Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

13

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

13 results for “mental spaces”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Figure 11. Comparison of MultiNet and MST representations-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>In the sentence (7) there are two clauses describing two hypothetical situations. These two<br> situations are connected by the relation COND in MultiNet representation (Figure 11).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 10. Comparison of MultiNet and MST representations.-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>Helbig [18, p. 507] defines the expression (s MCONT c) as &ldquo;a specification of the<br> informational or mental content c of a mental or informational process s&hellip; By default, the second<br> argument c is assumed to be a hypothetical object or situation.&rdquo;<br> MCONT relation properties are roughly equivalent to those of subject-verb complexes<br> (SVSBs) of MST. MCONT relation can generally be treated as capturing the idea behind what<br> philosophers call propositional attitudes in representational theories of mind [12] or opaque<br> contexts [10] in semantics. For example, consider the sentence in (3) rewritten below as (6) and<br> semantic representation of which is given in Figure 10.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 8. Comparison of MultiNet and MST representations-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>Figure 8 shows the representation of the<br> first reading of the sentence (5) in MWR. The MultiNet is shown at top of the figure, and the corresponding mental space representation is shown at the bottom side. Blue circles mark<br> hypothetical or nonreal objects and situations and red circles mark real objects and situations.<br> Facticity value for John is real, for unicorn it is nonreal, and for the process of riding, marked with<br> blue broken circle, it is non-real as well.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 7. The mental spaces set up by the sentence If John buys the car, he will drive to Berlin.-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>In the sentence (4) there are three proper names which constitute elements of the base space<br> or reality space (R). The CNSB if sets up the hypothetical space (H) with elements identical to those<br> of reality space (Figure 7). Every space&rsquo;s internal structure is presented in the boxes next to them.<br> In the next part, we will see how MultiNet&rsquo;s built-in meaning representation mechanisms are<br> capable of representing the basic principles of mental space building outlined above.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 6. The mental spaces set up by the sentence Mary thinks that John smokes.-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>The proper nouns Mary and John setup a base space (B). By the help of background<br> knowledge and activated frames we know that they are names of female and male humans. Not<br> having access to the previous discourse, we also consider their existence presupposed. The SVSB<br> Mary thinks that sets up a belief space (L) relative to space B (Figure 6). The identity connector<br> maintains the referential link between elements a and a ׳ both referring to the same person.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 9. Comparison of MultiNet and MST representations-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>Second interpretation of the sentence (5) can be represented with changing John&rsquo;s Facticity<br> attribute-value from [FACT = real] to [FACT = nonreal] making the whole situation and its<br> elements non-real (Figure 9).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 5. The mental spaces set up by the second interpretation of the sentence in the film, John is riding a unicorn.-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>Second interpretation: The proper name John exists only in film space without having a<br> counterpart in base space. Therefore, the second interpretation of the sentence is: John is a<br> film character who is riding a unicorn in the film (Figure 5).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4. The mental spaces set up by the first interpretation of the sentence in the film, John is riding a unicorn-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>First interpretation: The reality space (let&rsquo;s call it R) contains an element a associated with<br> the proper name John. The noun phrase a unicorn introduces an element b ׳ to the film space<br> (call it F). I is the connector linking a in the space B to a ׳ in the space F (Figure 4). Since the<br> elements of both mental spaces are co-referential, this connector is an identity connector.<br> The rectangles represent the internal structure of the spaces next to them. The dashed line<br> indicates that the space F is set up in relation to R and that it is subordinate to R in<br> discourse.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1. The upper ontology of sorts in MultiNet (after Helbig [17])-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>One of the distinguishing features of MultiNet is its commitment to the Cognitive Adequacy<br> requirement. According this requirement [9], semantic representations and knowledge<br> representations should be centered around concepts. Concepts2 are represented by nodes in the<br> graphical representation of the network. Every node belongs to a specific sort defined by the<br> MultiNet&rsquo;s ontology of sorts (Figure 2).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1. Mental space representation of "In the play, Mary is excited"-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>Thus an entity can have a variable reality status depending on the mental<br> space to which it belongs. The mental space constructed by the sentence Poirot is a Belgian<br> detective is a non-real imaginary story space of which Poirot is an element. But when we say in<br> reality, Poirot is not Belgian the constructed space is reality space in which Poirot (the actor, not<br> the character) does not have the fictional nationality.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2. Semantic representation of the sentence Peter finished the discussion in MultiNet after Helbig [8, p. 447].-Representing Mental Spaces and Dynamics of Natural Language Semantics

<p>In Figure 3, semantic frame of the concept Finish realized in the form of the verb finish<br> requires two C-roles: An agent represented by the relation AGT, and an affected entity represented<br> by the relation AFF. Here agent is Peter and the affected entity is an abstract object ([SORT = ad]<br> means the concept is a dynamic abstraction).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Impact of the 'Reserved Therapeutic Space' Nursing Intervention: an Intervention Study in Acute Mental Health Units

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05220566. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Bio-Experiential Spaces for Mental Health in Healthworkers

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05227352. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record