Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
206
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
206 results for “humerus”
Biplane fluoroscopy derived humerus and scapula kinematics during arm elevation and rotation
<p>This dataset contains torso, scapula, and humerus kinematics from 20 healthy subjects performing coronal plane abduction, scapular plane abduction, forward elevation, internal external rotation at 90º of abduction, and internal external rotation in adduction. The humerus and scapula were imaged at 100 Hz using a biplane fluoroscopy system. 3D models of the humerus and scapula were constructed from each subject’s CT scan. Model-based markerless tracking ascertained the 3D position and orientation of each bone model by semi-automatically aligning digitally reconstructed radiographs against each frame of the biplane fluoroscopy recordings. The kinematics of the torso were measured using skin marker motion capture.</p>
Text-fig. 20. Proximal right ulna of an embrithopod from White Patch Bone Site. a: lateral view; b: proximal view (anterior to the left); c: stereo view of the articular surface for the humerus. Note the damaged medial and lateral sides of the articular surface (dotted lines) which makes the distal part of the articular surface look narrower than it would have been in life. in Stratigraphy, Chronology And Palaeontology Of The Tertiary Rocks Of The Cheringoma Plateau, Mozambique
Text-fig. 20. Proximal right ulna of an embrithopod from White Patch Bone Site. a: lateral view; b: proximal view (anterior to the left); c: stereo view of the articular surface for the humerus. Note the damaged medial and lateral sides of the articular surface (dotted lines) which makes the distal part of the articular surface look narrower than it would have been in life.
→ Fig. 2. Representative skeletal elements of ornithosuchid archosaur Dynamosuchus collisensis gen. et sp. nov. (CAPPA/UFSM 0248) from Janner outcrop, Carnian, Late Triassic. A. Selected skull bones in left lateral view. B. Reconstruction of the skull. C. Skull in ventral view. D. Left quadrate and quadratojugal in posterodorsal view. E. Parabasisphenoid in left lateral view. F. Neural arch of an anterior cervical vertebra in anterior view. G. Centrum of a cervical vertebra in left lateral view. H. Right osteoderm in dorsal view. I. Neural arch of an anterior dorsal vertebra in left lateral view. J. Left ilium in lateral view. L. Right humerus in anterior view. M. Right forearm in medial view. N. Left manus in dorsal view. O. Right (reversed) pubis in lateral view. P. Left femur in anterior view. Q. Left fibula in lateral view. Some unpreserved portions are modified from Baczko et al. in press, for the reconstruction of the skeleton of CAPPA/UFSM 0248 (preserved elements indicated in orange) (K). Scale bars 20 mm. in The first ornithosuchid from Brazil and its macroevolutionary and phylogenetic implications for Late Triassic faunas in Gondwana
→ Fig. 2. Representative skeletal elements of ornithosuchid archosaur Dynamosuchus collisensis gen. et sp. nov. (CAPPA/UFSM 0248) from Janner outcrop, Carnian, Late Triassic. A. Selected skull bones in left lateral view. B. Reconstruction of the skull. C. Skull in ventral view. D. Left quadrate and quadratojugal in posterodorsal view. E. Parabasisphenoid in left lateral view. F. Neural arch of an anterior cervical vertebra in anterior view. G. Centrum of a cervical vertebra in left lateral view. H. Right osteoderm in dorsal view. I. Neural arch of an anterior dorsal vertebra in left lateral view. J. Left ilium in lateral view. L. Right humerus in anterior view. M. Right forearm in medial view. N. Left manus in dorsal view. O. Right (reversed) pubis in lateral view. P. Left femur in anterior view. Q. Left fibula in lateral view. Some unpreserved portions are modified from Baczko et al. in press, for the reconstruction of the skeleton of CAPPA/UFSM 0248 (preserved elements indicated in orange) (K). Scale bars 20 mm.
Figure 10. Anthropodyptes gilli holotype right humerus, NMV P17167 in A review of Australian fossil penguins (Aves: Sphenisciformes)
Figure 10. Anthropodyptes gilli holotype right humerus, NMV P17167: A, dorsal view; B, ventral view.
Figure 8. Sphenisciformes indet. partial right humerus, SAM P10863 in A review of Australian fossil penguins (Aves: Sphenisciformes)
Figure 8. Sphenisciformes indet. partial right humerus, SAM P10863: A, dorsal view; B, ventral view.
Fig. 7 in A geometric morphometric study of sex differences in the scapula, humerus and ulna of Chaetophractus villosus (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae)
Fig. 7. Ulna. Distribution of males (black dots) and females (white dots) of Chaetophractus villosus (Desmarest, 1804) in the plane determined by the first two relative warps (RW1 and RW2). Numbers indicate specimens. Deformation grids below the graph show shape changes linked to negative (left) and positive (right) scores in RW1. Grids on the right show deformations linked to negative (below) and positive (above) scores in RW2.
Fig. 6 in A geometric morphometric study of sex differences in the scapula, humerus and ulna of Chaetophractus villosus (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae)
Fig. 6. Scatterplot for the ulna of Chaetophractus villosus (Desmarest, 1804), showing the distribution of the individuals in the plane formed by the two first principal components. The black outlines below the plot represent the shape variation associated to PC1, and those of the right show the changes associated to PC2 with respect to the consensus of the species (grey outlines).
Fig. 4 in A geometric morphometric study of sex differences in the scapula, humerus and ulna of Chaetophractus villosus (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae)
Fig. 4. Humerus. Distribution of males (black dots) and females (white dots) of Chaetophractus villosus (Desmarest, 1804) in the plane determined by the first two relative warps (RW1 and RW2). Numbers indicate specimens. Deformation grids below the graph show shape changes linked to negative (left) and positive (right) scores in RW1. Grids on the right show deformations linked to negative (below) and positive (above) scores in RW2.
Fig. 3 in A geometric morphometric study of sex differences in the scapula, humerus and ulna of Chaetophractus villosus (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae)
Fig. 3. Scatterplot for the humerus of Chaetophractus villosus (Desmarest, 1804), showing the distribution of the individuals in the plane formed by the two first principal components. The black outlines below the plot represent the shape variation associated to PC1, and those of the right show the changes associated to PC2 with respect to the consensus of the species (grey outlines).
Fig. 2 in A geometric morphometric study of sex differences in the scapula, humerus and ulna of Chaetophractus villosus (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae)
Fig. 2. Canonical analysis for the humerus of males and females of Chaetophractus villosus (Desmarest, 1804). The bone outlines below the graph represent the tendencies to deformation in males and females (black dots and lines) with respect to the consensus of the species (grey dots and lines) along the axis.
Fig. 1 in A geometric morphometric study of sex differences in the scapula, humerus and ulna of Chaetophractus villosus (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae)
Fig. 1. Landmarks digitised on the left appendicular bones of Chaetophractus villosus (Desmarest, 1804). Scapula in dorsal view; humerus in caudal view; ulna in lateral view.
Fig. 5 in A geometric morphometric study of sex differences in the scapula, humerus and ulna of Chaetophractus villosus (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae)
Fig. 5. Canonical analysis for the ulna of males and females of Chaetophractus villosus (Desmarest, 1804). The bone outlines below the graph represent extreme individuals (black dots and lines) with respect to the consensus of the species (grey dots and lines) along the axis.
Fig. 8 in Osteometric analysis of the scapula and humerus of Rangifer tarandus and Cervus elaphus: A contribution to the discrimination of Late Pleistocene cervids
Fig. 8. Morphological features distinguishing the distal portion of the humerus of Rangifer tarandus (A) and Cervus elaphus (B), in anterior (A1, B1), distal (A2,B2), and posterior (A3,B3) views (modified from Breda 2005).
Fig. 7 in Osteometric analysis of the scapula and humerus of Rangifer tarandus and Cervus elaphus: A contribution to the discrimination of Late Pleistocene cervids
Fig. 7. Morphological features distinguishing the proximal portion of the humerus of Rangifer tarandus (A) and Cervus elaphus (B) (modified from Pales and García 1981).
Fig. 6 in Osteometric analysis of the scapula and humerus of Rangifer tarandus and Cervus elaphus: A contribution to the discrimination of Late Pleistocene cervids
Fig. 6. Scatterplots of different combinations of scapular measurements and indices for Rangifer tarandus and Cervus elaphus from Kiputz IX (southern Pyrenees, Spain), Late Pleistocene. Abbreviations: GLP, greatest anteroposterior length of the glenoid process; LG, greatest anteroposterior length of the glenoid cavity; SLC, minimum diameter of the scapular neck.
Fig. 3 in Osteometric analysis of the scapula and humerus of Rangifer tarandus and Cervus elaphus: A contribution to the discrimination of Late Pleistocene cervids
Fig. 3. Osteological measurements of the scapula (A, B) and the humerus (C, D) (modified from Weinstock 2000a). All drawings are based on Rangifer tarandus.
Fig. 4 in Osteometric analysis of the scapula and humerus of Rangifer tarandus and Cervus elaphus: A contribution to the discrimination of Late Pleistocene cervids
Fig. 4. Morphological features distinguishing the scapulae of the cervid mammals Rangifer tarandus, BGG KI-IX.2D.39.618 (A) and Cervus elaphus, BGG KI-IX.2C.28.142 (B), from Kiputz IX (southern Pyrenees, Spain), Late Pleistocene, in lateral (A 1, B 1) and distal (A 2, B 2) views; α, the angle formed by the glenoid cavity and the supraglenoid tubercle.
Fig. 9 in Osteometric analysis of the scapula and humerus of Rangifer tarandus and Cervus elaphus: A contribution to the discrimination of Late Pleistocene cervids
Fig. 9. Scatterplot of the greatest breadth of the trochlea (BT) vs. the depth of the distal epiphysis (Dd) of the humerus of Rangifer tarandus and Cervus elaphus from Kiputz IX and other European sites.
FIGURE 16 in Mammalian distal humerus fossils from eastern Montana, USA with implications for the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction and the adaptive radiation of placentals
FIGURE 16. Eutherian morphotype EuE (UCMP specimen 218901, from locality V91065; right) in anterior (1) and posterior (2) stereopair views, and in lateral (3), medial (4), and distal (5) views.
FIGURE 19 in Mammalian distal humerus fossils from eastern Montana, USA with implications for the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction and the adaptive radiation of placentals
FIGURE 19. Summary of humerus morphotypes and relative sizes in our study area in the Hell Creek and Tullock formations of eastern Montana. Multituberculate morphotypes are shown as black bars, metatherians as gray bars, and eutherians as white bars. Numbers within the bars indicate the sample size for each temporal bin. Morphotypes are arranged left to right according to increasing size (see text for specimen numbers, localities, and details; Appendices 7–8 for morphotype mean sizes). Gradients for MuF, EuC, and EuD indicate morphotypes were present in the timeaveraged Bug Creek Anthills assemblages, and the morphotype range may extend into the Pu1 and/or the Lancian. Pu2 assemblages are not known from our study area (hashmarks indicate resultant uncertainty of range-through morphotypes; Clemens 2015). The age model is based on previous geochronological work in this study area (Swisher et al., 1993; Renne et al., 2011, 2013; Wilson, 2014; Sprain et al. 2014); note the temporal axis is not to scale. Modified from Sprain et al. (2014). Abbreviations: Fm, Formation; NALMA, North American Land Mammal "age"; Pu1, early Puercan; Pu3, middle/late Puercan; queries (?) indicate specimens that are only tentatively attributed to that morphotype, see Methods.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.