Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

The diversity and function of the peanut pods-associated microbiota and their effects on aflatoxin contamination in China

In essence, these results are instructive for developing novel aflatoxin-control technology, selecting for better peanut species, and predicting aflatoxin contamination, therefore are of great interest for improving peanut quality and safety.

Figure 7 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 7: Number of Meloidogyne arenaria eggs per egg mass from roots of the peanut cultivars Tifguard (resistant) and Georgia-06G (susceptible) at 34°C at 40 days after inoculation. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.

Figure 6 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 6: Mature egg-laying females and necrotic lesions formed around Meloidogyne arenaria infection sites in Tifguard roots. A. Mature females at 35 days after inoculation (DAI) at 34°C; B. Egg-laying female at 40 DAI at 34°C (arrow points to egg mass); C. Arrow points to necrotic lesion at 5 DAI; D. Arrow points to necrotic lesion at 40 DAI.

Figure 3 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 3: Number of second-stage juveniles (J2) per gram of root system of the resistant cultivar Tifguard and the susceptible cultivar Georgia-06G 5 days after inoculation in Experiments 1 and 2. Different letters over bars from the same experiment indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.

Figure 5 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 5: Number of egg-laying females per gram of roots of the resistant cultivar Tifguard and susceptible cultivar Georgia-06G at 30 or 40 days after inoculation in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Bars followed by different letters from the same experiment indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.

Figure 4 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 4: Number of Meloidogyne arenaria second-stage juveniles (J2) and females 30 days after inoculation (Experiment 1), and J2, females, and egg-laying females 40 days after inoculation (Experiment 2) on Tifguard.

Figure 2 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 2: Mean number of Meloidogyne arenaria in roots of Tifguard and Georgia-06G at 5-day intervals over a 40-day period in Experiment 2.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in New attractant food for catching adult rednecked peanutworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in peanut

Fig. 1. Trap containing sugarcane molasses and Stegasta bosqueella adults (see white circles) captured in a peanut crop.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →

Fig. 2. The 2019 in Wild bee pollinators foraging in peanut and cotton adjacent to native wildflower strips

Fig. 2. The 2019 mean (± SE) of bees per bee bowl captured in cotton and those with cotton pollen and unidentified pollen (= other) (a), and the mean (± SE) of bees per bee bowl captured in cotton with G. pulchella (IB), Monarda citriodora (mint), and Rudbeckia hirta (susan) (b).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →

Fig. 1. The 2018 in Wild bee pollinators foraging in peanut and cotton adjacent to native wildflower strips

Fig. 1. The 2018 mean (± SE) of bees per bee bowl captured in peanut and those with peanut pollen (a), and the mean (± SE) of bees per bee bowl captured in peanut with Gaillardia pulchella (IB), and both G. pulchella and peanut pollen (b).

opencc-zeroJun 2023View details →

Experimental data of dancing peanuts in beer

In Argentina, some people add peanuts to their beer. Once immersed, the peanuts initially sink part way down into the beer before bubbles nucleate and grow on the peanut surfaces and remain attached. The peanuts move up and down within the beer glass in many repeating cycles. In this work, we propose a physical description of this dancing peanuts spectacle. We break down the problem into component physical phenomena, providing empirical constraint of each: (i) heterogeneous bubble nucleation occurs on peanut surfaces and this is energetically preferential to nucleation on the beer glass surfaces; (ii) peanuts enshrouded in attached bubbles are positively buoyant in beer above a critical attached gas volume; (iii) at the beer top surface, bubbles detach and pop, facilitated by peanut rotations and rearrangements; (iv) peanuts containing fewer bubbles are then negatively buoyant in beer and sink; and (v) the process repeats so long as the beer remains sufficiently supersaturated in the gas phase for continued nucleation. We used laboratory experiments and calculations to support this description, including constraint of the densities and wetting properties of the beer–gas–peanut system. We draw analogies between this peanut dance cyclicity and industrial and natural processes of wide interest, ultimately concluding that this bar-side phenomenon can be a vehicle for understanding more complex, applied systems of general interest and utility.

ClinicalTrials.gov40/100

Study to Evaluate Dupilumab Monotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Peanut Allergy

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03793608. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 2. Publications: 2.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →

publicNov 2025View details →

Polarimetric peanut drone images of peanut crop infected with leaf spot

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2025View details →

Data from: Evaluating UAV captured RGB and multispectral imagery as a proxy for visual rating of leaf spot in cultivated peanut

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.