Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

3

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

3 results for “lexical relation”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo52/100

Lexical Relations from the Wisdom of the Crowd 1.0

<p>A set of 300 most frequent nouns has been extracted from the Russian National Corpus. Then, each method or resource, including RuThes, produced at most five hypernyms, if possible. In case it is not possible, missing answers treated as empty results. This resulted in 9 322 unique non-empty subsumption pairs that have been passed for crowdsourcing annotation on the Yandex.Toloka&nbsp;microtask platform. Each pair has been annotated by seven different annotators whose mother tongue is Russian and the age is at least 20 by February 1, 2017.</p> <p>The layout of the human intelligence task (HIT) design assumes the direct answer to a simple question: does the given pair of words represent a meaningful <em>is-a</em> relation? Since the crowd workers are not expert lexicographers and this question might be difficult for them, it has been rephrased as &ldquo;Is it correct that a <em>kitten</em> is a kind of <em>mammal</em>?&rdquo; (in Russian).</p> <p>The answers have been aggregated using the Yandex.Toloka proprietary answer aggregation mechanism. As the result, 3&nbsp;940 out of 9&nbsp;322 pairs have been annotated as positive while the rest 5&nbsp;382 have been annotated as negative.</p> <p>Interestingly, the workers were more confident in negative answers rather than in the positive ones. These negative answers are extremely useful for both training and testing different relation extraction methods. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first dataset of this kind made for the Russian language using microtask-based crowdsourcing.</p>

opencc-by-sa-4.0Feb 2017View details →
zenodo48/100

Lexical Relations from the Wisdom of the Crowd 1.1

<p>A set of 300 most frequent nouns has been extracted from the Russian National Corpus. Then, each method or resource, including RuThes and RuWordNet, produced at most five hypernyms, if possible. In case it is not possible, missing answers treated as empty results. This resulted in 10,600 unique non-empty subsumption pairs that have been passed for crowdsourcing annotation on the Yandex.Toloka&nbsp;microtask platform. Each pair has been annotated by seven different annotators whose mother tongue is Russian and the age is at least 20 by February 1, 2017.</p> <p>The layout of the human intelligence task (HIT) design assumes the direct answer to a simple question: does the given pair of words represent a meaningful <em>is-a</em> relation? Since the crowd workers are not expert lexicographers and this question might be difficult for them, it has been rephrased as &ldquo;Is it correct that a <em>kitten</em> is a kind of <em>mammal</em>?&rdquo; (in Russian).</p> <p>The answers have been aggregated using the Yandex.Toloka proprietary answer aggregation mechanism. As the result, 4,576 out of 10,600 pairs have been annotated as positive while the rest 6,024 have been annotated as negative.</p> <p>Interestingly, the workers were more confident in negative answers rather than in the positive ones. These negative answers are extremely useful for both training and testing different relation extraction methods. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first dataset of this kind made for the Russian language using microtask-based crowdsourcing.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Age-related Hearing Loss and Lexical Disorders

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03638323. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record