Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

203

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

203 results for “rehabilitation robotics”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo44/100

Dataset of the scientific paper " Multimodal robotic system for upper-limb rehabilitation in physical environment" (Advances in Mechanical Engineering)

<p>There are eight files with the following information:<br>     - pos_stateXX.bin, binary file with information of the end effector position of the robot device in meters along the three axis (X, Y, Z) during state XX of the experiment<br>     - target_stateXX.bin, binary file with information of the target position for the robot device in meters along the three axis (X, Y, Z) during state XX of the experiment<br>     - emg_channelXX.bin, binary file with information of channel 1 of the EMG sensor in mV during during the whole time of the experiment<br>     - color_stateXX.bin, binary file with information of color filter information during state XX of the experiment. This information is the percentage of pixels with the correct color (yellow, cyan or magenta) inside the region of interest</p> <p> </p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →
zenodo36/100

Bilateral Stand-alone Robotic Motion-Assisted Finger Exoskeleton for Home Rehabilitation

<p><span>This presents a novel exoskeleton robot which can be used at home for rehabilitating the index fingers of stroke-affected patients. This exoskeleton is designed as a one degree-of-freedom four bar mechanism able to guide the human index finger motion. The proposed device is the only lateral, stand-alone mechanism built till date which can carry the weight of the human hand, thus making the user free from wearing it. The design starts by tracing the trajectory of the index finger using &lsquo;Angulus&rsquo; software. &lsquo;SALAR&rsquo; software is used for dimensional synthesis of four bar mechanism. Using additive manufacturing technology, a prototype of the proposed device is developed. Static force analysis is done to select the most appropriate actuator for producing the required torque to manipulate the fingers effectively. The kinematics of the index finger while performing finger curl exercise is obtained. The proposed linkage mechanism can drive the index fingers of both the hands. Simulation and experimental results proved feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed design to be used for index finger rehabilitation for a wide range of users and applications by making simple minor alterations in the design. Also, the device can be used for rehabilitating the middle fingers together with the index fingers.</span></p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

A case report on intensive, robot-assisted rehabilitation program for brainstem radionecrosis

<p>Radiotherapy is a valid treatment option for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, complications can occur following irradiation of the closest anatomical structures, including brainstem radionecrosis (BRN). The rehabilitation is poorly described in patients with BRN, despite its usefulness in improving functional independence in patients with brain tumors. We aimed at testing the usefulness of intensive, robot-assisted neurorehabilitation program to improve functional independence in a 57-year-old male with BRN.</p> <p>Patient concerns:&nbsp;</p> <p>A 57-year-old male diagnosed with a nasopharyngeal carcinoma, received a radiation total dose of 72 Gy. Owing to the appearance of a severe symptomatology characterized by dysphagia, hearing loss, and left sided hemiparesis, the patient was hospitalized to be provided with intensive pharmacological and neurorehabilitation treatment.</p> <p>Diagnosis:&nbsp;</p> <p>Follow-up brain magnetic resonance imaging disclosed no residual cancer, but some brainstem lesions compatible with BRN areas were appreciable.</p> <p>Intervention:&nbsp;</p> <p>The patient underwent a 2-month conventional, respiratory, and speech therapy. Given that the patient only mildly improved, he was provided with intensive robot-aided upper limb and gait training and&nbsp;virtual reality-based cognitive rehabilitation for other 2 months.</p> <p>Outcomes:&nbsp;</p> <p>The patient reported a significant improvement in functional independence, spasticity, cognitive impairment degree, and balance.</p> <p>Conclusion:&nbsp;</p> <p>Our case suggests the usefulness of neurorobotic intensive rehabilitation in BRN to reduce functional disability. Future studies should investigate whether an earlier, even multidisciplinary rehabilitative treatment could lead to better functional outcome in patients with BRN.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →
zenodo36/100

Experimental data for "A Novel Clinical-Driven Design for Robotic Hand Rehabilitation: Combining Sensory Training, Effortless Setup and Large Range of Motion in a Palmar Device"

<p>Experimental data for the interaction force benchmark test of the PRIDE haptic hand rehabilitation device.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Early After Stroke Using Feedback-controlled Robotics-assisted Treadmill Exercise

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01679600. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Rehabilitation Robotic System ReHand

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06937346. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Evaluation of Robot Assisted Neuro-Rehabilitation

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01253018. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Extension of the MIME Robotic System for Stroke Rehabilitation

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00995774. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Evaluation of Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00333983. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Motor Imagery-based Robotic Arm Training for Stroke Rehabilitation

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01897025. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Robotics For Rehabilitation Therapy: Functional Versus Individual Joint Training

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01050231. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Effectiveness of Intelligent Rehabilitation Robot Training System Combined With Repetitive Facilitative Exercise on Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: a Randomized Control Trial.

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06435624. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Model-informed Patient-specific Rehabilitation Using Robotics and Neuromuscular Modeling

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06008743. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
zenodo32/100

Validation of the pelvic attachment mechanism of NIMBLE, an ambulatory user support gait rehabilitation robot.

<p>Description of the project<br><span><span>NIMBLE project aims to design and validate a novel gait rehabilitation robot. The objective of the robot is to provide ambulatory, body-weight supported walking training assisting user's limbs and its center of mass. The NIMBLE robot is comprised by a robotic frame, a lower limb exoskeleton, and a exoskeleton-frame coupling mechatronics that allows to assist the user's center of mass.</span></span></p> <p>Description of the dataset<br><span><span>This dataset contains the results of an experiment conducted to assess the alteration on walking kinematics due to the mechatronic device coupling the frame and the exoskeleton.</span></span></p> <p>--------------------------<br>METHODOLOGY<br>--------------------------<br>1. Methodology<br>The walking kinematics were recorded and analyzed at slow (0.5 m/s) and normal (1 m/s) speeds under three different conditions: unrestricted walking, walking while wearing the Exo-H3 corset, and walking while wearing the Exo-H3 corset coupled to the robotic frame. Only the corset is worn, to isolate and evaluate the direct impact of the designed mechanism without the kinematic restrictions imposed by the exoskeleton. This approach ensures that the effects observed are solely attributable to the mechanism itself, avoiding any confounding influences from the exoskeleton. This approach allows the evaluation of the influence of the exoskeleton corset, as it is a required component to secure the user to the robotic frame, and a comparison of its impact with that of the robotic frame. For this purpose, joint angles and their maximum and minimum values and ranges of motion (ROM) are analyzed in both the sagittal and frontal planes, along with the step width and the displacement of the CoM in the vertical and horizontal directions.</p> <p>2. Software<br>Data were collected using Kinovea and then processed and analyzed using Matlab.</p> <p>--------------------------<br>FILES<br>--------------------------<br>1. Files&nbsp;<br>One ".m" file is included. For each subject (idX), three subfolders are found:<br>- Calib folder: it contains the initial position and angular value of the markers and angles analyzed.<br>- frontal folder: for both speeds and the three analyzed conditions (Unrestricted walking CL, wearing the corset CC, and attached to the robotic frame CML), it contains the raw data, filtered data, segmented data normalized by gait cycles, mean and standard deviation data of those segmented cycles, and normalized data using the initial value from Calib file, for every marker position in the frontal plane (ankle, knee, hip and center of mass). Also, segmented, mean and deviations are presented from angular values in the frontal plane (right and left hip abduction and pelvic list).<br>- sagittal folder: for both speeds and the three analyzed conditions (Unrestricted walking CL, wearing the corset CC, and attached to the robotic frame CML), it contains the raw data, filtered data, segmented data normalized by gait cycles, mean and standard deviation data of those segmented cycles, and normalized data using the initial value from Calib file, for every marker position in the sagittal plane (hip, knee, ankle and toe tip). Also, segmented, mean and deviations are presented from angular values in the frontal plane (hip, knee and ankle flexo-extension).</p> <p>In addition, one average folder (media) includes average data for the statistical analysis. Signals subfolder includes all segmented data from the previous variables for every speed and conditions, joining the data from every subject in one table, a total of 50 samples (10 segmented cycles x 5 subjects). Value subfolder includes maximum, minimum and ranges of motion of angular variables. Every variable has 50 rows (10 segmented cycles x 5 subjects) and 3 columns (CL, CC, and CML conditions). Also mean step width is presented, as the distance between ankle markers in the frontal plane.</p> <p>--------------------------<br>OTHERS<br>--------------------------<br>1. Data dictionary<br>speed05: data collected at 0.5 m/s<br>speed1: data collected at 1 m/s<br>CL: Unrestricted walking condition<br>CC: Wearing the corset condition<br>CML: Attached to the robotic frame condition<br>R: right leg<br>L: left leg<br>x: horizontal direction<br>y: vertical direction<br>ANKLE, KNEE, HIP, COM: ankle, knee, hip, and virtual center of mass markers in the frontal plane.<br>HIP_lat, KNEE_lat, ANKLE_lat and TOE_lat: hip, knee, ankle, and toe tip markers in the sagittal plane.<br>Abd: hip abduction angle.<br>Hip_Angle, Knee_Angle, Ankle_Angle: hip, knee, and ankle flexo-extension angles.</p> <p>--------------------------<br>SPONSORSHIP INFORMATION AND GRANT IDs<br>--------------------------<br>1. Grant Information<br>This work is part of the R&amp;D project PID2021-123657OB-C32, funded by MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and by &ldquo;ERDF A way of making Europe&rdquo;.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

The Effects Of Upper Extremity Robotic Rehabilitation On Upper Extremity Functions And Gait Parameters

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05136612. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Brainwave Control of a Wearable Robotic Arm for Rehabilitation and Neurophysiological Study in Cervical Spine Injury

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02443558. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Upper Limb Task-Oriented Rehabilitation With Robotic Exoskeleton for Hemiparetic Stroke Patients

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03319992. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Robotic Gait Training VS.Conventional Rehabilitation in SCI

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01432990. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Rehabilitation With and Without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies in Stroke Patients

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06547827. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Robot-Enhanced Stroke Therapy Optimizes Rehabilitation (RESTORE)

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04201613. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 14.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record