Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?

Fig. 6. Biplots of some shrimp species and environmental variables (arrows) on the first two canonical axes derived from CCA of shrimp abundance and environmental variables in Pattani bay during February 2011 and January 2012.

Fig. 3 in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?

Fig. 3. Relative density (%) and species richness of shrimps collected in different months in Pattani Bay between February 2011–January 2012 at five different habitats.

Fig. 4 in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?

Fig. 4. Cluster dendogram demonstrating grouping of shrimps by month and habitat (Jan…Dec = January…December; Sa = sandy habitat, Ma = Mangrove habitat, S = Shell-deposited habitat, Mu = Muddy habitat and G = Seagrass habitat; G1, 2, 3 = cluster group 1, 2, and 3).

Fig. 5. A in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?

Fig. 5. A non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) ordination of abundance data (log N+1 transformation) for shrimps (a) collected between 12 different months (j = January, f = February, mr = March, ap = April, my = May, j = June, Jl = July, ag = August, s = September, o = October, n = November, d = December) and (b) at five different habitats in Pattani bay (1 = sandy habitat, 2 = mangrove habitat, 3 = shell-deposited habitat, 4 = muddy habitat and 5 = seagrass habitat).

Fig. 1 in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?

Fig. 1. Map of study area, Pattani Bay, Thailand, showing habitat characteristics (A1–3 = Sandy habitat, B1–3 = Seagrass habitat, C1–3 = Shell-doposited habitat, D1–3 = Muddy habitat, and E1-3 = Mangrove habitat).

Fig. 2 in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?

Fig. 2. Relative density (%) and species richness of shrimps collected at different habitats in Pattani Bay between February 2011–January 2012

Figure 8 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 8 - Seasonal variation in males/females sex ratio in the copepod Acartia bispinosa in the study area.

Figure 7 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 7 - Seasonal patterns at Sharm El-Maya Bay, the northern Red Sea. A Temperature and Salinity B pH and dissolved oxygen concentrations (DO), and C Chlorophyll a concentration (chl a) and abundance of Acartia bispinosa.

Figure 6 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 6 - Variations in Acartia bispinosa from the northern Red Sea. A–C female genital compound somite D female leg 5 E–H male last pediger I male second urosomite. All scale bars in mm.

Figure 4 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 4 - Acartia bispinosa male from the northern Red Sea. A habitus, dorsal view B rostrum, ventral view C urosome, dorsal view D urosome, latero-ventra view E left antennule F right antennule G leg 5 H terminal segment of left exopod of leg 5 I terminal segment of right exopod of leg 5. All scale bars in mm.

Figure 2 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 2 - SEM micrographs of Acartia bispinosa female from the northern Red Sea. A rostrum, ventral view B urosome, fine hairs on the posterior margin of genital compound somite indicated by arrow, ventral view C proximal part of antennule, claw-like curved spine indicated by arrow, lateral view D Female leg 5.

Figure 1 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 1 - Acartia bispinosa female from the northern Red Sea. A habitus, dorsal view B habitus, lateral view C rostrum and proximal part of the antennule, lateral view D urosome, dorsal view E urosome, ventral view F urosome, later view right G urosome, lateral view left H–I antennule. All scale bars in mm.

Figure 10 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 10 - Distribution of Acartia bispinosa based on previous records and on the present study (Note that its distribution is restricted between 35°N and 32°S).

Figure 5 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 5 - SEM micrographs of Acartia bispinosa male from the northern Red Sea. A abdomen, lateral view B leg 5, posterior surface.

Figure 3 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 3 - Acartia bispinosa female from the northern Red Sea. A antenna B mandible C maxillule D maxilla E maxilliped F Leg 1 G leg 2, posterior surface H Leg 3, posterior surface I leg 4, posterior surface J third exopodal segment of leg 1, anterior surface K second endopodal segment of leg 3, anterior surface L basis of leg 4, anterior surface I leg 5 anterior surface. All scale bars in mm.

Figure 9 from: El-Sherbiny M, M Al - Aidaroos A (2014) First report of the presence of Acartia bispinosa Carl, 1907 (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a semi-enclosed Bay (Sharm El-Maya), northern Red Sea with some notes on its seasonal variation in abundance and body size. ZooKeys 444: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.444.7633

Figure 9 - Box and whisker plot of seasonal variations of total and prosome length of female A and male B of Acartia bispinosa (total length: open symbol, prosome length: filled symbol).