Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
22
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
22 results for “lower first molar”
Fig. 4 in Morphotype And Multivariate Analysis Of The Occlusal Pattern Of The First Lower Molar In European And Asian Arvicoline Species (Rodentia, Microtus, Alexandromys)
Fig. 4. Differentiation on 16 Microtus samples by the morphotypic variation of the occlusal pattern.
Fig. 3 in Morphotype And Multivariate Analysis Of The Occlusal Pattern Of The First Lower Molar In European And Asian Arvicoline Species (Rodentia, Microtus, Alexandromys)
Fig. 3. Differentiation on six East Asian vole samples by the morphotypic variation of the occlusal pattern.
Fig. 1 in Morphotype And Multivariate Analysis Of The Occlusal Pattern Of The First Lower Molar In European And Asian Arvicoline Species (Rodentia, Microtus, Alexandromys)
Fig. 1. Elements of the occlusal surface of m1 (the terminology follows van der Meulen, Zagwijn, 1974; Maul et al., 2007).
FIGURE 6. A in Distinguishing between three modern Ellobius species (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of fossil Ellobius from Kaldar Cave (Iran) using geometric morphometric analyses of the first lower molar
FIGURE 6. A) First two PCs from the Principal component analysis performed on the size and shape including the reference collection and Kaldar Cave material. B) Boxplot of the total length of Ellobius from the extant reference collections and Kaldar Cave.
FIGURE 4. Ellobius right lower m1. A in Distinguishing between three modern Ellobius species (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of fossil Ellobius from Kaldar Cave (Iran) using geometric morphometric analyses of the first lower molar
FIGURE 4. Ellobius right lower m1. A) 14 landmarks: Landmarks on the outermost turning point of buccal (2, 4, 6) and lingual (8, 10, 12, 14) salient angles, and on the innermost turning point of buccal (3, 5) and lingual (9, 11, 13) reentrant angle. B) 60 semi-landmarks on the anterior cap.
FIGURE 2. Ellobius lower m1s in Distinguishing between three modern Ellobius species (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of fossil Ellobius from Kaldar Cave (Iran) using geometric morphometric analyses of the first lower molar
FIGURE 2. Ellobius lower m1s (all figured as right ones) from the extant reference collections and Kaldar Cave. A) Ellobius fuscocapillus: A.1-Kaldar Cave, 2014/4/SL5II/E6/125-130, right lower m1, number 157. A.2-Kaldar Cave, 2014/4/SL5/E5/109-111, right lower m1, number 520. A.3-Kaldar Cave, 2014/5/SL7II/E7/170-180, right lower m1, number 104. A.4- Kaldar Cave, 2014/5/SL7II/F6/135-145, right lower m1, number 547.A.5-modern, NHM86101513, Afghanistan, right lower m1. A.6-modern, FM111846, Iran, right lower m1. A.7-modern, NHM86101512, Afghanistan, right lower m1; B) Ellobius lutescens: B.1-Kaldar Cave, 2014/5/SL7II/F6/130-140, right lower m1, number 319. B.2- Kaldar Cave, 2014/4/SL5II/F7/115-118, right lower m1, number 90. B.3- Kaldar Cave, 2014/4/SL5II/F7/115-118, right lower m1, number 91. B.4- Kaldar Cave, 2014/5/SL7II/E7/145-150, right lower m1, number 436. B.5-modern, NMH916416, Turkey, right lower m1. B.6-modern, NMH916414, Turkey, right lower m1. B.7-modern, NMH916412, Turkey, right lower m1; C) Ellobius talpinus: C.1-modern, NHM3421126, Russia, right lower m1. C.2-modern, FM103163, Afghanistan, right lower m1. C.3-modern, AMNH59797, Mongolia, right lower m1. Scale 1 mm.
FIGURE 1. A in Distinguishing between three modern Ellobius species (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of fossil Ellobius from Kaldar Cave (Iran) using geometric morphometric analyses of the first lower molar
FIGURE 1. A) Occlusal surface of Ellobius right lower m1: triangle (T); buccal re-entrant angle (BRA); lingual reentrant angle (LRA); anterior cap (AC); posterior lobe (PL); B) Lingual view of left lower m1.
FIGURE 5 in Distinguishing between three modern Ellobius species (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of fossil Ellobius from Kaldar Cave (Iran) using geometric morphometric analyses of the first lower molar
FIGURE 5. Principal component analysis on the normalized landmarks and sliding semilandmarks and shape configuration at the extreme ends of the two first PCs.
FIGURE 7 in Distinguishing between three modern Ellobius species (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of fossil Ellobius from Kaldar Cave (Iran) using geometric morphometric analyses of the first lower molar
FIGURE 7. Morphological differences between Ellobius fuscocapillus (left) and Ellobius lutescens (right). Arrows depict the displacements between corresponding landmarks in the reference (dots) and Ellobius lutescens as target specimens.
FIGURE 3. A in Distinguishing between three modern Ellobius species (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of fossil Ellobius from Kaldar Cave (Iran) using geometric morphometric analyses of the first lower molar
FIGURE 3. A) Kaldar Cave location. B) Entrance from the south of Kaldar Cave.
Testing the Anesthetic Effectiveness of Three Different Dental Local Anesthetics Injected Next to a Lower First Molar
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01567839. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Testing the Anesthetic Effectiveness of Buffered Articaine Injected Next to a Lower First Molar.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01862614. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
Figure 5 in Phylogeny explains better than ecology or body size the variation of the first lower molar in didelphid marsupials
Figure 5: Graphics of the three factors analyzed in variation partitioning analyses to illustrate both their individual contribution for explaining shape variance. (a) lnCS; (b) phylogeny; and (c) habitat and their interacting components (d, e, f, g). (A) females; (B) males.
Figure 4 in Phylogeny explains better than ecology or body size the variation of the first lower molar in didelphid marsupials
Figure 4: Shape deformations related to the first molar (m1). Deformation grids of the predicted shape of m1 for females (A) from the minimum (left, 0.090), medium (center, 0.785), and maximum (right, 1.568); males (B) from the minimum (left, 0.065), medium (center, 0.732), and maximum (right, 1.498) values of natural logtransformed centroid size (body size). Deformation grids related to habitat for females (C) and males (D) from the most terrestrial/semiaquatic (left) to the most arboreal (right).
Figure 3 in Phylogeny explains better than ecology or body size the variation of the first lower molar in didelphid marsupials
Figure 3: Scatter plot of relative warp (RW1 and RW2). Transformation grids visualize shape deformations relative to the mean at the positive and negative extremes of RW axes. (A) body size of females; (B) body size of males; (C) habitat of females; (D) habitat of males; (E) lineages of females; (F) lineages of males. Body sizes classified according to Paglia et al. (2012) and subfamilies/tribes according to Voss and Jansa (2009). Subtitles: see in Supplementary Appendix 1.
Figure 1 in Phylogeny explains better than ecology or body size the variation of the first lower molar in didelphid marsupials
Figure 1: Position of the six landmarks on the occlusal view of the first lower molar (m1) in a specimen of MetachirUS nUdicaUdatUS, and tooth nomenclature used in the study.
Space Changes After Premature Loss of Lower First Primary Molars in Children Using Digital Scanning
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06965777. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Comparative study of gene expression in lower and upper first molar cap stage tooth germs of DUHi and FVB mice
GEO Series GSE135432. Mus musculus. 12 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Assessing the Effect of Virtual Reality Gamification on Anxiety and Pain Management During Extraction of MIH-affected Lower First Permanent Molars in Pediatric Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06964451. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Figure 2 in Phylogeny explains better than ecology or body size the variation of the first lower molar in didelphid marsupials
Figure 2: Phylogenetic hypothesis of species used (Didelphidae) constructed from articles by Voss and Jansa (2009) and secondarily Cardillo et al. (2004), in addition to Pine et al. (2013) for MonodelphiS. Main tribes are according to Voss and Jansa (2009). Time is in millions of years (My).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.