Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
5 results for “open data ecosystem”
Stakeholders in Croatian Agriculture Open Data Ecosystem
<p>The dataset shows the identified stakeholders in the Croatian agriculture open data ecosystem in the researched literature available on national portals Hrčak (the Portal of Croatian scientific and professional journals) and Dabar (Digital Academic Archives and Repositories). The complex query: "stakeholder" OR "persons" OR "actors" OR "agriculture" OR "agriculture business" OR "farms" OR "agriculture sector" OR "agriculture area" OR "agriculture field" AND "open data" was used for search of the national databases Hrčak and Dabar. The stakeholders identified in the query were classified and grouped into five key stakeholder groups: Agriculture producers/Farmers, Suppliers, Management and Support Organizations, Consumer Organizations/Consumers, Researches and Scientists, and Others.</p>
Dataset: maturity of transparency of open data ecosystems in 22 smart cities
<p>This dataset contains data collected during a study "<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670722002281?casa_token=8xHhtKug0xEAAAAA:POKIQswXhPdbwqgi5A8q98xitcUju_VS8T7oSP6YujXdABZlc5bNn4vEHzHGoxoW16mT6hA-HZ4#!">Transparency of open data ecosystems in smart cities: Definition and assessment of the maturity of transparency in 22 smart cities</a>" (Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS), vol.82, 103906) conducted by Martin Lnenicka (University of Pardubice), Anastasija Nikiforova (University of Tartu), Mariusz Luterek (University of Warsaw), Otmane Azeroual (German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies), Dandison Ukpabi (University of Jyväskylä), Visvaldis Valtenbergs (University of Latvia), Renata Machova (University of Pardubice).</p> <p>This study inspects smart cities’ data portals and assesses their compliance with transparency requirements for open (government) data by means of the expert assessment of 34 portals representing 22 smart cities, with 36 features.</p> <p>It being made public both to act as supplementary data for the paper and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work potentially contributing to the improvement of current data ecosystems and build sustainable, transparent, citizen-centered, and socially resilient open data-driven smart cities.</p> <p>***Purpose of the expert assessment***<br> The data in this dataset were collected in the result of the applying the developed benchmarking framework for assessing the compliance of open (government) data portals with the principles of transparency-by-design proposed by Lněnička and Nikiforova (2021)* to 34 portals that can be considered to be part of open data ecosystems in smart cities, thereby carrying out their assessment by experts in 36 features context, which allows to rank them and discuss their maturity levels and (4) based on the results of the assessment, defining the components and unique models that form the open data ecosystem in the smart city context.</p> <p>***Methodology***<br> Sample selection: the capitals of the Member States of the European Union and countries of the European Economic Area were selected to ensure a more coherent political and legal framework. They were mapped/cross-referenced with their rank in 5 smart city rankings: IESE Cities in Motion Index, Top 50 smart city governments (SCG), IMD smart city index (SCI), global cities index (GCI), and sustainable cities index (SCI). A purposive sampling method and systematic search for portals was then carried out to identify relevant websites for each city using two complementary techniques: browsing and searching.<br> To evaluate the transparency maturity of data ecosystems in smart cities, we have used the transparency-by-design framework (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585321000447?casa_token=7K8YGcYWbQcAAAAA:_HnV50rvxwQmDYyTjLYCmUkhDM2Qpsu8TPPBgOxajkV6ammJ1BBwgtQEnMMZdVk5ONxrGNY8hOw">Lněnička & Nikiforova, 2021</a>)*.<br> The benchmarking supposes the collection of quantitative data, which makes this task an acceptability task. A six-point Likert scale was applied for evaluating the portals. Each sub-dimension was supplied with its description to ensure the common understanding, a drop-down list to select the level at which the respondent (dis)agree, and a comment to be provided, which has not been mandatory. This formed a protocol to be fulfilled on every portal. Each sub-dimension/feature was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where strong agreement is assessed with 6 points, while strong disagreement is represented by 1 point.<br> Each website (portal) was evaluated by experts, where a person is considered to be an expert if a person works with open (government) data and data portals daily, i.e., it is the key part of their job, which can be public officials, researchers, and independent organizations. In other words, compliance with the expert profile according to the International Certification of Digital Literacy (ICDL) and its derivation proposed in <a href="https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0204/full/html?casa_token=6Yd7zSiQMg0AAAAA:yT8d_thrh84stDSVbax8eXLm5vP9LkrwZZFMzC_vql9vZNoQP_iYBHCZ0NOndkvusIx9TZAvJLWBp6lqe9bymm-xHaZ93k2mYfoHXKdVq52A0a7MlwGa">Lněnička et al. (2021)</a>* is expected to be met.<br> When all individual protocols were collected, mean values and standard deviations (SD) were calculated, and if statistical contradictions/inconsistencies were found, reassessment took place to ensure individual consistency and interrater reliability among experts’ answers.<br> *<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585321000447?casa_token=7K8YGcYWbQcAAAAA:_HnV50rvxwQmDYyTjLYCmUkhDM2Qpsu8TPPBgOxajkV6ammJ1BBwgtQEnMMZdVk5ONxrGNY8hOw">Lnenicka, M., & Nikiforova, A. (2021). Transparency-by-design: What is the role of open data portals?. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101605</a><br> *<a href="https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0204/full/html?casa_token=6Yd7zSiQMg0AAAAA:yT8d_thrh84stDSVbax8eXLm5vP9LkrwZZFMzC_vql9vZNoQP_iYBHCZ0NOndkvusIx9TZAvJLWBp6lqe9bymm-xHaZ93k2mYfoHXKdVq52A0a7MlwGa">Lněnička, M., Machova, R., Volejníková, J., Linhartová, V., Knezackova, R., & Hub, M. (2021). Enhancing transparency through open government data: the case of data portals and their features and capabilities. Online Information Review.</a></p> <p>***Test procedure***<br> (1) perform an assessment of each dimension using sub-dimensions, mapping out the achievement of each indicator<br> (2) all sub-dimensions in one dimension are aggregated, and then the average value is calculated based on the number of sub-dimensions – the resulting average stands for a dimension value - eight values per portal<br> (3) the average value from all dimensions are calculated and then mapped to the maturity level – this value of each portal is also used to rank the portals.</p> <p>***Description of the data in this data set***<br> Sheet#1 "comparison_overall" provides results by portal<br> Sheet#2 "comparison_category" provides results by portal and category<br> Sheet#3 "category_subcategory" provides list of categories and its elements<br> </p> <p>***Format of the file***<br> .xls</p> <p>***Licenses or restrictions***<br> CC-BY</p> <p>For more info, see README.txt</p>
Evaluation of Agriculture Open Data Ecosystem Maturity
<p>This dataset represents an evaluation of the key elements of the agricultural open data ecosystem in Croatia: Stakeholders, Infrastructure, Data, Policy/Governance. The evaluation was made by experts. For each element, an evaluation was made according to certain criteria. The experts involved in the research were representatives of each stakeholder group, namely: Management and Support Organizations, Agriculture Producers/Farmers, Suppliers, Researchers and Scientists, Consumers/Consumer Organizations and Other Stakeholders. </p>
Data from: Nineteenth-century collapse of a benthic marine ecosystem on the open continental shelf
The soft-sediment seafloor of the open continental shelf is among the least-known biomes on Earth, despite its high diversity and importance to fisheries and biogeochemical cycling. Abundant dead shells of epifaunal suspension-feeding terebratulid brachiopods (Laqueus) and scallops on the now-muddy mainland continental shelf of southern California reveal the recent, previously unsuspected extirpation of an extensive offshore shell-gravel ecosystem, evidently driven by anthropogenic siltation. Living populations of attached epifauna, which formerly existed in a middle- and outer-shelf mosaic with patches of trophically diverse muds, are restricted today to rocky seafloor along the shelf edge and to the sandier shelves of offshore islands. Geological age-dating of 190 dead brachiopod shells shows that (i) no shells have been produced on the mainland shelf within the last 100 years, (ii) their shell production declined steeply during the nineteenth century, and (iii) they had formerly been present continuously for at least 4 kyr. This loss, sufficiently rapid (less than or equal to 100 years) and thorough to represent an ecosystem collapse, coincides with intensification of alluvial-plain land use in the nineteenth century, particularly livestock grazing. Extirpation was complete by the start of twentieth-century urbanization, warming, bottom fishing and scientific surveys. The loss of this filter-feeding fauna and the new spatial homogeneity and dominance of deposit- and detritus-feeders would have altered ecosystem functioning by reducing habitat heterogeneity and seawater filtering. This discovery, attesting to the power of this geological approach to recent ecological transitions, also strongly increases the spatial scope attributable to the negative effects of siltation, and suggests that it has been under-recognized on continental shelves elsewhere as a legacy of coastal land use.
Data from: Nineteenth-century collapse of a benthic marine ecosystem on the open continental shelf
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.