Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
36
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
36 results for “socio-ecological”
Qualitative Data on 60 Small-Scale Fisheries: A socio-ecological rapid appraisal applied to cases from America (Colombia, Ecuador, and Mexico), Africa (Kenya, Madagascar, and Nigeria), and Europe (France and Spain)
<h2><span lang="EN-US">Dataset name</span></h2> <p><span lang="EN-US">Small_Scale_Fishery_Data_2023_v2 </span><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p> <h2><span lang="EN-US">Title</span></h2> <p><span lang="EN-US">Qualitative Data on 60 Small-Scale Fisheries: A socio-ecological rapid appraisal applied to cases from America (Colombia, Ecuador, and Mexico), Africa (Kenya, Madagascar, and Nigeria), and Europe (France and Spain). </span><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p> <h2><span lang="EN-US">Description </span></h2> <p><span lang="EN-US"> This dataset was created for the Fish2Sustainability research project, which aims to evaluate how small-scale fisheries (SSF) contribute to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The dataset includes 60 case studies across eight countries and was developed using a rapid appraisal framework. The framework includes a four-step process: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US"> 1. Identifying specific SDG targets influenced by SSF;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US"> 2. Extracting relevant variables from UN indicators;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US"> 3. Gathering expert input via a questionnaire to score these variables;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US"> 4. Creating composite indicators to measure SSF performance against SDGs.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US"> The dataset contains raw data from step 3, case study details, variable scores, and comments from data collectors (contributing authors). The dataset is valuable for researchers interested in small-scale fisheries and socio-ecological systems. By incorporating expert judgments from individuals with expertise in SSF, particularly in data-poor contexts, the dataset offers a wealth of knowledge for conducting comparative analyses across different contexts.</span><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p> <h2><span lang="EN-US">Authors </span></h2> <p><span lang="EN-US">Léopold, M.1, Bitoun, R.E.2, Beckensteiner, J.3, Chuenpagdee, R.4, Fondo, E.N.5, Akintola, S.L.6, Bach, P.7, Frangoudes, K.8, Gaibor, N.9, Gutierrez-Cala, L.10, Massey, Y.7, Randrianandrasana, R.11, Razanakoto, T.11, Saavedra-Díaz, L.M.10, Schreiber Arias, M.12,13, Salas, S.14, Devillers, R.2,4 </span></p> <h3><span lang="EN-US">Affiliations </span></h3> <p><span lang="EN-US">1 ENTROPIE (IRD, University of La Reunion, CNRS, University of New Caledonia, Ifremer), c/o IUEM, Plouzané, France </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US">2 Espace-Dev (IRD, Univ. </span>Montpellier, Univ. Guyane, Univ. La Réunion, Univ. Antilles, Univ. Nouvelle Calédonie), Montpellier, France</p> <p>3 AMURE (Ifremer, UBO, CNRS), Plouzané, France</p> <p><span lang="EN-US">4 Department of Geography, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US">5 Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, Mombasa, Kenya</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US">6 Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Science, Lagos State University, Nigeria</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US">7 MARBEC, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Sète, France</span></p> <p>8 Université de Bretagne Occidentale: Brest, France</p> <p>9 Instituto Público de Investigación de Acuicultura y Pesca (IPIAP), Universidad del Pacifico (UPAC), Guayaquil, Ecuador</p> <p>10 Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas Socioecológicos para el Bienestar Humano (GISSBH), Programa de Biología, Universidad del Magdalena, Colombia</p> <p>11 Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Economiques pour le Développement (CERED), Université d’Antananarivo, Madagascar</p> <p><span lang="EN-US">12 EqualSea Lab, Universidad Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US">13 School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</span></p> <p>14 Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados (CINVESTAV), IPN, Unidad Mérida, Mexico </p> <h2><span lang="EN-US">Method </span></h2> <p><span lang="EN-US">Case studies were selected in eight countries by national SSF experts, based on specific criteria and research priorities. Case studies were not selected to represent the full diversity of SSF globally or even nationally. Instead, they were chosen to capture a range of fisheries that could showcase different contributions to SDGs. SSF were defined based on various characteristics, such as resources harvested, gear used, and location of the fishery. </span><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p> <h3><span lang="EN-US">Geographical Coverage </span></h3> <p><span lang="EN-US">60 small-scale fisheries located in seven countries are documented in the data:</span></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-US">Colombia (4 case studies) – Pacifico: La Guajira, San Andrés y Providencia; Caribe: Chocó, Cauca, Valle del Cauca, Nariño.</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-US">Ecuador (3) – Region: Esmeraldas, Manabi, Guayas, El Oro.</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-US">France (2) – Region: Bretagne, Occitanie.</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-US">Kenya (22) – County: Kilifi, Kwale, Lamu, Mombasa, Tana River.</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-US">Madagascar (20) – Region: Analanjirofo, Anosy, Atsimo Andrefana, Boeny, Diana, Menabe, Vatovavy Fitovinany.</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-US">Mexico (2) – State: Baja California Sur, Campeche, Yucatan.</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-US">Nigeria (6) – State: Bayelsa, Cross River, Lagos, Ondo, Ogun. </span></li> <li><span lang="EN-US">Spain (1) – State: Galicia.</span> </li> </ul> <h3><span lang="EN-US">Data Collection </span></h3> <p><span lang="EN-US">Data collection took place from November 30, 2022, to July 3, 2023, spanning approximately seven months. The data presented serve as a snapshot of the conditions within a specific small-scale fishery during the assessment period. To consider the evolution of trends such as exports, economic growth, and income, we considered any relevant variables over the past decade. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-US">Data collection approaches varied depending on the context, and data collectors received training to ensure survey consistency. We used primary data sources such as interviews, observations, and measurements whenever possible. In cases where resources were limited, we preferred secondary sources such as existing datasets and literature. Our methods were standardized, but data collectors could adjust them based on their resources. We primarily used direct observation, focus groups, and interviews to collect data. Scoring in interviews and focus groups was done directly or through group analysis by interviewers. Disagreements were resolved through additional interviews or group discussions, with secondary data used if needed. Please refer to the methods in : </span></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-US">Bitoun et al., (2024). A methodological framework for capturing marine small-scale fisheries’ contributions to the sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 19(4), 1119–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01470-0. </span></strong><span lang="EN-US"><strong> </strong> </span></p> <h3><span lang="EN-US">Ethics </span></h3> <p><span lang="EN-US">Participants had the option to join of their own accord, were fully briefed on the research goals, and were given the opportunity to review interview guidelines before proceeding. Depending on the circumstances, interviews could last 45 minutes to 4.5 hours. Participants were guaranteed confidentiality and anonymity in the handling and reporting of their data.</span><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p> <h3><span lang="EN-US">Suggested citation</span></h3> <p><span lang="EN-US">Léopold, M., Bitoun, R., & Devillers, R. (2023). Qualitative Data on 61 Small-Scale Fisheries: A socio-ecological rapid appraisal applied to cases from America (Colombia, Ecuador, and Mexico), Africa (Kenya, Madagascar, and Nigeria), and Europe (France and Spain) (Version 2) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16077739</span></p> <h2><span lang="EN-US">Data Files</span></h2> <p><span lang="EN-US">The dataset includes the following:</span></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-US">The raw dataset (.xls format).</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-US">A data dictionary describing and defining each dataset column (.xls format).</span></li> </ul>
A Dataset for Investigating Socio-ecological Changes in Arctic Fjords v2
<p>The collection of in situ data is generally a costly process, with the Arctic being no exception. Indeed, there has been a perception that the Arctic lacks for in situ sampling; however, after many years of concerted effort and international collaboration, the Arctic is now rather well sampled with many cruise expeditions every year. For example, the GLODAP product has a greater density of in situ sample points within the Arctic than along the equator. While this is useful for open ocean processes, the fjords of the Arctic, which serve as crucially important intersections of terrestrial, coastal, and marine processes, are sampled in a much more ad hoc process. This is not to say they are not well sampled, but rather that the data are more difficult to source and combine for further analysis. It was therefore noted that the fjords of the Arctic are lacking in FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data. To address this issue a single dataset has been created from publicly available, predominantly in situ data from a number of online platforms. After finding and accessing the data, they were amalgamated into a single project-wide standard, ensuring their interoperability. The dataset was then uploaded to PANGAEA so that it itself can be findable and reusable into the future. The focus of the data collection was driven by the key drivers of change in Arctic fjords identified in a companion review paper. After receiving feedback on this process and the dataset itself, a second version (v2.0) has been created.</p>
Indicator for the current and future socio-ecological burden caused by the expansion of wind energy in German districts
<p>The data table lists the calculated present burden (IST-Belastungsgrad) based on the year 2014 and the maximum possible burden (MAX-Belastungsgrad) on the population caused by the further expansion of wind energy. The so-called burden level is calculated accounting for the area occupied by wind turbines, the total area of a district and the population density. Additionally the table holds data on possible future burden levels based on two scenarios for the year 2050. Each district can be identified by its key, "Regionalschlüssel", and corresponding geo data (EPSG: 25832) of the administrative area provided by the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy: © GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2014 (data was changed).</p> <p>The dataset was created in the context of the interdisciplinary research project VerNetzen and is described in detail in the final project report: VerNetzen Degel, M., Christ, M., Grünert, J., Becker, L., Wingenbach, C., Soethe, M., Bunke, W.-D., Mester, K., und Wiese, F. (2016). <em>VerNetzen: Sozial-ökologische und technisch-ökonomische Modellierung von Entwicklungspfaden der Energiewende</em>. IZT Berlin, Europa-Universität Flensburg, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V., pp. 98-118, 143-145.</p> <p><strong><em>Deutsch:</em></strong></p> <p>Die Tabelle enthält u.a. den derzeitigen Belastungsgrad, festgestellt für das Jahr 2014, und den maximal möglichen Belastungsgrad je Landkreis. Der Belastungsgrad ist ein Indikator für die durch den Zubau von Windenergie betroffene Bevölkerung und berechnet sich aus der Gesamtfläche eines Landkreises, der für die Windenergie genutzten Fläche und der Bevölkerungsdichte. In der Tabelle sind ebenfalls mögliche zukünftige Belastungsgrade auf Grundlage zweier Projektszenarien für das Jahr 2050 enthalten. Die jeweiligen Landkreise können mit dem Regionalschlüssel oder den geographischen Daten (EPSG: 25832) des Bundesamtes für Kartographie und Geodäsie zugeordnet werden: © GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2014 (Daten verändert).</p> <p>Der Datensatz ist im Kontext des interdisziplinären Forschungsprojekts VerNetzen entstanden und ist ausführlich im Projektabschlussbericht beschrieben: VerNetzen Degel, M., Christ, M., Grünert, J., Becker, L., Wingenbach, C., Soethe, M., Bunke, W.-D., Mester, K., und Wiese, F. (2016). <em>VerNetzen: Sozial-ökologische und technisch-ökonomische Modellierung von Entwicklungspfaden der Energiewende</em>. IZT Berlin, Europa-Universität Flensburg, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V., S.98-118, S.143-145.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Indicator for the current and future socio-ecological burden caused by the expansion of wind energy in German districts - auxiliary values
<p>The table contains the population and the size of the total area for each German district as of 2013. Furthermore it contains the size of those areas per district, that potentially could be used for wind energy.</p> <p>The data on the population is provided by the Federal Statistical Office and the statistical Offices of the Länder: © Federal Statistical Office and the statistical Offices of the Länder, Regionaldatenbank Deutschland, December 2014, Datenlizenz by-2-0 (https://www.govdata.de/dl-de/by-2-0) (data was changed). The total district area is derived from geo data provided by the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy: © GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2014 (data was changed).</p> <p>For further information on potential areas see VerNetzen Degel, M., Christ, M., Grünert, J., Becker, L., Wingenbach, C., Soethe, M., Bunke, W.-D., Mester, K., und Wiese, F. (2016). <em>VerNetzen: Sozial-ökologische und technisch-ökonomische Modellierung von Entwicklungspfaden der Energiewende</em>. IZT Berlin, Europa-Universität Flensburg, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V., pp. 105-109.</p> <p><em><strong>Deutsch:</strong></em></p> <p>Die Tabelle umfasst die Bevölkerungsanzahl und Flächengröße je deutschem Landkreis für das Jahr 2013. Außerdem ist die Größe jener Fläche angegeben, die potentiell für die Windenergie genutzt werden könnte.</p> <p>Die Bevölkerungszahlen werden von den Statistischen Ämtern des Bundes und der Länder zur Verfügung gestellt: © Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder, Regionaldatenbank Deutschland, Dezember 2014, Datenlizenz by-2-0 (https://www.govdata.de/dl-de/by-2-0) (Daten geändert). Die Landkreisflächen werden auf Grundlage von Geodaten des Bundesamtes für Kartographie und Geodäsie berechnet: © GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2014 (Daten geändert).</p> <p>Für weitere Informationen bzgl. der Potentialflächen siehe VerNetzen Degel, M., Christ, M., Grünert, J., Becker, L., Wingenbach, C., Soethe, M., Bunke, W.-D., Mester, K., und Wiese, F. (2016). <em>VerNetzen: Sozial-ökologische und technisch-ökonomische Modellierung von Entwicklungspfaden der Energiewende</em>. IZT Berlin, Europa-Universität Flensburg, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V., S. 105-109.</p>
Long-Term Demographic Trends in Prehistoric Italy: climate impacts and regionalised socio-ecological trajectories (dataset and R script)
<p>The present digital archive is the outcome of the paper: <strong>Palmisano, A., Bevan, A., Kabelindde, A., Roberts, N., and Shennan, S., 2021. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-021-09159-3">Long-Term Demographic Trends in Prehistoric Italy: climate impacts and regionalised socio-ecological trajectories</a>. <em>Journal of World Prehistory, 34 (3)</em>, </strong>381-432<strong>.</strong></p> <p>The dataset included here provides a collection of <strong>4,010</strong> radiocarbon dates from <strong>947</strong> archaeological sites for a period spanning between 11,000 and 1500 BP. In addition, the digital archive related to this paper provides reproducible analyses in the form of one script written in R statistical computing language.</p> <p>List of versions:</p> <ul> <li><strong>1.0.</strong> 4 August 2021 - First public release of the dataset on Zenodo. </li> </ul>
Implementing social network analysis to understand the socio-ecology of wildlife co-occurrence and joint interactions with humans in anthropogenic environments
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Reciprocity evolves more readily in competitive than cooperative socio-ecologies
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Socio-ecological drivers of long-term ecosystem carbon stock trend: An assessment with the LUCCA model of the French case
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Population dynamics and socio-ecological trajectories explain the emergence of farming in Late Neolithic South-eastern Norway
<p>The repository contains radiocarbon data and code for the paper "Population dynamics and socio-ecological trajectories explain the emergence of farming in Late Neolithic South-eastern Norway", published in the Journal of Neolithic Archaeology.</p> <p><a href="https://www.jna.uni-kiel.de/index.php/jna/article/view/1562">Population Dynamics and Socio-ecological Trajectories Explain the Emergence of Farming in Late Neolithic Southeast Norway | Journal of Neolithic Archaeology</a>.</p> <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>This paper examines the emergence of farming in Late Neolithic Southeast Norway. A summed probability distribution of radiocarbon dates is used to infer population dynamics and together with a chronological model using dated samples from post-built houses, cultivation layers and cereal grains, it is argued that the introduction of farming was swift and caused by incoming farmers. It is further explored how a low population during the Middle Neolithic period, cause by shifting environmental conditions, was central to the rapid population shift and economic change seen in the Late Neolithic, from ca. 2200 cal BC. </p>
Supplementary materials - Exploring a Framework for Assessing the Socio-Ecological Performance of Systems Design
<p>Supplementary materials for the paper presented for the Cirp LCE Conference 2025: Exploring a Framework for Assessing the Socio-Ecological Performance of Systems Design</p>
A Socio-Ecological View of Research Capacity
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Integrating socio-ecological suitability with human-wildlife conflict risk: Case study for translocation of a large ungulate
<p>1. Translocations are essential for reestablishing wildlife populations. As they sometimes fail, it is critical to assess factors that influence their success pre-translocation.</p> <p>2. Socio-ecological suitability models (SESMs) integrate social acceptance and ecological suitability to enable identification of areas where wildlife populations will expand, which makes it likely that SESMs will also be useful for predicting translocation success.</p> <p>3. To inform site-selection for potential elk (Cervus canadensis) reintroduction to northeastern Minnesota, USA, we developed broad-scale maps of social acceptance from surveys of local residents and landowners, animal use equivalence (AUE) from forage measured in the field, and empirical conflict risk from geospatial data. Resulting SESMs integrated social acceptance favorability scores, AUE, and conflict risk, and weighted SESMs showed the relative influences of acceptance and conflict.</p> <p>4. Social acceptance was positive for local residents and landowners (mean ≥ 5.4; scale of 1 to 7). AUE (scaled to an elk home range) ranged between 1 and 9 elk/16 km2 during winter, and from 14 to 83 elk/16 km2 during summer. Human-elk conflict risk was low (mean ≤ 0.10; scaled 0 to 1), increasing from north to south. Geographical distributions differed for social acceptance, AUE, and conflict risk, and weighted SESMs revealed unsuitable areas that were otherwise obscured.</p> <p>5. <em>Synthesis and applications</em>. Integrating human-wildlife conflict risk into SESMs shows where social acceptance of translocated species is likely to erode, even where viewed favorably pre-translocation, to inform translocation planning by highlighting interactions between key factors. Such integrated models supplement existing reintroduction biology frameworks by supporting decision-making and knowledge development. In northeastern Minnesota, natural resource managers who are considering elk reintroductions are using SESMs reported here to identify where human-elk conflict is likely to result in an isolated elk population and where addressing concerns for area residents about conflict risk is essential.</p>
Interview Transcriptions related to PhD Thesis "Degrowth at a Global Scale? Geographies of Chile's Fruit Production and Export between Extractivism and Socio-Ecological Transformation"
<p>The material is composed of transcriptions of interviews conducted for the empirical work of this PhD Thesis.</p> <p>Not all conducted interviews are included (which can be seen from the accompanying table); those not included are not available mostly due to lack of consent of interviewees or because certain interviews were not registered and only hand-written notes were taken.</p>
Me & You-Tech: A Socio-Ecological Solution to Teen Dating Violence for the Digital Age
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05225727. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Data from: Socio-ecological context modulates significance of territorial contest competition in Drosophila prolongata
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Integrating socio-ecological suitability with human-wildlife conflict risk: Case study for translocation of a large ungulate
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Juvenile socio-ecological environment shapes material technology in nest-building birds
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Where money grows on trees: a socio-ecological assessment of land use change in an agricultural frontier
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data sets supporting "Report on EU socio-ecological systems" (MAGIC Deliverable 4.2)
<p>Description: Report on EU socio-ecological systems (Deliverable 4.2; WP4; EU H2020 MAGIC Project)</p> <p>Subject and Keywords: nexus (i.e. food, water, energy, land use, climate and environment); quantitative story telling (QST); metabolic pattern; robustness of narratives; EU’ sustainability strategy</p> <p>Abstract: The sustainability agenda builds on key components (i.e. food, water, energy, land use, climate and environment) that are inherently interconnected in a Nexus. MAGIC uses an innovative approach to test the robustness of narratives about the Nexus in Europe and focuses on the EU sustainable strategy. The aim of this deliverable is to operationalize and test a tool-kit to structure the quantitative analysis of the metabolic pattern of social-ecological systems in relation to their sustainability and the Nexus, at different levels of aggregation and spatial scales (EU, country or regional level). We use “quantitative story telling” as an alternative approach to use scientific information generated and better inform policy-makers. This deliverable build on the methodological approach and the basic features of the theoretical framework of accounting called Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal and Ecosystem Metabolism (MuSIASEM). The application of the tool-kit in this deliverable has the only goal of illustrating the potentiality of the approach. In a series of chapters we i) present the theoretical background and features of the tool-kit used to characterize the state-of-the-play (diagnostic analysis) with regard to the sustainability of SES; ii) provide an overview of the results obtained in the analysis of 8 EU countries (i.e. France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Romania, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom); iii) demonstrate the capability of the toolkit to perform the analysis at different scales (in this case, at a lower aggregated level -NUTS2-); and iv) highlight the methodological breakthrough provided by relational analysis and its relevance for policy making with regard to the water-energy-food-environment Nexus</p> <p>Publisher: MAGIC</p> <p>Contributors: 18 co-authors from 4 organisations</p> <p>Citation: Ripoll-Bosch and Giampietro (Editors). 2019. Report on EU socio-ecological systems. MAGIC (H2020–GA 689669) Project Deliverable 4.2, Revision</p> <p>Date: March/18</p> <p>Language: English</p> <p>Rights Management: The access is open</p>
Data from: Combining human acceptance and habitat suitability in a unified socio-ecological suitability model: a case study of the wolf in Switzerland
Habitat suitability models (HSMs) are commonly used in conservation practise to assess the potential of an area to be occupied and colonised. A major limitation of these models, however, is the omission of spatially explicit understanding of human acceptance towards the focal species. As wildlife is more and more subject to human-dominated landscapes, ignoring the sociological component will result in misrepresentation of the observed processes and inappropriate management. We distributed 10 000 questionnaires across Switzerland and identified key socio-demographical factors correlated with human acceptance of the wolf. We then created a spatially explicit acceptance model based on geo-referenced socio-demographical, social and geographical information. Finally, we combined our acceptance model with a HSM to obtain a unified socio-ecological suitability model, which included human and ecological components. We showed that the key factors associated with human acceptance were perception of how harmful the wolf is, interest in wolf-related issues, need for livestock protection, and fear of the wolf. Perceived harmfulness was in turn correlated with direct and indirect experience with the wolf, and level of education. Our acceptance map predicted decreasing acceptance with increasing altitude of residency and proximity to locations of confirmed wolf presence. This resulted in the overall opposition to the wolf for the Alpine region, albeit substantial regional differences. We found little spatial overlap (6% of Switzerland) between areas where the wolf was accepted and areas of suitable habitat. These areas of socio-ecological suitability were concentrated in the Jura Mountains and in the eastern and southern Alps, and were absent in the western and central Alps. Particularly in the Jura region, which is yet to be colonised, management of human acceptance will be a crucial conservation target. Synthesis and applications. We developed an integrative, socio-ecological approach that allowed us to accurately reproduce recent wolf recolonisation. We anticipate our framework to be a powerful tool to reliably evaluate overall suitable habitats and predict short to medium-term range expansion for species whose distribution is also dependent on human attitudes. Because our approach is sensitive to both the ecological and human component, it is ideally suited to identify key regions where proactive and targeted socio-ecological management plans are needed.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.