Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
228
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
228 results for “forecast modeling”
Datasets from study: "Land surface observations boost temperature forecast skill: experiments using Long Short-Term Memory surrogate for physics-based models to assess potential predictability"
<p>This repository contains the datasets needed to reproduce the figures from manuscript: Land surface observations boost temperature forecast skill: experiments using Long Short-Term Memory surrogate for physics-based models to assess potential predictability.</p> <p>In this study, we examine the potential of land surface temperature and vegetation data, which are not routinely assimilated in NWP models, for enhancing temperature forecast skill. We build surrogate models for NWP using Long Short-Term Memory.</p>
Modified WRF/Chem source code, output data, and post-processing scripts for the GMD manuscript "Evaluation of WRF/Chem model (v3.9.1.1) real-time air quality forecasts over the Eastern Mediterranean"
<p>Here you will find the modified WRF/Chem code used in the simulations, the scripts used for post-processing and the model output data used in the manuscript. </p> <p>Two modifications have been made in module_aerosols_soa_vbs.F:</p> <ol> <li>ch_dust is set to1.0D-9*0.36</li> <li>The model is set not to initialize during restarts</li> </ol> <p>The model data directory includes:</p> <ol> <li>Two csv files (Winter and Summer) with the hourly concentrations of atmospheric pollutants at the locations of the ground stations. These data were used to produce Figures 4-8 in the manuscript as well as all the metrics.</li> <li>Two netcdf files (Winter and Summer) with the average ground concentrations of atmospheric pollutants over Cyprus. These data were use to produce Figure 3 in the manuscript. </li> </ol>
WRF Forecast Data used for Verification of multi-resolution model forecasts of heavy rainfall events of 23rd-26th August 2017 over Nigeria
<p>A deterministic Weather Research and Forecasting model version 4.2 forecast of heavy convective rainfall associated with the passage of the African Easterly Wave (AEW) within the period 23<sup>rd</sup>-26<sup>th</sup> August 2017 over Nigeria. The model was setup to perform two nested domain simulations with 18 (parent domain), 6 and 2 km (hereafter WRF18, WRF6 and WRF2) horizontal resolutions. The outer domain covers West Africa and the innermost domain, which runs at convection-permitting scale, focuses on Nigeria. When interpreting the results, it is worthy of note that the data has been regridded to 18 km, which is 3 x the grid scale for WRF6 and 9 x the grid scale for WRF2. This means that there is a fair degree of smoothing that has been applied using a bilinear regridding process to get the models onto a level playing field. Only WRF18 retains its native grid and has not benefited from any additional smoothing.</p> <p>The WRF model setup is similar to the study of Gbode et al. (2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2538-x) in terms of the model physics combination used in the model simulations. The parameterization schemes used are the Goddard (GD) WRF model microphysics (MP), the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ) planetary boundary layer (PBL) and the Bett-Miller-Janjic (BMJ) cumulus convection (CU) parameterization schemes. This combination was found to reproduce realistic rainfall and temperature relative to gridded observations over West Africa. The GD is a six-class microphysics with graupel and modifications for ice/water saturation. MYJ is a local closure scheme that predicts turbulent kinetic energy and the BMJ CU is a profile adjustment scheme that relaxes both deep and shallow profiles toward a reference profile without explicit updraft, downdraft, or cloud entrainment. However, the CU scheme was turned off in the 2 km domain to explicitly represent convection.</p>
Impact of urban and shipping emissions on NASA-Unified Weather Research and Forecasting model results
<p>This dataset supports Huang et al. (2019, JGR-Atmospheres): "Impact of aerosols from urban and shipping emission sources on terrestrial carbon uptake and evapotranspiration: a case study in East Asia". The file named "NUWRFout.tar.gz" contains NUWRF base and sensitivity simulation results on 31 May 2016. The file named "LIS_soil_LAI.zip" contains model grid information, soil conditions and leaf area index (LAI) at NUWRF initialization times in late May 2016.</p>
Evaluating demand forecasting models using multi-criteria decision-making approach
<p>The datasets added include the raw data, ANP weights calculations and TOPSIS ranking calculations for the demonstration case in the article titled: Evaluating demand forecasting models using multi-criteria decision-making approach.</p> <p>The files include a data explanation text file.</p>
Dataset: Approximating input data to a snowmelt model using Weather Research and Forecasting model outputs in lieu of meteorological measurements
<p>The dataset presented is the companion data to the Journal of Hydrometeorology publication entitled “Approximating input data to a snowmelt model using Weather Research and Forecasting model outputs in lieu of meteorological measurements.” The data that follows contains everything needed to reproduce the spatial inputs for the meteorological station model run using the Spatial Modeling for Resources Framework (SMRF, Havens et al., 2017).</p> <p> </p> <p>Software versions used:</p> <ul> <li>Image Processing Workbench v2.2.0 (Marks et al., 2017)</li> <li>Spatial Modeling for Resources Framework v0.5.3 (Havens et al., 2019)</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>NOTE:</strong> Reproducing the spatial inputs will generate 10 netCDF files at ~80GB per file.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>topo.nc</strong> – Contains multiple static layers that are required to run SMRF and iSnobal. The netCDF layers are:</p> <ul> <li>dem – digital elevation model at 100 meter resolution, aggregated from the 10 meter National Elevation Dataset (Archuleta et al., 2017)</li> <li>mask – basin mask for the Boise River Basin</li> <li>veg_height – vegetation height in meters from the National Land Cover Database (Homer et al., 2015)</li> <li>veg_type – vegetation type from the National Land Cover Database</li> <li>veg_tau – vegetation fractional transmissivity derived from the vegetation type</li> <li>veg_k – vegetation emissivity derived from the vegetation type</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>maxus.nc</strong> – maximum upwind slope netCDF that contains 72 images for all wind directions in 5 degree increments using the algorithm described in Winstral and Marks (2002)</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Station data:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Contains hourly meteorological station data downloaded from Mesowest (Horel et al., 2002). Data was cleaned and filtered prior to running SMRF.</li> <li>metadata.csv – metadata for 40 stations</li> <li>air_temp.csv – 38 stations</li> <li>cloud_factor.csv – 7 stations</li> <li>precip.csv – 21 stations</li> <li>vapor_pressure.csv – 19 stations</li> <li>wind_direction.csv – 14 stations</li> <li>wind_speed.csv – 14 stations</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>smrf_config.ini</strong> – Configuration file needed to reproduce the spatial inputs using SMRF. The paths will need to be changed to reflect the data location.</p>
Mainshock+aftershock forecasts from Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) experiment
<p>Contains mainshock+aftershock forecasts produced by various members of the working group for the development of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models. These forecasts were obtained from the Collaboratory of the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) testing center hosted by the Southern California Earthquake Center at the University of Southern California.</p> <p>Forecasts are described by the following publications</p> <ol> <li>Helmstetter et al. (2007) with aftershocks</li> <li>Kagan et al. (2007)</li> <li>Shen et al. (2007)</li> <li>Bird & Liu (2007)</li> <li>Ebel et al. (2007) with aftershocks</li> </ol> <p>Forecasts are stored in tab separated value files with the following fields (the first row of data is shown as an example):</p> <pre>LON_0 LON_1 LAT_0 LAT_1 DEPTH_0 DEPTH_1 MAG_0 MAG_1 RATE FLAG -125.4 -125.3 40.1 40.2 0.0 30.0 4.95 5.05 5.8499099999999998e-04 1 </pre> <p>References</p> <p>Bird, P., and Z. Liu (2007). Seismic Hazard Inferred from Tectonics: California, Seismological Research Letters 78 37-48.</p> <p>Ebel, J. E., D. W. Chambers, A. L. Kafka, and J. A. Baglivo (2007). Non-Poissonian Earthquake Clustering and the Hidden Markov Model as Bases for Earthquake Forecasting in California, Seismological Research Letters 78 57-65.</p> <p>Helmstetter, A., Y. Y. Kagan, and D. D. Jackson (2007). High-resolution Time-independent Grid-based Forecast for M >= 5 Earthquakes in California, Seismological Research Letters 78 78-86.</p> <p>Kagan, Y. Y., D. D. Jackson, and Y. Rong (2007). A Testable Five-Year Forecast of Moderate and Large Earthquakes in Southern California Based on Smoothed Seismicity, Seismological Research Letters 78 94-98.</p> <p>Shen, Z.-K., D. D. Jackson, and Y. Y. Kagan (2007). Implications of Geodetic Strain Rate for Future Earthquakes, with a Five-Year Forecast of M5 Earthquakes in Southern California, Seismological Research Letters 78 116-120</p> <p> </p>
Mainshock+aftershock M4.95+ seismicity forecasts derived from the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) and the multiplicative hybrid earthquake models developed by Rhoades et al. (2014)
<p>Contains six mainshock+aftershock seismicity forecasts developed by the Working Group of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) experiment, sixteen multiplicative hybrid forecasts created by Rhoades et al. (2014), and the 2011-2020 M4.95+ ANSS earthquake catalog for California. Six additional forecast files are included to properly conduct the comparative tests implemented in the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) testing centre.</p> <p>Forecasts are stored in tab separated value files with the following fields (the first row of data is shown as an example):</p> <pre>LON_0 LON_1 LAT_0 LAT_1 DEPTH_0 DEPTH_1 MAG_0 MAG_1 RATE FLAG -125.4 -125.3 40.1 40.2 0.0 30.0 4.95 5.05 5.8499099999999998e-04 1 </pre> <p>Forecast are described in detail by the following publications:</p> <p>Bird, P., and Z. Liu (2007). Seismic Hazard Inferred from Tectonics: California. Seismological Research Letters, 78(1):37-48.</p> <p>Ebel, J. E., D. W. Chambers, A. L. Kafka, and J. A. Baglivo (2007). Non-Poissonian Earthquake Clustering and the Hidden Markov Model as Bases for Earthquake Forecasting in California. Seismological Research Letters, 78(1): 57-65.</p> <p>Helmstetter, A., Y. Y. Kagan, and D. D. Jackson (2007). High-resolution Time-independent Grid-based Forecast for M >= 5 Earthquakes in California. Seismological Research Letters, 78(1): 78-86.</p> <p>Holliday, J., Chen, C., Tiampo, K., Rundle, J., Turcotte, D., and Donnellan, A. (2007). A RELM earthquake forecast based on pattern informatics. Seismological Research Letters, 78(1):87–93.</p> <p>Kagan, Y. Y., D. D. Jackson, and Y. Rong (2007). A Testable Five-Year Forecast of Moderate and Large Earthquakes in Southern California Based on Smoothed Seismicity. Seismological Research Letters, 78(1): 94-98.</p> <p>Rhoades, D.A., Gerstenberger, M.C., Christophersen, A., Zechar, J.D., Schorlemmer, D., Werner, M.J. and Jordan, T.H., 2014. Regional earthquake likelihood models II: Information gains of multiplicative hybrids. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(6):3072-3083.</p> <p>Shen, Z.-K., D. D. Jackson, and Y. Y. Kagan (2007). Implications of Geodetic Strain Rate for Future Earthquakes, with a Five-Year Forecast of M5 Earthquakes in Southern California. Seismological Research Letters, 78(1):116-120.</p> <p>Ward, S. (2007). Methods for evaluating earthquake potential and likelihood in and around California. Seismological Research Letters, 78(1):121–133.</p> <p>Wiemer, S. and Schorlemmer, D. (2007). ALM: An asperity-based likelihood model for California. Seismological Research Letters, 78(1):134–140.</p>
Input and output data for Experiment B2 (Deliverable 3.3 - Data assimilation in process-based models for algae bloom forecasting - Section 2)
<p>The dataset contains:</p> <p>i. the meteorological forcing, hydrological boundary condition and chlorophyll-a files used as an input</p> <p>ii. the model output and skill produced</p> <p>for Experiment B2 (Deliverable 3.3 - Data assimilation in process-based models for algae bloom forecasting - Section 2)</p>
Input and output data for Experiment B2 (Deliverable 3.3 - Data assimilation in process-based models for algae bloom forecasting - Section 1)
<p>The dataset contains:</p> <p>i. the meteorological forcing, hydrological boundary condition and chlorophyll-a files used as an input</p> <p>ii. the model output and skill produced</p> <p>for Experiment B2 (Deliverable 3.3 - Data assimilation in process-based models for algae bloom forecasting - Section 1)</p>
Input and output data for Experiment B2 (Deliverable 3.3 - Data assimilation in process-based models for algae bloom forecasting - Section 3)
<p>The dataset contains:</p> <p>i. the meteorological forcing, hydrological boundary condition and chlorophyll-a files used as an input</p> <p>ii. the model output and skill produced</p> <p>for Experiment B2 (Deliverable 3.3 - Data assimilation in process-based models for algae bloom forecasting - Section 3)</p>
AI4ER MRes Models & Forecasts
<p>A collection of model checkpoints and forecasts generated for the MRes thesis "Towards sharp sea ice concentration forecasts in the Arctic" by Andrew McDonald. See 4_forecast.ipynb and 5_evaluate.ipynb in the notebooks folder of the project GitHub repository at https://github.com/ampersandmcd/icenet-gan for a demo of how to make use of these files.</p> <p><strong>Checkpoints</strong></p> <ul> <li>radiant-sponge-59-great-unet-epoch=11-step=456 contains the PyTorch model checkpoint of our best performing UNet model</li> <li>stilted-armadillo-99-great-gan-epoch=7-step=3024.ckpt contains the PyTorch model checkpoint of our best performing GAN model</li> </ul> <p><strong>Forecasts</strong></p> <ul> <li>radiant-sponge-59-great-unet.nc contains a forecast generated by our best performing UNet model for the test set beginning February 2018 and ending June 2019</li> <li>stilted-armadillo-99-great-gan.nc contains a forecast generated by our best performing GAN model for the test set beginning February 2018 and ending June 2019</li> </ul> <p>Why is the GAN forecast file so much larger than the UNet forecast file? The GAN forecast file is an ensemble forecast comprising 25 ensemble members, with a mean forecast cached as a 26th member. Hence, it is 26x the size of the deterministic UNet forecast.</p>
Data and code for gmd-2023-113 "Parameter estimation for ocean background vertical diffusivity coefficients in the Community Earth System Model (v1.2.1) and its impact on ENSO forecast"
<p>Data and code for the paper "Parameter estimation for ocean background vertical diffusivity coefficients in the Community Earth System Model (v1.2.1) and its impact on ENSO forecast"</p> <p>includes: </p> <p>The model is Community Earth System Model (v1.2.1) (provided by www.cesm.ucar.edu)</p> <p>Data assimilation code is initially provided by Data Assimilation Research Testbed (DART) (https://dart.ucar.edu/), some modifications are made to enable parameter estimation function of ocean background vertical diffusivity coefficients. And the programs and scripts for deal with OISST and EN4 profiles are also developed.</p> <p>The parameter sensitivity experiment results are saved as <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/6e5b4bfa-61cf-44bc-8e15-e62fab467ea6/sensitive2008-2012.nc">sensitive2008-2012.nc</a> and <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/6e5b4bfa-61cf-44bc-8e15-e62fab467ea6/sensitive2008-2012salt.nc">sensitive2008-2012salt.nc</a> for temperature and salinity, respectively. And the python script to draw the results is </p> <p>The state estimation results are provided as <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/6e5b4bfa-61cf-44bc-8e15-e62fab467ea6/Temp_05-17.nc">Temp_05-17.nc</a> and <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/6e5b4bfa-61cf-44bc-8e15-e62fab467ea6/Temp_05-17.nc">Salt_05-17.nc</a> for temperature and salinity, respectively.</p> <p>The parameter estimation results are provided as <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/6e5b4bfa-61cf-44bc-8e15-e62fab467ea6/PE_Temp_05-17.nc">PE_Temp_05-17.nc</a> and <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/6e5b4bfa-61cf-44bc-8e15-e62fab467ea6/PE_Temp_05-17.nc">PE_Salt_05-17.nc</a> for temperature and salinity, respectively.</p> <p>the estimated paremeter ensemble is saved in <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/6e5b4bfa-61cf-44bc-8e15-e62fab467ea6/parameters.nc">parameters.nc</a></p> <p>the python script for comparing the SE and PE results is <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/6e5b4bfa-61cf-44bc-8e15-e62fab467ea6/plot_analysis.py">plot_analysis.py</a></p> <p>the nino3.4 indices computed by the forecast experiment is saved in <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/6e5b4bfa-61cf-44bc-8e15-e62fab467ea6/fcst_correlation.nc">fcst_correlation.nc</a></p> <p> </p>
GNSS tomography data for assimilation into the Weather Research and Forecasting model
<p>The data set contains GNSS troposphere tomography estimations of 3D wet refractivity fields for a part of Central Europe (mostly Germany and Czech Republic), for the period of 29 May–14 June 2013 when heavy-precipitation events were observed. The refractivity fields were estimated using two different GNSS tomography models: ATom software package (https://github.com/GregorMoeller/ATom) developed at TU Wien, and the TOMO2 model (Rohm and Bosy, 2011; Rohm et al., 2014; Trzcina and Rohm, 2019) developed at the Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences. Further description of the GNSS tomography processing can be found in the paper by Hanna et al. (2019).</p>
Non-Poissonian Forecast and Hazard source files - New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model 2022
<h3>This repository contains:</h3><ul><li>The forecast's files for the Distributed Seismicity Model of the NZNSHM2022, as well as figures, and the Paraview files to explore them in the software interactively. (https://www.paraview.org/)</li><li>The Openquake source files (https://github.com/gem/oq-engine) to run the NZ-NSHM2022 model using the non-Poisson forecasts as single branches.</li></ul><h3>Installation instructions</h3><p>For reproducibility, this package should install OpenQuake (https://github.com/gem/oq-engine) in its version v3.16.4. However, Openquake should remain backward compatible for the Negative Binomial formulation in the future. To install the version 3.16.4, a virtual environment can be created used Anaconda/Miniconda/Micromamba (the latter is recommended, see installation instructions https://mamba.readthedocs.io/en/latest/installation.html) by using:</p><blockquote><p><i>conda env create -f environment.yml</i></p></blockquote><p>This environment should already contain the Openquake version. If the Openquake software should be installed manually into an environment created by the user:</p><blockquote><p><i>source activate {user_env}</i></p><p><i>git clone https://github.com/gem/oq-engine --depth=1 --branch=v3.16.4</i></p><p><i>cd oq-engine</i></p><p>pip install -e .</p></blockquote><p>For additional information, please see the README.md file, or visit <a href="https://github.com/pabloitu/nz_nshm2022_nonpoisson">https://github.com/pabloitu/nz_nshm2022_nonpoisson</a></p>
Supplementary Material for 'Benchmarking Explanatory Models for Inertia Forecasting using Public Data of the Nordic Area'
<p>This data set is supplementary material for the paper 'Benchmarking Explanatory Models for Inertia Forecasting using Public Data of the Nordic Area' by Jemima Sophie Graham, Evelyn Heylen, and Fei Teng.</p> <p>This data set is intended for day-ahead inertia forecasting in the Nordic (Eastern Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden). It contains hourly data for the inertial energy (MVAs), day-ahead national demand forecast (MW), day-ahead wind power forecast (MW), day-ahead solar power forecast (MW), and interconnection flow (MW) in the Nordic between January 2016 and August 2020. </p>
Quadtree aggregations of WHEEL forecast model
<p>World Hybrid Earthquake Estimates based on Likelihood scores (WHEEL) is a model obtained from a multiplicative log-linear combination of TEAM with the Smoothed Seismicity (KJSS) model of Kagan and Jackson (2011).</p> <p>The forecast model is proposed and described in the following publication:</p> <p>Bayona, J.A., Savran, W., Strader, A., Hainzl, S., Cotton, F. and Schorlemmer, D., 2021. Two global ensemble seismicity models obtained from the combination of interseismic strain measurements and earthquake-catalogue information. <em>Geophysical Journal International</em>, <em>224</em>(3), pp.1945-1955.</p> <p>Multi-resolution grids are generated using Quadtree. The grids are generated based on earthquake catalog data and strain data points. Each file in the repository represents a forecast aggregated on a particular grid. The forecast files are naming is derived from the criteria used to generate the grid. For example, 'N' stands for number earthquakes, 'SN' stands for Strain data points, and 'L' stands for maximum zoom-level allowed for the grid. </p> <p>The forecast is represented in the following format:</p> <table align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td>Tile</td> <td>depth_min</td> <td>depth_max</td> <td>5.95</td> <td>6.05</td> <td>6.15</td> <td>6.25</td> <td> ... </td> </tr> <tr> <td>'000'</td> <td>0.0</td> <td>70.0</td> <td>0.00715</td> <td>0.00693</td> <td>0.00628</td> <td>0.00573</td> <td> ...</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
Data used for the article "Hybrid intrahour DNI forecast model based on DNI measurements and sky-imaging data"
<p>Data used to obtain the results presented in the article "Hybrid intrahour DNI forecast model based on DNI measurements and sky-imaging data".</p> <ul> <li>CNRS_PROMES_DNI_2020-09-03_2021-01-11.zip : contains DNI measurements taken at PROMES-CNRS laboratory in Odeillo.</li> <li>The other zipped files contain image data taken at PROMES-CNRS laboratory in Odeillo. Each zipped file contains all images for one day (the date is given in the file name).</li> </ul> <p>Images and GHI measures from the following days have been used for training and cross-validation:</p> <ol> <li>2020-09-11</li> <li>2020-09-12</li> <li>2020-09-16</li> <li>2020-09-19</li> <li>2020-09-20</li> <li>2020-09-21</li> <li>2020-09-22</li> <li>2020-09-23</li> <li>2020-09-24</li> <li>2020-09-29</li> <li>2020-10-01</li> </ol> <p>Images and GHI measures from the following days have been used for test:</p> <ol> <li>2020-10-04</li> <li>2020-10-05</li> <li>2020-10-08</li> <li>2020-11-05</li> <li>2020-11-15</li> </ol>
Lightning Assimilation in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model: Technique Updates and Assessment of the Applications from Regional to Hemispheric Scales
<p>Figure 1. The data is proprietary, but it can be purchased from Vaisala Inc. (https:// <a href="http://www.vaisala.com/en/products/systems/lightning-detection">www.vaisala.com/en/products/systems/lightning-detection</a>), and the WWLLN raw data are also available for purchase at <a href="http://wwlln.net">http://wwlln.net</a>.</p> <p>Figure 2. Maps, data is not applicable.</p> <p>Figure 3. Data file: NLDN_WWLLN_Prism_Rainfall_Analysis.xlsx</p> <p>Figure 4. Data file: NLDN_WWLLN_METVARS_T2_Jul_2016.xlsx</p> <p>Figure 5. Data file: CONUSall_METOBS_q_Jul_2016.xlsx</p> <p>Figure 6. Data file: CONUSall_METOBS_ws_Jul_2016.xlsx</p> <p>Figure 7. Created using the R script: Hemi_Rain_ModelOnlyWGPM.R based on the R object files: AnnualRainFall_CFC_WRF_Hemi_BASE_*.rds, AnnualRainFall_CFC_WRF_Hemi_LTA_*.rds, and GPM_WRF_Paired_rain2Hemispheric_July2016.rds.</p> <p>Figure 8. Created using the R script: Hemi_Rain_Aanlysis.R based on the R object files: AnnualRainFall_CFC_WRF_Hemi_BASE_*.rds and AnnualRainFall_CFC_WRF_Hemi_LTA_*.rds.</p> <p>Figure 9. Data file: CPC_Model_Monthly_Prep_Hemi_Stats.xlsx</p> <p>Figure 10. Data file: CPC_Model_Monthly_Prep_Hemi_Stats.xlsx</p> <p>Figure 11. Data file: CPC_Model_Monthly_Prep_Hemi_Stats.xlsx</p> <p>Figure 12. Created using the R script: CreateCPCdataforUSdomain_vs_Prism.R based on the R oject files: Prism_CFC_WRF*.rds</p> <p>Figure 13. Data file: Hemi_lta_METOBS_T2_Jul_2016.xlsx</p> <p>Figure 14. Data file: Hemi_lta_METOBS_q_Jul_2016.xlsx</p> <p> </p>
Probabilistic forecasts of the daily maximum of the Kp index produced by the SERENADE prototype model and three empirical models for the period 2010-2018
<p>This dataset contains the probabilistic outputs of SERENADE's first prototype model dedicated to the forecasting of the <span class="math-tex">\(\textit{Kp}_{\textrm{max, 24 h}}\)</span> index for forecasting horizons ranging between 2 and 7 days. The period covered is the one of the SDOML dataset, which is 2010-05 --- 2018-12. All data is contained in a single pickle file, that can be opened in Python, using the following code lines:</p> <p><span class="math-tex">\(\texttt{import pickle}\\ \texttt{with open(DATA_PATH+`/serenade_outputs.pkl', `rb') as f:}\\ ~~~~\texttt{dict_outputs = pickle.load(f)}\)</span></p> <p>The pickle file contains a dictionnary, which itself contains Pandas DataFrames. Each DataFrame corresponds to a forecasting horizon. The dictionnary's keys are the forecasting horizons stored as strings, that is:</p> <p><span class="math-tex">\(\texttt{dict_output.keys() = [`2',`3',`4',`5',`6',`7']}\)</span></p> <p>The DataFrames are indexed by datetime. They contain the observed (true) hourly values of the daily maximum of the Kp index, the forecasts provided by SERENADE and three baseline models (Climatology model, Persistence model and 27-day Recurrence model). The forecast values include the mean and the standard deviation of the forecast normal distributions. Missing moments are due to the absence of EUV images needed to provide the forecast at the given moment.</p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.