Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2 results for “gold open access”
Annual Article Processing Charges (APCs) and number of gold and hybrid open access articles in Web of Science indexed journals published by Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis and Wiley 2015-2018
<p><strong>Dataset of annual Article Processing Charges (APCs) for 6,252 journals from 2015 to 2018. </strong>The dataset contains annual APCs for journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) and published by the oligopoly of academic publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, Wiley). It also includes an estimate of the total APCs paid by the academic community based on the number of gold and hybrid articles published between 2015 and 2018. The dataset was created using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall and annual APC prices from open datasets (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3841568">Matthias, 2020</a>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/84PNSG">Morrison, 2021</a>) and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. </p> <p>Detailed methods and findings are reported in the following journal article</p> <p>Butler, L.-A., Matthias, L., Simard, M.-A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The Oligopoly's Shift to Open Access. How the Big Five Academic Publishers Profit from Article Processing Charges. <em>Quantitative Science Studies</em>. Preprint: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8322555">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8322555</a></p> <p><strong>Description of included files (v1):</strong></p> <p><em>APCs.csv: </em>contains the annual APCs for gold and hybrid OA journals indexed in Web of Science published by the oligopoly of academic publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, Wiley) between 2015 and 2018 including the total estimate of APCs paid per journal per year. It contains APC data for 18,846 journal-year-OA status combinations.</p> <p><em>countries.csv</em>: contains the fractionalized number of annual gold and hybrid OA articles by oligopoly publishers between 2015 and 2018 and the total estimate of fractionalized APCs paid per country per journal per year.</p> <p><em>oecd.csv</em>: contains the fractionalized number of annual gold and hybrid OA articles by oligopoly publishers between 2015 and 2018 and the total estimate of fractionalized APCs per discipline per journal per year.</p> <p><em>ReadMe.csv</em>: contains a description of the variables used in <em>APCs.csv</em>, <em>countries.csv</em> and <em>oecd.csv</em>.</p> <p> </p>
Open Access levels of Dutch universities' output 2016-2017 (articles & reviews): green, gold, hybrid and bronze - May 2018
<p>Using Web of Science and Unpaywall data, we here provide an update of Open Access (OA) levels of Dutch universities, for 2016 and 2017.</p> <p>Our previous analysis (<a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1133759">10.5281/zenodo.1133759</a> and <a href="http://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3520v1">10.7287/peerj.preprints.3520v1</a>) looked at OA classification as included in Web of Science (gold and green OA, based on Unpaywall data), and supplemented that with a breakdown of gold OA into pure gold, hybrid and bronze, taken from Unpaywall data (formerly OADOI) directly. Here, we improve on this by running all DOIs retrieved from WoS through Unpaywall data (using their web interface that allows batch checking of up to 10,000 DOIs at a time). Unlike WoS, Unpaywall data itself includes author-submitted versions in their green OA classification, resulting in more complete green OA levels. </p> <p>In addition, since our initial analysis of December 2017, Unpaywall data has considerably expanded its coverage of institutional repositories (IRs) (see <a href="https://unpaywall.org/sources">https://unpaywall.org/sources</a>). This now includes coverage of the IRs from all Dutch universities. </p> <p>Taken together, the current data show higher levels of green open access, including author-submitted versions, compared to our previous analysis. </p> <p>In this update, we include output (articles and reviews) from 2016 and 2017 for all 14 universities in the Netherlands. </p> <p>The following categories are distinguished (description taken from Piwowar at al., 2018, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375">10.7717/peerj.4375</a>)</p> <ul> <li><strong>Pure gold</strong>: Published in an open-access journal (as defined by the DOAJ)</li> <li><strong>Hybrid</strong>: Free under an open license in a toll-access journal</li> <li><strong>Bronze</strong>: Free to read on the publisher page, but without a license</li> <li><strong>Green: </strong>Available from an institutional or disciplinary repository (including PubMedCentral)</li> </ul> <p>Data for Dutch universities were collected from Web of Science using the organization-enhanced field. Only articles and reviews were included. DOIs were extracted from the Web of Science export, run through the Unpaywall data <a href="https://unpaywall.org/products/simple-query-tool">Simple Query Tool</a>. From the resulting data from Unpaywall, OA classification was done using a simple formula in Excel (to be replaced by an R script in a future update). The Excel template used is included in this dataset, as is the OADOI API output for each Dutch university's article subset, and the lists of DOIs derived from Web of Science. The dataset also includes summarized data and three charts generated from these data, showing levels of different types of OA for 2016, 2017 and the two years compared. </p> <p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.