Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

60

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

60 results for “rationale”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo44/100

Data and materials from: "Towards Auditory Profile-based Hearing-aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation"

<p>This repository contains materials and data used and described in:</p> <p><strong>Sanchez-Lopez, R., Fereczkowski, M., Santurette, S., Dau, T., Neher, T. (2021). Towards Auditory Profile-based Hearing-aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation. <em>Audiol. Res.</em>&nbsp;11, no. 1: 10-21.&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11010002 ">https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11010002&nbsp;</a></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p><strong>Background</strong> - The clinical characterization of hearing deficits for hearing-aid fitting purposes is typically based on the pure-tone audiogram only. In a previous study, a group of hearing-impaired listeners completed a comprehensive test battery designed to tap into different dimensions of hearing abilities. A data-driven analysis of the data yielded four clinically relevant patient subpopulations or &ldquo;auditory profiles&rdquo;. The purpose of the current study was to propose and pilot-test profile-based hearing-aid settings to explore their potential for providing more targeted hearing-aid treatment.<br> <strong>Methods </strong>- &nbsp;Four candidate hearing-aid settings were developed and evaluated by a subset of the participants tested previously. The evaluation consisted of multi-comparison preference ratings carried out in realistic sound scenarios.<br> <strong>Results </strong>- &nbsp;Listeners belonging to the different auditory profiles showed different patterns of preference for the tested hearing-aid settings that were largely consistent with the expectations.<br> <strong>Conclusion</strong> - &nbsp;The results of this pilot evaluation support further investigations into stratified, profile-based hearing-aid fitting with wearable hearing aids.</p> <p>Please cite this article when using the data</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Description of the files:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>APBHAF_Audiofiles.zip: </strong>Audio files used in the SenseLabOnline environment. Each folder corresponds to one participant.</li> <li><strong>APBHAF_MUSHA.xlsx: </strong>Raw Data of the MUSHA experiment.</li> <li><strong>APBHAF_MUSHA_Analysis.R: </strong>R code for the data&nbsp;analysis.</li> <li><strong>MUS_SoundScenes.mat</strong>: Mat file with a structure 1x9 MUS with the raw acoustic signals before processing with the hearing-aid simulator. <ul> <li>CurrentMixture: matrix consisting of the simulated acoustic signal recorded by the 4 microphones of the hearing-aid satellites: 1) front-left, 2) back-left, 3) front-right, 4) back-right.</li> <li>CurrentAnchor: matrix consisting of the simulated acoustic signal recorded by the 4 microphones of the hearing-aid satellites: 1) front-left, 2) back-left, 3) front-right, 4) back-right. The Anchor is -6 dB SNR.</li> <li>SampleLabel: Either &quot;Kantine&quot;, &quot;Traffic&quot; or &quot;Quiet&quot;</li> <li>ConditionLabel: Either &quot;Cond1&quot;, &quot;Cond2&quot; or &quot;Cond3&quot;</li> <li>fsmix: sampling frequency. For all signals must be 32000Hz</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>MUSHA_Instruction: </strong>Instructions used for explaining the task and the environment.</li> </ul> <p>* The participant IDs in each of the files has been assigned randomly to ensure the anonymization of the data. The pseudo-anonymized data might be shared under request by direct correspondence with the authors.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

FIG. 3 in Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their rationale

FIG. 3. — Same relationships as in Figure 2, but expressed under the form of a hierarchical inclusion of members into sets.

opencc-zeroDec 2006View details →
zenodo40/100

FIG. 2 in Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their rationale

FIG. 2. — Diagrammatic illustration (as cladograms) of the different kinds of relationships between taxa in a given ergotaxonomy (G1 to G8 are genera; F1 to F4 are families; O1 and O2 are orders; C1 is a class) and nesonyms (N1 to N6) proposed for various protaxa composed of some of the genera G1 to G8. See text for explanation.

opencc-zeroDec 2006View details →
zenodo40/100

FIG. 1 in Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their rationale

FIG. 1. — Diagrammatic illustration (as cladograms) of the different kinds of relationships between taxa in a given ergotaxonomy (G1 to G8 are genera; F1 to F4 are families; O1 and O2 are orders; C1 is a class) and nomina (N1 to N12) proposed for various protaxa composed of some of the genera G1 to G8. See text for explanation.

opencc-zeroDec 2006View details →
zenodo36/100

The Three R's Of Reasonable: Relationships, Rationale, & Resources

<p>Central to applying the principle of optimisation in the system of radiological protection is the evaluation of what level of radiation exposure should be considered &ldquo;as low as reasonably achievable&rdquo; (ALARA) in a given circumstance. Determining what is &ldquo;reasonable&rdquo; is an abstract although somewhat intuitive concept with many potential answers depending on both the situation and those involved, whether individuals or organisations. There are common themes across exposure scenarios and within existing radiation protection guidance related to the determination of reasonableness. However, despite the fairly consistent and agreeable nature, there remains a gap in how to apply these themes in real situations. For example, without measurable goalposts (or a transparent process for setting such goalposts) for determining what constitutes ALARA, we can find ourselves misinterpreting the optimisation process as keeping exposures &ldquo;as low as possible.&rdquo; We thus propose herein, by consolidating and building on existing ideas, an easily understandable and actionable &ldquo;reasonableness&rdquo; framework. This simple, yet broadly applicable tool is intended to help radiation protection practitioners systematically reflect on all of the factors that make up &ldquo;reasonable&rdquo; before making a decision, although the process and decision itself will necessarily retain the complexity of the prevailing circumstance. The proposed &ldquo;Rs&rdquo; of Reasonable represent Relationships (stakeholders, transparency, and empathy), Rationale (contextual, scientific, and ethical justifications), and Resources (technology/technique, finances, time).</p>

opencc-by-2.0Nov 2021View details →
zenodo36/100

Dataset for "Definition and rationale for placebo composition: Cross-sectional analysis of randomized trials and protocols published in high-impact medical journals"

<p>Contains our data extraction sheets</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →
zenodo36/100

Different sources of natural products from the (a) bacterial, (b) archaeal, (c) fungal, (d) protozoan, (e) chromistan, (f) plant and (g) animal kingdoms, the rationale(s) for screening them for antibacterial activity, and associated advantages and disadvantages

<p>This table of information is&nbsp;from the review article&nbsp;&#39;Bioprospecting for Antibacterial drugs: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Natural Product Source Material, Bioassay Selection and Avoidable Pitfalls&#39; (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-020-02849-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-020-02849-1</a>).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo36/100

A Case of Psychogenic Myoclonus Responding to a Novel Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Approach: Rationale, Feasibility, and Possible Neurophysiological Basis

<p>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can relieve motor symptoms related to psychogenic movement disorders (PMDs), but the subtending neurophysiological basis is unclear. We report on a 50-year-old woman with a diagnosis of psychogenic myoclonus in the right lower limb, who was treated with a daily session (in the late morning/early afternoon) of 1 Hz rTMS over the left premotor cortex (PMC), five times a week for 6 weeks. Clinical data and EEG at rest were collected before and immediately and 2-month after the rTMS protocol completion. The patient reported a significant reduction of involuntary movement frequency and intensity and the related disability burden up to the follow-up. In parallel, any abnormality in terms of source current density within and connectivity between the frontal and parietal areas was reset. The short follow&ndash;up period, the lack of extensive neurophysiological measures, and the lack of control treatment represent the main limitation of the study. However, low-frequency rTMS over PMC seems a safe and promising approach for the management of psychogenic myoclonus owing to the combination of cortical neuromodulation and non-specific mechanisms suggesting cognitive-behavioral effects.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo36/100

Digital Appendix of "Continuous Rationale Management" Doctoral Thesis

<p>Digital appendix to the doctoral thesis &quot;Continuous Rationale Management&quot;.</p> <p>Kleebaum A <strong>Continuous Rationale Management</strong> PhD Thesis, Heidelberg University, Germany, 2023, <a href="https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00033470">https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00033470</a></p> <p>The&nbsp; appendix contains the following artifacts for the chapters:</p> <ul> <li>Chapter 4: Protocol of systematic mapping study and R script for analysis.</li> <li>Chapter 9: Anonymized decision knowledge documentation of the case study projects and R script for analysis.</li> <li>Chapter 10: Ground truth data used to evaluate the automatic text classification.</li> <li>Chapter 11: R script for analysis of usage frequencies from log files.</li> </ul> <p>The source code of the ConDec plug-ins is published as follows:</p> <ul> <li>ConDec Jira: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7953646">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7953646</a></li> <li>ConDec Confluence: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7948296">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7948296</a></li> <li>ConDec Bitbucket: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6866299">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6866299</a></li> <li>ConDec Eclipse: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7958350">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7958350</a></li> <li>ConDec Visual Studio Code: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7954331">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7954331</a></li> <li>ConDec Slack: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7955051">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7955051</a></li> </ul> <p>The respective binary releases are provided in GitHub: <a href="https://github.com/cures-hub">https://github.com/cures-hub</a></p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Survival Prolongation by Rationale Innovative Genomics

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03386929. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 4. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Exposure With Acceptance-Based Versus Habituation-Based Rationale for Public Speaking Anxiety

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00842946. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
zenodo32/100

Artifacts for the SPLC 2020 Paper "A Conceptual Model for Unifying Variability in Space and Time" and the ESE journal extension "A Conceptual Model for Unifying Variability in Space and Time: Rationale, Validation, and Illustrative Applications"

<p>These artifacts relate to the SPLC&#39;20 research paper &quot;A Conceptual Model for Unifying Variability in Space and Time&quot; and the Empirical Software Engineering journal extension &quot;A Conceptual Model for Unifying Variability in Space and Time: Rationale, Validation, and Illustrative Applications.&quot;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary file 2; Photographs of various camp survey locations that illustrate various characteristics of the study site and points of rationale for the approach taken to data collection, analysis and interpretation

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Automated rationale generation: a technique for explainable AI and its effects on human perceptions (Dataset)

<p>Explainable AI Dataset for paper published in the proceedings of IUI 2019 titled, &quot;<strong>Automated rationale generation: a technique for explainable AI and its effects on human perceptions</strong>&quot;. Consists of data collected from human participants via Mechanical Turk.<br> <strong>Abstract</strong>:<br> <em>Automated rationale generation</em> is an approach for real-time explanation generation whereby a computational model learns to translate an autonomous agent&#39;s internal state and action data representations into natural language. Training on human explanation data can enable agents to learn to generate human-like explanations for their behavior. In this paper, using the context of an agent that plays <em>Frogger</em>, we describe (a) how to collect a corpus of explanations, (b) how to train a neural rationale generator to produce different styles of rationales, and (c) how people perceive these rationales. We conducted two user studies. The first study establishes the plausibility of each type of generated rationale and situates their user perceptions along the dimensions of <em>confidence, humanlike-ness, adequate justification, and understandability.</em> The second study further explores user preferences between the generated rationales with regard to <em>confidence</em> in the autonomous agent, communicating <em>failure and unexpected behavior.</em> Overall, we find alignment between the intended differences in features of the generated rationales and the perceived differences by users. Moreover, context permitting, participants preferred detailed rationales to form a stable mental model of the agent&#39;s behavior.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2019View details →
zenodo32/100

DATABASE RATIONALE OF CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING CMWGS - RFCS: Minrescue Project

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

On the Rationale and Use of Assertion Messages in Test Code: Insights from Software Practitioners

<p>This is the dataset for the paper: <strong>On the Rationale and Use of Assertion Messages in Test Code: Insights from Software Practitioners</strong></p> <p>This paper was accepted for publication at the International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME 2024)</p> <p>Preprint: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01751" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01751</a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

The Modulatory Role of Communicated Treatment Rationale on Treatment Expectation Effects in Depression.

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04719663. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

OPtimized Stenting Using Intravascular Ultrasound(IVUS) in Long lEsion: Rationale for Simplified criteriA

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01861860. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Rationale, Design and Methods for the Early Surgery in Infective Endocarditis Study (ENDOVAL)

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00624091. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Rationale for New Topical Anthroponotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ACL) Treatment in Kabul

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00947362. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.