit MEPs from the left motor cortex (M1) while healthy participants (N=22) passively viewed the same faces expressing either anger, fear, disgust, happiness, sadness, surprise, and no emotion (in different blocks).</p> <p>Results (in brief)</p> <p>We found that the observation of fearful, angry, disgusted, and happy facial expressions was associated with a significant increase in the MEPs’ amplitude compared to neutral facial expressions, with a comparable enhancement in the CSE occurring across these emotions. In turn, viewing sad and surprised faces did not modulate the CSE, suggesting<span> </span>that only facial expressions that signal (real or potential) danger or a rewarding stimulus, but not emotional facial expressions per se, are capable of activating action-related mechanisms.</p>
Context shapes emotion perception and prosocial behavior to real-life laughter and crying vocalizations - Raw data
<p>This repository contains raw data for the manuscript (under review): <i>Context shapes emotion perception and prosocial behavior to real-life laughter and crying vocalizations regardless of their diverse perceptual properties. </i></p><p>Please contact Doron Atias (doron.atias@mail.huji.ac.il) if you have questions concerning the data provided in this repository.</p>
Context shapes emotion perception and prosocial behavior to real-life laughter and crying vocalizations - Code
<p>This R Markdown document includes the code for data presentation in Atias & Aviezer (2024): "Context shapes emotion perception and prosocial behavior to real-life laughter and crying vocalizations regardless of their diverse perceptual properties". Please contact Doron Atias (doron.atias@mail.huji.ac.il) if you have questions.</p>
THE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL STATES AND ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS ON SELF-PERCEPTION
<p><i>This article explores the intricate relationship between emotional states and anthropometric measurements and their psychological impact on self-perception. Emotions, ranging from positive to negative, influence how individuals view themselves, while anthropometric measurements like body weight and height can play a significant role in shaping self-esteem and body image. The interplay between these factors is multifaceted and varies from person to person. Strategies for promoting a healthier self-perception include emotional regulation, body positivity, education, social support, and a shift towards holistic well-being. This article emphasizes the importance of self-compassion and individuality in the journey towards a positive and resilient self-image, free from societal pressures.</i></p>
Auditory Processes and Emotional Perception in Schizophrenia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04768335. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Emotional Support Given at Birth to Women Effect on Birth Duration, Perception and Fear
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06479746. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.