Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
14
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
14 results for “institutional repository”
Raw Data for Mapping Repositories and their Institutional Open Science Policies in Asia
<p>Persistent Identifiers (PIDs), particularly Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs), are crucial for establishing a robust and globally accessible research infrastructure. In Asia, a diverse array of research outputs and resources are produced and published in repositories. However, a significant number of these repositories, and outputs remain undiscoverable in global registries and aggregators. <br><br>These three datasets provides comprehensive information on the adoption of repositories, Open Access mandates, and DOIs adoption in Asian countries. It includes detailed records from different registry sources and repository platforms.<br><br>You can read the full report titled 'Mapping Repositories and their Institutional Open Science Policies in Asia' at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12566244">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12566244</a></p>
Raw Data for Mapping Repositories and their Institutional Open Science Policies in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
<div> <p>Persistent Identifiers (PIDs), particularly Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs), are crucial for establishing a robust and globally accessible research infrastructure. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, a diverse array of research outputs and resources are produced and published in repositories. However, a significant number of these repositories, and outputs remain undiscoverable in global registries and aggregators. <br><br>These three datasets provides comprehensive information on the adoption of repositories, Open Access mandates, and DOIs adoption in MENA countries. It includes detailed records from different registry sources and repository platforms.<br><br>You can read the full report titled 'Mapping Repositories and their Institutional Open Science Policies in MENA' at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11370031">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11370031</a></p> </div>
Questionnaire for the self-assessment of digital preservation activities in institutional research repositories
<p>This dataset includes a questionnaire designed to enable institutional repository managers to conduct a self-assessment of their digital preservation strategies and activities. It consists of 46 evaluation criteria extracted and modified from the NDSA Levels of Digital Preservation and ISO 16363:2017 standards. The questionnaire is provided in queXML format, facilitating its import into various survey applications</p> <p> </p>
A census of research software in 171 academic institutional repositories.
<p> A dataset of metadata for 171 UK academic institutional repositories, including a census of research software contained.</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>URL</strong></td> <td>The OAI url</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>id</strong></td> <td>CORE Identifier</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>openDoarId</strong></td> <td>Open DOAR identifier</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>name</strong></td> <td>Name of repository</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Russell_member</strong></td> <td>If the university is a member of the Russell Group of research intensive universities</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>RSE_group</strong></td> <td>If an RSE group is present (based on Soc of RSE data)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>email</strong></td> <td>Redacted</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>uri</strong></td> <td>Not used</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>uni_sld</strong></td> <td>Second level domain (the part of the url between . And .ac.uk</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>homepageUrl</strong></td> <td>University website</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>source</strong></td> <td>Not used</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>ris_software</strong></td> <td>the Research Information System software used</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>ris_software_enum</strong></td> <td>Resolve ris_software into similar types (e.g. Eprints 3, EPrints3.3.16 both equal eprints)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>metadataFormat</strong></td> <td>the protocol used for metadata</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>createdDate</strong></td> <td>Repository creation date</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>location</strong></td> <td>location of university</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>logo</strong></td> <td>University logo (resolves in error)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>type</strong></td> <td>Only = Repository for this dataset. Can be = journal etc.</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>stats</strong></td> <td>Not used</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>contains_software_set</strong></td> <td>Whether the OAI-PMH software set is present in the repository.</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Num_sw_records</strong></td> <td>The response of the OAI-PMH query for software (erroneous as discussed in paper)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Error</strong></td> <td>The category of error returned by the experiment’s OAI-PMH queries (see paper)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Manual_Num_sw_records</strong></td> <td>The true amount of software contained in the repository as found by a manual exhaustive search of each university website</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Category</strong></td> <td>Whether the repository (a) contains software; (b) can contain software, but doesn’t yet; (c) has no separate type of research output called software or similar</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
A dataset of metadata for UK academic institutional repositories, including a census of research software contained.
<p>A dataset of metadata for UK academic institutional repositories, including a census of research software contained.</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>URL</strong></td> <td>The OAI url</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>id</strong></td> <td>CORE Identifier</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>openDoarId</strong></td> <td>Open DOAR identifier</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>name</strong></td> <td>Name of repository</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Russell_member</strong></td> <td>If the university is a member of the Russell Group of research intensive universities</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>RSE_group</strong></td> <td>If an RSE group is present (based on Soc of RSE data)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>email</strong></td> <td>Redacted</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>uri</strong></td> <td>Not used</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>uni_sld</strong></td> <td>Second level domain (the part of the url between . And .ac.uk</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>homepageUrl</strong></td> <td>University website</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>source</strong></td> <td>Not used</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>ris_software</strong></td> <td>the Research Information System software used</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>ris_software_enum</strong></td> <td>Resolve ris_software into similar types (e.g. Eprints 3, EPrints3.3.16 both equal eprints)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>metadataFormat</strong></td> <td>the protocol used for metadata</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>createdDate</strong></td> <td>Repository creation date</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>location</strong></td> <td>location of university</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>logo</strong></td> <td>University logo (resolves in error)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>type</strong></td> <td>Only = Repository for this dataset. Can be = journal etc.</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>stats</strong></td> <td>Not used</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>contains_software_set</strong></td> <td>Whether the OAI-PMH software set is present in the repository.</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Num_sw_records</strong></td> <td>The response of the OAI-PMH query for software (erroneous as discussed in paper)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Error</strong></td> <td>The category of error returned by the experiment’s OAI-PMH queries (see paper)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Manual_Num_sw_records</strong></td> <td>The true amount of software contained in the repository as found by a manual exhaustive search of each university website</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Category</strong></td> <td>Whether the repository (a) contains software; (b) can contain software, but doesn’t yet; (c) has no separate type of research output called software or similar</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Support of Creative Commons Licenses in German disciplinary and institutional open access repositories
<p>Which of the following open content licenses can be chosen for the metadata description of the open access full-texts (apart from the deposit license)? n=81* </p> <p>* This survey question is part of the 2014 Census of Open Access Repositories in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, see: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-100222687 For the research data see: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10734 </p>
Prototyping 3D Virtual Learning Environments with X3D-based Content and Visualization Tools-Figure 11. Online accessible repository of digital data on cultural heritage with X3D models (STARC Web Repository, 2017, © Copyright 2017, STARC, Cyprus Institute. Used with permission)
<p>Prototyping can also include the development of toolkits for automatic content generation simulator, but in the case of an architectural environment, the components are too complex to be automatically generated. Furniture elements or the learning artifacts (i.e. content created by learners) can be converted to be viewed in X3D compatible browsers or included in online galleries (Figure 11). After functional and 3D content prototyping, certain components of the virtual campus can be easily modified and adapted as needed.</p>
URLs with query strings for software in UK Academic Institutional Repositories.
<p>A set of exact URLs containing the query strings to search for software within UK Academic IRs.</p>
Surveys of Reporting Practices of Institutional Repositories
<p>This dataset contains the summary results of two surveys, which gathered data about the reporting practices for institutional repositories (IR). The surveys were completed by library directors and IR managers, and questions were asked about strategic importance, content scope, and the methods and mechanisms libraries utilize to evaluate and report on IR use and impact. </p>
Open metadata of the Institutional Repository (O2) of the UOC (Dataset in English)
<pre>Dataset of the metadata of all the academic and scientific production generated by the university community of the UOC.</pre>
Institutional Repositories in Kenya
<p>This dataset, collected in August 2020, lists institutional repositories belonging to institutions of higher learning accredited by the Commission for University Education in Kenya by June 2020.</p>
Driving Traffic to Institutional Repositories: How Search Engine Optimization can Increase the Number of Downloads from IR
<p>The success of institutional repositories (IR) is measured in large part by the number of file downloads they sustain. Most traffic to IR is referred by Internet search engines, but referrals are hindered when IR are not properly optimized for search engine harvesting and indexing, leading to low visitation and downloads. This presentation will discuss search engine optimization techniques, especially for Google Scholar, which can be responsible for the majority of referrals that result in IR file downloads. The presentation will also introduce a new web service called RAMP (Repository Analytics & Metrics Portal) that accurately counts file downloads from IR and requires no installation or training.</p>
Cited references and records of Imperial College London institutional repository grey literature
<p>Cited references (all time) to items published under Imperial College London's grey literature DOI prefix 10.25561 and bibliographic data of deposited Reports in the repository (2016-2020).</p>
The Rogosin Institute Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Repository
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01109368. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.