Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Evidence of Stress Recovery in Free-Living Ciliate Colpoda cucullus: The Repair Capability of Resting Cysts to Damage Caused by Gamma Irradiation

Fig. 1. Excystment assay of Colpoda wet cysts (A) and dry cysts (B). 'Non-irradiated' indicates non-irradiated cysts; 'irradiated' indicates cysts irradiated at 4000 Gy, and 'irradiated-incubated' indicates cysts irradiated at 4000 Gy and incubated for 12 hours before the induction of excystment. Time indicates the number of hours after the induction of excystment. Columns and attached bars correspond to the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements. Asterisks and double asterisks represent significant differences at p <0.05 and p <0.01 (Mann-Whitney U test), respectively.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

Composite of graphene and silver nanoparticles obtained by low-dose gamma irradiation

Content: TEM.zip - TEM images of composites, file type .tif and .dm3 VINCA_FTIR.zip - FTIR data of graphene oxide and exfoliated graphene, file type .csv VINCA_UV-Vis.zip - FTIR data of graphene oxide and exfoliated graphene composites, file type .csv IEMN_VNA_Graphene-AgNP - EMI shielding measurement of graphene oxide and exfoliated graphene composites, file type .xlsx VINCA_CA_graphene-AgNP.jpg - contact angle measurement of graphene oxide and exfoliated graphene composites VINCA_532nmLASER.zip - temperature elevation measurements of graphene oxide and exfoliated graphene composites, file type .csv FTPO_TGA_Graphene-AgNP.zip - TGA data of graphene oxide and exfoliated graphene composites, file type .txt

Fig. 2 in Gamma Radiation Tolerance and Protein Carbonylation Caused by Irradiation of Resting Cysts in the Free-living Ciliated Protist Colpoda cucullus

Fig. 2. Analysis of proteins (Left panel) and protein carbonylation by ECL (Right panel) from non-irradiated and 4000 Gy irradiated cells. The samples in the lanes were from non-irradiated cells (NonIR), 4000 Gy irradiated cells (IR), and cells incubated for 12 h after 4000 Gy irradiation (IR incubated). The protein bands and ECL signals were measured and are shown in parentheses for each lane relative to the Non-IR sample.

Fig. 4 in Gamma Radiation Tolerance and Protein Carbonylation Caused by Irradiation of Resting Cysts in the Free-living Ciliated Protist Colpoda cucullus

Fig. 4. Relative viability of Colpoda vegetative cells, wet cysts, and dry cysts after gamma radiation doses of 0 (non-irradiated), 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 Gy. The column heights and attached bars are the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements at each dose. Double asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.01 (Mann-Whitney U test).

Fig. 3 in Gamma Radiation Tolerance and Protein Carbonylation Caused by Irradiation of Resting Cysts in the Free-living Ciliated Protist Colpoda cucullus

Fig. 3. Excystment of Colpoda dry cysts, after gamma irradiation at 0 (non-irradiated), 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 Gy, as a function of time after induction of excystment. The points and bars mark the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements at each dose. The excystment mean ± SE at 3, 6, 24, and 96 h after the induction of excystment is shown in (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. The column heights and attached bars in (a) to (d) are the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements at each dose. Asterisks and double asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 and p <0.01, respectively (Mann-Whitney U test).

Fig. 1 in Gamma Radiation Tolerance and Protein Carbonylation Caused by Irradiation of Resting Cysts in the Free-living Ciliated Protist Colpoda cucullus

Fig. 1. Excystment of Colpoda wet cysts, after gamma irradiation at 0 (non-irradiated), 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 Gy, as a function of time after the induction of excystment. The points and bars mark the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements at each dose. The excystment mean ± SE at 3, 6, 9, and 36 h after induction of excystment is shown in (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. The column heights and attached bars in (a) to (d) are the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements. Asterisks and double asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 and p <0.01, respectively (Mann-Whitney U test).

Fig. 2 in Flight ability and dispersal of European grapevine moth gamma-irradiated males (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the vineyard and the pheromone traps positions at the experimental plot where the marked male moths were released.

Fig 1 in Flight ability and dispersal of European grapevine moth gamma-irradiated males (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig 1. Schematic representation of the flight assessment cage used to measure the flight responses of Lobesia botrana males to calling females. In the female compartment, 2-day-old virgin females were confined inside a small cylindrical plastic mesh box with a 5% sucrose-wetted wick. Males irradiated either with 150 Gy or with 350 Gy and untreated males differentially marked with variously colored fluorescent powders were introduced into the male compartment. The number of males of each of the 3 kinds that flew through the open slit at the 45 cm height [the 2 lower openings (slits) were sealed] into the female compartment were recorded at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Air was drawn into the female compartment and exhausted from the male compartment.

Fig. 2 in Development, reproduction and sexual competitiveness of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) gamma-irradiated as pupae and adults

Fig. 2. Mean (± SE) mortality of eggs oviposited by Conopomorpha sinensis females involved in 3 different crosses. The upper curve shows the percentage hatch of eggs from the cross, UF × TM in which males were γ-irradiated as mature pupae with doses ranging egg from 50 and 300 Gy. The middle curve shows the corresponding results from the cross, TF × UM, however females irradiated with 200–300 Gy did not oviposit any eggs. The lower curve shows the corresponding results when both parents were irradiated.

Fig. 1 in Development, reproduction and sexual competitiveness of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) gamma-irradiated as pupae and adults

Fig. 1. Fecundity of P generation Conopomorpha sinensis adults that emerged from pupae irradiated at various γ-radiation doses ranging from 50 to 300 Gy. UF = non-irradiated females, TF = treated females, UM = non-irradiated males, TM = treated males. Different letters above bars indicate statistically significant differences within each combination (DMRT, P = 0.05).

Fig. 2 in Influence of gamma-irradiation on flight ability and dispersal of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 2. Numbers of adult Conopomorpha sinensis males recaptured in traps deployed at various distances (m) from the release point in 2 release/recapture experiments in a litchi orchard of the South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. The males were either non-irradiated or irradiated either with 150 or 200 Gy. A: First release, B: Second release.

Fig. 1 in Influence of gamma-irradiation on flight ability and dispersal of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 1. Survival (days) of non-irradiated Conopomorpha sinensis males either dyed with 1 of 3 different fluorescent colors or undyed (control) in the laboratory. Each treatment involved 30 males.

Fig. 3 in Influence of gamma-irradiation on flight ability and dispersal of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 3. Frequency distributions of the dispersal directions of adult Conopomorpha sinensis males in 2 release/recapture experiments in a litchi orchard of the South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. The males were either non-irradiated or irradiated either with 150 or 200 Gy. A: First release, B: Second release.