Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig. 5. Flavalona rustica (Scott, 1895) comb. nov. A–N. Labrum, antennule and thoraciс limbs of parthenogenetic ♀ from Bol'shoe Torfyanoe lake, Bolshoi Solovetskiy Island (White Sea), Russia. A–B. Labrum. C. Antennule. D. Limb I. E. IDL and ODL of limb I. F. Scrapers of limb II. G. Gnathobase of limb II. H. Exopodite of limb III. I. Inner portion of limb III. J. Exopodite of limb IV. K. Inner portion of limb IV. L. Limb V. M. Gnathobase of limb V. N. Limb VI. O–P. Adult ♁. O. Lateral view. P. Postabdomen. Figure O redrawn from Alonso (1996) and P from Sinev (1999a).

Fig.3. A in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig.3. A. Flavalona cheni (Sinev, 1999) comb. nov., head pores of parthenogenetic ♀. B–C. Flavalona natalensis (Sinev, 2008) comb. nov., parthenogenetic ♀. B. Lateral view. C. Head pores. D. Flavalona setigera (Brehm, 1931) comb. nov., head pores of parthenogenetic ♀. E–F. Flavalona weltneri (Keilhack, 1905) comb. nov., parthenogenetic ♀. E. Head pores. F. Postabdomen. Figures A and D from Sinev (1999a), B–C from Sinev (2008), E redrawn from Flössner (2000) and F redrawn from Van Damme et al. (2010).

Fig. 2 in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig. 2. Flavalona costata (Sars, 1862) comb. nov., Randsfjorden Lake, Norway. A–L. Labrum and thoraciс limbs of parthenogenetic ♀. A. Labrum. B. Limb I. C. ODL of limb I. D. Ejector hooks of limb I. E. Limb II. F. Exopodite of limb III. G–H. Inner portion of limb III. I. Exopodite of limb IV. J. Inner portion of limb IV. K. Limb V. L. Limb VI. M–N. Thoracic limb I of adult ♁.

Fig. 1 in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig. 1. Flavalona costata (Sars, 1862) comb. nov., Randsfjorden Lake, Norway. A–K. Parthenogenetic ♀. A. Lateral view. B. Ventral margin of valves. C. Anterior setae of valves. D. Posterior setae of valves. E. Posteroventral corner and posterior margin of valves. F. Head shield. G–H. Head pores. I. Postabdomen. J. Antennule. K. Antenna. L. Ephippial ♀. M. Ephippium. N–P. ♁. N. Lateral view. O. Postabdomen. P. Antennule and outline of rostrum.

Fig. 6 in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig. 6. Flavalona bicolor (Frey, 1965) comb. nov. A–E. Parthenogenetic ♀. A. Lateral view (specimen retaining valves from previous moult). B. Head shield. C. Head pores. D. Labrum. E. Postabdomen. F. Postabdomen of adult ♁. — G–J. Flavalona hudeci (Sinev, 1999) comb. nov., parthenogenetic ♀ G. Lateral view. H. Head pores. I. Posteroventral corner of valves. J. Thoracic limb V. — K–O. Flavalona iheringula (Sinev & Kotov, 2004) comb. nov. K–M. Parthenogenetic ♀. K. Lateral view. L. Head pores. M. Thoracic limb V. N–O. Adult ♁. N. Lateral view. O. Postabdomen. — P. Flavalona sphagnophila (Van Damme & Eggermont, 2011) comb. nov., parthenogenetic ♀, head pores. Figures A–F from Sinev (2009), G–J redrawn from Hudeč (1998), K–M from Sinev (2001), N–O from Kotov & Sinev (2004) and P redrawn from Van Damme & Eggermont (2011).

opencc-zeroDec 2003View details →

FIGURES 16 – 21. Female genitalia and papillae anales. 16 in Systematics of Schinia cupes (Grote) complex: Revised status of Schinia crotchii (Hy. Edwards) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Heliothinae)

FIGURES 16 – 21. Female genitalia and papillae anales. 16, Schinia cupes; 17, S. crotchii; 18, S. deserticola; 19, S. cupes, papillae anlaes; 20, S. crotchii, papillae anales; 21, S. deserticola, papillae anales.

opencc-zeroDec 2003View details →

FIGURES 10 – 15. Male genitalia and aedoeagus. 10 in Systematics of Schinia cupes (Grote) complex: Revised status of Schinia crotchii (Hy. Edwards) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Heliothinae)

FIGURES 10 – 15. Male genitalia and aedoeagus. 10, Schinia cupes; 11, S. cupes, aedeagus; 12, S. crotchii; 13, S. crotchii, aedeagus; 14, S. deserticola; 9, 15, S. deserticola, aedeagus.

opencc-zeroDec 2004View details →

FIGURES 5 – 12 in Revision of the systematic status of Helminthoglypta walkeriana morroensis (Hemphill, 1911) (Gastropoda: Pulmonata)

FIGURES 5 – 12. Shells of Helminthoglypta morroensis and H. walkeriana. Figures 5 – 8. Helminthoglypta morroensis, BR 2571, Highway 1 at Stenner Road, San Luis Obispo; top, side, and basal views of shell and detail of papillose sculpture (scored as Ppl = 3, see Methods section) on shoulder of penultimate and body whorls. Shell diameter 23.1 mm. Figures 9 – 12. Helminthoglypta walkeriana, BR 2568, Elfin Forest; detail of papillose sculpture (Ppl = 1) and spiral grooves (Grv = 2) on shoulder of penultimate and body whorls, top, side, and basal views of shell. Shell diameter 22.1 mm.

opencc-zeroDec 2004View details →

FIGURE 1 in Revision of the systematic status of Helminthoglypta walkeriana morroensis (Hemphill, 1911) (Gastropoda: Pulmonata)

FIGURE 1. Geographic distribution of Helminthoglypta walkeriana () and Helminthoglypta morroensis () shown as line polygons. Open symbols represent locations of occurrence; filled symbols indicate sites where shells were collected for morphometric analyses (see Table 1 for site descriptions and abbreviations). Projected distribution of H. morroensis beyond documented shell occurrences based on topography, soils, and vegetation similarities with known sites. Shaded regions are communities, as labeled.

Fig. 7. A in Contribution to the knowledge of Batrachideini (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae): description of two new flightless genera, Naskreckiana and Procellator, and revision of the status of Eotetrix

Fig. 7. A nymph of Procellator kai gen. & sp. nov. photographed in its natural habitat by Kai Squires.

Fig. 3. A in Contribution to the knowledge of Batrachideini (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae): description of two new flightless genera, Naskreckiana and Procellator, and revision of the status of Eotetrix

Fig. 3. A living female individual of Naskreckiana, potentially representing an undescribed species of the genus. Photographed by Piotr Naskrecki.

Fig. 6 in Contribution to the knowledge of Batrachideini (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae): description of two new flightless genera, Naskreckiana and Procellator, and revision of the status of Eotetrix

Fig. 6. An adult female of Procellator kai gen. & sp. nov. photographed in its natural habitat by Kai Squires.

Fig. 2 in Contribution to the knowledge of Batrachideini (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae): description of two new flightless genera, Naskreckiana and Procellator, and revision of the status of Eotetrix

Fig. 2. The holotype of Naskreckiana kosemeni gen. & sp. nov. A – hind tarsus; B – body in lateral view; C – body in dorsal view; D–E – head in anterior view; F – head in dorsal view; G – knee of the hind leg, showing the antegenicular and the genicular teeth. Photographs by Filippo Maria Buzzetti, Josip Skejo and Jadranka Škorput.

Fig. 5 in Contribution to the knowledge of Batrachideini (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae): description of two new flightless genera, Naskreckiana and Procellator, and revision of the status of Eotetrix

Fig. 5. The holotype of Procellator kai gen. & sp. nov. with key diagnostic characters marked. Photographed by Kai Squires.

Fig. 1 in Contribution to the knowledge of Batrachideini (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae): description of two new flightless genera, Naskreckiana and Procellator, and revision of the status of Eotetrix

Fig. 1. Illustrations of some of the characters used in the key. A – shape of the eyes; B – elevation of the median carina of the pronotum; C – undulations of the median carina of the pronotum. The drawings were made after photographs taken by Josef Tumbrinck, Daniela Silva, Marcelo Pereira, Josip Skejo, Jadranka Škorput, Filippo Maria Buzzetti, and Holger Braun, available on the Orthoptera Species File website (CIGLIANO et al. 2023).

Fig. 4 in Contribution to the knowledge of Batrachideini (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae): description of two new flightless genera, Naskreckiana and Procellator, and revision of the status of Eotetrix

Fig. 4. Living male (top) and female (bottom) individuals of Naskreckiana kosemeni gen. & sp. nov. in their natural habitat. Photographed in Braulio Carrillo National Park in Costa Rica by Roland Lupoli.

Figure 5 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 5. Global phylogenetic trees of killer whales based on (a) haplotypes from 452 mitogenomes and (b) 49 nuclear genome sequences. Reprinted with permission from Morin et al. [15] (figure 2; by permission from John Wiley & Sons, licence 5458310335802) and [9] (electronic supplementary material, figure S3b, by permission from Andrew D. Foote). Black branches in (a) lead to haplotypes that are from animals that have not been identified to ecotype (see electronic supplementary material, table S1 from [15]).

Figure 3 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 3. PCA plot of first two principal components based on (a) 88 SNPs: offshore (n = 3), resident (n = 11), Bigg's (n = 30) from data in Morin et al. [15]; (b) 26 microsatellites: offshore (n = 5), resident (n = 250), Bigg's (n = 116) (samples genotyped at ≥20 loci) [56]; unpublished); (c) 3678 RADseq SNPs: offshore (n = 7), resident (n = 52) and Bigg's (n = 37) populations [57,62]; (d) 1 00 000 (subset from 6 371 282) SNPs from 147 high-coverage genomes of offshore (n = 7), Bigg's (n = 14) and resident (n = 126) samples from multiple geographically and behaviourally defined subpopulations (Alaska, northern and southern resident populations) (based on subset of SNP genotype data from [113]. See Supplementary Materials for methods and data set information.

Figure 7 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 7. Photographs of neotype skulls for (a) Orcinus rectipinnus (USNM 594671) and (b) Orcinus ater (USNM 594672).

Figure 1 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 1. Expected range maps for (a) resident and (b) Bigg's killer whales, including locations of samples used for mitogenome analysis (figure 5a, resident n = 106, Bigg's n = 93) [15]. Distribution ranges have been inferred based on published identifications of individuals that are identified by ecotype [48–53]. Sample distributions cover the known ranges of both ecotypes, with the exception of residents of Oregon and northern California, and both ecotypes off northern Japan (Hokkaido) in the western Pacific [48,54]. Sample maps for microsatellite data are in electronic supplementary material, figure S2.