Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
8
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
8 results for “pesticide application”
A battery of in silico models application for pesticides exerting reproductive health effects: assessment of performance and prioritization of mechanistic studies
<p>Dataset of Table 1-7</p> <p>Data of Table 1, “Pesticides and their classification”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1_Tab1.PNG). Corresponding raw data is regarding classification in the hazard class reproductive toxicity available on line. All further related information are provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK__Tab1_PPP_27_1_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 2, “PDB structures of nuclear receptors used in VTL and ED” </p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1_Tab2 15 meta data files as pdf-format with information sources of PDB structures used in employed in silico models (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M1.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M2.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M3.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M4.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M5.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M6.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M7.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M8.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M9.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M10.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M11.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M12.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M13.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M14.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M15.pdf). All further related information are provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab2_27_2_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 3, “Results of in vivo studies (Shepelska et al., 2021; Shepelskaya and Kolyanchuk, 2021; Shepelskaya and Kolianchuk, 2018)”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1_Table3.PNG). Three meta data file as pdf-format with data of in vivo studies (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_3_M1.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_3_M2.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_3_M3.pdf). All further related information are provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab3_27_3_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 4, “Results of in silico modelling of pesticides interaction with nuclear receptors”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1 _Tab4.PNG). Corresponding raw data with in silico modelling results provided as two files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1-17.csv) and seventeen pdf files (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_2.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_3.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_4.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_5.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_6.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_7.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_8.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_9.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_10.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_11.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_12.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_13.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_14.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_15.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_16.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_17.pdf). Four meta data file as pdf-format with detailed in silico modelling descriptions (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M1.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M2.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M3.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_M1.pdf). All further related information is provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab4_24_1-2_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Tabe 5, “Combination of in silico results with in vitro results by considering as positive result only where both in silico models predict a hit (Combined 1)”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1 _Tab5.PNG). Corresponding raw data with in silico modelling results provided as two files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1-17.csv) and seventeen pdf files (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_2.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_3.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_4.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_5.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_6.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_7.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_8.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_9.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_10.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_11.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_12.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_13.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_14.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_15.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_16.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_17.pdf). Four meta data file as pdf-format with detailed in silico modelling descriptions (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M1.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M2.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M3.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_M1.pdf).</p> <p>Corresponding raw data with ToxCast results provided as seventeen files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_2.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_3.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_4.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_5.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_6.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_7.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_8.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_9.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_10.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_11.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_12.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_13.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_14.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_15.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_16.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_17.csv)All further related information is provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab5_24_25_1_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 6, “Combination of in silico results with in vitro results by considering as a positive any in silico hit independently of the employed model (Combined 2)”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1 _Tab6.PNG). Corresponding raw data with in silico modelling results provided as two files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1-17.csv) and seventeen pdf files (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_2.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_3.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_4.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_5.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_6.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_7.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_8.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_9.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_10.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_11.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_12.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_13.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_14.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_15.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_16.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_17.pdf). Four meta data file as pdf-format with detailed in silico modelling descriptions (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M1.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M2.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M3.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_M1.pdf).</p> <p>Corresponding raw data with ToxCast results provided as seventeen files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_2.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_3.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_4.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_5.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_6.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_7.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_8.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_9.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_10.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_11.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_12.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_13.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_14.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_15.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_16.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_17.csv)All further related information is provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab6_24_25_1_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 7, “Metrics of performance of in silico models separately and combined.”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1 _Tab7.PNG). Corresponding raw data with calculation of relevant performance metrics provided as one file in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_26_1.csv). One meta data file as pdf-format with detailed description of the method used for calculation (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_26_1_M1.pdf).</p> <p>All further related information is provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab7_26_1_M.txt) in txt format.</p>
Application of multi-analyte / multi-matrix screening method for pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables to Interaboratory Comparison Study on Pesticide Residues in Food (ILC)
<p>The suitability of multi-analyte / multi-matrix screening method for pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables and related products, developed within activities of task (Multi-analyte / multi-matrix screening method for pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables (including tea) and fruit juices), was evaluated by the Interaboratory Comparison Study on Pesticide Residues in Food (ILC). Test material (“Pesticide Residues in green tea”), prepared from the batch used for another proficiency test (PT), was provided by Fapas (Fera Science Ltd, York, UK).</p> <p>Data set obtains (i) information about performance characteristics of the analytical method and (ii) compilation of results of interlaboratory study.</p>
Pesticide application data and agronomic practices accross Europe and Argentina
<p>A farm survey in 135 farms accross 10 european countries and Argentina was conducted in 2021. Data collected and reported in this database include</p> <p>(i) General information such as the type of farming practice, size of farm and of fields, types of crops and livestock, as well as working capacity (employees).</p> <p>(ii) For a selected one or two fields, a detailed description of the agronomic activities and yield parameters was compiled, which included crop and variety and e.g. position in crop rotation, as well as all crop-specific activities such as tillage, fertilisation, irrigation, pruning, and sowing. </p> <p>(iii) Activities related to crop protection were requested in detail, including but not limited to the use of PPP formulations and related tools and techniques, and the strategy and motivation of the farm manager for PPP applications. The assessment of the crop protection strategy on the respective fields included variety, dates of PPP applications, product tank mixtures, type of products, product brand name, product distributor, target organisms, mode of action, area treated, quantity of product applied, total volume applied (total tank volume: product and water volume), formulation, active substances and concentrations, technique of application, speed of application, type of nozzles, and costs of products applied.</p> <p>(iv) Soil fertility management assessment included pre-crop, dates of application, types of product and nutrient specifications (NPK, micronutrients) as well as quantities applied. The information on agronomic practices was compiled in a ‘log book’, which listed all agronomic management practices on the respective fields during the whole season from planting/sowing to harvest as well as the underlying assumptions and motivations.</p> <p>(vi) Finally, econometric data included costs of products and yield</p> <p>Raw data was thoroughly screened for completeness, plausibility and data integrity, and revised/supplemented where necessary. Missing/unknown data was tagged and complemented where possible with proxies from e.g. product technical leaflets to allow for subsequent analysis. The data set was further complemented with related publicly available data, such as phenological codes (BSV, 2021.; Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft, 2021), standard codes for crops and pests (EPPO secretariat, 2022.), mode of action of active substances and resistance risks (FRAC Committee, 2022.; HRAC Committee, 2022.; IRAC Committee, 2022.; Sparks & Nauen, 2015), and application recommendations of PPPs and fertilizers (collection of regional crop-specific or manufacturer-specific technical leaflets). If expenditures for PPPs were not available, costs for PPPs were assessed based on publicly available catalogues issued by manufacturers or regional PPP distributors. Data was also amended by hazard statements of active substances (Burtscher-Schaden et al.,)</p>
Figure 2 in Application of demographic analysis for assessing effects of pesticides on the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae)
Figure 2. Age specific survival rate (lx), fecundity (mx), maternity (lxmx) and age-stage specific fecundity (fxj) of offspring from Phytoseiulus persimilis females treated with LC25 of three pesticides compared with untreated females.
Figure 1 in Application of demographic analysis for assessing effects of pesticides on the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae)
Figure 1. Age-stage specific survival rate (sxj) of offspring from Phytoseiulus persimilis females treated with LC25 of three pesticides compared with untreated females.
Field level pesticide application datasets
<p>This package contains the results of two pilot surveys collecting field level data on the application of plant protection products. The first survey was completed in 2012 with the aim of collecting information on cumulative exposure to plant protection products for operators and workers. In this pilot six countries participated, covering arable crops, soft fruits, green house cultivation, orchards and vineyards. The dataset contains results from 428 farms, 581 operators, 481 workers resulting 17,058 rows of application events. The second survey was completed in 2015 with the aim of collecting information for use in environmental risk assessments. Applications of plant protection products over multiple years for selected fields was recorded. In this pilot eight countries participated, covering wheat, potatoes, oilseed rape, maize, sugar beet, apples, citrus, grapes and vegetables. The dataset contains results from 419 farms, 580 environmental fields, 414 operators resulting 28,903 rows of application events. In both cases this survey was considered to be a pilot since the number of farms surveyed was insufficient to be representative for any of the participating countries.</p> <p>The data was collected using standardised questionnaires. Farmers, operators and workers were asked to provide information. The questionnaire was made up of eight topic specific forms. </p> <p>Form 1 – cropping types and area grown in the year of the survey</p> <p>Form 2 – farm business details including, size, location, number of spray operators. Information on the use of agronomists, buffer strips and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) was added in the second survey</p> <p>Form 3 – pesticide application details for the principal spray operator on the farm, including date, crop stage, product, method of application, application rate, area treated, start time and duration of application.</p> <p>Form 3b (second survey only) –off- and in-field margin information</p> <p>Form 4 – information on the principal operator, age, gender, percentage spraying undertaken, qualifications, time and PPE worn for different on farm activities</p> <p>Form 5 –details of the sprayers on the farm including make, model, age, tank capacities, filling systems, cab type, age and nozzle sets</p> <p>Form 6 – worker activities, including date, crop stage, time since last pesticide application, activity types and number of hours</p> <p>Form 6b (second survey only) – working hours for operators and workerss</p>
Immunological Indices and Infections Among Pesticide Applicators in Sohag Governorate
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05828563. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Incidence and Mortality of Childhood Cancer Among Children of Farmer Pesticide Applications
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00339378. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.