Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
17
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
17 results for “mass digitization”
Example data from a virtual mass comparison using the Digital Calibration Certificate (DCC) scheme
<p><strong>The example data is an outcome of a project on a fully automated evaluation of a virtual mass comparison using the Digital Calibration </strong><strong>Certificate (DCC) schema.</strong></p> <p>We present the proof of concept for the first fully automated evaluation of a virtual mass comparison. The focus of this comparison is to demonstrate a possibility of digital transformation in metrology using an automated evaluation chain of different tools as well as machine-interpretable files for data transfer and final report. This publication provides the example data being used as input and output of the automated comparison evaluation tool.</p>
Data for: The public sphere as a normative ideal for public communications: From mass media to digital platforms
<p><span>Public sphere is a normative concept that has long been associated with traditional media; however, its validity and feasibility is tested under the digital media age. Implications needs to be valued under the growing concern over trust or mistrust against the social media, where 'mediasphere' became more relevant than 'public sphere'. This study employs systematic literature review as the main research approach, sampling from 7449 papers to 535 corpus, to investigate discussions of public sphere under the relevance of trust communications. Findings suggest that the term 'public sphere' has increased since 2017, with an explicit correlation with trust in media more broadly. </span></p>
Data for: The public sphere as a normative ideal for public communications: From mass media to digital platforms
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Digital Preservation for the Masses: Creating Workflows for Institutions & Under-Resourced Organisations
<p>Digital preservation for the masses: Creating and publishing workflows and guidelines for institutions and smaller organisations interested in digital preservation, data management, and archiving</p> <p>Presentation given by Julia Colleen Miller at the Language Documentation and Archiving conference</p> <p>Creating public documentation is a crucial step in providing transparency of archiving processes, helping maintain consistent institutional knowledge, and making available resources for those wanting to know about digital preservation, archiving or data management. To this end, PARADISEC's pre-existing archiving workflows have been reworked and new technical workflows and archiving help-guides [1] have been developed and made available on GitHub.</p> <p>These resources can provide guidance for other archives, but perhaps more importantly, to empower smaller communities with fewer available resources wishing to preserve their own cultural materials. The archiving guides discuss topics such as data management and metadata. Technical workflows include digitising audio tapes, creating high-resolution photographs of manuscripts and notebooks, and processing born-digital audio and video files, closely following specifications [2] set out by the International Association for Sound and Audiovisual Archives and refined with input from holding institutions such as The National Library of Australia, The National Film and Sound Archive and The Language Archive based at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.</p> <p>Cultural institutions including the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies and the National Film and Sound Archive have discussed their concerns to get their magnetic tape holdings digitised by 2025- a deadline beyond which access to functioning digitising equipment will become increasingly difficult and costly [3], [4]. Collaboration and capacity building will bring us closer to preserving at-risk cultural material before it is too late.</p> <p>References: [1] Miller, JC (2021) PARADISEC archiving workflows. https://paradisec-archive.github.io/PARADISEC_workflows/. [2] Prentice, W. and Gaustad, L. (2017) The Safeguarding of the Audiovisual Heritage: Ethics, Principles and Preservation Strategy (web edition). IASA. https://www.iasa-web.org/iasa-publications. [3] Campbell, L. (16 November 2021) Deadline 2025, the need to preserve First Nations community collections. AIATSIS. https://aiatsis.gov.au/publication/117747. [4] National Film and Sound Archive (27 October 2015) Deadline 2025. NFSA. https://www.nfsa.gov.au/corporate-information/publications/deadline-2025</p>
supplement videos of Solution for Mass Production of High-Throughput Digital Microfluidic Chip Based on Thin Film Transistor Technology
<p>supplement videos of Solution for Mass Production of High-Throughput Digital Microfluidic Chip Based on Thin Film Transistor Technology</p>
Data from: Examining community stability in the face of mass extinction in communities of digital organisms
Digital evolution is a computer-based instantiation of Darwinian evolution in which short self-replicating computer programs compete, mutate, and evolve. It is an excellent platform for addressing topics in long-term evolution and paleobiology, such as mass extinction and recovery, with experimental evolutionary approaches. We evolved model communities with ecological interdependence among community members, which were subjected to two principal types of mass extinction: a pulse extinction that killed randomly, and a selective press extinction involving an alteration of the abiotic environment to which the communities had to adapt. These treatments were applied at two different strengths, along with unperturbed control experiments. We examined how stability in the digital communities was affected from the perspectives of division of labor, relative shift in rank abundance, and genealogical connectedness of the community's component ecotypes. Mass extinction that was due to a Strong Press treatment was most effective in producing reshaped communities that differed from the pre-treatment ones in all of the measured perspectives; weaker versions of the treatments did not generally produce significant departures from a Control treatment; and results for the Strong Pulse treatment generally fell between those extremes. The Strong Pulse treatment differed from others in that it produced a slight but detectable shift towards more generalized communities. Compared to Press treatments, Pulse treatments also showed a greater contribution from re-evolved ecological doppelgangers rather than new ecotypes. However, relatively few Control communities showed stability in any of these metrics over the whole course of the experiment, and most did not represent stable states (by some measure of stability) that were disrupted by the extinction treatments. Our results have interesting, broad qualitative parallels with findings from the paleontological record, and show the potential of digital evolution studies to illuminate many aspects of mass extinction and recovery by addressing them in a truly experimental manner.
Figure 7 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 7 - Focus stacking in Zerene Stacker. The small image in the upper corner provides a detailed close-up of 518 × 345 pix of the image at 100%. A Stack of 77 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax B Stack of 44 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax The individual pictures of both stacks are made with the Leica Z6 APO with DFC290 and Manfrotto led light system.
Figure 9 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 9 - A 3D model of a Dicranorrhina sp. beetle. The left pictures (A, C) represent the 3D model with its texture, while the right pictures (B, D) are from the model with the mesh only and show the level of detail of the 3D model made in Agisoft Photoscan.
Figure 8 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 8 - Focus stacking in Zerene Stacker. The small image in the upper corner provides a detailed close-up of 518 × 345 pix of the image at 100%. A Stack of 74 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax B Stack of 41 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax. The individual pictures of both stacks are made with the Canon-Cognisys set-up and double flash lights.
Figure 5 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 5 - The results of the different stacking methods in Zerene Stacker, each with a detail of a hairy leg and a part of the head with hairs. A, B details of the stack pictures by the PMax method C, D details of the stacked picture with the DMap method.
Figure 4 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 4 - The results of the different stacking methods in Helicon Focus: each stacking option is provided with a detail of a hairy leg and a part of the head with hairs. A, B result of Method A (average) C, D result of Method B (depth) E, F result of Method C (pyramid).
Figure 6 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 6 - Focus stacking in Zerene Stacker. The small image in the upper corner provides a detailed close-up of 518 × 345 pix of the image at 100%. A Stack of 70 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax B Stack of 41 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax. The individual pictures of both stacks are made with the Leica MZ16A with DFC500 camera and Leica KL 1500 LCD lights.
Figure 3 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 3 - The results of the different stacking methods in CombineZP: each stacking option is provided with a detail of a hairy leg and a part of the head with hairs. A, B details of the stack pictures by the Do Stack method C, D details of the stacked picture with the Do Soft Stack E, F details of the Do Weighted Stack method G, H details of the combined pictured with the Pyramid Weighted method I, J details of the stacked image with the Pyramid Do stack method K, L Details of the Stacked image with the Pyramoid Maximum Contrast method.
Figure 1 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 1 - The Canon-Cognisys set-up at the RBINS. The Canon 600D Camera, equipped with a Canon MP-E 65 mm 1:2.8 1–5× Macro Photo Lens, is mounted on the vertically positioned StackShot (Cognisys inc.). In the Ikea closet, at the bottom, you see the two Yongnuo YN560II speedlites positioned frontally and above is the plexiglas fig covered with paper to position the specimen.
Figure 2 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 2 - The results of the different stacking methods in Auto-Montage: each stacking option is provided with a single picture which is reduced in size by the Auto-Montage software itself and imprinted with watermarks. A represents the Blended Stacking option B picture composed by the Compound Weighted method C picture stacked by the Exponentially Weighted option D picture composed by the Fixed method and E picture stacked by the Weighted method.
Data from: Examining community stability in the face of mass extinction in communities of digital organisms
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Comparison of Conspicuity of Masses and Architectural Distortions Between Wide- and Narrow-angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06373354. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.