Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
57
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
57 results for “scholarly communication”
[review paper] Sustaining the 'Frozen Footprints' of Scholarly Communication through Open Citations_Dataset
<p>This dataset belongs to the review titled <em>Sustaining the ‘Frozen Footprints’ of Scholarly Communication through Open Citations</em>. The review explores the developments in the open citations movement, the OpenCitations infrastructure, and the Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC), providing a comprehensive overview of key milestones and initiatives.</p> <p>The dataset includes bibliographic and citation data for 174 scholarly outputs and 149 blogposts analyzed in the review. These outputs were drawn from a range of sources, including journal articles, conference proceedings, and other scholarly materials. The data has been curated to adhere to open citation principles, ensuring it is structured, separable, and openly accessible. It is provided in accordance with the licenses and terms of use of the original databases.</p> <p>Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers can use this dataset to explore the evolution of open citations and to further their understanding of the connections between scholarly works in the field of open research.</p>
Understanding the Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) Model of Scholarly Communication - Data and Code
<p>Summary data for the number of articles submitted to publish-review-curate platforms as of August 2024 (Figure 1) [Update 14 Nov 2024: Added JMIRx. Data still from August 2024]</p> <p>Summary data for the number of articles reviewed by review platforms (Figure 2)</p> <p>Analysis code to produce Figures 1 and 2</p> <p>Code to extract articles for inclusion in data</p>
Research4Life Landscape and Situation Analysis - Trends in Scholarly Communication PEST Analysis
<p>A PEST infographic summarising the key trends in scholarly communication, as identified in the report 'Research4Life Landscape and Situation Analysis' prepared by Research Consulting for the Research4Life partnership.</p>
Innovations in scholarly communication - data of the global 2015-2016 survey
<p>Innovations in scholarly communication - data of the global 2015-2016 survey.</p> <p>This data set contains:</p> <ul> <li>Full raw (anonymized) and cleaned data files of the 2015-2016 global Survey on Innovations in Scholarly Communication. Data are in xls format (raw and cleaned) and csv format (only for cleaned data as the raw data contain non-Roman script).</li> <li>Survey questionnaires for 7 languages (zipped PDFs)</li> <li>Variable list (xls)</li> <li>Readme file (txt)</li> </ul> <p>The data files contain >3,000,000 cells, and thus cannot be opened in their entirety in Google Drive.</p> <p>Many new websites and online tools have come into existence to support<br /> scholarly communication in all phases of the research workflow. To what extent<br /> researchers are using these and more traditional tools has been largely<br /> unknown. This 2015-2016 survey aimed to fill that gap. Its results may help<br /> decision making by stakeholders supporting researchers and may also help<br /> researchers wishing to reflect on their own online workflows. In addition,<br /> information on tools usage can inform studies of changing research workflows.<br /> The online survey employed an open, non-probability sample. A largely<br /> self-selected group of 20663 researchers, librarians, editors, publishers and<br /> other groups involved in research took the survey, which was available in seven<br /> languages. The survey was open from May 10, 2015 to February 10, 2016. It<br /> captured information on tool usage for 17 research activities, stance towards<br /> open access and open science, and expectations of the most important<br /> development in scholarly communication. Respondents’ demographics<br /> included research roles, country of affiliation, research discipline and year of<br /> first publication.</p> <p>A full description of data collection, survey response and methodology is in a data publication in F1000 Research:</p> <p>Kramer, Bianca & Jeroen Bosman (2016) Innovations in scholarly communication - global survey on research tool usage. F1000 Research. DOI:10.12688/f1000research.8414.1</p> <p>Contact:</p> <p>Jeroen Bosman: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-2727 / j.bosman@uu.nl</p> <p>Bianca Kramer: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-6560 / b.m.r.kramer@uu.nl</p>
Figure 9b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
<p>Figure 9b. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11)</p>
Figure 7c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7c. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 7b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7b. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 8b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 8b. - Workshop visualization - collection of ideas and group visionsFigure 8a.Visualization showing all ideas generated collectively in the first round (session 3, dark grey) or second round (session 4, light grey), and those generated by the respective groups (solid colors) as part of their vision of scholarly communication. Figure 8b.Visualizaton showing all groups' visions as interconnected elements (triples), with common elements overlapping. <br>
Figure 6d. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6d. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's suggested principles (session 11)
Figure 9c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 9c. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11) <br>
Figure 6a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6a. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> Visualizaton showing all groups' visions as interconnected elements (triples), with common elements overlapping.
Figure 5d. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5d. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Visualization showing all ideas generated collectively in the first round (session 3, dark grey) or second round (session 4, light grey), and those generated by the respective groups (solid colors) as part of their vision of scholarly communication.
Figure 6b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6b. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)
Figure 5c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5c. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Screenshot of public Trello board
Figure 5b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5b. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.
Figure 7a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7a. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 9a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 9a. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11) <br>
Figure 5a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5a. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision.
Figure 3b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 3b. - Islands of possibilities (part of YKON facilitation) at Madrid workshopFigure 3a.Islands of possibilities located in workshop roomFigure 3b.Personality modification islandFigure 3c.Observation island <br> Personality modification island
Figure 6c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6c. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.