Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
870
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
870 results for “model development”
Raw data for "Development and characterization of a non-human primate model of disseminated synucleinopathy"
<p><span>In this study, the performance and biodistribution of the retrogradely-spreading AAV9-SynA53T vector was evaluated in the NHP brain. Conducted intraparenchymal deliveries of viral suspensions in the left putamen gave rise to a disseminated synucleinopathy in a circuit-specific basis.</span></p>
OpenFOAM cases of the paper "Development and validation of an open-source CFD model for the efficiency assessment of data centers"
<p>This dataset contains the<em> underling data</em> for the paper "Development and validation of an open-source CFD model for the efficiency assessment of data centers”, submitted for the consideration and open review in Open Research Europe (ORE).</p> <p><strong>Validation1.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of flow and thermal structures in an enclosed environment (Wang and Chen, 2009).</p> <p><em>Wang, Miao; Chen, Qingyan (2009). Assessment of Various Turbulence Models for Transitional Flows in an Enclosed Environment (RP-1271). HVAC&R Research, 15(6), 1099–1119. doi:10.1080/10789669.2009.10390881</em></p> <p><strong>Validation2-kOmegaSSTModel.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of forced convection in a room (Zhang et al. 2007) using k-omega SST turbulence model. </p> <p><em>Zhao Zhang, Wei Zhang, Zhiqiang John Zhai & Qingyan Yan Chen (2007) Evaluation of Various Turbulence Models in Predicting Airflow and Turbulence in Enclosed Environments by CFD: Part 2—Comparison with Experimental Data from Literature, HVAC&R Research, 13:6, 871-886, DOI: 10.1080/10789669.2007.10391460</em></p> <p><strong>Validation2-RNGkEpsilonModel.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of forced convection in a room (Zhang et al. 2007) using RNG k-epsilon turbulence model. </p> <p><em>Zhao Zhang, Wei Zhang, Zhiqiang John Zhai & Qingyan Yan Chen (2007) Evaluation of Various Turbulence Models in Predicting Airflow and Turbulence in Enclosed Environments by CFD: Part 2—Comparison with Experimental Data from Literature, HVAC&R Research, 13:6, 871-886, DOI: 10.1080/10789669.2007.10391460</em></p> <p><strong>Validation3.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of strong natural convection in a model fire room (Murakami et al. 1995).</p> <p><em>Murakami, S., S. Kato, and R. Yoshie. 1995. Measurement of turbulence statistics in a model fire room by LDV. ASHRAE Transactions 101(2):287–301.</em></p> <p><strong>Validation4.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of thermal distribution in an open-aisle data center (Abdelmaksoud et al. 2013).</p> <p><em>W.A. Abdelmaksoud, T.Q. Dang, H. Ezzat Khalifa, R.R. Schmidt Improved computational fluid dynamics model for open-aisle air-cooled data center simulations J. Electron. Packag., 135 (2013), pp. 030901-30913</em></p> <p><strong>Results_Validation1.tar.xz:</strong> Simulation results of the Validation case 1.</p> <p><strong>Results_Validation2.tar.xz:</strong> Simulation results of the Validation case 2.</p> <p><strong>Results_Validation3.tar.xz:</strong> Simulation results of the Validation case 3.</p> <p><strong>Results_Validation4.tar.xz:</strong> Simulation results of the Validation case 4.</p> <p><strong>layout.csv:</strong> Input file for the Validation case 4.</p>
CFMDG: a Coastal Flood Modelling Dataset in Gâvres (France) to support risk prevention and metamodels development
<p>Along most of the coastal areas, detailed coastal flood observations (e.g. inland water depths) are scarce, and when they are available, this for a limited number of events. Given recent scientific advances, <strong>coastal flooding</strong> events can be properly modelled, even in complex environments and under the action of wave overtopping, and thus provide detailed information. However, such models are computationally expensive, which prevents their use for instance for forecasting and warning. At the same time, metamodelling techniques have been explored for coastal hydrodynamics and have shown promising results. Metamodels are functions that aim to reproduce the behaviour of a “true” model (e.g., a numerical hydrodynamic model) for given input variables (for instance, offshore conditions). Within the RISCOPE research project (<a href="http://perso.math.univ-toulouse.fr/riscope">https://perso.math.univ-toulouse.fr/riscope</a>/) aiming at exploring to which extent such metamodelling techniques may allow to forecast coastal floods with a good accuracy, a <strong>simulated flood database</strong> has been built for the site of Gâvres (France), characterised by a significant effect of wave overtopping processes.</p> <p>The <strong>CFMDG dataset </strong>compiles a set of post-processed coastal flood simulations on the site of Gâvres. The dataset includes 250 scenarios. Each scenarios is defined by 6h time series centered on high tide, with one time series per forcing variables. The forcing variables (called X) are: local relative mean sea-level, tide, atmospheric storm surge, the offshore wave characteristics and the offshore wind. These scenarios combine past real (flood and no flood) events in the 1900-2021 time span with extreme statistics based events, and some complementary fictive events. The post-processed outputs (called Y) includes, for each scenario, the maximal flooded area (m²) and the maximal water depth (m) in each of the 64 618 inland model grid points.</p> <p>The modelling chain that allowed building this dataset relies on the joint use of a spectral wave model (WW3) to propagate the waves to the coast, and a non-hydrostatic wave-flow model (SWASH) to simulate the nearshore hydrodynamics and the flooding. The spatial and temporal resolution of the SWASH configuration validated on the Gâvres site are respectively 3 m and more than 10Hz. All the results are obtained for a Digital Elevation Model corresponding to the 2018 configuration of the site. </p> <p>Such type of dataset is of use for local knowledge, risk prevention, metamodel testing/training, and local coastal flood forecast. </p> <p>Part of this dataset has already been used in (<a href="http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/11/1191">Idier et al., 2021</a>; <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021006293?via%3Dihub">López-Lopera et al., 2021</a>; <a href="https://hal.science/hal-02536624">Betancourt et al., 2022</a>), to develop metamodels and set up a coastal flood forecast and early warning prototype.</p> <p>We hope and expect that making this dataset accessible will trigger further developments/investigations for improving risk knowledge on the considered site as well as methodological developments on machine-learning/metamodel-based techniques to support flood forecast.</p> <p>The table below summarizes the variables contained in the dataset, for each scenario.</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Variable name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Description and unit </strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Comment</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Scenario n°</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of the scenario.</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>INPUTS (X)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>NM</p> </td> <td> <p>Relative mean sea level, referenced to the French vertical datum (m, IGN69)</p> </td> <td> <p>Time series over 6h</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>T</p> </td> <td> <p>Tidal water level (m), referenced to the relative mean sea level</p> </td> <td> <p>Time series over 6h</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>S</p> </td> <td> <p>Atmospheric storm surge (m)</p> </td> <td> <p>Time series over 6h</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Hs</p> </td> <td> <p>Significant wave height (m)</p> </td> <td> <p>Time series over 6h</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Tp</p> </td> <td> <p>Wave peak period (s)</p> </td> <td> <p>Time series over 6h</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Dp</p> </td> <td> <p>Wave peak direction (° in nautical convention)</p> </td> <td> <p>Time series over 6h</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>U</p> </td> <td> <p>Wind speed (m/s)</p> </td> <td> <p>Time series over 6h</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>DU</p> </td> <td> <p>Wind direction (° in nautical convention)</p> </td> <td> <p>Time series over 6h</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>t</p> </td> <td> <p>Relative time centered on the high tide of each event (min)</p> </td> <td> <p>Not Concerned</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>High Tide date</p> </td> <td> <p>UTC date for scenarios corresponding to past real events</p> </td> <td> <p>Not Concerned</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>OUTPUTS (Y)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Smax</p> </td> <td> <p>Maximum flooded area during the event (m²)</p> </td> <td> <p>Post-processed scalar output</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Hmax</p> </td> <td> <p>Maximum water depth reached during the event (m), provided for each inland location</p> </td> <td> <p>Post-processed functional (map) output</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>longitude</p> </td> <td> <p>Longitude (°, WGS84)</p> </td> <td> <p>For each inland location point</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>latitude</p> </td> <td> <p>Latitude (°, WGS84)</p> </td> <td> <p>For each inland location point</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>XL93</p> </td> <td> <p>Longitude (m, Lambert 93)</p> </td> <td> <p>For each inland location point</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>YL93</p> </td> <td> <p>Latitude (m, Lambert 93)</p> </td> <td> <p>For each inland location point</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p><br> </p>
Alaska 2020 update for USGS G19AP00019: Initial Development of Alaska Community Seismic Velocity Models
<p>Seismic velocity model AKEP2020 uses earthquake travel-time and ambient noise group velocity data to update Eberhart-Phillips et al. (2006: AKEP2006)</p> <p> </p> <p>The model is provided in a table: vlAKEP2020xyzltlnSFDRE.tbl.txt</p> <p>and in the simul output from velocity inversion: vlAKEP2020.out.txt</p> <p>Map plots of Vp and Vp/Vs are also provided, with lines denoting limits of adequate data.</p> <p> </p> <p>Velocity Inversion Procedure Notes for AKEP2020 model</p> <p> </p> <p>The 2006 AK model and the 2020 updated model both use Transverse Mercator coordinate transformation with central meridian= -150 and counterclockwise rotation of 162.1. Earth-flattening transformation is used for velocity during ray-tracing. The depths are relative to sea-level and station elevations are used. For the group-velocity data, the surface is taken as the 30-km median filtered topography.</p> <p>Velocity with the 3D gridded model is defined by linearly interpolating between nodes.</p> <p>A gradational inversion approach was used with earthquake and shot travel-time data, and group velocity observations for periods 6-15 s. The table provides, from the computed resolution matrix, the diagonal resolution element (DRE), and the spread function (SF), for each Vp and Vp/Vs node.</p> <p> </p> <p>This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Geological Survey under Grant No. G19AP00019. Note that an earlier model, AKEP2018, from the first year of this funded project was reported in Eberhart-Phillips et al. (2019).<br> <br> The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Geological Survey. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey</p>
Wind measurement data from the publication: "Development of a load model validation framework applied to synthetic turbulent wind field evaluation"
<h3>Dataset description:</h3> <p>This datasat represents supplementary material used in the contribution "Development of a load model validation framework applied to<br>synthetic turbulent wind field evaluation" by Meyer, Huhn and Gottschall.</p> <p>Wind measurements from the Testfeld BHV are made available. For installation details, see the mentioned reference.</p> <p> </p> <h3>File description:</h3> <ul> <li>Lidar_HWS.nc - Horizontal wind speed measurements (10 min averages) from a WindCube V2 vertical profiler for one day with a low-level jet occurrence ( <div> <div>2021-04-20)</div> </div> </li> <li>Cups_HWS.nc - Horizontal wind speed measurements (10 min averages) from cup anemometer installed on a met mast for the same day</li> <li>Ensemble_averaged_Spectra.nc - Ensemble averaged spectra for neutral and near neutral situations from a Gill Windmaster at 110m above ground level, used to fit the Mann and KSEC model parameters</li> </ul> <h3> </h3> <h3>Referencing:</h3> <p>When used, please cite like the following:</p> <p>Meyer, Paul J., Matthias L. Huhn, and Julia Gottschall. 2024. "Development of a Load Model Validation Framework Applied to Synthetic Turbulent Wind Field Evaluation" <em>Energies</em> 17, no. 4: 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040797</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Database from: Developing a lateral topographic density model for Brazil.
<p>This dataset is part of the article entitled "DEVELOPING A LATERAL TOPOGRAPHIC DENSITY MODEL FOR BRAZIL".</p> <p>This dataset includes the topographic Lateral Topographic Density model for Brazil (LTDBrasil) and standard deviations (sdLTDBrasil), in Kg/m³, with 30 arc-seconds grid spacing.</p> <p>The files are in *tif and *.tfw format.</p> <p>Reference: Medeiros D.F., Marotta G.S., Yokoyama E., Franz I.B., Fuck R.A. 2021. Developing a lateral topographic density model for Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 110, p. 103425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103425</p>
Thermophysical properties for the published article "Experiments and modelling on ASDEX Upgrade and WEST in support of tool development for tokamak reactor armour melting assessments"
<p>In order to model the macroscopic metallic melt motion realized in the poor-versus-efficient thermionic emitter leading edge exposures in the ASDEX-Upgrade outer divertor [1], the material library of the MEMENTO melt dynamics code, that previously only concerned tungsten [2] and beryllium [3], had to be extended to iridium and niobium. </p> <p>Reliable experimental data have been analyzed for the latent heats, specific isobaric heat capacity, electrical resistivity, thermal conductivity, mass density, vapor pressure, work function, total hemispherical emissivity and absolute thermoelectric power from the room temperature up to the normal boiling point of iridium and niobium as well as for the surface tension and the dynamic viscosity across the liquid state. Analytical expressions are recommended for the temperature dependence of these thermophysical properties, which involve high temperature extrapolations given the absence of extended liquid iridium and liquid niobium measurements. The analytical expressions, the details of their construction and the main references are included in the accompanying pdf.</p> <p>[1] S. Ratynskaia, K. Paschalidis, P. Tolias, K. Krieger, Y. Corre, M. Balden, M. Faitsch, A. Grosjean, Q. Tichit, R.A. Pitts, the ASDEX-Upgrade team, the WEST team and the Eurofusion MST1 team, "Experiments and modelling on ASDEX Upgrade and WEST in support of tool development for tokamak reactor armour melting assessments", Nucl. Mater. Energy 33 (2022) 101303.<br> [2] P. Tolias, "Analytical expressions for thermophysical properties of solid and liquid tungsten relevant for fusion applications", Nucl. Mater. Energy 13 (2017) 42.<br> [3] P. Tolias, "Analytical expressions for thermophysical properties of solid and liquid beryllium relevant for fusion applications", Nucl. Mater. Energy 31 (2022) 101195.</p>
Alaska 2018 update for USGSG18AP00017: Initial Development of Alaska Community Seismic Velocity Models
<p>Seismic velocity model AKEP2018 uses earthquake travel-time and ambient noise group velocity data to update the Alaska 3-D model of Eberhart-Phillips et al. (2006: AK2006), for the USGS project on developing Alaska Community Seismic Velocity Models . This 2018 model will be expanded with additional data in 2019 in the second year of the funded project.</p> <p>Velocity within the 3D gridded model is defined by linearly interpolating between nodes. The inversion solved for Vp and Vp/Vs. The model is provided in a table: vlAKEP2018xyzltlnSFDRE.tbl.txt, with velocity at inversion nodes in cartesian and latitude-longitude coordinates. The table provides, from the computed resolution matrix, the diagonal resolution element (DRE), and the spread function (SF), for each Vp and Vp/Vs node.</p> <p>This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Geological Survey under Grant No. G18AP00017. <br> <br> The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Geological Survey. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.</p>
Supplement for Drone-based magnetic and multispectral surveys to develop a 3D model for mineral exploration at Qullissat, Disko Island, Greenland
<p>Supplement to Jackisch et al., 2021: Drone-based magnetic and multispectral surveys to develop a 3D model for mineral exploration at Qullissat, Disko Island, Greenland.</p> <p><a href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/793/2022/se-13-793-2022.html">https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/793/2022/se-13-793-2022.html</a></p> <p>Data set contains 3D model in dxf file, additional images, selected handheld spectra.</p> <p>Publication summary:</p> <p>We integrate UAS-based magnetic and remote sensing mineral exploration data with legacy exploration data of a Ni-Cu-PGE prospect on Disko Island, West Greenland. The basalt unit has a complex magnetization, and we use a 3D magnetic vector inversion on the UAS magnetics to estimate magnetic properties and spatial dimensions of the mineralized unit. Our 3D modelling reveals a horizontal sheet and a strong remanent magnetization component. We highlight the advantage of UAS in rugged terrain.</p> <p> </p>
Dataset to Model the Sustainability of a Primary School Digital Education Curricular Reform and Professional Development Program
<p>This dataset contains the quantitative teacher data used to analyse the sustainability of an in-service teacher training program for Digital Education that took place from September 2019 to March 2020 in the Canton Vaud in Switzerland. As such, the study follows up on the 350 teachers over a year after the end of their professional development program had ended in order to model the sustainability of the reform, understand to what extent sustainability had been reached, thus validating the curricular reform model and helping draw recommendations for researchers and practitioners involved in Digital Education curricular reforms. As such, approximately 290 teachers from grades 1-4 in primary school (ages 5-9) responded to two sustainability surveys using web-based questionnaire to provide information relating to their perception of the training sessions and adoption of the computer science activities.</p> <p>The study is accepted for publication in Education and Information Technologies. </p> <p>A README is included and provides additional information regarding :</p> <p>- the requirements for re-use. </p> <p>- the specific content of the 2 csv files</p>
Ecological Niche Models, in 2019 and across RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100, of 1508 European Marine Species, developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machines, and AquaMaps at 0.5° Resolution
<p>Native ecological niche models of 1508 European species (894 fish and 614 non fish) developed with AquaMaps, Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machines, for 2019 and under RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100, at 0.5° spatial resolution.</p>
Research data related to switchable contact model (SCM) development
<p>Research data of the linked journal article, is composed of input and output files of the LIGGGHTS simulations (Project folders) and an Excel data sheet (Results_Excel) which includes calculated data.</p> <p>The contents are the simulation data and results of cake formation in centrifugal filtration using conventional (mesh) method and novel Switchable contact model (SCM, primitive) method. (For more information see the linked article and the source code of SCM: <a href="https://github.com/DamlaSerper/SCM">https://github.com/DamlaSerper/SCM</a>)</p>
Biodiversity Index, in 2019 and across RCP 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100 of 1508 European Marine Species based on ensemble Ecological Niche Models developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machines, and AquaMaps at 0.5° Resolution
<p>Biodiversity Index in 2019 and across RCP 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100 of 1508 European marine species based on ensemble Ecological Niche Models developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machines, and AquaMaps at 0.5° Resolution. The Index counts the number of species (among the 1508) potentially present in each 0.5° cell according to the ensemble models. For each ensemble model, a threshold of at least 3 models agreeing on species presence in the cell was used to indicate species presence.</p>
Experimenting with Formal Verification and Model-based Development in Railways: the case of UMC and Sparx Enterprise Architect - Complementary Data
<p>This repository contains the UMC and SPARX EA data used in the paper:</p> <p>Experimenting with Formal Verification and Model-based Development in Railways: the case of UMC and Sparx Enterprise Architect</p> <p>by Davide Basile, Franco Mazzanti and Alessio Ferrari.</p>
Ecological Niche Models of 96 European Marine Species, for 2019, developed with AquaMaps, Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machines at 0.1° Resolution
<p>Native ecological niche models of 96 European marine species of particular commercial and conservation interest developed with AquaMaps, Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machines, for 2019 at 0.1° spatial resolution.</p>
Ensemble Ecological Niche Models and Biodiversity Index for 2019 of 96 European Marine Species based on Ecological Niche Models developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, AquaMaps, and Support Vector Machines at 0.1° Resolution
<p>Ensemble Ecological Niche Models for 2019 of 96 European marine species of particular commercial and conservation interest, based on Ecological Niche Models developed with (i) Artificial Neural Networks, (ii) Maximum Entropy, (iii) Support Vector Machines, and (iv) AquaMaps at 0.1° Resolution. The data report, for each 0.1° cell, how many models (from 0 to 4) overcome a model-specific decision threshold to assess species presence in the cell. A Biodiversity Index is also provided as the count of the number of species (among the 96) potentially present in each 0.1° cell according to the ensemble models. For each ensemble model, a threshold of at least 3 models agreeing on species presence in the cell was used to indicate species presence.</p>
Physiological parameters for three farm animal species (cattle, sheep, and swine) as the basis for the development of generic physiologically based kinetic models
<p><strong>IMPORTANT : PLEASE DISREGARD VERSION 1 OF THIS UPLOAD SINCE IT INCLUDES ERRONEOUS INFORMATION.</strong></p> <p>This excel file (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3433224) provides physiological parameters and their inter-individual variability (mean, coefficient of variation, sample size) for three farm animal species: cattle (<em>Bos taurus</em>), sheep (<em>Ovis aries</em>), and swine (<em>Sus scrofa domesticus</em>). These physiological parameters were estimated based on the results of extensive literature searches and specific experimental data described in Lautz et al., (2020). This file is associated with R codes (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3432796) for generic PBK models, partition coefficient Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) models for each farm animal species and parameterisation of the model.</p> <p>The full data collection and implementation of the models using case studies are described in Lautz et al., 2020 (10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.10.008).</p>
Modeling the metabolic profile of Mytilus edulis reveals molecular signatures linked to gonadal development, sex and environmental site
<p>Metabolomics dataset used in the publication "Modeling the metabolic profile of Mytilus edulis reveals molecular signatures linked to gonadal development, sex and environmental site"</p> <p>Jaanika Kronberg, Jonathan J. Byrne, Jeroen Jansen, Philipp Antczak, Adam Hines, John Bignell, Ioanna Katsiadaki, Mark R. Viant and Francesco Falciani </p> <p>Metabolomics dataset for metabolic bins 1 to 1045 for 376 mussels as used in the publication.</p> <p>Mussel metadata are described in a separate file (spectrum number, sample label, sex, site, species, month, temperature of water, salinity of water, ADG rate, gonadal stage, parasite load)</p> <p>Species 1: Mytilus edulis, species 2: hybrid, species 3: Mytilus galloprovincialis</p>
C2D2: An Open-Source, Pan-European, Harmonised Crop Development Database for Use in Regulatory Pesticide Exposure Modelling and Risk Assessment.
<p>There is a regulatory need for crop development dates to assess current default values used within chemical exposure assessments as well as to justify refinements within risk assessments. However, a readily available pan-European crop phenology database covering key FOCUS (FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their USe) crops and scenarios to meet this need is not currently available. Therefore, we describe the development of a harmonised, pan-European, CropLife Europe Crop Development Database, C2D2, that is fully aligned with this regulatory requirement utilising efficacy trials data generated for regulatory submissions when registering plant protection products under Regulation (EU) 1107/2009. Evaluation of C2D2 against an independent dataset showed good agreement for equivalent time periods, crop growth stages and geographical regions. We illustrate how this database can be used to evaluate existing default crop development dates mandated by regulatory agencies for use within exposure assessments. Despite the large dataset compiled and the geographical coverage of C2D2, not all FOCUSsw/gw scenarios have sufficient data to facilitate comparison, with less significant scenarios, like FOCUSgw Porto, being under-represented. For those scenarios with sufficient data, clear differences between C2D2 and crop development dates assumed in the FOCUS modelling framework (using the AppDate tool) are often indicated over some/many growth stages suggesting that amendment of the existing representation of crop development within the risk assessment process may be required. C2D2 is freely available under a Creative Commons licence to facilitate innovation in exposure science to allow for more accurate and realistic risk assessment leading to enhanced crop and environmental protection.</p>
Data: "Using butterfly survey data to model habitat associations in urban developments", JEJ Cooper et al., (2023)
<p>This data package has been used to examine the responses of UK butterfly species </p> <p>to different features of the urban environment. 'JC_WCBSmodel.Rdata' presents the</p> <p>butterfly abundance data, and supporting information about </p> <p>species and sites. This data can be fed through the script '04_model_builder.R', to </p> <p>produce the models reported in the research article. '00_functions.R' is a script </p> <p>containing functions which support the modelling process, which is loaded as part of </p> <p>the 04_model_builder script. </p> <p> </p> <p>Summaries of the resulting models are an output of that script - </p> <p>'Butterfly_GAM_Outputs.xlsx'. These are represented graphically in the manuscript, </p> <p>using scripts '06_01_Map'.R:'06_03_Cross_Validation'. '06_04_Model_Metric.R' </p> <p>is a further summary of the .xlsx file, found in the Supplementary Materials. </p> <p>'06_05_graphic_4_twitter.R' produces a condensed version of the figure resulting </p> <p>from the script '06_02_Metric_Summary.R'</p> <p> </p> <p>Dataset descriptions are found in the attached readme.txt</p> <p>........................................................................................</p> <p>We would also greatly appreciate if you could fill out <a href="https://forms.gle/DCc58VXpdmqnTmTk8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this very short form</a> to tell us how you intend to use these data. Thanks in advance!</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.