Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
81
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
81 results for “research communication”
Dataset: Rainbow color map distorts and misleads research in hydrology – guidance for better visualizations and science communication
<p>The rainbow color map is scientifically incorrect and hinders people with color vision deficiency to view visualizations in a correct way. Due to perceptual non-uniform color gradients within the rainbow color map the data representation is distorted what can lead to misinterpretation of results and flaws in science communication. Here we present the data of a paper survey of 797 scientific publication in the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. With in the survey all papers were classified according to color issues. Find details about the data below.</p> <ul> <li><code>year</code> = year of publication (YYYY)</li> <li><code>date</code> = date (YYYY-MM-DD) of publication</li> <li><code>title</code> = full paper title from journal website</li> <li><code>authors</code> = list of authors comma-separated</li> <li><code>n_authors</code> = number of authors (integer between 1 and 27)</li> <li><code>col_code</code> = color-issue classification (see below)</li> <li><code>volume</code> = Journal volume</li> <li><code>start_page</code> = first page of paper (consecutive)</li> <li><code>end_page</code> = last page of paper (consecutive)</li> <li><code>base_url</code> = base url to access the PDF of the paper with <code>/volume/start_page/year/</code></li> <li><code>filename</code> = specific file name of the paper PDF (e.g. <code>hess-9-111-2005.pdf</code>)</li> </ul> <p>Color classification is stored in the <code>col_code</code> variable with:</p> <ul> <li><code>0</code> = chromatic and issue-free,</li> <li><code>1</code> = red-green issues,</li> <li><code>2</code>= rainbow issues and</li> <li><code>bw</code>= black and white paper.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>See more details (e.g., sample code to analyse the survey data) on https://github.com/modche/rainbow_hydrology</p> <p>Paper: Stoelzle, M. and Stein, L.: Rainbow color map distorts and misleads research in hydrology – guidance for better visualizations and science communication, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4549–4565, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4549-2021, 2021.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Brain-Computer Interfaces for communication: preferences of individuals with locked-in syndrome, caregives and researchers
<p>Nine animation videos used in the questionnaire described in the articles "<strong>Brain-Computer Interfaces for communication: preferences of individuals with locked-in syndrome</strong>" (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1545968321989331">https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968321989331</a>) and "<strong>Brain-Computer Interfaces for communication: preferences of individuals with locked-in syndrome, caregivers and researchers</strong>" (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2021.1958932">https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2021.1958932</a>). <em>Video animations were designed and produced by Merel Horsmeier.</em></p>
Communicating Animal Research Part 1
<p><strong>Episode Summary:</strong></p> <p>In this episode we are discussing the issues connected to communicating animal research. Open Science is based on making science more transparent and accessible, but what does that mean for those who do more controversial research? We will cover what fears scientists might have, and the arguments for and against animal research that scientists often hear. In Part 1, Luiza gives her perspective as a former lab scientist and Emma talks about her ideological change from animal rights activist to science communicator. </p> <p><strong>Links:</strong></p> <ul> <li><a href="http://eara.eu/en/">European Animal Research Association (EARA)</a></li> <li><a href="http://concordatopenness.org.uk/about-the-concordat-on-openness/openness-in-animal-research-public-dialogue">Openness in Animal Research Public Dialogue</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Quotes:</strong></p> <p>'If one scientist feels they can talk about this a bit more then that's good, right?' </p>
Figure 9b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
<p>Figure 9b. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11)</p>
Figure 7c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7c. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 7b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7b. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 8b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 8b. - Workshop visualization - collection of ideas and group visionsFigure 8a.Visualization showing all ideas generated collectively in the first round (session 3, dark grey) or second round (session 4, light grey), and those generated by the respective groups (solid colors) as part of their vision of scholarly communication. Figure 8b.Visualizaton showing all groups' visions as interconnected elements (triples), with common elements overlapping. <br>
Figure 6d. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6d. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's suggested principles (session 11)
Figure 9c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 9c. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11) <br>
Figure 6a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6a. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> Visualizaton showing all groups' visions as interconnected elements (triples), with common elements overlapping.
Figure 5d. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5d. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Visualization showing all ideas generated collectively in the first round (session 3, dark grey) or second round (session 4, light grey), and those generated by the respective groups (solid colors) as part of their vision of scholarly communication.
Figure 6b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6b. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)
Figure 5c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5c. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Screenshot of public Trello board
Figure 5b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5b. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.
Figure 7a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7a. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 9a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 9a. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11) <br>
Figure 5a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5a. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision.
Figure 3b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 3b. - Islands of possibilities (part of YKON facilitation) at Madrid workshopFigure 3a.Islands of possibilities located in workshop roomFigure 3b.Personality modification islandFigure 3c.Observation island <br> Personality modification island
Figure 6c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6c. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)
Figure 3c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 3c. - Islands of possibilities (part of YKON facilitation) at Madrid workshopFigure 3a.Islands of possibilities located in workshop roomFigure 3b.Personality modification islandFigure 3c.Observation island <br> Observation island
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.