Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
123
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
123 results for “review paper”
The Open Review–Based (ORB) dataset: Towards Automatic Assessment of Scientific Papers and Experiment Proposals in High–Energy Physics
<p>We introduce the new comprehensive Open Review–Based dataset (ORB); it includes a curated list of more than 62,000 scientific papers, publications and submitted preprints with their more than 157,000 reviews and final decisions. We gather this information from three peer-reviewed sources: the OpenReview.net, SciPost.org and PeerJ.com websites.</p>
The data that support the findings of a review paper "From urban data to city-scale models: A review of traffic simulation case studies"
<p>This dataset contains the data that were used in a review paper "From urban data to city-scale models: A review of traffic simulation case studies". It contains the following files:</p> <ul> <li>keywords with counts.txt - list of keywords and their counts in the considered corpus of traffic simulation case studies. The data were used to produce Figure 2 and Figure 3 in the paper.</li> <li>Papers analysis.xlsx - Excel file containing the data on the reviewed studies. The document has the following sheets: <ul> <li> Appendix A - contains a table short reference, location, simulation period, spatial scale, simulated units and marked categories for a paper;</li> <li>Geography - contains data on geographical distribution of simulated areas between world regions and countries, these data were used to produce Figure 4 in the paper;</li> <li>Software tools - contains data on simulation tools used in the studies. </li> <li>Journals and conferences - contains data on where the reviewed papers were published.</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
[review paper] Sustaining the 'Frozen Footprints' of Scholarly Communication through Open Citations_Dataset
<p>This dataset belongs to the review titled <em>Sustaining the ‘Frozen Footprints’ of Scholarly Communication through Open Citations</em>. The review explores the developments in the open citations movement, the OpenCitations infrastructure, and the Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC), providing a comprehensive overview of key milestones and initiatives.</p> <p>The dataset includes bibliographic and citation data for 174 scholarly outputs and 149 blogposts analyzed in the review. These outputs were drawn from a range of sources, including journal articles, conference proceedings, and other scholarly materials. The data has been curated to adhere to open citation principles, ensuring it is structured, separable, and openly accessible. It is provided in accordance with the licenses and terms of use of the original databases.</p> <p>Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers can use this dataset to explore the evolution of open citations and to further their understanding of the connections between scholarly works in the field of open research.</p>
Dataset for paper: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for Ontology-based Support of Digital Forensics
<p>PLEASE, READ THE README.TXT FILE</p> <p>This document describes how to interpret the data and metadata files, and it is licensed under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-AS (https://creativecommons.org/licenses).</p> <p>The file "primary_studies_final_set-DATA.csv" is a CSV file format and contains the raw data extracted from our systematic literature review primary studies. Such data were extracted based on the research questions defined for our study.<br> The file "primary_studies_final_set-METADATA.csv" is a CSV file format and contains the following:<br> - the first row contains two pieces of information: the data type, which might be original or reused;<br> - the second row contains the reused data URL/DOI, which should inform the URL or DOI from which the data was reused, or n/a if the data is original;<br> - the third row contains the date of data generation in the format mm/dd/yyyy;<br> - the fourth row contains 11 elements describing each of the fields of the file "primary_studies_final_set-DATA.csv": the study ID, title, objective, six research questions, and an observation field; and<br> - the fifth row describes the data type of each field of the file "primary_studies_final_set-DATA.csv".<br> The .bib files contain the bibtex entry for the final set of studies.<br> The license.txt file describes the Creative Commons license for this material.</p> <p>We hope you have an excellent read!!</p> <p>Cheers!<br> Thiago, Edson, and Avelino</p>
Reproduction package for paper "How far are we from reproducible research on code smell detection? A systematic literature review"
<p>Checklist and data extracted from publications analyzed for "How far are we from reproducible research on code smell detection? A systematic literature review" paper, together with processing scripts and calculations of Cohen's Kappa.</p> <p>Paper that describes details of the data is available here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106783</p>
Philosphical papers reviewed and scored for their compliance with a vegan ethic 1975-2020
<p>This is the updated dataset to complement the submitted manuscript "<strong>Has the philosophical case for animal liberation been proved? A systematic and narrative review of the philosophical literature 1975-2020."</strong></p>
Dataset supporting the paper "Bipolar single-molecule electroluminescence and electrofluorochromism. Physical Review Research 5, 033027 (2023)"
<p>Dataset corresponding to theoretical calculations in the paper "Bipolar single-molecule electroluminescence and electrofluorochromism. Physical Review Research 5, 033027 (2023)" DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033027</p> <p>Please cite as:</p> <p>Tzu-Chao Hung, Roberto Robles, Brian Kiraly, Julian H. Strik, Bram A. Rutten, Alexander A. Khajetoorians, Nicolas Lorente and Daniel Wegner. Dataset supporting the paper "Bipolar single-molecule electroluminescence and electrofluorochromism. Physical Review Research 5, 033027 (2023)" DOI:10.5281/zenodo.13768737</p> <p>List of files:</p> <p>Several folders corresponding to the figures of the paper. They contain:</p> <p>CONTCAR files: relaxed structures in VASP format. They can be visualized with VESTA (https://jp-minerals.org/vesta/en/).</p> <p>.agr: grace files (https://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/).</p> <p>Image files in png format.</p>
spanichella/RP_EMSE_MCR_2019 v.1.0.1 Second release of of the replication Package for the paper "An Empirical Investigation of Relevant Changes and Automation Needs in Modern Code Review".
<p>Replication Package for the paper "An Empirical Investigation of Relevant Changes and Automation Needs in Modern Code Review"</p> <p>Structure</p> <pre><code>project_raw_data/ gerrit_review_comments.csv gerrit_review_changes.csv survey_raw_data/ google_forms_survey.pdf google_forms_survey.csv RQ1_taxonomy_mcr/ RQ1_inception_phase/ initial_taxonomy.pdf intermediate_taxonomy.pdf RQ1_definition_phase/ Q1.2_evaluation_survey.csv cram_classified.csv cram.pdf RQ2_automation_needs/ Q2.1-Q2.5_evaluation_survey.xlsx Q2.6-Q2.7_evaluation_survey.xlsx Q2.1-Q2.7_question_index.csv Now "RQ3_automated_support/" contain the results concerning RQ2.1 in the paper. content explained in the README.md file located in "RQ3_automated_support/README.md" </code></pre> <p>Contents of the Replication Package</p> <p><strong>project-raw-data/</strong> contains the data used for the creation of our taxonomies, it includes information about the ten open-source projects.</p> <ul> <li><code>gerrit_review_comments.csv</code> - information about all in-line review comments used for this paper</li> <li><code>gerrit_review_changes.csv</code> - information about all patches analyzed that contain the in-line comments</li> </ul> <p><strong>survey_raw_data/</strong> contains information about the survey conducted for the paper.</p> <ul> <li><code>google_forms_survey.pdf</code> - the distributed <em>Google Forms</em> of our survey</li> <li><code>google_forms_survey.csv</code> - all survey answers obtained from 52 survey participants</li> </ul> <p><strong>RQ1_taxonomy_mcr/</strong> contains information and data about the elicited taxonomies in our paper (RQ1).</p> <ul> <li><strong>RQ1_inception_phase/</strong> <ul> <li><code>initial_taxonomy.pdf</code> - initial taxonomy obtained in the inception phase of our paper</li> <li><code>intermediate_taxonomy.pdf</code> - intermediate taxonomy after integrating and merging the initial taxonomy with the one by Beller <em>et al</em> [1]</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>RQ1_definition_phase/</strong> <ul> <li><code>Q1.2_evaluation_survey.csv</code> - relevant survey feedback with additional taxonomy categories integrated into <em>CRAM</em></li> <li><code>cram_classified.csv</code> - classified review comments (<code>gerrit_review_comments.csv</code>) into <em>CRAM</em></li> <li><code>cram.pdf</code> - <em>CRAM</em> taxonomy</li> <li><code>cram_classified_with_frequency_information2020.xls</code> - it contain the information used to compute the frequency of CRAM changes, derived by the analysis of the 211 commits</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>RQ2_automation_needs/</strong> contains the encoded evaluation of the survey question Q2.1-2.7 for RQ2</p> <ul> <li><code>Q2.1-Q2.5_evaluation_survey.xlsx</code> - the encoded evaluation of the survey questions Q2.1-Q2.5 (used for the <em>Automation Needs</em> Section in the paper) and contains the following sheets: <ul> <li><strong>all Findings</strong>: Very detailed findings matrix distilled from all answers concerning possible automated solutions or general possibilities to achieve automation in MCR. Every feedback was analyzed and decomposed into single findings. These findings are grouped, into categories of our Taxonomy of Code Changes in MCR (CRAM). Red represent in the feedback-text where the corresponding category was distilled from.</li> <li><strong>unique Findings</strong>: As one participant could mention the same categories/solutions in multiple feedbacks, the following matrix is cleaned of any duplication of participant answers. Multiple feedbacks containing the same information by one participant were removed, leaving only distinct occurances.</li> <li><strong>aggregated by Solution</strong>: Aggregated feeback clustered into abstracted solutions and the number of times participants mentioned the solution.</li> <li><strong>aggregated by Taxonomy</strong>: Aggregated feeback grouped by low-level categoried in CRAM.</li> </ul> </li> <li><code>Q2.6-Q2.7_evaluation_survey.xlsx</code> - the encoded evaluation of the survey questions Q2.6-Q2.7 (used for the <em>Automation Needs</em> Section in the paper) and contains the following sheets: <ul> <li><strong>all Findings</strong>: Very detailed findings matrix distilled from all answers concerning possible techniques, approaches and data to achieve automation in MCR. Every feedback was analyzed and decomposed into single findings. These findings are grouped, into categories of our Taxonomy of Code Changes in MCR (CRAM). Red represent in the feedback-text where the corresponding category was distilled from.</li> <li><strong>unique Findings</strong>: As one participant could mention the same categories/solutions in multiple feedbacks, the following matrix is cleaned of any duplication of participant answers. Multiple feedbacks containing the same information by one participant were removed, leaving only distinct occurances.</li> <li><strong>aggregated by low-level taxonomy</strong>: Aggregated mentionings of approaches/data by developers in the survey grouped by low-level taxonomy category.</li> <li><strong>aggregated by high-level taxonomy</strong>: Aggregated mentionings of approaches/data by developers in the survey grouped by high-level taxonomy category.</li> </ul> </li> <li><code>Q2.1-Q2.7_question_index.csv</code> - table of IDs given to each participant-question pair for Q2.1-Q2.7 in order to trace back the feeback.</li> <li><code>cram_survey-with_criticality_and_feasibility2020.xls</code> and <code>cram_survey-with_relevance_and_completeness_information2020.xls</code>: they contain we results of the survey, involving 14 additional participants (12 developers and 2 researchers), not involved in the aforementioned survey, and performed to qualitatively assess the relevance and completeness of the identified MCR change types as well as assess how critical and feasible to implement are some of the identified techniques to support MCR activities.</li> </ul> <p><strong>RQ2_1_automated_support/</strong> (or <strong>RQ3_automated_support/</strong> )- content explained in the README.md file located in "RP_EMSE_MCR_2019/tree/master/EMSE_MCR_2019/RQ3_automated_support/README.md"</p> <p>References</p> <p>[1] Moritz Beller, Alberto Bacchelli, Andy Zaidman, and Elmar Juergens. 2014. Modern code reviews in open-source projects: which problems do they fix?. In Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2014). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 202-211. DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597082">http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597082</a></p>
Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals in Austria 2008-2013
<p>In 2014, Archambault et al. published a report which provided data about Open Access publishing for the years 2008-2013 for all countries of the European Research Area (ERA) as well as for Brazil, Canada, Japan and the USA. They differentiated not only by disciplines but also by three OA categories: Golden, Green and a residual category. For the dataset, the data for Austria and the whole area examined has been extracted and modified. The results show above-average rates for Austria in almost all disciplines.</p>
Scientific names used for the South American sea lion in peer-review papers (2010-2020)
<p>The valid specific name of the South American sea lion was controversial for many years since <em>Otaria flavescens</em> (Shaw, 1800) and <em>Otaria byronia</em> (de Blainville, 1820) were the disputing designations. The present database summarizes the use of both names in peer-reviewed papers obtain in Google Scholar for the period 2010-2020.</p>
APPENDIX A - SEARCH PROTOCOLE AND PAPERS LIST - Cognitive Neuroscience's Transposition in STEAM Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review
<p>An integrative literature review was performed corresponding to PRISMA’ protocol in order to integrate issues over an innovative curriculum through cognitive sciences didactic transposition in STEAM classrooms. The search action was handled using various international databases. Each paper was selected alongside the PICO strategy and a defined selection criterion. Analysis of the literature between 2000 and 2021 is presented.</p>
Appendix for Review Paper Entitled: "A literature review of "lawful" text and data mining."
<p><span>This appendix complements the review paper entitled ““A literature review of “lawful” text and data mining” with 8 Tables highlighting which scholarly works were used for each section of the literature review, but also how those works were used. </span></p>
Dataset: What Are Cybersecurity Education Papers About? A Systematic Literature Review of SIGCSE and ITiCSE Conferences
<p>This repository contains supplementary materials for the following conference paper:</p> <p>Valdemar Švábenský, Jan Vykopal, Pavel Čeleda.<br> <em>What Are Cybersecurity Education Papers About? A Systematic Literature Review of SIGCSE and ITiCSE Conferences.</em><br> In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2020).<br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366816">https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366816</a></p> <p>Preprint available at: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11675">https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11675</a></p> <p><strong>How to cite</strong></p> <p>If you use or build upon the materials, please use the BibTeX entry below to cite the original paper (not only this web link).</p> <pre><code class="language-json">@inproceedings{Svabensky2020what, author = {\v{S}v\'{a}bensk\'{y}, Valdemar and Vykopal, Jan and \v{C}eleda, Pavel}, title = {{What Are Cybersecurity Education Papers About? A Systematic Literature Review of SIGCSE and ITiCSE Conferences}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education}, series = {SIGCSE '20}, location = {Portland, OR, USA}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, month = {03}, year = {2020}, pages = {2--8}, numpages = {7}, isbn = {978-1-4503-6793-6}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366816}, doi = {10.1145/3328778.3366816}, }</code></pre> <p><strong>Attached content</strong></p> <p>The file "SIGCSE 2020 Literature Review.xlsx" is an Excel spreadsheet with three sheets corresponding to 1) all papers found by automated search, 2) manually excluded papers, and 3) papers included in the literature review. There are also three CSV files that correspond to the three individual sheets.</p>
Fig. 3 in Review paper Stimulation of Plant Growth through Interactions of Bacteria and Protozoa: Testing the Auxiliary Microbial Loop Hypothesis
Fig. 3. Difference in growth responses of 16 cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in autoclaved soil and with a diverse soil bacterial filtrate reinoculated into the farmland soil in presence (black bars) and absence (white bars) of Acanthamoeba sp. Shoot dry weight (a), total root length (b), number of laterals at seminal root (c), and total nitrogen uptake (d). Vertical error bars represent standard deviation (n = 4–9). The symbols * and ** indicate a significant difference at P <0.05 and 0.01 by one way ANOVA, respectively. Data from Somasundaram et al. (2008).
Fig. 1 in Review paper Stimulation of Plant Growth through Interactions of Bacteria and Protozoa: Testing the Auxiliary Microbial Loop Hypothesis
Fig. 1. Respiration of glucose-C (µg CO -C * g–1 soil) after addi2 tion of 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, and 8,000 ppm glucose to soil from the Heteren field site (Scheu 1992). 1,000 ppm glucose are completely respired by soil microorganisms within a single day, but glucose was not lasting longer than 4 days after saturation of the soil with glucose at 2,000–8,000 ppm (mean of 3 replicates ± 1 SD, see Ekelund et al. (2009) for a characterization of the soil).
Fig. 4 in Ecology of Soil Eumycetozoans Review paper
Fig. 4. Fruiting bodies of Hemitrichia calyculata (Speg.) M. L. Farr (photo by Kim Fleming). Scale bar: 1.0 mm.
Appendix for Review Paper Entitled: "A literature review of "lawful" text and data mining."
<p>This appendix complements the review paper entitled ““A literature review of “lawful” text and data mining” with 8 Tables highlighting which scholarly works were used for each section of the literature review, but also how those works were used.</p>
Supplementary data for "a systematic literature review on design for testability approaches in software systems" paper
<p>The Microsoft Excel files containing the supplementary data and diagrams for the paper:</p> <p><strong>A systematic literature review on design for testability approaches in software systems</strong></p> <p>The article is under review in the ACM Computing Surveys.</p> <p> </p>
FIG, 1. John William Daly (1933–2008) on the upper Río San Juan. This paper is dedicated to John Daly, our late friend and colleague, who helped collect three of the new species here described. In addition to his globally acclaimed discoveries in chemistry and pharmacology, John was an accomplished field herpetologist who contributed importantly to the systematics and natural history of dendrobatoid frogs (see Grant et al., 2006; Myers, 2009). This photograph shows John at age 37, with the upper Río San Juan behind him and branches overhead of a madroño tree (probably Garcinia magnifolia, syn. Rheedia chocoensis, Clusiaceae). When in South America, John was never far from a dendrobatid frog—this time, in the tree above his head, a tiny, undescribed semiarboreal species (also collected and later named "Dendrobates fuguritus" by our colleague Philip Silverstone). Other dendrobatids found nearby included Phyllobates aurotaenia (Boulenger, 1913), which was then being used for poisoning blowgun darts, and also the nontoxic species that we name Silverstoneia dalyi herein. (Photograph by C. W. Myers, 2 km above Playa de Oro, Chocó, February 16, 1971.) in Review of the Frog Genus Silverstoneia, with Descriptions of Five New Species from the Colombian Chocó (Dendrobatidae: Colostethinae)
FIG, 1. John William Daly (1933–2008) on the upper Río San Juan. This paper is dedicated to John Daly, our late friend and colleague, who helped collect three of the new species here described. In addition to his globally acclaimed discoveries in chemistry and pharmacology, John was an accomplished field herpetologist who contributed importantly to the systematics and natural history of dendrobatoid frogs (see Grant et al., 2006; Myers, 2009). This photograph shows John at age 37, with the upper Río San Juan behind him and branches overhead of a madroño tree (probably Garcinia magnifolia, syn. Rheedia chocoensis, Clusiaceae). When in South America, John was never far from a dendrobatid frog—this time, in the tree above his head, a tiny, undescribed semiarboreal species (also collected and later named "Dendrobates fuguritus" by our colleague Philip Silverstone). Other dendrobatids found nearby included Phyllobates aurotaenia (Boulenger, 1913), which was then being used for poisoning blowgun darts, and also the nontoxic species that we name Silverstoneia dalyi herein. (Photograph by C. W. Myers, 2 km above Playa de Oro, Chocó, February 16, 1971.)
Data for the paper, "Social media data for environmental sustainability: a critical review of opportunities, threats and ethical use"
<p>These data were collected for the paper, "Social media data for environmental sustainability: a critical review of opportunities, threats and ethical use" published in One Earth. It includes a database of studies applying social media data in environmental sustainability research, which were collected and reviewed in full by the authors. Rather than providing a comprehensive summary of all relevant literature like in a systematic review, our objective was to take stock and evaluate the previous body of work in the field in order to promote conceptual innovation from its critical examination. Building on a set of 169 studies collected in a previous systematic review of social media data applications in environmental research (Ghermandi and Sinclair 2019), the database includes additional relevant studies that were identified by snowballing previous references and adding further gray and scientific academic articles known to the authors. For studies to be included in our analysis, they had to involve the use of data from one or more social media platforms and investigate human interactions with and/or impacts on the environment. We relied on a broad definition of social media including any website or application that enables users to create and share content or to participate in social networking (e.g., blogging sites, recommendation sites, and online forums). We further strengthened the analysis by including insights from additional literature on social media that do not have a direct application to environmental sustainability (e.g., studies on biases in social media data). The final database consists of 415 studies, which were published between 2011 and 2021.</p> <p> </p> <p>Ghermandi, Andrea, and Michael Sinclair. "Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map." <em>Global environmental change</em> 55 (2019): 36-47.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.