Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
61
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
61 results for “human in the loop”
Human-AI Collaboration: A tool to enable AI model generation with human-in-the-loop
<p>Human-AI collaboration enables domain experts to contribute their expertise with the goal of enhancing the knowledge learned by the AI models from the patterns in the data. This enables the integration of domain-specific knowledge to enrich the data for further improvement of the models through retraining. The human-AI collaboration is composed of multiple sub-components and interfaces that enables communication with external systems such as data sources, model repositories, machine configurations and decision support systems.</p> <p>Human-AI Collaboration component is developed using Python programming language. The frontend is developed using Streamlit1. The backend is developed using python and the API is implemented using FastAPI2. The choice of the programming language was made because of its wide usage and vast user base. The frameworks Streamlit and FastAPI are chosen because of the rich features for functionality and documentation as well as suitability for data analysis tasks. The applications are packaged as docker images for deployment. The application runs as a web application served by nginx for reverseproxying and users can access it via client applications such as web browsers or REST clients like Postman.</p>
AI-TAM: a model to investigate user acceptance and collaborative intention in human-in-the-loop AI applications
<p>More and more frequently, digital applications make use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities<br> to provide advanced features; on the other hand, human-in-the-loop approaches are on the<br> rise to involve people in AI-powered pipelines for data collection, results validation and decision making.<br> Does the introduction of AI features affect user acceptance? Does the AI result quality<br> affect people’s willingness to use such applications? Does the additional user effort required in<br> human-in-the-loop mechanisms change the application adoption and use?<br> This study aims to provide a reference approach to answer those questions. We propose a model<br> that extends the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with further constructs explicitly related to<br> AI – user trust in AI and perceived quality of AI output, from explainable AI (XAI) literature – and<br> collaborative intention – willingness to contribute to AI pipelines.<br> We tested the proposed model with an application for car damage claim reporting with AI-powered<br> damage estimation for insurance customers. The results showed that the XAI related factors have<br> a strong and positive effect on behavioral intention, perceived usefulness, and ease of use of the<br> application. Moreover, there is a strong link between behavioral intention and collaborative intention,<br> indicating that indeed human-in-the-loop approaches can be successfully adopted in final user<br> applications.</p> <p>Users were invited to test the interactive prototype of the BumpOut application and to report the given car accident from start to finish. These are the two interactive prototypes experienced by users:</p> <ul> <li> <p><a href="https://bit.ly/bo-prototype-flawlessAI">FlawlessAI-Group prototype</a></p> </li> <li> <p><a href="https://bit.ly/bo-prototype-failingAI">FailingAI-Group prototype</a></p> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>This study is shared as a research object adopting the <a href="https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/1.0/">RO-Crate</a> specification.</p>
Improvement of reporting method for closed-loop human localization experiments -- Data
<p>This data set contains stimuli and results from two experiments for human localisation of virtual sound source simulated via binaural synthesis using head related impulse responses (HRIRs). The corresponding binaural room scanning (BRS) files for the binaural simulation can be found in the directory `brs`. The employed noise stimulus is contained in `stimuli`. The localisation results are stored in `results` together with a text file to describe the content in more detail. The `analysis` directory includes scripts for the statistical evaluation and reproduction of the figures in the paper.</p> <p>Abstract of the Publication:</p> <p>Sound Field Synthesis reproduces a desired sound field within an extended listening area using up to hundreds of loudspeakers. The perceptual evaluation of such methods is challenging, as many degrees of freedom have to be considered. Binaural Synthesis simulating the loudspeakers over headphones is an effective tool for the evaluation. A prior study has investigated, whether non-individual anechoic binaural synthesis is perceptually transparent enough to evaluate human localisation in sound field synthesis. With the used apparatus, an undershoot for lateral sound sources was observed for real loudspeakers and their binaural simulation. This paper reassesses human localisation for the mentioned technique using a slightly modified setup. The results show that the localisation error decreased and no undershoot was observed.</p>
Dataset accompanying Buscombe et al.: Human-in-the-loop segmentation of earth surface imagery
<p>The datasets used in this study are provided in 7 folders:</p> <ol> <li> <p>"dataset A", containing data from Sandwich Town Neck Beach on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. These images are published as a USGS data series (Sherwood et al., 2021) are publicly available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5066/P9BFD3YH">https://doi.org/10.5066/P9BFD3YH</a></p> </li> <li> <p>"dataset B", containing data from North and South Carolina collected immediately after Hurricane Florence in October 2018. National Geodetic Survey emergency response imagery courtesy of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, available at <a href="https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/">https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov</a></p> </li> <li> <p>"dataset C", containing some examples of shoreline environments captured by a low-altitude aircraft. These images are published as a USGS data series (Kranenburg et al., 2020) are publicly available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5066/P9CA3D8P">https://doi.org/10.5066/P9CA3D8P</a></p> </li> <li> <p>"dataset D", containing data collected from the Pearl River and its tributary the Bogue Chitto, and from the Chickasawhay, Buoy and Leaf tributaries of the Pascagoula River, in spring 2021. Used with permission from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service</p> </li> <li> <p>"dataset E", containing Sentinel-2 satellite images of coastal lagoon environments in Salinas Rivermouth Natural Preserve and National Wildlife Refuge in Monterey, California. Sentinel-2 imagery courtesy of European Space Agency (ESA)</p> </li> <li> <p>"dataset F", containing Landsat-8 of Cape Hatteras, Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North Carolina. Landsat-8 imagery is courtesy of U.S. Geological Surve</p> </li> <li> <p>"code", containing a version of the code used to generate the results contained in this data repository. Full details about this code can be obtained from the github code repository (<a href="https://github.com/dbuscombe-usgs/dash_doodler">https://github.com/dbuscombe-usgs/dash_doodler</a>) and website (<a href="https://dbuscombe-usgs.github.io/dash_doodler/">https://dbuscombe-usgs.github.io/dash_doodler/</a>).</p> </li> </ol>
Combining Dipole and Loop Coil Elements for 7 T Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Human Calf Muscle - Dataset
<p>Data necessray to reprodice and to verify the results of the publication "Combining Dipoles and Loops for High SNR and Parallel Imaging Performance in Human Calf Muscle Studies at 7 T".</p>
Dataset accompanying Buscombe et al.: Human-in-the-loop segmentation of earth surface imagery
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Supplementary material of article "Stem-loop-induced ribosome queuing in the uORF2/ATF4 overlap fine-tunes stress-induced human ATF4 translational control"
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Knowledge Graph Triple Validation by LLMs and Human-in-the-Loop
<p>Suplementary material for the sumbitted article to the IPM Special issue on<strong> </strong><em>Large Language Models and Data Quality for Knowledge Graphs. </em></p> <p>The dataset is an extension of [1] and includes the following columns:</p> <ul> <li><em>subj</em> the subject/head of the triple</li> <li><em>rel</em> the predicate of the triple</li> <li><em>obj</em> the object/tail of the triple</li> <li><em>support-level </em>indicating the reliability of the triple</li> <li><em>ann-random</em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], randomly selected annotation from the expert annotations avaialble in [1] </li> <li><em>ann-new</em> [1: valid, 0: invalid], junior expert annotation </li> <li><em>gpt-4o-1 </em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], response from 1st GPT prompt</li> <li><em>gpt-4o-2 </em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], response from 2nd GPT prompt</li> <li><em>gpt-4o-3</em> [1: valid, 0: invalid], response from 3rd GPT prompt</li> <li><em>gpt-4o-majority </em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], GPT annotation, computed as majority vote of gpt-4o-1,gpt-4o-2,gpt-4o-3</li> <li><em>claude-1 </em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], response from 1st <em>claude</em> prompt</li> <li><em>claude-2 </em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], response from 2nd <em>claude</em> prompt</li> <li><em>claude-3</em> [1: valid, 0: invalid], response from 3rd <em>claude</em> prompt</li> <li><em>claude-majority </em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], <em>claude</em> annotation, computed as majority vote of <em>claude</em>-1,<em>claude</em>-2,<em>claude</em>-3</li> <li><em>llama-1 </em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], response from 1st <em>llama</em> prompt</li> <li><em>llama-2 </em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], response from 2nd <em>llama</em> prompt</li> <li><em>llama-3</em> [1: valid, 0: invalid], response from 3rd <em>llama</em> prompt</li> <li><em>llama-majority </em>[1: valid, 0: invalid], <em>llama</em> annotation, computed as majority vote of <em>llama</em>-1,<em>llama</em>-2,<em>llama</em>-3</li> </ul> <p>[1] https://github.com/danilo-dessi/SKG-pipeline/tree/main/eval </p>
Cell type-specific loops linked to RNA polymerase II elongation in human neural differentiation (Supplementary Tables)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Driving data from multi-human-in-the-loop simulation experiments
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
IGF2BP1 induces neuroblastoma via a druggable feedforward loop with MYCN promoting 17q oncogene expression [human sWGS]
GEO Series GSE181579. Homo sapiens. 101 samples. Type: Genome variation profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Chromosomal loop engineering in human beta globin locus
GEO Series GSE160425. Homo sapiens. 25 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing; Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing; Other.
Chromosomal loop engineering in human beta globin locus (RNA-Seq)
GEO Series GSE160420. Homo sapiens. 6 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
The yeast and human FACT complexes resolve R-loop-mediated transcription-replication conflicts
GEO Series GSE51653. Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 5 samples. Type: Genome binding/occupancy profiling by genome tiling array.
Genome wide mapping of R-loops in the repriming deficient human cells using RNA DIP-Seq
GEO Series GSE112745. Homo sapiens; Gallus gallus. 3 samples. Type: Other.
Looping of upstream cis-regulatory elements is required for CFTR expression in human airway epithelial cells
GEO Series GSE132808. Homo sapiens. 30 samples. Type: Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing; Other.
Human immunodeficiency virus-1 targets genomic R-loops of the host for integration [IS-seq]
GEO Series GSE281026. Homo sapiens. 12 samples. Type: Other.
Looping of upstream cis-regulatory elements is required for CFTR expression in human airway epithelial cells [4C-seq]
GEO Series GSE138166. Homo sapiens. 16 samples. Type: Other.
Genome-wide nucleosome-resolution map of promoter-centered interactions in human cells corroborates the enhancer-promoter looping model
GEO Series GSE225087. Homo sapiens. 6 samples. Type: Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing; Other.
Human iPSC-derived closed-loop cardiac tissue for drug assessment
GEO Series GSE251914. Homo sapiens. 6 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.