Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
14
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
14 results for “rural-urban gradient”
Figure S2 in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient
Figure S2. MDS ordination indicating the clear separation of the two land use groups based on the urbanisation measures.
Figure 6. A in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient
Figure 6. A, Percentage distribution of alien and indigenous species per site; B, the indigenous (ISR) and alien (ASR) species richness per site; C, the percentage of the total average cover of all alien species per site; D, the associated adjusted Floristic Quality Assessment Index values (adjFQAI) of each site; arranged along a gradient of increasing percentage urban landcover.
Figure S1 in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient
Figure S1. Cluster analysis results based on the urbanisation measures indicating clear grouping between the urban sites 1 and 2 and the rural sites.
Figure 3. A in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient
Figure 3. A, Total number of species per wetland site (alpha diversity); B, the average species richness per transect for each site; C, the size of each wetland; arranged along a gradient of increasing percentage urban landcover.
Figure 4. A in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient
Figure 4. A, Beta diversity between sites (calculated as the average between all the rural sites (R1–R12), the average between the two urban sites and all the rural sites (U1 and U2), and between the two urban sites (U)); B, the SIMPER analysis results of the average similarity of the transects in each wetland site; arranged along a gradient of increasing percentage urban landcover.
Figure 5. A in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient
Figure 5. A, Wetland index values (WIV) of each site; B, the average site cover descriptions; C, the percentage average growth form distribution at each site; D, the average functional diversity per site (upland (U), facultative upland (FU), facultative (F), facultative wetland (FW), obligate wetland (OB)); arranged along a gradient of increasing urban landcover.
Figure 1 in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient
Figure 1. Study area indicating the urban area of Potchefstroom, its rural surroundings and the 14 wetland study sites. Inset map shows the size and location of the urban area and Mooi River within the former Tlokwe Municipal area.
Figure 2 in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient
Figure 2. NMDS ordination for the average cover-abundance per transect per site of all species.
Limited evidence for genetic differentiation or adaptation in two amphibian species across replicated rural-urban gradients
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Supplementary material 1 from: Palomo-Campesino S, Palomo I, Moreno J, González J (2018) Characterising the rural-urban gradient through the participatory mapping of ecosystem services: insights for landscape planning. One Ecosystem 3: e24487. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24487
List of the 19 socio-demographic and ecological parameters used for the study area clustering and their values for each municipality of the study area.
Supplementary material 2 from: Palomo-Campesino S, Palomo I, Moreno J, González J (2018) Characterising the rural-urban gradient through the participatory mapping of ecosystem services: insights for landscape planning. One Ecosystem 3: e24487. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24487
Eigenvalue, percentage of explained variablity and accumulated percentage of explained variability of the five factors (with an eingenvalue higher than 1) result of the PCA analysis and used for the HCA analysis.
Supplementary material 3 from: Palomo-Campesino S, Palomo I, Moreno J, González J (2018) Characterising the rural-urban gradient through the participatory mapping of ecosystem services: insights for landscape planning. One Ecosystem 3: e24487. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24487
Factors' loadings for each of the 19 socio-demographic and ecological variables analysed. Values in bold are statistically significant at P>0.05.
Supplementary material 1 from: Wolf J, Haase D, Kühn I (2020) The functional composition of the neophytic flora changes in response to environmental conditions along a rural-urban gradient. NeoBiota 54: 23-47. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.54.38898
: Data type: (measurement/occurrence/multimedia/etc.)
Dataset on 'Green in grey: ecosystem services and disservices perceptions from small-scale green infrastructure along a rural-urban gradient in Bengaluru, India'
<p>This dataset includes the raw data of a survey of 649 residents of 61 villages along a rural-urban gradient in Bengaluru, India. It presents socio-demographic characteristics (village, village rural-urban state, age, gender, level of education, caste, and sources of household income) and Likert-scale answers (ranging from 1, i.e., not important to 5, i.e., very important) to rank the perceived importance of ecosystem services and disservice from five types of small-scale green infrastructure: Domestic trees (DT), Farm trees (FT), Street trees (ST), Platform trees (PT), Temple trees (TT).</p> <p>The complete method is described in Thapa, P., Torralba, M., Bhaskar, D., Nagendra, H., Plieninger, T. (2023): Green in grey: ecosystem services and disservices perceptions from small-scale green infrastructure along a rural-urban gradient in Bengaluru, India. Ecosystems and People, in press.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.