Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 3 in Potomida littoralis (Bivalvia, Unionidae) evolutionary history: slow evolution or recent speciation?

Figure 3. Chronogram obtained with BEAST using two independent calibrations: COI substitution rate (scale above) and the opening of the Gibraltar Strait (scale below). The x-axis scale is in million years. Bars indicate 95% HPD intervals.

Figure 2 in Potomida littoralis (Bivalvia, Unionidae) evolutionary history: slow evolution or recent speciation?

Figure 2. Bayesian tree reconstruction based on the two mitochondrial genes analysed. Stars on the branches indicate well supported clades, one star for each method: Bayesian inference, maximum-parsimony and maximum-likelihood.

Figure 4 in Potomida littoralis (Bivalvia, Unionidae) evolutionary history: slow evolution or recent speciation?

Figure 4. Network of P. littoralis haplotypes. I, Iberian Peninsula; K, Turkey; G, Greece; M, Morocco; T, Tunisia; F, France.

Figure 4. Individual multilocus genotype clustering analysis for Podarcis carbonelli. A in Recent evolutionary history of the Iberian endemic lizards Podarcis bocagei (Seoane, 1884) and Podarcis carbonelli Pérez-Mellado, 1981 (Squamata: Lacertidae) revealed by allozyme and microsatellite markers

Figure 4. Individual multilocus genotype clustering analysis for Podarcis carbonelli. A, inferred population structure from the number of clusters (K) = 2 to 5. These plots were obtained from the runs producing the highest values of Ln probability for each value of K, assuming correlated allele frequencies. In these plots, each individual is represented by a column divided into K segments, the size of each corresponding to the individual's estimated membership fraction in each of the K clusters. See Table 1 for locality name abbreviations. B, variation of the value of DK with the number of clusters, following Evanno et al. (2005). C, pie charts representing the mean proportion of membership for K = 4 (chosen by the previous method) for each locality.

Figure 3. Individual multilocus genotype clustering analysis for Podarcis bocagei. A in Recent evolutionary history of the Iberian endemic lizards Podarcis bocagei (Seoane, 1884) and Podarcis carbonelli Pérez-Mellado, 1981 (Squamata: Lacertidae) revealed by allozyme and microsatellite markers

Figure 3. Individual multilocus genotype clustering analysis for Podarcis bocagei. A, inferred population structure from the number of clusters (K) = 2 to 5. These plots were obtained from the runs producing the highest values of Ln probability for each value of K, assuming correlated allele frequencies. In these plots, each individual is represented by a column divided into K segments, the size of each corresponding to the individual's estimated membership fraction in each of the K clusters. See Table 1 for locality name abbreviations. B, variation of the value of DK with the number of clusters, following Evanno et al. (2005). C, pie charts representing the mean proportion of membership for K = 3 and 5 (chosen by the previous method) for each locality.

Figure 2 in Recent evolutionary history of the Iberian endemic lizards Podarcis bocagei (Seoane, 1884) and Podarcis carbonelli Pérez-Mellado, 1981 (Squamata: Lacertidae) revealed by allozyme and microsatellite markers

Figure 2. Synthetic maps showing patterns of geographical variation in allele frequencies across species distribution ranges based on the inversed distance weighted interpolation of the values calculated for each locality of Podarcis bocagei (top) and Podarcis carbonelli (bottom) for the first (A, D), second (B, E), and third (C, F) axes of factorial correspondence analyses. White represents higher and black lower factor score values.

Figure 1 in Recent evolutionary history of the Iberian endemic lizards Podarcis bocagei (Seoane, 1884) and Podarcis carbonelli Pérez-Mellado, 1981 (Squamata: Lacertidae) revealed by allozyme and microsatellite markers

Figure 1. Distribution and localities analysed in this study for Podarcis bocagei (dark grey, circles) and Podarcis carbonelli (light grey, squares) (A), and median-joining networks of mtDNA haplotypes for P. bocagei (B) and P. carbonelli (C) reproduced from Pinho et al., 2007a. Dashed lines indicate the mtDNA groups and corresponding geographical distributions in P. carbonelli. Locality codes and sampling details are given in Table 1. Notice that the distribution shown for P. carbonelli is based on a 20 km buffer of occupied 10 ¥ 10 km UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator) squares and is therefore amplified compared to that in Pinho et al., 2007a. This was necessary in order to visualize geographical patterns of genetic variation (see Material and methods).

zenodo28/100

Figure 1 in Potomida littoralis (Bivalvia, Unionidae) evolutionary history: slow evolution or recent speciation?

Figure 1. Distribution of Potomida littoralis. Numbered points show sampling localities.