Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
11
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
11 results for “quality criteria”
Quality evaluation criteria, best practices, and assessment systems for Institutional Publishing Service Providers (IPSPs): dataset
<p>The dataset contains tabular information on the elements of best practice in scholarly publishing found in a set of documents (high-level recommendations and principles, indexation criteria and specific assessment guidelines used on the national and institutional levels). The set of documents subject to analysis (58 items) were identified by the DIAMAS project team members (bibliographic metadata are provided in IPSP-best-practice-documents.xml and IPSP-best-practice-documents.ris).</p> <p>The dataset was compiled by the DIAMAS project team using an analysis matrix that included the general information about the documents (title, issuing entity, scope and purpose, etc.) and the the seven core components of scholarly publishing identified in the Diamond Open Access Action Plan (2022) and revised by the DIAMAS project team.</p> <p>More information about the data collection methodology can be found in the report D3.1 IPSP Best Practices Quality evaluation criteria, best practices, and assessment systems for Institutional Publishing Service Providers (IPSPs) (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7859172">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7859172</a>), which is based on this dataset.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>****Dataset contents****</strong></p> <p>IPSPs_best-practices-overview.csv</p> <p>IPSPs_best-practices-overview.ods</p> <p>IPSP-best-practice-documents.xml</p> <p>IPSP-best-practice-documents.ris</p> <p>README.txt</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>****Column headers and field types***</strong></p> <p>Title (original) (text)</p> <p>Title (English) (text)</p> <p>Publication date (date, DD/MM/YY)</p> <p>Last accessed (date, DD/MM/YY)</p> <p>URL (text-web address)</p> <p>Scope (text, controlled)</p> <p>Type of document (text, controlled)</p> <p>Original language (text)</p> <p>Other languages (text)</p> <p>Entity issuing the document (text)</p> <p>Entity responsible for the assessment (text)</p> <p>Scope of the assessment (text, controlled)</p> <p>Scope of assessment: region or country (text)</p> <p>Disciplines’ coverage (text)</p> <p>Periodicity of the assessment (text)</p> <p>Reassessment frequency? If yes: periodicity (text)</p> <p>Benefits linked to the assessment (text)</p> <p>(1) Funding (text)</p> <p>(2) Ownership and governance (text)</p> <p>(3) Open science practices (text)</p> <p>(4) Editorial quality, editorial management and research integrity (text)</p> <p>(5) Technical service efficiency (text)</p> <p>(6) Visibility (including indexation), communication, marketing and impact (text)</p> <p>(7) Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (text)</p>
Figure 2 in Evaluation of some nutritional quality criteria of seventeen Moroccan dates varieties and clones, fruits of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.)
Figure 2. Representation of dates varieties and clones according to their quality characteristics. (a) Representation of variables according to PCA. (b) Segregation of 17 dates varieties and clones according to their quality attributes.
Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility"
<p>This snapshot contains code and data for the preprint "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility".</p> <p>Instructions on re-using the data and running the code can be found in the README.md.</p> <p>Changes:</p> <ul> <li>Added survey instrument and informed consent.</li> </ul>
A synchronized estimation of hourly ground-level concentrations of six criteria air pollutants in China using data from the first geostationary air-quality monitoring satellite
<p>This dataset provides the ground-level concentrations of six criteria air pollutants estimated from the first geostationary air quality monitoring satellite GEMS with a multi-output random forest model.</p>
Figure 1 in Evaluation of some nutritional quality criteria of seventeen Moroccan dates varieties and clones, fruits of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.)
Figure 1. Map of Zagora of the date palm in Morocco as seen from space (Source: Google earth).
Bibliography on criteria for assessing the quality of scientific publications
<p>The data deposited here consist of references to literature that was evaluated during the development of a qualitative survey and an online questionnaire on the qualitative perception of scientific publications.</p> <p>In preparation for these qualitative interviews and the online survey, a literature study on the qualitative perceptions of scientific literature was conducted in January and February 2018. The focus was on the question which internal characteristics, i.e. in the narrower sense content-related factors, influence the perception of a publication as qualitatively valuable or poor. External characteristics as citation counts should not be at the centre of the research - knowing that they control qualitative perception - since their effect on the perception of the quality of a publication is sufficiently discussed (see e.g. Dong, Loh, & Mondry, 2005).<br> The literature study was based on the results of a search in the databases Web of Science, Scopus, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts and the search engine Google Scholar.</p> <p>VisOA_full_results.bib includes references that were considered valuable in principle, VisOA.bib only those that have been considered in the development of the survey instruments.</p>
On the relation between technical debt indicators and quality criteria in Stack Overflow discussions
<p>This is the replication package for the paper "On the relation between technical debt indicators and quality criteria in Stack Overflow discussions". The paper was published on the Technical Research Track of the Bralizian Symposium on Software Engineering.This is the replication package for the paper "On the relation between technical debt indicators and quality criteria in Stack Overflow discussions". The paper was published on the Technical Research Track of the Bralizian Symposium on Software Engineering.</p>
Can Proposed Service Interface Metrics Effectively Evaluate the Quality of RESTful APIs? Dataset and Filter Criteria
<p>The csv datasets contains repositories with API metrics and software quality metrics.</p> <p>We use linear regression to predict a software quality metric with the API metrics.</p> <p> </p> <p>The .txt files contain the lists for the filter criteria to filter out unsuitable repositories.</p>
Quality criterias for a diagnostic test
<p>The figure illustrates <strong>the quality criteria for a diagnostic test</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>Sensitivity and specificity as pre-probability before the test is used in routine practice</li> <li>Positive and negative predictive value as post-probability interpretation of the result </li> </ul> <p><strong>A diagnostic test</strong> is a diagnostic tool with a binary output, i.e. yes/no, sick/healthy, suitable/unsuitable or positive/negative. </p> <p><strong>Explanation</strong></p> <p>Before being used in diagnostics or screening, the two parameters of the diagnostic test <strong>sensitivity </strong>and <strong>specificity </strong>are determined. This is done on (known) sick or infected and healthy or non-infected persons. In the case of sick persons, the statistical measures of true-positive and false-positive are also obtained. In the case of healthy persons, the statistical measures true-negative and false-negative are also obtained.</p> <p>After the test has been performed, <strong>the positive predictive value</strong> indicates the probability that, if the test result is positive, the person is actually sick or infected (post-test probability).</p> <p>After the test has been carried out, <strong>the negative predictive value</strong> indicates the probability that, in the case of a negative test result, the person is actually healthy or non-infected (post-test probability).</p>
Efficacy Study on Quality of Life Criteria of a Digital Application on Any Cellphone (OnKO-Tips&Tricks) for Adolescents and Young Adults Diagnosed With Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05350631. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Development and Validation of Intraoperative Image-quality Criteria
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01660490. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 3. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.