Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
44
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
44 results for “energy economics”
Agrisolar Food, Energy, and Water and economic Lifecycle Scenario (FEWLS) Tool Data
<p>Input data and baseline outputs for the Agrisolar Food, Energy, Water, and economic Lifecycle Scenario (FEWLS) Tool. Note that corresponding code is linked in the attached Github doi (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10023281). </p> <p>The FEWLS tool was developed and used in the recently submitted research article, <em>Food-energy-water and economic outcomes of agrisolar co-location in irrigated regions</em>. In general, this code takes in a ground-mounted solar PV shape file (with some auxiliary information) and generates user set lifespan predictions for food (Calorie), energy (GWh), water (m3), and economic (USD) effects due to offsetting agricultural land with solar PV energy generation. </p>
Environmental and economic potential of decentralised electrocatalytic ammonia synthesis powered by solar energy
<p>Dataset associated with the publication "Environmental and economic potential of decentralised electrocatalytic ammonia synthesis powered by solar energy" by Sebastiano C. D'Angelo, Antonio J. Martín, Selene Cobo, Diego Freire-Ordóñez, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, and Javier Pérez-Ramírez, available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE02683J">https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE02683J</a>. The dataset includes the numeric data required to plot all the figures embedded in the main manuscript and in the Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI).</p> <p>The structure of the dataset is here elucidated sheet by sheet:</p> <ul> <li><strong>GeneralParameters</strong>: numerical values for the scaled functional unit used in the study, the world population value adopted, and the three voltage efficiencies assumed in different parts of the study.</li> <li><strong>AL_BaseCase_SensECE</strong>: numerical values associated with the results for the ammonia leaf scenarios adopting a voltage efficiency of 63% (base case) and a Faradaic efficiency varying from 1% to 100%; highest, average, and lowest capacity factors for the solar power production were here used. The ammonia leaf configuration here assessed is the one including solar panels, electrolyzer, and fuel cell as key components. The results report all the ReCiPe 2016 (hierarchical approach) midpoints and endpoints and the values for the assessed planetary boundaries; the levelised cost of ammonia (LCOA) is reported, as well.</li> <li><strong>AL_EtaV75_SensECE</strong>: this sheet has the structure as the previous one, but includes the results for the ammonia leaf scenario using 75% voltage efficiency, instead of 63%. The remaining assumptions do not deviate from the base case.</li> <li><strong>AL_Eta100_SensECE</strong>: this sheet has the structure as the previous one, but includes the results for the ammonia leaf scenario using 100% voltage efficiency, instead of 63%. The remaining assumptions do not deviate from the base case.</li> <li><strong>AL_NoFC_H2Vented_SensECE</strong>: this sheet has the same structure as the sheet "AL_BaseCase_SensECE", but includes the ammonia leaf scenario using a configuration with no fuel cell. The hydrogen by-product was here considered vented to the air. The remaining assumptions do not deviate from the base case.</li> <li><strong>AL_NoFC_H2Subst_SensECE</strong>: this sheet has the same structure as the sheet "AL_BaseCase_SensECE", but includes the ammonia leaf scenario using a configuration with no fuel cell. The hydrogen by-product was here considered substituting the production of an equivalent quantity from a water electrolyzer deployed in the same location as the ammonia leaf. The remaining assumptions do not deviate from the base case.</li> <li><strong>AL_BaseCase_SpatAnal_BreakFEff</strong>: numerical results for the ammonia leaf base case scenario stemming from the spatial analysis performed on a global grid of 1140 points. The yearly average capacity factors for the solar panels at each location are included, and the results portraying the breakeven Faradaic efficiency for the indicators climate change - CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, global warming, human health, and levelised cost of ammonia were included. The assumptions for the voltage efficiency and the other parameters correspond to the base case.</li> <li><strong>AL_BaseCase_SpatAnal_AbsValues</strong>: numerical results for the ammonia leaf scenarios using the base case state-of-the-art (34%) and 100% Faradaic efficiency, as well as the base case voltage efficiency of 63%. The same metrics as the previous sheet are reported. The structure of the sheet is the same as the previous one.</li> <li><strong>AL_BaseCase_Breakdowns</strong>: breakdown of the same four indicators as the previous sheet for the best and worst combination of Faradaic efficiency and solar panels capacity factors, i.e., 34% Faradaic efficiency and 6% capacity factor on one side and 100% Faradaic efficiency and 26% capacity factor on the other side. The breakdown is divided into solar panels, electrolyser, fuel cell, and other elements. A further breakdown of the levelised cost of ammonia (LCOA) into capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) is provided, as well. The voltage efficiency is the same as the base case, as well as the other parameters.</li> <li><strong>AL_BaseCase_CAPEXSens</strong>: numerical results for the levelised cost of ammonia (LCOA) in dependence of the sensitivity on the capital expenditure (CAPEX) for the ammonia leaf configuration assessed in the base case. Two cases assuming state-of-the-art (34%) and 100% Faradaic efficiency were assumed, and lowest, average, and highest capacity factor are included. The remaining parameters do not deviate from the base case configuration.</li> <li><strong>AL_gHB_BestMap</strong>: numerical results to produce the map showing the best technology between ammonia leaf (AL) and green Haber-Bosch (gHB) in the category climate change - CO<sub>2</sub> concentration for all the assessed locations. column D shows the share of safe operating space (%SOS) for each location, while column E shows which technology was selected, where 1 is ammonia leaf and 2 is green HB.</li> <li><strong>AL_BaseCase_Sensitivity</strong>: percentual variation of the results obtained assuming the base configuration ammonia leaf for a state-of-the-art Faradaic efficiency and an average capacity factor for the solar panels. The varied parameters include the voltage efficiency (columns C-D-E), the levelised cost of electricity (columns G-H-I), the electrolyser cost (columns K-L-M), the fuel cell cost (columns O-P-Q), the electrolyser environmental impact (columns S-T-U), and the fuel cell environmental impact (columns W-X-Y).</li> <li><strong>CompTech_BaseCase</strong>: environmental and economic metrics characterizing the assessed Haber-Bosch scenarios (business as usual, BAU; blue Haber-Bosch; green Haber-Bosch for lowest, average, and highest solar panels capacity factor; BAU assuming natural gas spot prices in Europe in August 2022). The reported metrics are the ReCiPe 2016 (hierarchical approach) midpoints and endpoints, the planetary boundaries, and the levelised cost of ammonia (LCOA).</li> <li><strong>CompTech_EtaV75</strong>: this sheet has the same structure as the previous one, but the hydrogen electrolyser used for the green Haber-Bosch scenarios was assumed to have a 10% stack efficiency improvement. The remaining parameters are the same.</li> <li><strong>CompTech_EtaV100</strong>: this sheet has the same structure as the previous one, but the hydrogen electrolyser used for the green Haber-Bosch scenarios was assumed to have a 100% stack efficiency. The remaining parameters are the same.</li> <li><strong>CompValues_Fig1</strong>: numerical values for yearly global warming impacts of a selection of countries, as well as for the yearly human health impacts of selected diseases and catastrophic events.</li> </ul> <p> </p>
Dataset for Hydropower Expansion in Eco-Sensitive River Basins under Global Energy-Economic Change
<p>The data presented in this repository can be fed into the codes provided in <a href="https://github.com/kamal0013/chowdhury-etal_2023_hydropower">this GitHub repository</a> to reproduce the results of the following paper:</p> <p> </p> <p>Chowdhury, A.F.M.K., Wild, T., Zhang, Y. <em>et al.</em> Hydropower expansion in eco-sensitive river basins under global energy-economic change. <em>Nat Sustain</em> <strong>7</strong>, 213–222 (2024). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01260-z">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01260-z</a></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Summary</strong></p> <p>In this study, we investigate how rapid economic growth and transition to low-carbon energy may impact hydropower development, with potential countervailing effects of increasingly cost-competitive variable renewable energy (VRE). We explore the effects of these forces on hydropower expansion in the world's 20 most eco-sensitive river basins, that have substantial untapped hydropower potential and ecological richness. Our investigation is based on the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM), an integrated model of global energy-water-economy dynamics. The GCAM outputs and other data provided in this repository, in combination with the Jupyter Notebooks provided in <a href="https://github.com/kamal0013/chowdhury-etal_2023_hydropower">this GitHub repository</a>, can be used to conduct our key analysis, and reproduce the relevant results.</p>
Case study result data set for Energy Economics article "Demystifying market clearing and price setting effects in low-carbon energy systems"
<p>The data set contains country-specific power generation and consumption time series data for the European energy system, including both traditional and new market participants due to cross-sectoral integration.</p> <p>Country codes: ALPHA-3<br> Unit: Megawatt (electric) (interval average values, i.e. MWh/h)</p> <p><strong>Generation technology types</strong></p> <ul> <li>batteryStorage (Li-Ion)</li> <li>conventionalHydro (aggregated for different equivalent hydropower systems)</li> <li>natural_gas_CC_COND (Combined Cycle Gas Turbine)</li> <li>natural_gas_CC_EXCOND (Combined Cycle Gas Turbine as extraction condensing CHP plant for district heating)</li> <li>natural_gas_GT_COND (Open-Cycle Gas Turbine)</li> <li>natural_gas_GT_EXCOND (Open-Cycle Gas Turbine as extraction condensing CHP plant for industry)</li> <li>offshoreWind (aggregated for different LCOE and IEC wind turbine classes)</li> <li>offshoreWindExplicit (offshore wind generation considered for offshore grid investments in the North Seas area, aggregated for different LCOE classes)</li> <li>onshoreWind (solar PV, aggregated for different LCOE classes)</li> <li>other (geothermal, waste)</li> <li>pumpedHydro (aggregated for different equivalent hydropower systems)</li> <li>solar (solar PV, aggregated for different LCOE classes)</li> <li>uran_ST_COND (steam turbine condensing power plant)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Consumption technology types</strong></p> <ul> <li>BEV (Battery Electric Vehicles, aggregated for different market segments)</li> <li>PHEV (Battery Electric Vehicles, aggregated for different market segments)</li> <li>airConditioning</li> <li>batteryStorage (Li-Ion)</li> <li>conventionalLoad</li> <li>heatPump (aggregated for different combinations of building, e.g. residential and non-residential, and technology, e.g. air-source, ground-source, types)</li> <li>hybridHeatPump (aggregated for different combinations of building, e.g. residential and non-residential, and technology, e.g. air-source, ground-source, types)</li> <li>hybridTruck (Hybrid Overhead-Line truck)</li> <li>largeScaleDirectResistiveHeating (Centralised CHP systems)</li> <li>natural_gas_CC_EXCOND_electrodeHeater</li> <li>natural_gas_CC_EXCOND_heatpumpHeater</li> <li>natural_gas_GT_EXCOND_electrodeHeater</li> <li>natural_gas_GT_EXCOND_heatpumpHeater</li> <li>powerToGas</li> <li>pumpedHydro (aggregated for different equivalent hydropower systems)</li> </ul>
Result data related to Tröndle et al (2024): Rebuilding Ukraine's energy supply in a secure, economic, and decarbonised way
<p>This dataset contains the result data of all the scenarios ran in the scientific article "Rebuilding Ukraine’s energy supply in a secure, economic, and decarbonised way".</p> <p>The results of the main five scenarios of the study are available as PyPSA result files:</p> <ul> <li>nuclear-and-renewables-high.nc: A scenario with nuclear in the mix and high economic growth assumption.</li> <li>nuclear-and-renewables-low.nc: A scenario with nuclear in the mix and low economic growth assumption.</li> <li>only-renewables-high-low-bio.nc: A scenario with only renewables, high economic growth assumption, and only 10% of assumed biomass potential.</li> <li>only-renewables-high.nc: A scenario with only renewables and high economic growth assumption.</li> <li>only-renewables-low.nc: A scenario with only renewables and low economic growth assumption.</li> </ul> <p>See the PyPSA documentation for more information: <a href="https://pypsa.readthedocs.io" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://pypsa.readthedocs.io</a>.</p> <p>The results of the 330 global sensitivity analysis runs are available as summary files in CSV format:</p> <ul> <li>gsa-capacities-energy-gwh.csv: The installed energy storage capacities for each scenario.</li> <li>gsa-capacities-power-gw.csv: The installed generation capacities for each scenario.</li> <li>gsa-lcoe.csv: The levelised cost of electricity for each scenario.</li> </ul>
(PRE) Socio-economic and cultural dataset in relation to Persuasive Strategies to boost Energy Efficiency and in the UK, Spain, Greece and Austria
<p>The dataset has been created from obtaining answers from 303 participants of four different countries in the EU (the questionnaire can be studied in <strong>GreenSoul_Questionnaire.pdf</strong>). It is composed by several factors which are explained in different TXT files. All these factors are contained in a "<strong>all_code_final_zenodo.xlsx</strong>" along with their answers by participants. In the following a short descrition of each TXT which explian the dataset is provided.:</p> <p> * <strong>socio-economic_description_not_dependent_of_work</strong><br> - Contains all the information from participants which is irrespective of their current workplace. This file contains typical socio-demographic and cultural attributes from respondents.</p> <p> * <strong>socio-economic_description_dependent_of_work</strong><br> - Contains socio-economic and cultural information from participants which is relevant to the workplace in relation to energy efficient practices in such environment.</p> <p> * <strong>actions-at-work</strong><br> - Are a set of attributes which describe certain practices of employees in relation to energy efficiency.</p> <p> * <strong>persuasive_strategies</strong><br> - Explain the ratings from 1 to 5 that participants attributed to a set of persuasive strategies. These strategies are framed within Phychological Persuasive principles which are also explained in the file.</p> <p> * <strong>all_attributes_together</strong><br> - All the variables together without distinction of the environment where they are applicable.</p> <p>Finally, plots from every construct or attribute are provided in a zip file (<strong>plots_descriptive_analysis_per_city.zip</strong>) which contains the plots uploaded in "PNG" extension</p>
Open and Lite Techno-economic Dataset for Long-term Energy Systems Modelling in the Republic of South Africa
<p>An open-source lite techno-economic dataset for long term energy systems modelling in the Republic of South Africa. Includes data on electricity generation and demand, electricity imports and exports, power transmission and distribution, residual capacity, capacity factor, operational lifetime, and fixed, variable and capital costs of electricity generation technologies. It also contains estimates for renewable potential and fossil fuel reserves in South Africa.</p>
Dataset for "Sustainable Disposal and End-of-Life Treatment of Battery Energy Storage Systems: An Environmental and Economic Case Study"
This study investigates the environmental and economic impacts of end-of-life (EOL) treatment for a 2.8 MWh/2.5 MW battery energy storage system (BESS) based on lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). It focuses on recycling pre-treatment processes for battery systems and recycling procedures for components like cooling systems, fire extinguishing systems, inverters, and the reuse of BESS containers and substations. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was employed to evaluate key environmental impacts, including climate change, eutrophication, and resource use. The study reveals substantial environmental benefits, particularly from recovering secondary materials like aluminium and copper, with recycling pre-treatment contributing significantly to overall benefits. Additionally, the economic analysis projects profits, emphasizing the advantages of locally sourcing critical raw materials. The research highlights the need for more sustainable recycling practices and provides insights for improving environmental and economic strategies in BESS management, offering guidance for future research and policy development in battery waste processing.
Case study result data set for Energy Economics (submitted) article "On Wholesale Electricity Prices and Market Values in a Carbon-Neutral Energy System"
<p>The data set contains wholesale power price time series data for Germany and France focussing on price setting effects in a long term low carbon European energy system context (scenario year 2050) generated with the model SCOPE SD of Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology IEE. The single time series are focussing on the price setting effects of different flexible technologies including both traditional and new market participants due to cross-sectoral integration.</p> <p>Unit: Euro/Megawatthour</p> <p><strong>Abbreviations:</strong></p> <ul> <li>BEV - Battery Electric Vehicles</li> <li>GER - Germany</li> <li>FRA - France</li> <li>OCGT - Open Cycle Gas Turbine</li> <li>PHEV - Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles</li> <li>RES - Renewable energy sources (here: wind and solar power)</li> <li>th. - thermal</li> </ul>
Supplying renewable energy to Central European research facilities: A techno-economic comparison of electricity and hydrogen (Dataset)
<p>This dataset contains central input assumptions and results related to the publication "Supplying renewable energy to Central European research facilities: A techno-economic comparison of electricity and hydrogen".</p> <p>Result files are contained in the <strong> results.zip</strong> archive file. The file contains for each scenario, as indicated by the folder structure, the following files:</p> <ul> <li><strong>results.csv</strong>: Central scenario results exported as <em>character separated value</em> <em>(csv)</em> file, with a semicolon (<strong>;</strong>) as field separator. All fields are quoted using double quotation marks <strong>"..."</strong>. Can be explored using standard office software like Microsoft Excel/Libre Office or other tools.</li> <li><strong>network.nc</strong>: PyPSA network file containing the optimized scenario with all input and unprocessed outputs (results). Can be explored using the <a href="https://pypsa.readthedocs.io">PyPSA software package</a>.</li> <li><strong>lcoes.csv</strong>: Levelised Cost of Electricity used to construct the renewable energy source (RES) based supply curve for each scenario.</li> </ul> <p>The dataset further contains the following files which represent central input assumptions to the model and scenarios, both as <em>CSV</em> files:</p> <ul> <li><strong>efficiencies.csv</strong>: Technology process and conversion efficiencies<em> </em>including more details on the assumptions and information on which references the assumptions are based.</li> <li><strong>costs_2030.csv</strong>: Technology cost assumptions for 2030 including more details on the assumptions and information on which references the assumptions are based. This data is based on this <a href="https://github.com/pypsa/technology-data">Technology Data repository</a> on GitHub.</li> </ul>
(POST) Socio-economic and cultural dataset in relation to Persuasive Strategies to boost Energy Efficiency and in the UK, Spain, Greece and Austria
<p>The dataset has been created from obtaining post-pilot answers from 106 participants of four different countries in the EU (the questionnaire can be studied in <strong>GreenSoul_Validation_Questionnaire-POST.pdf</strong>). It is composed by several factors which are explained in<strong> POST-coding.ods </strong>file. All these factors are contained in: "<strong>POST-results-socio-economic-model.ods</strong>" and "<strong>POST-results-treatments-evaluation.ods</strong>" along with their answers by participants.</p> <p>Finally, we provided a cleaned version of the dataset to study how can a researcher is able to forecast the ranking that a user will give to different persuasion strategies according to user profiles: "<strong>POST-results-ranking-model.ods</strong>"</p>
Socio- and Techno-Economic Dataset for Energy Modelling in Sierra Leone
<p>This repositary contains a Reference Energy Syatem (RES) and dataset containing the raw data used in the Sierra Leone energy models created by CCG and the Ministry of Energy in Sierra Leone including scenario-specific constraints used in the modelling. The models used were MAED and OSeMOSYS. Full information regarding data sources and assumptions used can be found in the corresponding Data in Brief.</p> <p>This work was supported by the Climate Compatible Growth Programme (#CCG) of the UK's Foreign Development and Commonwealth Office (FCDO). The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the UK government's official policies.</p>
The Global and National Energy Systems Techno-Economic (GNESTE) Database: Economic and performance data for hydro power in current and future electricity systems
<p><span><span>Here, we </span><span>present a</span><span> database </span><span>which collates </span><span>historical, </span><span>current</span><span>,</span><span> and future </span><span>cost and performance</span><span> data</span> <span>and </span><span>assumption</span><span>s</span> <span>for </span></span><span><span>hydroelectric</span> <span>generation</span></span><span> <span>from</span><span> the open literature. </span></span><span><span>Hydroelectric power is the largest source of renewable energy, supplying 15% of global electricity.</span></span><span> <span>The data are </span><span>global in scope but with </span><span>regional and national</span> <span>specificity</span><span>, </span><span>cover</span><span>s</span><span> the years 2015 t</span><span>hrough </span><span>to 2050, </span><span>and </span><span>span</span> </span><span><span>1011</span></span><span><span> datapoints from </span></span><span><span>11</span></span><span><span> sources</span><span>.</span> </span></p> <p><span><span>The database </span><span>enables modellers to select and justify</span> <span>model input data and </span><span>provides </span><span>a </span><span>benchmark for comparing assumptions and projections to </span><span>other source</span><span>s</span><span> across the literature</span> <span>to </span><span>validate</span><span> model inputs and outputs</span><span>.</span><span> It is designed to be easily updated with </span><span>new sources of</span><span> data, ensuring its utility</span><span>, comprehensiveness,</span><span> and broad applicability over time.</span></span><span> </span> Technoeconomic data on utility-scale hydroelectric power was collected from websites, reports, academic articles and databases of national and international organisations.</p>
The Global and National Energy Systems Techno-Economic (GNESTE) Database: Economic and performance data for battery storage in current and future electricity systems
<p><span><span>Here, we </span><span>present a</span><span> database </span><span>which collates </span><span>historical, </span><span>current</span><span>,</span><span> and future </span><span>cost and performance</span><span> data</span> <span>and </span><span>assumption</span><span>s</span> <span>for </span></span><span><span>battery energy storag</span><span>e </span><span>systems</span></span><span> <span>from</span><span> the open literature. </span></span><span><span>Battery energy storage is the fastest growing form of power system </span><span>flexibility, and</span><span> will be critical to integrating large shares of variable renewable energy.</span></span><span> <span>The data are </span><span>global in scope but with </span><span>regional and national</span> <span>specificity</span><span>, </span><span>cover</span><span>s</span><span> the years 2015 t</span><span>hrough </span><span>to 2050, </span><span>and </span><span>span</span> </span><span><span>671</span></span><span><span> datapoints from </span></span><span><span>18</span></span><span><span> sources</span><span>.</span> </span></p> <p><span><span>The database </span><span>enables modellers to select and justify</span> <span>model input data and </span><span>provides </span><span>a </span><span>benchmark for comparing assumptions and projections to </span><span>other source</span><span>s</span><span> across the </span><span>literature</span> <span>to </span><span>validate</span><span> model inputs and outputs</span><span>.</span> <span>It is designed to be easily updated with </span><span>new sources of</span><span> data, ensuring its utility</span><span>, comprehensiveness,</span><span> and broad applicability over time.</span></span><span> </span>Technoeconomic data on utility-scale batteries was collected from websites, reports, academic articles and databases of national and international organisations.</p>
The Global and National Energy Systems Techno-Economic (GNESTE) Database: Economic and performance data for wind power in current and future electricity systems
<p><span><span>Here, we </span><span>present a</span><span> database </span><span>which collates </span><span>historical, </span><span>current</span><span>,</span><span> and future </span><span>cost and performance</span><span> data</span> <span>and </span><span>assumption</span><span>s</span> <span>for </span></span><span><span>wind</span><span> power </span><span>generation</span></span><span> <span>from</span><span> the open literature. </span></span><span><span>Wind energy supplies 7% of global electricity, and production has grown three-fold in the decade to 2022.</span></span><span> <span>The data are </span><span>global in scope but with </span><span>regional and national</span> <span>specificity</span><span>, </span><span>cover</span><span>s</span><span> the years 2015 t</span><span>hrough </span><span>to 2050, </span><span>and </span><span>span</span> </span><span><span>1506</span></span><span><span> datapoints from </span></span><span><span>28</span></span><span><span> sources</span><span>.</span> </span></p> <p><span><span>The database </span><span>enables modellers to select and justify</span> <span>model input data and </span><span>provides </span><span>a </span><span>benchmark for comparing assumptions and projections to </span><span>other source</span><span>s</span><span> across the literature</span> <span>to </span><span>validate</span><span> model inputs and outputs</span><span>.</span><span> It is designed to be easily updated with </span><span>new sources of</span><span> data, ensuring its utility</span><span>, comprehensiveness,</span><span> and broad applicability over time.</span></span><span> </span>Technoeconomic data on utility-scale wind energy was collected from websites, reports, academic articles and databases of national and international organisations.</p>
The Global and National Energy Systems Techno-Economic (GNESTE) Database: Economic and performance data for gas power in current and future electricity systems
<p><span><span>Here, we </span><span>present a</span><span> database </span><span>which collates </span><span>historical, </span><span>current</span><span>,</span><span> and future </span><span>cost and performance</span><span> data</span> <span>and </span><span>assumption</span><span>s</span> <span>for </span></span><span><span>gas</span><span>-fired power </span><span>generation</span></span><span> <span>from</span><span> the open literature. </span></span><span><span>Natural gas supplies 23% of global </span><span>electricity, but</span><span> must be rapidly phased down to meet global decarbonisation </span><span>objectives</span></span><span><span>.</span> <span>The data are </span><span>global in scope but with </span><span>regional and national</span> <span>specificity</span><span>, </span><span>cover</span><span>s</span><span> the years 2015 t</span><span>hrough </span><span>to 2050, </span><span>and </span><span>span</span> </span><span><span>620</span></span><span><span> datapoints from </span></span><span><span>14</span></span><span><span> sources</span><span>.</span></span></p> <p> </p> <p><span><span>The database </span><span>enables modellers to select and justify</span> <span>model input data and </span><span>provides </span><span>a </span><span>benchmark for comparing assumptions and projections to </span><span>other source</span><span>s</span><span> across the literature</span> <span>to </span><span>validate</span><span> model inputs and outputs</span><span>.</span><span> It is designed to be easily updated with </span><span>new sources of</span><span> data, ensuring its utility</span><span>, comprehensiveness,</span><span> and broad applicability over time.</span></span>Technoeconomic data on new-build gas-fired power generation was collected from websites, reports, academic articles and databases of national and international organisations.</p>
The Global and National Energy Systems Techno-Economic (GNESTE) Database: Economic and performance data for coal power in current and future electricity systems
<p><span><span>Here, we </span><span>present a</span><span> database </span><span>which collates </span><span>historical, </span><span>current</span><span>,</span><span> and future </span><span>cost and performance</span><span> data</span> <span>and </span><span>assumption</span><span>s</span> <span>for </span><span>coal-fired power </span><span>generation</span> <span>from</span><span> the open literature. </span><span>Coal supplies 35% of global </span><span>electricity, but</span><span> must be rapidly phased down to meet global decarbonisation </span><span>objectives</span><span>.</span> <span>The data are </span><span>global in scope but with </span><span>regional and national</span> <span>specificity</span><span>, </span><span>cover</span><span>s</span><span> the years 2015 t</span><span>hrough </span><span>to 2050, </span><span>and </span><span>span</span> <span>345</span><span> datapoints from </span><span>12</span><span> sources</span><span>.</span> <span>The database </span><span>enables modellers to select and justify</span> <span>model input data and </span><span>provides </span><span>a </span><span>benchmark for comparing assumptions and projections to </span><span>other source</span><span>s</span><span> across the literature</span> <span>to </span><span>validate</span><span> model inputs and outputs</span><span>.</span><span> It is designed to be easily updated with </span><span>new sources of</span><span> data, ensuring its utility</span><span>, comprehensiveness,</span><span> and broad applicability over time.</span></span> Technoeconomic data on new-build coal-fired power generation was collected from websites, reports, academic articles and databases of national and international organisations.</p>
The Global and National Energy Systems Techno-Economic (GNESTE) Database: Economic and performance data for solar power in current and future electricity systems
<p><span><span>Here, we </span><span>present a</span><span> database </span><span>which collates </span><span>historical, </span><span>current</span><span>,</span><span> and future </span><span>cost and performance</span><span> data</span> <span>and </span><span>assumption</span><span>s</span> <span>for </span></span><span><span>solar</span><span> power </span><span>generation</span></span><span> <span>from</span><span> the open literature. </span></span><span><span>Solar energy supplies 5% of global electricity, and production has grown ten-fold in the decade to 2022</span><span>.</span></span><span> <span>The data are </span><span>global in scope but with </span><span>regional and national</span> <span>specificity</span><span>, </span><span>cover</span><span>s</span><span> the years 2015 t</span><span>hrough </span><span>to 2050, </span><span>and </span><span>span</span> </span><span><span>753</span></span><span><span> datapoints from </span></span><span><span>31</span></span><span><span> sources</span><span>.</span> </span></p> <p><span><span>The database </span><span>enables modellers to select and justify</span> <span>model input data and </span><span>provides </span><span>a </span><span>benchmark for comparing assumptions and projections to </span><span>other source</span><span>s</span><span> across the literature</span> <span>to </span><span>validate</span><span> model inputs and outputs</span><span>.</span><span> It is </span><span>designed to be easily updated with </span><span>new sources of</span><span> data, ensuring its utility</span><span>, comprehensiveness,</span><span> and broad applicability over time.</span></span><span> </span>Technoeconomic data on utility-scale solar PV was collected from websites, reports, academic articles and databases of national and international organisations.</p>
CROSSBOW HLU2-UC6-TC1 Economical benefit of mFRR market participation with 5% of energy saved for upward regulation
<p>The energy market participation algorithm of RES-CC allows for participating in DA/ID markets and balancing markets. The process uses the energy generation forecasting of the plants to generate the energy bids for the DA/ID market. With regards to the mFRR market, the whole amount of curtailable energy is offered for downward regulation. Additionally, the process is configurable so that it can save a given amount of the potential generation, do not offering this energy in the DA/ID market but offering it for upward regulation in the mFRR. This upward regulation can only be done with Renewables by means of not selling part of the forecasted energy. This is a risk, as the upward regulation energy might not be requested by the operator, and thus the profit for the generation will be lost.</p> <p>This dataset contains the results of the market participation algorithm running for a week, configured for offering 5% of the forecasted energy for upward regulation.</p> <p>Dataset contains the results for the CROSSBOW portfolios of Croatia, Bulgaria, Romania and Greece.</p> <p>For each country, hour by hour, the following information is provided:</p> <ul> <li>Energy sold in IDM</li> <li>Forecasted generation</li> <li>Energy sold mFRR down</li> <li>Energy sold mFRR up</li> <li>Energy price mFRR down</li> <li>Energy price mFRR up</li> <li>Energy price in IDM</li> <li>Energy looses (saved and not sold in mFRR up)</li> </ul>
CROSSBOW HLU2-UC6-TC1 Economical benefit of mFRR market participation with 20% of energy saved for upward regulation
<p>The energy market participation algorithm of RES-CC allows for participating in DA/ID markets and balancing markets. The process uses the energy generation forecasting of the plants to generate the energy bids for the DA/ID market. With regards to the mFRR market, the whole amount of curtailable energy is offered for downward regulation. Additionally, the process is configurable so that it can save a given amount of the potential generation, do not offering this energy in the DA/ID market but offering it for upward regulation in the mFRR. This upward regulation can only be done with Renewables by means of not selling part of the forecasted energy. This is a risk, as the upward regulation energy might not be requested by the operator, and thus the profit for the generation will be lost.</p> <p>This dataset contains the results of the market participation algorithm running for a week, configured for offering 20% of the forecasted energy for upward regulation.</p> <p>Dataset contains the results for the CROSSBOW portfolios of Croatia, Bulgaria, Romania and Greece.</p> <p>For each country, hour by hour, the following information is provided:</p> <ul> <li>Energy sold in IDM</li> <li>Forecasted generation</li> <li>Energy sold mFRR down</li> <li>Energy sold mFRR up</li> <li>Energy price mFRR down</li> <li>Energy price mFRR up</li> <li>Energy price in IDM</li> <li>Energy looses (saved and not sold in mFRR up)</li> </ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.