Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
73
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
73 results for “science journalism”
Data supplement for "Alignment of scanning lidars in offshore wind farms" - Wind Energy Science Journal
<p>These data are supplements for the calculations of the methods from the article "Alignment of scanning lidars in offshore wind farms".<br> The data was used to produce the results from the publication and is intended to be used here as sample data for illustrative purposes.</p>
Data for "Breaking the Paywall: The role of Open Journal System as key Open Science infrastructure"
<h3><strong>Context</strong></h3> <p>This research was conducted within the NSF-SEEKCommons Project, a research initiative dedicated to supporting Open Science and Open Access in disciplinary research. The project has a special interest in understanding the role that critical infrastructure has in supporting open initiatives. The Open Journal System (OJS) serves as a long-standing fundamental piece for Open Access throughout the globe. Hence, it provides valuable information about experiences developing, deploying, and maintaining open technologies. </p> <h3><strong>Methods<br></strong></h3> <div> <div>We used mixed methods for our research, triangulating repository data, installation data, interviews, and documentary analysis. We collected repository data using a report generator (Kopp [2018] 2024) that uses repository metadata to present general statistics about a Git project. The resulting information was manually curated, disambiguated, and annotated to have a homogeneous set of developers with information about their institutional affiliation and country. </div> <div> </div> <div>Names are normalized based on the information in qualitative interviews and by browsing the full-extent commits in the GitHub repository. Other sources for this were the institutional materials (available in current and archived versions of the PKP website), meeting minutes, the user forum, and further project documentation available online. GitHub handles are homologated to their most comprehensive version. For institutional and country affiliation, we resorted to GitHub profiles, PKP documentation and forums, institutional domains available in emails, and researchers' ORCID IDs. </div> </div> <h3><strong>Available files</strong></h3> <ol> <li><strong>Information about the codebase</strong> (number of files, lines of code, and timestamp) organized by <strong>month, quarter, and semester. </strong><br>See file: OJS_GitStats_04-24.csv</li> <li>Information about the historical evolution of the codebase (number of files, lines of code, and timestamp), including <strong>a description of the top committers for each month</strong>. Commiters are described by including their institutional affiliation and country of origin. <br>See file: OJS_DevStats_Institution-Country_1.tsv</li> <li>Information about the <strong>historical evolution of the codebase </strong>focusing on <strong>top committers</strong>, along with their institution and country. This file is formatted to map the co-occurrence of developers and attributes by month between 2004-2024.<br>See file: OJS_DevStats_Institution-Country_2.tsv</li> <li>Selected fields to describe<strong> working and regularly maintained plugins for OJS as of October 2024.</strong> Includes name of the plugin, homepage, description, maintainer, and institutional affiliation. <br>See file: OJS_Plugins_2024_Processed.tsv</li> <li>Details of the aggregated <strong>information</strong> included in <strong>Table</strong> <strong>5</strong> of the article.<br>See file: OJS_Plugins_2024_Table5.tsv</li> <li><strong>Snapshot</strong> to XML information of the <strong>plugin gallery of OJS </strong>(October 21) retrieved from PKP website (Smecher 2024)<br>See file: OJS_Plugins_2024.csv</li> </ol> <h3>Funding</h3> <p><span>The SEEKCommons Project is funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), grant #2226425</span></p>
Supplementary data to Dating the timbers from the 'Sparrow-Hawk', a shipwreck from Cape Cod, USA. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 103374
<p>This record gives access to all supplementary data that forms the background to the paper: Daly, A., Hocker, F. & Mires, C., 2022. Dating the timbers from the ‘Sparrow-Hawk’, a shipwreck from Cape Cod, USA. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103374</p> <p>In 1626, a vessel making its way to Virginia was forced off course and damaged in a storm, which drove the ship onto the eastern shore of the Cape Cod peninsula, Massachusetts. Onboard were two English merchants and some servants and farmers, many of whom were Irish. In 1863, a storm exposed the weathered remains of a vessel at Old Ship Harbor. At the time, it was hailed as the same ship that had brought the Virginia-bound passengers to Plymouth in 1626. Recent wiggle-match C14 dating and dendrochronology suggests that this is indeed a ship from the early seventeenth century.</p>
Annual Article Processing Charges (APCs) and number of gold and hybrid open access articles in Web of Science indexed journals published by Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis and Wiley 2015-2018
<p><strong>Dataset of annual Article Processing Charges (APCs) for 6,252 journals from 2015 to 2018. </strong>The dataset contains annual APCs for journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) and published by the oligopoly of academic publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, Wiley). It also includes an estimate of the total APCs paid by the academic community based on the number of gold and hybrid articles published between 2015 and 2018. The dataset was created using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall and annual APC prices from open datasets (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3841568">Matthias, 2020</a>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/84PNSG">Morrison, 2021</a>) and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. </p> <p>Detailed methods and findings are reported in the following journal article</p> <p>Butler, L.-A., Matthias, L., Simard, M.-A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The Oligopoly's Shift to Open Access. How the Big Five Academic Publishers Profit from Article Processing Charges. <em>Quantitative Science Studies</em>. Preprint: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8322555">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8322555</a></p> <p><strong>Description of included files (v1):</strong></p> <p><em>APCs.csv: </em>contains the annual APCs for gold and hybrid OA journals indexed in Web of Science published by the oligopoly of academic publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, Wiley) between 2015 and 2018 including the total estimate of APCs paid per journal per year. It contains APC data for 18,846 journal-year-OA status combinations.</p> <p><em>countries.csv</em>: contains the fractionalized number of annual gold and hybrid OA articles by oligopoly publishers between 2015 and 2018 and the total estimate of fractionalized APCs paid per country per journal per year.</p> <p><em>oecd.csv</em>: contains the fractionalized number of annual gold and hybrid OA articles by oligopoly publishers between 2015 and 2018 and the total estimate of fractionalized APCs per discipline per journal per year.</p> <p><em>ReadMe.csv</em>: contains a description of the variables used in <em>APCs.csv</em>, <em>countries.csv</em> and <em>oecd.csv</em>.</p> <p> </p>
Data of the article Analysis of the self-archiving policies of journals in the highest rank category of the Finnish journal classification system within computer science, physics and electronic engineering
<p>The publication forum level three journals representing the three fields of science of computer science, computer science and electrical engineering were identified by utilizing the MinEdu field search filter while searching for the top-ranked journals from the publication channel search (https://www.tsv.fi/julkaisufoorumi/haku.php?lang=en), which is based on Field of Science, Statistics Finland classification (https://www.stat.fi/meta/luokitukset/tieteenala/001-2010/index_en.html). The data were extracted during august 2017 consists of total of 127 individual journals. It is worth noting that circa 30 journals were classified into more than one fields of sciences under scrutiny. First, the journals were divided into representing gold and hybrid model journals. Second, green open access policies of the identified hybrid journals were analyzed using Laakso’s (2014) publisher policy coding framework. Also publishers of the individual journals were identified and subsequently added to the data.</p> <p>NOTE! The data includes the shortest embargo to either institutional or subject repositories. For example, Elsevier had no embargo to opening accepted manuscripts from arXiv subject repository and thus no embargoes to Elsevier's journals are included within this datasheet.</p> <p>Data is in CSV. format</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Aoife Daly & Ian Tyers 2022. The sources of Baltic oak. Journal of Archaeological Science 139, 105550, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2022.105550
<p>Past trade in oak from the lands to the east and south of the Baltic Sea was extraordinary in that it dominated the Northern European market for specialized oak products for many centuries. Equally extraordinary is the fact that since the 1980s, when a large corpus of dendrochronological data from artworks was demonstrated to represent the material evidence for this past trade, we, until now, have not been able to pinpoint where, in this large region, the trees for this trade grew. Through our analysis we can now present the likely sources of three major timber groups in this material, and significantly, the new chronologies that we make available here, will be the key foundation for dating and identifying provenance of Baltic oak, for tree-ring research long into the future.</p>
Dataset for "Authorship concentration in health sciences journals from Latin America and the Caribbean"
<p>Authorship concentration indexes and other data for journals in the LILACS (Latin American and the Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences) bibliographic database, from 2015 to 2019 (FONTENELLE, 2022). These data are read and created by <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6127497">analytic code in Zenodo</a>.</p> <ul> <li><em>authorship_concentration.csv</em> - dataset derived in Fontenelle (2022) from raw data exported from LILACS. This is the main file, and it's CC-BY because other researchers might have curated the raw data differently and thus derived different data. CSV file encoded with ASCII.</li> <li><em>authorship_concentration_datadictionary.csv</em> - data dictionary for the previous file. This file is actually CC0. CSV file encoded with ASCII.</li> <li><em>journals.csv</em> - dataset about the journals indexed in LILACS between 2015 and 2019. As a result of simply converting and filtering the original TITLE database, this is actually CC0 by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). CSV file encoded with UTF-8.</li> <li><em>journal_subjects.csv</em> - DeCS descriptors for the journals identified by the ISSN. CC0 by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), as above. CS file encoded with ASCII.</li> </ul>
Interviews with editors of library science journals on transitioning to open access
<p>These three files are related to qualitative, semi-structured interviews conducted in Fall 2023 with editors of Library and Information Science (LIS) journals on transitioning to open access. One subgroup consisted of participants who were editors at the time of an LIS journal when it transitioned (or flipped) to an open access model that does not charge a fee to either readers or authors (which this study refers to as equitable open access), and the other subgroup consisted of current editors (at the time) of LIS journals that have not yet transitioned (or unflipped) to an equitable open access model. Two of the files are the interview protocols for each group of flipped and unflipped editors, and the third file is the codebook the researchers used to analyze the interview transcripts. Interview transcripts are not being publicly shared to ensure confidentiality for interview participants.</p> <p>The interview protocols were created based on the findings of a prior research study:</p> <p>Borchardt, R., Dawson, D., & Schultz, T. (2024). Financial and other perceived barriers to transitioning to an equitable no-publishing fee open access model: A survey of LIS journal editors. College & Research Libraries, 85(1). <a href="https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.1.96">https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.1.96</a></p> <p>The codebook was created iteratively based on the researchers' review and analysis of the interview transcripts.</p>
Electronic representation of Russian journals on Earth Sciences
<p>The dataset describes the deprth of digital archives of the most authoritative Russian journal on Earth Sciences. The five figures demostrate the results of graphical processing while preparing digital archives of Geologiya i Geofizika and Zapiski Gornogo Instituta journals, as well as the forms of metadata presentation in electronic archives.</p>
Data accessibility in the chemical sciences: an analysis of recent practice in organic chemistry journals
<div> <p>Data is the analysis of the data outputs of 240 randomly selected research papers from 12 top-ranked journals published in early 2023. We investigate author compliance with recommended (but not compulsory) data policies, whether there is evidence to suggest that authors apply FAIR data guidance in their data publishing, and if the existence of specific recommendations for publishing NMR data by some journals encourages compliance. Files in the data package have been provided in both human and machine-readable forms. The main dataset is available in the Excel file Data worksheet.XLSX, the contents of which can also be found in Main_dataset.CSV, Data_types.CSV, and Article_selection.CSV with explanations of the variable coding used in the studies in Variable_names.CSV, Codes.CSV, and FAIR_variable_coding.CSV. The R code used for the article selection can be found in Article_selection.R. Data about article types from the journals that contain original research data is in Article_types.CSV. Data collected for analysis in our sister paper[4] can be found in Extended_Adherence.CSV, Extended_Crystallography.CSV, Extended_DAS.CSV, Extended_File_Types.CSV, and Extended_Submission_Process.CSV. A full list of files in the data package and a short description for each is given in README.TXT.</p> </div>
Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - RESULTS DATASET (with Mega Journals)
<p>The dataset contains all the data produced running the research software for the study:"Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta".</p> <p>Disclaimer: these results are not considered to be representative, because we have fount that Mega Journals skewed significantly some of the data. The result datasets without Mega Journals are published <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/8249907">here</a>.</p> <p>Description of datasets:</p> <ul> <li><strong>SSH_Publications_in_OC_Meta_and_Open_Access_status.csv: </strong>containing information about OpenCitations Meta coverage of ERIH PLUS Journals as well as their Open Access availability. In this dataset, every row holds data for a Journal of ERIH PLUS also covered by OpenCitations Meta database. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"</strong><strong>OC_omid", </strong>the internal OpenCitations Meta identifier for the venue;<strong> "issn",</strong> numbers of publications in each venue;<strong> "Open Access",</strong> a value to represent if the journal is OA or not, either "True" or "Unknown".</li> <li><strong>SSH_Publications_by_Discipline.csv:</strong> containing information about number of publications per discipline (in addition, number of journals per discipline are also included). The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled <strong>"Discipline",</strong> contains single disciplines of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled <strong>"Journal_count" </strong>and <strong>"Publication_count", </strong>respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.</li> <li><strong>SSH_Publications_and_Journals_by_Country:</strong> containing information about number of publications and journals per country. The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled <strong>"Country",</strong> contains single countries of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled <strong>"Journal_count" </strong>and <strong>"Publication_count", </strong>respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.</li> <li><strong>result_disciplines.json:</strong> the dictionary containing all disciplines as key and a list of related ERIH PLUS venue identifiers as value.</li> <li><strong>result_countries.json:</strong> the dictionary containing all countries as key and a list of related ERIH PLUS venue identifiers as value.</li> <li><strong>duplicate_omids.csv: </strong>a dataset containing the duplicated Journal entries in OpenCitations Meta, structured with two columns: "<strong>OC_omid"</strong>, the internal OC Meta identifier; "<strong>issn", </strong>the issn values associated to that identifier</li> <li><strong>eu_data.csv: </strong>contains the data specific for European countries' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"Original_Title"</strong>,<strong> "Country_of_Publication"</strong>,<strong>"ERIH_PLUS_Disciplines"</strong>, <strong>"disc_count"</strong>, the number of disciplines per Journal.</li> <li><strong>eu_disciplines_count.csv: </strong>containing information about number of publications per discipline and number of journals per discipline of european countries. The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled <strong>"Discipline",</strong> contains single disciplines of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled <strong>"Journal_count" </strong>and <strong>"Publication_count", </strong>respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.</li> <li><strong>meta_coverage_eu.csv: </strong>contains the data specific for European countries' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"</strong><strong>OC_omid", </strong>the internal OpenCitations Meta identifier for the venue;<strong> "issn",</strong> numbers of publications in each venue;<strong> "Open Access",</strong> a value to represent if the journal is OA or not, either "True" or "Unknown".</li> <li><strong>us_data.csv: </strong>contains the data specific for the United States' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"Original_Title"</strong>,<strong> "Country_of_Publication"</strong>,<strong>"ERIH_PLUS_Disciplines"</strong>, <strong>"disc_count"</strong>, the number of disciplines per Journal.</li> <li><strong>us_disciplines_count.csv: </strong>containing information about number of publications per discipline and number of journals per discipline of the United States. The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled <strong>"Discipline",</strong> contains single disciplines of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled <strong>"Journal_count" </strong>and <strong>"Publication_count", </strong>respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.</li> <li><strong>meta_coverage_us.csv: </strong>contains the data specific for the United States' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"</strong><strong>OC_omid", </strong>the internal OpenCitations Meta identifier for the venue;<strong> "issn",</strong> numbers of publications in each venue;<strong> "Open Access",</strong> a value to represent if the journal is OA or not, either "True" or "Unknown".</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Abstract of the research: </strong></p> <p><strong>Purpose:</strong> this study aims to investigate the representation and distribution of Social Science and Humanities (SSH) journals within the OpenCitations Meta database, with a particular emphasis on their Open Access (OA) status, as well as their spread across different disciplines and countries. The underlying premise is that open infrastructures play a pivotal role in promoting transparency, reproducibility, and trust in scientific research.<br> <strong>Study Design and Methodology:</strong> the study is grounded on the premise that open infrastructures are crucial for ensuring transparency, reproducibility, and fostering trust in scientific research. The research methodology involved the use of secondary data sources, namely the OpenCitations Meta database, the ERIH PLUS bibliographic index, and the DOAJ index. A custom research software was developed in Python to facilitate the processing and analysis of the data.<br> <strong>Findings:</strong> the results reveal that 78.1% of SSH journals listed in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH-PLUS) are included in the OpenCitations Meta database. The discipline of Psychology has the highest number of publications. The United States and the United Kingdom are the leading contributors in terms of the number of publications. However, the study also uncovers that only 38% of the SSH journals in the OpenCitations Meta database are OA.<br> <strong>Originality:</strong> this research adds to the existing body of knowledge by providing insights into the representation of SSH in open bibliographic databases and the role of open access in this domain. The study highlights the necessity for advocating OA practices within SSH and the significance of open data for bibliometric studies. It further encourages additional research into the impact of OA on various facets of citation patterns and the factors leading to disparity across disciplinary representation.</p> <p><strong>Related resources:</strong></p> <p>Ghasempouri S., Ghiotto M., & Giacomini S. (2023). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - RESEARCH ARTICLE. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8263908">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8263908</a></p> <p>Ghasempouri, S., Ghiotto, M., Giacomini, S., (2023). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 4). Zenodo. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8174644">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8174644</a></p> <p>Ghasempouri, S., Ghiotto, M., Giacomini, S. (2023e). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - PROTOCOL. V.5. (<a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8jo1rg2w/v5">https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8jo1rg2w/v5</a>)</p>
Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - RESULTS DATASET (without Mega Journals)
<p>The dataset contains all the data produced running the research software for the study <em>Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta</em>, a research carried out in the contest of the Open Science course 22/23 at the University of Bologna.</p> <p>Mega Journals have been excluded form the datasets, since we found they were significantly skewing the results, the only datasets not interested by this exclusion are <strong>SSH_Publications_in_OC_Meta_and_Open_Access_status </strong>and<strong> duplicate_omids.</strong> The result datasets with Mega Journals included are published <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8250858">here</a><br> The Journals excluded from the results are: PLOS ONE (issn:1932-6203), PNAS (issn:1091-6490), Science (issn:1095-9203), Nature(issn:0028-0836).</p> <p>Description of datasets:</p> <ul> <li><strong>SSH_Publications_in_OC_Meta_and_Open_Access_status.csv: </strong>containing information about OpenCitations Meta coverage of ERIH PLUS Journals as well as their Open Access availability. In this dataset, every row holds data for a Journal of ERIH PLUS also covered by OpenCitations Meta database. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"</strong><strong>OC_omid", </strong>the internal OpenCitations Meta identifier for the venue;<strong> "issn",</strong> numbers of publications in each venue;<strong> "Open Access",</strong> a value to represent if the journal is OA or not, either "True" or "Unknown".</li> <li><strong>SSH_Publications_by_Discipline.csv:</strong> containing information about number of publications per discipline (in addition, number of journals per discipline are also included). The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled <strong>"Discipline",</strong> contains single disciplines of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled <strong>"Journal_count" </strong>and <strong>"Publication_count", </strong>respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.</li> <li><strong>SSH_Publications_and_Journals_by_Country:</strong> containing information about number of publications and journals per country. The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled <strong>"Country",</strong> contains single countries of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled <strong>"Journal_count" </strong>and <strong>"Publication_count", </strong>respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.</li> <li><strong>result_disciplines.json:</strong> the dictionary containing all disciplines as key and a list of related ERIH PLUS venue identifiers as value.</li> <li><strong>result_countries.json:</strong> the dictionary containing all countries as key and a list of related ERIH PLUS venue identifiers as value.</li> <li><strong>duplicate_omids.csv: </strong>a dataset containing the duplicated Journal entries in OpenCitations Meta, structured with two columns: "<strong>OC_omid"</strong>, the internal OC Meta identifier; "<strong>issn", </strong>the issn values associated to that identifier</li> <li><strong>eu_data.csv: </strong>contains the data specific for European countries' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"Original_Title"</strong>,<strong> "Country_of_Publication"</strong>,<strong>"ERIH_PLUS_Disciplines"</strong>, <strong>"disc_count"</strong>, the number of disciplines per Journal.</li> <li><strong>eu_disciplines_count.csv: </strong>containing information about number of publications per discipline and number of journals per discipline of european countries. The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled <strong>"Discipline",</strong> contains single disciplines of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled <strong>"Journal_count" </strong>and <strong>"Publication_count", </strong>respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.</li> <li><strong>meta_coverage_eu.csv: </strong>contains the data specific for European countries' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"</strong><strong>OC_omid", </strong>the internal OpenCitations Meta identifier for the venue;<strong> "issn",</strong> numbers of publications in each venue;<strong> "Open Access",</strong> a value to represent if the journal is OA or not, either "True" or "Unknown".</li> <li><strong>us_data.csv: </strong>contains the data specific for the United States' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"Original_Title"</strong>,<strong> "Country_of_Publication"</strong>,<strong>"ERIH_PLUS_Disciplines"</strong>, <strong>"disc_count"</strong>, the number of disciplines per Journal.</li> <li><strong>us_disciplines_count.csv: </strong>containing information about number of publications per discipline and number of journals per discipline of the United States. The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled <strong>"Discipline",</strong> contains single disciplines of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled <strong>"Journal_count" </strong>and <strong>"Publication_count", </strong>respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.</li> <li><strong>meta_coverage_us.csv: </strong>contains the data specific for the United States' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "<strong>EP_id", </strong>the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; <strong>"Publications_in_venue", </strong>the<strong> </strong>numbers of Publications counted in each venue; <strong>"</strong><strong>OC_omid", </strong>the internal OpenCitations Meta identifier for the venue;<strong> "issn",</strong> numbers of publications in each venue;<strong> "Open Access",</strong> a value to represent if the journal is OA or not, either "True" or "Unknown".</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Abstract of the research: </strong></p> <p><strong>Purpose:</strong> this study aims to investigate the representation and distribution of Social Science and Humanities (SSH) journals within the OpenCitations Meta database, with a particular emphasis on their Open Access (OA) status, as well as their spread across different disciplines and countries. The underlying premise is that open infrastructures play a pivotal role in promoting transparency, reproducibility, and trust in scientific research.<br> <strong>Study Design and Methodology:</strong> the study is grounded on the premise that open infrastructures are crucial for ensuring transparency, reproducibility, and fostering trust in scientific research. The research methodology involved the use of secondary data sources, namely the OpenCitations Meta database, the ERIH PLUS bibliographic index, and the DOAJ index. A custom research software was developed in Python to facilitate the processing and analysis of the data.<br> <strong>Findings:</strong> the results reveal that 78.1% of SSH journals listed in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH-PLUS) are included in the OpenCitations Meta database. The discipline of Psychology has the highest number of publications. The United States and the United Kingdom are the leading contributors in terms of the number of publications. However, the study also uncovers that only 38% of the SSH journals in the OpenCitations Meta database are OA.<br> <strong>Originality:</strong> this research adds to the existing body of knowledge by providing insights into the representation of SSH in open bibliographic databases and the role of open access in this domain. The study highlights the necessity for advocating OA practices within SSH and the significance of open data for bibliometric studies. It further encourages additional research into the impact of OA on various facets of citation patterns and the factors leading to disparity across disciplinary representation.</p> <p><strong>Related resources:</strong></p> <p>Ghasempouri S., Ghiotto M., & Giacomini S. (2023). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - RESEARCH ARTICLE. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8263908">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8263908</a></p> <p>Ghasempouri, S., Ghiotto, M., Giacomini, S., (2023). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 4). Zenodo. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8174644">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8174644</a></p> <p>Ghasempouri, S., Ghiotto, M., Giacomini, S. (2023e). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - PROTOCOL. V.5. (<a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8jo1rg2w/v5">https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8jo1rg2w/v5</a>)</p>
A Shortlist of Diamond Open Access Journals for the Faculty of Science at Utrecht University
<p><strong>Context</strong></p> <p>The following shortlist of diamond open-access journals was compiled to increase awareness of alternative scholarly publication models among the six departments of the <a href="https://www.uu.nl/en/organisation/faculty-of-science">Faculty of Science at Utrecht University</a>. The list is relevant to the six disciplines at the Faculty of Science: Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, Information and Computing Sciences, Physics, and Pharmaceutical Sciences. For this purpose, a "diamond journal" is defined as a journal indexed in the <a href="https://www.doaj.org/">Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</a> that does not charge an article processing charge (APC).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Contents and Results</strong></p> <p>The Excel file titled “Diamond_journals_faculty_of_science_UU” contains the list of selected diamond journals based on the following criteria: they allow submissions in English, have a plagiarism screening policy, possess an electronic ISSN number, and accept submissions in Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, Information and Computing Sciences, Physics, and Pharmaceutical Sciences. In this shortlist, 355 journals meet the criteria. Out of these 355 journals, only 29 have received a DOAJ seal, 150 journals are indexed in <a href="https://www.scopus.com/">Scopus</a>, and 94 journals are indexed in <a href="https://mjl.clarivate.com/home">Web of Science</a>.</p> <p>A detailed description of the methods employed to obtain this shortlist can be found in the Word file titled "Methods_and_Results".</p> <p>The raw CSV data has been included under the name "Raw_DOAJ_journal_metadata_2023_07_25".</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Limitations</strong></p> <p>The compilers of this shortlist are aware that some current diamond journals could change their status to non-diamond by charging article processing fees at a later stage. Since the journal record is not always updated by the publishers, we strongly recommend the users double-check the latest open access status directly on the journal's homepage (journal URLs are provided in the Excel file). The same applies for Scopus and WOS indexations.</p>
Hubei STEC Data through CORS stations for DOY 059 and 061 of the year 2018 which used in (Using Real GNSS Data for Ionospheric Disturbance Remote Sensing Associated with Strong Thunderstorm over Wuhan City, manuscript submitted to Earth and Space Science Journal AGU)
<p>Manuscript submitted to Earth and Space Science AGU entitled with <br> (Using Real GNSS Data for Ionospheric Disturbance Remote Sensing Associated with Strong Thunderstorm over Wuhan City)<br> by: Mohamed Freeshah, Xiaohong Zhang, Xiaodong Ren, Jun Chen, and Zhibo Zhao</p> <p>The STEC data inside two compressed folders named as stec059 and stec061, respectively.<br> The STEC file name has the CORS station name for the first forth letters and next three numbers epresent the Day of the year.<br> For example:<br> ES010590.18STEC<br> ES01 is the station name<br> 059 is the day of year (DOY), 2018</p>
East-African Social Sciences and Humanities Journals active in 2008-2009
<p>Research Data of „East-African Social Sciences and Humanities Publishing: A Handmade Bibliometrics Approach“, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, València (Spain), September 14-16, 2016.</p> <p>Corrected second version: due to an error, the journal “Chemchemi” was not included in “1 final list merged” and “7 ceased-established”. However, this does not change the conclusions drawn in the paper.</p> <p>Abstract of the paper to be published in the proceedings: For Eastern Africa, very little information about the SSH knowledge production can be found from a European perspective. Adequate indicators like information-rich bibliographic databases that cover East-Africa-based journals and book publishers are lacking. This research in progress explores their indexing situation in detail, their development, which is closely connected to political history, their (non-)usage, and affiliations as well as career-stages of their authors. Furthermore, it also pays attention to East-Africa-based SSH researchers who use other publication venues. Any bibliometric analysis in this field needs to rely on manual data collection, otherwise it would be heavily biased. This study lays out the foundation for citation analyses, qualitative research on the publications' content and the self-description of East-African scholars against the background of an academic environment that is often described as “international”.</p>
Supplementary material 10: Institutional collection dashboard: specimens from the collection of the California Academy of Sciences (CAS) from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Dashboard charts showing only specimens from the collection of the California Academy of Sciences. This page shows data from species-rank treatments. When viewed using a browser (such as Google Chrome) with an internet connection, this page sends a series of queries to Plazi and integrates the results with the Google Charts API to produce 37 interactive dashboard charts.
SCOPING REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL LITERATURE ON EVALUATION OF EDITORIAL POLICIES SUPPORTING OPEN SCIENCE PRACTICES IN SCHOLARLY JOURNALS
<p>Excel file containing the description of methods & materials used in the scoping review, the whole dataset of included studies, and respective descriptive metadata.</p>
Simulations used in the Ocean Science Journal submission titled "Internal and forced ocean variability in the Mediterranean Sea " by Benincasa et al., 2024
<p>Temperature (votemper) and current speed datasets from the EAS5 (Clementi et al., <em>Mediterranean Sea Analysis and Forecast (CMEMS MED-Currents, EAS5 system),</em> 2019; Coppini et al., <em>The Mediterranean forecasting system. Part I: evolution and performance</em>, EGUsphere, pp. 1–50, 2023) simulations used in the manuscript titled "<em>Internal and forced ocean variability in the Mediterranean Sea"</em> and submitted to the journal Ocean Science by Benincasa et al. </p> <p>The daily fields are at 2 depth levels ( 0 = 0 m, 2 = 30 m) and in the 2 seasons (JFMA = winter, JASO = summer) for the entire Mediterranean Sea. The vertical profile of the temperature field up to about 950 m depth is available at 8 locations distributed over the basin. The depth levels are found in <em>depth.pkl</em>: the first column represents the depth of the various levels, whereas the second is the increments between 2 consecutive depth levels. </p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 5. Differences in Validation Criteria between Classical Engineering Sciences and the Field of Brain- Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation
<p>A usual validation procedure in classical fields of engineering and computer sciences as well as in Applied AI, which is currently the dominant AI research domain, is to analyze and implement different potential methods to solve a given problem and to then compare their performance. What is thus usually desired are comparable, quantifiable results. In comparison, the starting situation is<br> different in the field of Brain-Like AI (see Figure 5).</p>
BRAIN Journal-Cursor Movement – a Valuable Indicator in Intelligent System Design-Figure 1. Science branches involved in translating product features to human needs
<p>Approach notwithstanding, designing product features involves basically a two-step process: (a) detecting and recognizing emotional information and (b) exhibiting a suitable reaction to the previously considered input. Since needs are reflected in the emotional impact, a method to measure the emotions is necessary (Abraham & Michie, 2008) to correctly assess the impact. Referring strictly to a software product, in order to implement the capability to sense the users’ emotional state, the first step should be developing an affective database (Tao & Tan, 2005), to allow correct identification of the affective status. This results in a translation between the affective status of the user and the computer, therefore allowing the program to process the user emotion just like any other input, successfully “digitizing” emotion. </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.