Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
14
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
14 results for “mowing regime”
Optimal Mowing Regime in Enhancing Biodiversity in Seasonal Floodplains along Engineered Channels, Survey data
<p>This is the survey dataset used in the publication " Optimal Mowing Regime in Enhancing Biodiversity in Seasonal Floodplains along Engineered Channels".</p>
Supplementary material 1 from: Unterweger PA, Klammer J, Unger M, Betz O (2018) Insect hibernation on urban green land: a winter-adapted mowing regime as a management tool for insect conservation. BioRisk 13: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.13.22316
Table with all captured species / morphotypes sorted by order, family and species / morphotype. : Explanation note: Collection: University of Tübingen, Evolutionary Biology of Invertebrates, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. Individuals with scientific species name that were checked by a taxonomic expert were counted as taxonomic species (s); all the other determinations were counted as morphotypes (m). Morphotypes are defined by the lowest practical taxonomic level (e.g. Hanula et al. 2009; Kutschbach-Brohl et al. 2010). In some cases, the family or the morphometric body length (in mm, numbers in column C, Mini: smaller than 1 mm) was counted as a morphotype (Daly 1985). In cases for which the determination was not validated by a taxonomic expert, our species determination was checked for plausibility in terms of its geographical occurrence via the Entomofauna Germanica (http://www.colkat.de, 2017.11.06). Alternatively (if no taxonomic name could be found), a classification letter / number was assigned for a morphotype. The provided author name refers to the lowest practical taxonomic level (e.g. Hanula et al. 2009; Kutschbach-Brohl et al. 2010). Validation: name of scientific expert who checked the taxonomic determination. Management type of meadow in autumn: mown /unmown. Plant compartment: flower head, stem, tuft, leaves. All numbers represent total sums of all sample sites over the entire study period. Brown-labelled species names are thought to have hibernated in the soil. Green-labelled species names could only be found in flower heads and stems. Black-labelled species occurred in all plant compartments without any preference for a specific plant compartment.
Figure 6 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 6 - PCA based on the orthopteran samples of four study sites (sites I–IV) (black circle: mowing once a year in May; black square: mowing twice a year in May and September; empty circle: mowing once a year in September; black triangle: abandoned).
Figure 5 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 5 - Box-plots (median values with minimum, maximum and ±SE) of nymphal density (specimen/m2) of orthopterans in four treatment types (mowing once a year in May; mowing twice a year in May and September; mowing once a year in September; abandoned) in June (Jn), July (Jl) and August (Ag). Significant (p<0.05) differences detected by Mann-Whitney U test are indicated by different letters.
Figure 4 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 4 - Box-plots (median values with minimum, maximum and ±SE) of species richness, adult density (specimen/m2) and Shannon diversity of orthopterans in four treatment types (mowing once a year in May; mowing twice a year in May and September; mowing once a year in September; abandoned) in June (Jn), July (Jl) and August (Ag). Significant (p<0.05) differences detected by Mann-Whitney U test are indicated by different letters.
Figure 3 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 3 - Box-plots (median values with minimum, maximum and ±SE) of species richness, density (specimen/m2) and Shannon diversity of orthopterans in four treatment types of sites I–IV. Significant (p<0.05) differences detected by Mann-Whitney U test are indicated by different letters.
Figure 1 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 1 - Location of the four study sites in Őrség National Park and the quadrats of different mowing regimes (quadrats are 20 × 20 metres; M: mowing once a year in May; MS: mowing twice a year in May and September; S: mowing once a year in September; C: abandoned).
Figure 2 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 2 - Box-plots (median values with minimum, maximum and ±SE) of vegetation height in four treatment types. Significant (p<0.05) differences detected by Mann-Whitney U test are indicated by different letters.
Figure 6 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 6 - PCA based on the orthopteran samples of four study sites (sites I–IV) (black circle: mowing once a year in May; black square: mowing twice a year in May and September; empty circle: mowing once a year in September; black triangle: abandoned).
Figure 5 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 5 - Box-plots (median values with minimum, maximum and ±SE) of nymphal density (specimen/m2) of orthopterans in four treatment types (mowing once a year in May; mowing twice a year in May and September; mowing once a year in September; abandoned) in June (Jn), July (Jl) and August (Ag). Significant (p<0.05) differences detected by Mann-Whitney U test are indicated by different letters.
Figure 2 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 2 - Box-plots (median values with minimum, maximum and ±SE) of vegetation height in four treatment types. Significant (p<0.05) differences detected by Mann-Whitney U test are indicated by different letters.
Figure 3 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 3 - Box-plots (median values with minimum, maximum and ±SE) of species richness, density (specimen/m2) and Shannon diversity of orthopterans in four treatment types of sites I–IV. Significant (p<0.05) differences detected by Mann-Whitney U test are indicated by different letters.
Figure 1 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 1 - Location of the four study sites in Őrség National Park and the quadrats of different mowing regimes (quadrats are 20 × 20 metres; M: mowing once a year in May; MS: mowing twice a year in May and September; S: mowing once a year in September; C: abandoned).
Figure 4 from: Kenyeres Z, Szentirmai I (2017) Effects of different mowing regimes on orthopterans of Central-European mesic hay meadows. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14549
Figure 4 - Box-plots (median values with minimum, maximum and ±SE) of species richness, adult density (specimen/m2) and Shannon diversity of orthopterans in four treatment types (mowing once a year in May; mowing twice a year in May and September; mowing once a year in September; abandoned) in June (Jn), July (Jl) and August (Ag). Significant (p<0.05) differences detected by Mann-Whitney U test are indicated by different letters.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.