Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
44
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
44 results for “nitrogen dioxide”
Soil Carbon Dioxide and Oxygen at the Soil Warming Plus Nitrogen Experiment at Harvard Forest since 2018
This dataset includes soil air CO2 and O2 concentrations measured from the organic/mineral horizon interface and 10, 30, and 50 cm depths of the mineral soil at SWaN using permanently installed stainless steel gas wells. Measurements were made 4-8 times throughout the year in 2018, 2019, and 2020.
Modeling the effect of explicit vs implicit representation of grazing on ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling in response to elevated carbon dioxide and warming in arctic tussock tundra, Alaska - Dataset A
We use a simple model of coupled carbon and nitrogen cycles in terrestrial ecosystems to examine how explicitly representing grazers versus having grazer effects implicitly aggregated in with other biogeochemical processes in the model alters predicted responses to elevated carbon dioxide and warming. The aggregated approach can affect model predictions because grazer-mediated processes can respond differently to changes in climate from the processes with which they are typically aggregated. We use small-mammal grazers in arctic tundra as an example and find that the typical three-to-four-year cycling frequency is too fast for the effects of cycle peaks and troughs to be fully manifested in the ecosystem biogeochemistry. We conclude that implicitly aggregating the effects of small-mammal grazers with other processes results in an underestimation of ecosystem response to climate change relative to estimations in which the grazer effects are explicitly represented. The magnitude of this underestimation increases with grazer density. We therefore recommend that grazing effects be incorporated explicitly when applying models of ecosystem response to global change.
Modeling the effect of explicit vs implicit representation of grazing on ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling in response to elevated carbon dioxide and warming in arctic tussock tundra, Alaska - Dataset B
We use a simple model of coupled carbon and nitrogen cycles in terrestrial ecosystems to examine how explicitly representing grazers versus having grazer effects implicitly aggregated in with other biogeochemical processes in the model alters predicted responses to elevated carbon dioxide and warming. The aggregated approach can affect model predictions because grazer-mediated processes can respond differently to changes in climate from the processes with which they are typically aggregated. We use small-mammal grazers in arctic tundra as an example and find that the typical three-to-four-year cycling frequency is too fast for the effects of cycle peaks and troughs to be fully manifested in the ecosystem biogeochemistry. We conclude that implicitly aggregating the effects of small-mammal grazers with other processes results in an underestimation of ecosystem response to climate change relative to estimations in which the grazer effects are explicitly represented. The magnitude of this underestimation increases with grazer density. We therefore recommend that grazing effects be incorporated explicitly when applying models of ecosystem response to global change.
Measurements and model simulations of iodine monoxide (IO) radical, water vapor (H2O), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) radical, formaldehyde (HCHO), gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0), and oxidized mercury (HgII) at Storm Peak Laboratory, Colorado, during April 2022
<p>This dataset was compiled to accompany the manuscript Lee et al., titled "Elevated Tropospheric Iodine over the Central Continental United States: Is Iodine a Major Oxidant of Atmospheric Mercury?", submitted to <em>AGU Geophysical Research Letters</em>.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>file01</strong> contains two example spectral proofs for iodine monoxide (IO) radical measured by the University of Colorado Multi-AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (CU MAX-DOAS) instrument at Storm Peak Laboratory, CO (SPL; 3220 meters above sea level; 40.455 degrees North; 106.745 degrees West) during April 2022.</p> <p><strong>file02</strong> contains oxygen collision-induced absorption (O2-O2) slant column densities (SCDs) measured in a spectral fit window from 350 to 388 nm by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file03</strong> contains O2-O2 SCDs measured in a spectral fit window from 425 to 490 nm by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file04</strong> contains IO SCDs measured in a spectral fit window from 417.5 to 438 nm by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file05</strong> contains water vapor (H2O) SCDs measured in a spectral fit window from 425 to 490 nm by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file06</strong> contains nitrogen dioxide (NO2) radical SCDs measured in a spectral fit window from 425 to 490 nm by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file07</strong> contains formaldehyde (HCHO) SCDs measured in a spectral fit window from 328,5 to 359 nm by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file08</strong> contains the profiles of pressure, temperature, O2-O2, ozone (O3), NO2, and H2O derived from ECMWF CAMS reanalysis (April 2022 at SPL) and used in the radiative transfer model McArtim3 to calculate weighting functions for the trace gas profile inversions of IO, H2O, NO2, and HCHO.</p> <p><strong>file09</strong> contains the a priori profiles used for the IO profile inversions during April 2022 at SPL. One profile assumes a "flat" profile shape with a constant volume mixing ratio of 0.10 pptv throughout the atmosphere. The other profile is adapted from the GEOS-Chem April 2022 daytime (SZA < 85) average.</p> <p><strong>file10</strong> contains the a priori profile used for the H2O profile inversions during April 2022 at SPL. The profile is adapted from the GEOS-Chem April 2022 daytime (SZA < 85) average.</p> <p><strong>file11</strong> contains the a priori profile used for the NO2 profile inversions during April 2022 at SPL. The profile is adapted from the GEOS-Chem April 2022 daytime (SZA < 85) average.</p> <p><strong>file12</strong> contains the a priori profile used for the HCHO profile inversions during April 2022 at SPL. The profile is adapted from the GEOS-Chem April 2022 daytime (SZA < 85) average.</p> <p><strong>file13</strong> contains the IO tropospheric vertical column densities (VCDtrop; surface to 12 km), volume mixing ratios near instrument altitude (VMRinstr), and degrees of freedom (DoF) measured by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file14</strong> contains the H2O VCDtrop, VMRinstr, and DoF measured by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file15</strong> contains the NO2 VCDtrop, VMRinstr, and DoF measured by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file16</strong> contains the HCHO VCDtrop, VMRinstr, and DoF measured by the CU MAX-DOAS instrument at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file17</strong> contains GEOS-Chem simulated temperature, relative humidity, IO VCDtrop & VMRinstr, H2O VCDtrop & VMRinstr, NO2 VCDtrop & VMRinstr, HCHO VCDtrop & VMRinstr, and bromine monoxide (BrO) radical VCDtrop & VMRinstr at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file18</strong> contains the gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0) measured by the Utah State University dual-channel mercury system at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file19</strong> contains the oxidized mercury (HgII) measured by the Utah State University dual-channel mercury system at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file20</strong> contains the GEOS-Chem simulated Hg0 and HgII at SPL from April 1 to April 30, 2022.</p> <p><strong>file21</strong> contains the profiles of pressure, temperature, relative humidity, BrO, bromine atom (Br), methane (CH4), chlorine monoxide (ClO) radical, chlorine atom (Cl), carbon monoxide (CO), Hg0, peroxy radical (HO2), IO, iodine atom (I), NO2, hydroxyl radical (OH), and O3 used as constraints for the gas-phase mercury box model. All profiles except IO and I are adapted from the GEOS-Chem April 2022 daytime (SZA < 85) average. The IO profile was calculated by scaling the GEOS-Chem April 2022 daytime (SZA < 85) average below 12 km by the average observed IO VCDtrop during April 2022. The I atom profile was calculated by multiplying the scaled IO profile by the ratio of unscaled I / unscaled IO profiles from GEOS-Chem.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>file22</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file23</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file24</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file25</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file26</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file27</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file28</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file29</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file30</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file31</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file32</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file33</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file34</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file35</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file36</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file37</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file38</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file39</strong> contains the time-resolved gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>file40</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file41</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file42</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file43</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file44</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file45</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file46</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file47</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file48</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgOH</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file49</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file50</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file51</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at half the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file52</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file53</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file54</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at the same rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file55</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>8 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file56</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>9.5 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p> <p><strong>file57</strong> contains a profile of the gas-phase mercury box model output assuming that <strong>HgI forms at twice the rate as HgBr</strong> and that the Hg-I bond strength is <strong>11 kcal / mol</strong>, using <strong>HgBr</strong> as reference for the B-value in the HgI equilibrium coefficient.</p>
Carbon dioxide response curve, dark respiration, specific leaf area, and leaf nitrogen data for the 2014 Eriophorum vaginatum reciprocal transplant gardens at Toolik Lake and Sagwon, AK, collected in 2016.
Transplant gardens at Toolik Lake and Sagwon were established in 2014. At each location, 60 tussocks each from ecotypes of Eriophorum vaginatum from Coldfoot (CF, 67°15′32″N, 150°10′12″W), Toolik Lake (TL, 68°37′44″N, 149°35′0″W), and Sagwon (SAG, 69°25′26″N, 148°42′49″W) were transplanted. Half the transplanted tussocks were grown under ambient conditions, while the other half were exposed to passive warming supplied by open-top chambers (OTC). Data were collected in late June through July 2016 include carbon dioxide response curve data, dark respiration, specific leaf area, and leaf nitrogen content.
Modeled dry deposition flux of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in central Arizona, USA (1998)
The role of urban vegetation on NOx-derived dry deposition fluxes was investigated for the arid Phoenix (Arizona, USA) metropolitan area using the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) (9-13 June 1998). A new land cover classification and updated land cover data were introduced in the model to account for spatial extent and heterogeneity of urban land cover. Adjustments were made in the deposition velocity calculations to consider the adaptation of local plants to the environmental conditions of Central Arizona. According to the simulations 25 % of the NOx derived dry deposition fluxes in the urban area were deposited on vegetation. When urban vegetation was excluded from the simulations NO2 deposition was reduced by 57 % because of the significantly lower deposition velocities of impervious compared to vegetated surfaces; nitric acid deposition was relatively unchanged. Using a diagnostic model with input data from urban air quality monitoring sites, hourly NO and NO2 dry N deposition fluxes were simulated for the entire year 1998 to ~6 kg ha-1 yr-1. Dry deposition declined during the summer months, due to lower pollutant concentrations and temperature-induced closure of the plant stomata during afternoon hours.
Direct sun retrievals of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) total columns from Brewer #067, Rome, Italy (reprocessed with algorithm BNALG2)
<p>Cloud-screened and quality-filtered direct sun retrievals of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) vertical column densities (VCDs) derived from MkIV Brewer #067 measurements in Rome (wavelengths 425.02, 431.40, 437.35, 442.83, 448.08, and 453.20 nm) and processed using the Brewer Nitrogen Dioxide Algoritm BNALG2. Calibration is carried out with Bootstrap Estimation techniques. The values represent averages of 5 samples.</p> <p>In the latest version, days with obviously erroneous data (NO2 VCD > 99.9% percentile) have been removed.</p> <p>A detailed description of the method has been accepted as a research article by the ESSD journal (H. Diémoz et al., Advanced NO2 retrieval technique for the Brewer spectrophotometer applied to the 20-year record in Rome, Italy, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 2021).</p>
Sentinel-5P Tropospheric Nitrogen Dioxide Density at 2 km from 2018-05 to 2022-11 Monthly Aggregation
<p>Layers include: Tropospheric Nitrogen Dioxide Density monthly median value May 2018 – November 2022. Derived using the <a href="https://eumap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html#">eumap package in Python</a>. We derived three standard statistics: (1) 10th percentile (p10), median (m), and 90th percentile (p10).</p> <p>Band info</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Name</td> <td>Units</td> <td>Scale</td> <td> <p>Description</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>NO<sub>2</sub></td> <td>(µmol m<sup>-</sup><sup>2</sup>)</td> <td>0.1</td> <td>tropospheric nitrogen dioxide density</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Warning:</p> <p>Original data have the different range of latitude among months. In December, there are no data above N 58°, where is approximately between Iceland and Scotland. Therefore, when it comes to monthly aggregation, there is a strip across N 58° as an artifact. It is not suggested to use this dataset in the region above N 58°.</p> <p>For more info about the s5p NO<sub>2</sub> product see: <a href="https://maps.s5p-pal.com"><strong>https://maps.s5p-pal.com/</strong></a>. Antarctica is not included.</p> <p>To access and visualize maps use: <a href="http://www.openlandmap.org/">OpenLandMap.org</a></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:</p> <ul> <li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues">https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues</a> </li> <li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/">https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/</a></li> </ul> <p>All files internally compressed using "COMPRESS=DEFLATE" creation option in GDAL in Cloud Optimised GeoTiff (COG). File naming convention:</p> <ul> <li>no2 = variable: nitrogen dioxide (µmol m<sup>-</sup><sup>2</sup>),</li> <li>s5p.l3.trop.tmwm= determination method: Copernicus Sentinel-5P product, level 3, tropospheric, temporal moving window median</li> <li>p10/p50/p90 = aggregation/statistics method: 10th/50th/90th percentile,</li> <li>2km = spatial resolution / block support: 2 km,</li> <li>a = vertical reference: above ground,</li> <li>start date_end date (i.e. 20180501_20180531) = time reference: from start date to end date</li> <li>go = bounding box: global land without Antarctica</li> <li>epsg.4326 = ESPG code: epsg.4326</li> <li>v20221219 = version code: creation date 20221219</li> </ul>
Warming-El Nino-Nitrogen Deposition Experiment (WENNDEx): Soil Temperature, Moisture, and Carbon Dioxide Data from the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico
Humans are creating significant global environmental change, including shifts in climate, increased nitrogen (N) deposition, and the facilitation of species invasions. A multi-factorial field experiment is being performed in an arid grassland within the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) to simulate increased nighttime temperature, higher N deposition, and heightened El Nino frequency (which increases winter precipitation by an average of 50%). The purpose of the experiment is to better understand the potential effects of environmental drivers on grassland community composition, aboveground net primary production and soil respiration. The focus is on the response of two dominant grasses (Bouteloua gracilis and B eriopoda), in an ecotone near their range margins and thus these species may be particularly susceptible to global environmental change. It is hypothesized that warmer summer temperatures and increased evaporation will favor growth of black grama (Bouteloua eriopoda), a desert grass, but that increased winter precipitation and/or available nitrogen will favor the growth of blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), a shortgrass prairie species. Treatment effects on limiting resources (soil moisture, nitrogen availability, species abundance, and net primary production (NPP) are all being measured to determine the interactive effects of key global change drivers on arid grassland plant community dynamics and ecosystem processes. This dataset shows values of soil moisture, soil temperature, and the CO2 flux of the amount of CO2 that has moved from soil to air. On 4 August 2009 lightning ignited a ~3300 ha wildfire that burned through the experiment and its surroundings. Because desert grassland fires are patchy, not all of the replicate plots burned in the wildfire. Therefore, seven days after the wildfire was extinguished, the Sevilleta NWR Fire Crew thoroughly burned the remaining plots allowing us to assess experimentally the effects of interactions among multip
Globally ubiquitous negative effects of nitrogen dioxide on crop growth
<p>Replication data and code for publication of 'Globally ubiquitous negative effects of nitrogen dioxide on crop growth'</p>
Nitrogen Dioxide Sentinel-5P 16-day composite map (2018-07-10 to 2018-07-25)
<p>Nitrogen Dioxide map of Ukraine and Eastern Europe developed based on Sentinel-5P L2 images. Mean NO2 values calculated using images over the period from 2018-07-10 to 2018-07-25. Air pollution hot spots identification.</p>
Systematic screening of DMOF-1 with NH2, NO2, Br and azobenzene functionalities for elucidation of carbon dioxide and nitrogen separation properties
<p><strong>Publication:</strong> M. Xie. N. Prasetya and B. P. Ladewig, Systematic screening of DMOF-1 with NH2, NO2, Br and azobenzene functionalities for elucidation of carbon dioxide and nitrogen separation properties, Inorganic Chemistry Communications (2019).</p> <p><strong>Preprint:</strong> M. Xie. N. Prasetya and B. P. Ladewig, Systematic screening of DMOF-1 with NH2, NO2, Br and azobenzene functionalities for elucidation of carbon dioxide and nitrogen separation properties, Inorganic Chemistry Communications (2019), <a href="https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.8862239.v1">https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.8862239.v1</a></p> <p>Dataset supporting publication, including SEM images, optical microscope images, NMR spectra, data used in Figures, and full resolution figures as included in the manuscript.</p> <p><strong>Abstract:</strong> In this study, dabco MOF-1 (DMOF-1) with four different functional groups (NH<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, Br and azobenzene) has been successfully synthesized through systematic control of the synthesis condition of their parent framework. The functionalised DMOF-1 is characterized using various analytical techniques including PXRD, TGA and N<sub>2</sub> sorption. The effect of the various functional groups on the performance of the MOFs for post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture is evaluated. DMOF-1s with polar functional groups are found to have better affinity with CO<sub>2</sub> compared with the parent framework as indicated by higher CO<sub>2</sub> heat of adsorption. However, imparting steric hindrance to the framework as in Azo-DMOF-1 enhances CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> selectivity, potentially as a result of lower N2 affinity for the framework. </p>
Dataset 1 of 8: Daily nitrogen dioxide concentrations in California (2012-2015) (CARB 19RD004)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Dataset 2 of 8: Daily nitrogen dioxide concentrations in California (2016-2019) (CARB 19RD004)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Meta-analytical data on soil organic, particulate organic, and mineral-associated organic carbon under nitrogen fertilization, elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide, atmospheric warming, increased precipitation, drought, and their combined effects
Data were harvested from journal articles found on the Web of Science Core Collection and the ProQuest Agricultural and Environmental Database that studied soil organic matter fraction carbon responses to global changes (nitrogen fertilization, elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide, atmospheric warming, increased and decreased precipitation, and combined effects). Soil organic carbon fractions were designated as particulate organic carbon or mineral-associated organic carbon based on size and density cutoffs. Relevant metadata, including article information (authors, publication year), environmental information (soil type, climate, and land use), and experiment information (rates, methods) were also added to the dataset.
Methane and carbon dioxide emissions were monitored in control, greenhouse, and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilized plots of three different plant communities, Toolik Field Station, North Slope Alaska, Arctic LTER 1991.
Methane and carbon dioxide emissions were monitored in control, greenhouse, and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilized plots of three different plant communities.
Methane and carbon dioxide emissions were monitored in control, greenhouse, and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilized plots of three different plant communities Arctic LTER experimental plots, Toolik Field Station, 1992.
Methane and carbon dioxide emissions were monitored in control, greenhouse, and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilized plots of three different plant communities. This is the second year of collection data.
Methane and carbon dioxide emissions were monitored in control, greenhouse, and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilized plots of three different plant communities, Toolik Field Station, North Slope Alaska, Arctic LTER 1993.
Methane and carbon dioxide emissions were monitored in control, greenhouse, and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilized plots of three different plant communities. This is the third year of collection data.
Experimental raw data sets associated with certified reference material BAM-P116 (titanium dioxide) for comparison of nitrogen and argon sorption, available in the universal adsorption information format (AIF)
<p>These data sets serve as models for calculating the specific surface area (BET method) using gas sorption in accordance with ISO 9277.<br>The present measurements were carried out with nitrogen at 77 Kelvin and argon at 87 Kelvin.<br>It is recommended to use the following requirements for the molecular cross-sectional area:<br>Nitrogen: 0.1620 nm²<br>Argon: 0.1420 nm²</p> <p>Expected specific surface area for nitrogen (BET): 305 to 345 m²/g<br>Expected specific surface area for argon (BET): 300 to 310 m²/g</p> <p>Titanium dioxides certified with nitrogen sorption and additionally measured with argon for research purposes were used as sample material.<br>The resulting data sets are intended to serve as comparative data for own measurements and show the differences in sorption behaviour and evaluations between nitrogen and argon.<br>These data are stored in the universal AIF format (adsorption information format), which allows flexible use of the data.</p>
Engineering Machine Learning features to predict adsorption of carbon dioxide and nitrogen in metal-organic frameworks
<p>This repository contains CIF files for metal-organic frameworks and Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation results for the article <em>Engineering Machine Learning features to predict adsorption of carbon dioxide and nitrogen in metal-organic frameworks</em> by Zijun Deng and Lev Sarkisov.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.