Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

394

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

394 results for “soil depth”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi60/100

Physical soil characteristics, microbial community composition, extracellular enzymatic activity, biologically based phosphorus (BBP) pools, and available phosphorus from two soil depths, four microhabitats, and four landforms at the Jornada Experimental Range, 2021.

This dataset contains physical soil characteristics, PLFA based microbial community composition, extracellular enzymatic activity, nitrate and ammonium activity, and phosphorus availability in various phosphorus pools (Biologically Based Phosphorus, potassium sulfate, Olsen-P). Soils were collected from two depths (0-2cm, 2-30 cm), four microhabitats (grass, shrub, biocrust, interspace), and four landforms (alluvial flat, alluvial fan remnant, erosional scarplet, fan piedmont – see coordinates) within the Jornada Experimental Range in July 2021 to answer questions about how these variables change across these spatial scales in drylands. This project was a collaboration between researchers at New Mexico State University and The University of Texas at El Paso as part of the Drylands Critical Zone Thematic Cluster within the Critical Zone Network. This dataset is complete.

openCC0Jun 2024View details →
edi60/100

WSC - Gridded sample points at Wibu field site including yield, soil texture, water table depth, and estimated soil water retention parameters

A variety of data from gridded sampling points at the Wibu field site. The gridded sampling scheme is described in the Point Locations dataset. This dataset includes 2012 and 2013 absolute and normalized yield, soil textural characteristics (organic content, porosity, bulk density, particle size metrics, % sand/silt/clay), a variety of water table depth metrics (mean, percentiles, sum exceedance values, moving averages), and soil water retention parameters estimated using the Rosetta pedotransfer function. It was collected as part of a study of the impacts of water table depth, soil texture, and growing season weather conditions on corn production at the Wibu field site, described in Zipper et al. (in review). The Wibu field site is a commercial agricultural field, which grew corn in the 2012, 2013, and 2014 growing seasons. See Zipper and Loheide (2014) Ag. For. Met. for more information about the field site.

openCC (other)Dec 2022View details →
edi60/100

Turf Transplant temperature, soil moisture and turf depths, 2024 - ongoing.

The Turf Transplant Experiment was set up in the summer of 2024. Paired experimental sites were established in two tundra community types - dry meadow and moist meadow - with one site of each community type pair in a lower elevation/warmer area and one site in a higher elevation/cooler area. Subplot turfs (25 cm^2) were transplanted (1) between sites of the same community type at different elevations/temperatures, (2) between plots within the same site or (3) left in place as non-transplant controls. This data package contains dates and depths of turfs as installation as well as plot-level moisture and temperature.

openCC (other)Dec 2025View details →
edi56/100

Summary of soil temperature, moisture, and thaw depth for 14 chamber flux measurements sampled near Arctic LTER shrub sites at Toolik Field Station, Alaska, summer 2012.

Soil temperature at 5cm and 10cm depth, volumetric water content (VWC) and depth of thaw for 14 shrub canopy flux plots measured in vicinity of the Arctic LTER shrub site, Toolik Field Station, AK in 2012.

openCC (other)Feb 2023View details →
edi52/100

Bonanza Creek LTER: Hourly Soil Temperature Measurements at Various Depths from 1988 to Present in the Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest near Fairbanks, Alaska

A collection of soil temperatures from upland and floodplain sites. Temperatures are recorded from a range of depths: Surface,0, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 cm. Depths represent the depth below the organic mineral interface (O/M) that the sensor was placed. Sensors in the organic soil layers were added at some sites and are given a negative depth value to indicate they were placed above the O/M interface. There is also a Surface temperature which is kept in the top few centimeters of the forest floor.

openOpenApr 2022View details →
edi52/100

Bonanza Creek LTER: Hourly Soil Temperature Measurements at Various Depths from 1998 to Present in the Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed near Fairbanks, Alaska

Hourly soil temperature is recorded at several sites within CPCRW. A variety of sensors are alo used including Campbell Scientific CS107's as well as a variety of thermistors.

openOpenApr 2022View details →
edi52/100

Bonanza Creek LTER: Hourly Soil Moisture (VWC) at Various Depths from 2000 to Present in the Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed near Fairbanks, Alaska

A collection of soil moisture measurements collected with from CPCRW sites. Moisture is recorded from a range of depths: 10, 20, and 40 cm.

openOpenApr 2022View details →
edi52/100

Bonanza Creek LTER: Hourly Soil Moisture (VWC) at Various Depths from 2002 to Present in the Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest near Fairbanks, Alaska

A collection of soil moisture from upland and floodplain sites. Moisture is recorded from a range of depths: 5, 10, 20, and 50 cm. Data was recorded using Campbell Scientific dataloggers. The sensors in use are CS615 water content reflectometers. The period average is recorded and converted to volumetric water content using the Topp's equation.

openOpenApr 2022View details →
edi52/100

Overwintering Fires from 2009-2010 Burns near Fairbanks, Alaska: Residual Soil Organic Layer Depth, Burn Depth and Thaw Depth Collected 2023

This dataset contains data from adjacent overwintering and single-season burn sites. For the overwintering fires, we targeted locations that had burned in the summers of 2009, smouldered through the winter months, and reignited in 2010. Adjacent to these overwintering sites, we identified single-season burn sites from within portions of the 2009 fires that were unaffected by overwintering. A total of seven overwintering fire sites and four single-season fire sites were sampled. Within each site, three plots were established. Data inlcudes within plot measurments of post-fire seedling composition and density, residual SOL, burn depth estimated by black spruce adventitious roots, thaw depth, and pre-fire tree species composition and estimates of combustion. This is one of three packages from this project; this one contains the soils data.

openOpenNov 2024View details →
edi52/100

Water Depths and Water Temperatures near Soil Surface from Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE LTER), Florida, USA, October 2000 - ongoing

Water depth (from October 2000 to present) and water temperature (from September 2021 to present) are recorded at least hourly at SRS1c (not active), SRS1d, SRS2, SRS3, SRS4, SRS5, and SRS6. Water depth is measured with pressure water level loggers (Infinities USA or HOBO) that record water height relative to the local soil surface. Water temperature near soil surface is measured with HOBO loggers. Note by IM (2021): The water meters at some of the SRS sites have been moved over the years as boardwalks have been reconstructed. There is no set survey datum for these sites, so it is impossible to correct the data to an actual datum. For hydrologic applications, it may be better to use water level data from USGS stations.

openCC (other)May 2025View details →
edi52/100

Water Depths and Water Temperatures near Soil Surface from Taylor Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE LTER), Florida, USA, August 1999 - ongoing

Water depth (from August 1999 to present) and water temperature (from May 2021 to present) are recorded hourly at TS/Ph1a, TS/Ph2 and TS/Ph3 and every 30 minutes at TS/Ph6a and TS/Ph7a. Water depth is measured with pressure water level loggers (Infinities USA or HOBO) that record water height relative to the local soil surface. Water temperature near soil surface is measured with HOBO loggers. Note by IM (2021): The water meters at some of the TS sites have been moved over the years as boardwalks have been reconstructed. There is no set survey datum for these sites, so it is impossible to correct the data to an actual datum. For hydrologic applications, it may be better to use water level data from USGS stations.

openCC (other)Dec 2025View details →
edi52/100

Soil volumetric water content data from fifteen locations, 3 depths at each location, within the Tromble Weir experimental watershed at the Jornada Basin LTER site, 2010-ongoing

This data package contains 30-minute soil volumetric water content (VWC) data collected at fifteen locations along 3 transects (5 locations per transect) in the Tromble Weir Watershed area of the Jornada Basin in southern New Mexico, USA. At each location, soil sensors measure VWC at three depths, 5, 15 and 30 cm, in units of cubic meters of water per cubic meter of soil. These measurements are used to help quantify the water balance across the small experimental watershed. Values have been used to investigate groundwater recharge, soil infiltration rates, and to evaluate the performance of hydrologic models. This is an ongoing dataset that will be updated annually.

openCC (other)Apr 2022View details →
zenodo48/100

iSDAsoil: soil clay content (USDA system) for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil clay content (USDA system) in % predicted at 30 m resolution for 0&ndash;20 and 20&ndash;50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>.&nbsp;Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, <a href="https://landpotential.org/data-portal/">LandPKS</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J.&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30&nbsp;m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning.&nbsp;<em>Sci Rep</em>&nbsp;<strong>11,&nbsp;</strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_clay_tot_psa_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil clay content mean value,</li> <li>sol_clay_tot_psa_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil clay content (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: clay_tot_psa R-square: 0.746 Fitted values sd: 16.5 RMSE: 9.63 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -75.803 -4.512 -0.178 3.748 82.146 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|) (Intercept) 4.494652 8.914671 0.504 0.61413 regr.ranger 1.076957 0.003611 298.210 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost -0.012617 0.004678 -2.697 0.00699 ** regr.cubist 0.030730 0.003930 7.820 5.32e-15 *** regr.nnet -0.238376 0.365390 -0.652 0.51415 regr.cvglmnet -0.044547 0.004379 -10.174 &lt; 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 9.629 on 122269 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.7458, Adjusted R-squared: 0.7458 F-statistic: 7.175e+04 on 5 and 122269 DF, p-value: &lt; 2.2e-16</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo48/100

iSDAsoil: soil extractable Iron for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Iron (Fe) log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0&ndash;20 and 20&ndash;50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>.&nbsp;Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J.&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30&nbsp;m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning.&nbsp;<em>Sci Rep</em>&nbsp;<strong>11,&nbsp;</strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.fe_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Iron mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.fe_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Iron model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.fe_mehlich3 R-square: 0.817 Fitted values sd: 0.497 RMSE: 0.235 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -4.0165 -0.1312 -0.0082 0.1238 2.5077 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|) (Intercept) 3.913522 1.869721 2.093 0.036344 * regr.ranger 0.856893 0.007912 108.306 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.027856 0.007738 3.600 0.000318 *** regr.cubist 0.146095 0.007230 20.207 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.879348 0.402810 -2.183 0.029037 * regr.cvglmnet 0.005610 0.004470 1.255 0.209415 --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.2349 on 57526 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.8173, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8173 F-statistic: 5.148e+04 on 5 and 57526 DF, p-value: &lt; 2.2e-16</code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo48/100

iSDAsoil: soil extractable Calcium for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Calcium log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0&ndash;20 and 20&ndash;50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>.&nbsp;Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J.&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30&nbsp;m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning.&nbsp;<em>Sci Rep</em>&nbsp;<strong>11,&nbsp;</strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.ca_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Calcium mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.ca_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Calcium model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.ca_mehlich3 R-square: 0.84 Fitted values sd: 1.24 RMSE: 0.543 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -6.0376 -0.2577 0.0076 0.2756 5.3825 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|) (Intercept) 5.737959 3.850998 1.490 0.136 regr.ranger 1.054018 0.003175 331.978 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost -0.030930 0.003939 -7.853 4.1e-15 *** regr.cubist 0.061829 0.003561 17.364 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.855297 0.561006 -1.525 0.127 regr.cvglmnet -0.065040 0.003225 -20.166 &lt; 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.5428 on 144593 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.8403, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8402 F-statistic: 1.521e+05 on 5 and 144593 DF, p-value: &lt; 2.2e-16 </code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo48/100

iSDAsoil: soil fine-earth bulk density for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil fine-earth bulk density in 10&times;kg/m3 predicted at 30 m resolution for 0&ndash;20 and 20&ndash;50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>.&nbsp;Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, <a href="https://landpotential.org/data-portal/">LandPKS</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J.&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30&nbsp;m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning.&nbsp;<em>Sci Rep</em>&nbsp;<strong>11,&nbsp;</strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_db_od_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil bulk density mean value,</li> <li>sol_db_od_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil bulk density model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: db_od R-square: 0.819 Fitted values sd: 0.269 RMSE: 0.126 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -1.06778 -0.06450 0.00215 0.06585 0.90016 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|) (Intercept) -0.05538 0.04860 -1.140 0.25451 regr.ranger 0.86305 0.01577 54.733 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.15383 0.01651 9.315 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.cubist 0.02039 0.01113 1.832 0.06695 . regr.nnet 0.03465 0.03710 0.934 0.35036 regr.cvglmnet -0.03021 0.01032 -2.927 0.00343 ** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.1263 on 13565 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.8194, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8193 F-statistic: 1.231e+04 on 5 and 13565 DF, p-value: &lt; 2.2e-16</code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to kg/m-cubic use:</p> <pre><code>kg/m3 = y * 10</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo48/100

iSDAsoil: soil extractable Phosphorus for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Phosphorus (P) log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0&ndash;20 and 20&ndash;50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>.&nbsp;Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J.&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30&nbsp;m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning.&nbsp;<em>Sci Rep</em>&nbsp;<strong>11,&nbsp;</strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.p_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Phosphorus mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.p_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Phosphorus model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.p_mehlich3 R-square: 0.486 Fitted values sd: 0.687 RMSE: 0.707 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -3.2892 -0.3942 -0.0637 0.2614 4.9466 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|) (Intercept) 3.378801 3.143200 1.075 0.282 regr.ranger 0.861655 0.011099 77.631 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.066139 0.013091 5.052 4.38e-07 *** regr.cubist 0.157674 0.008886 17.744 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -1.649621 1.442240 -1.144 0.253 regr.cvglmnet 0.013628 0.010407 1.310 0.190 --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.7066 on 53493 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.486, Adjusted R-squared: 0.486 F-statistic: 1.012e+04 on 5 and 53493 DF, p-value: &lt; 2.2e-16 </code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo48/100

iSDAsoil: soil extractable Magnesium for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Magnesium (Mg) log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0&ndash;20 and 20&ndash;50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>.&nbsp;Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J.&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30&nbsp;m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning.&nbsp;<em>Sci Rep</em>&nbsp;<strong>11,&nbsp;</strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.mg_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Magnesium mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.mg_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Magnesium model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.mg_mehlich3 R-square: 0.815 Fitted values sd: 1.05 RMSE: 0.498 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -5.8775 -0.2312 0.0028 0.2465 3.7400 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|) (Intercept) -0.034349 0.051219 -0.671 0.5025 regr.ranger 1.034217 0.003263 316.950 &lt;2e-16 *** regr.xgboost -0.008057 0.003854 -2.091 0.0366 * regr.cubist 0.073223 0.003649 20.067 &lt;2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.017388 0.009528 -1.825 0.0680 . regr.cvglmnet -0.075566 0.003402 -22.213 &lt;2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.4979 on 136681 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.8152, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8152 F-statistic: 1.206e+05 on 5 and 136681 DF, p-value: &lt; 2.2e-16 </code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo48/100

iSDAsoil: soil stone content for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil stone content / coarse fragments log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0&ndash;20 and 20&ndash;50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>.&nbsp;Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J.&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30&nbsp;m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning.&nbsp;<em>Sci Rep</em>&nbsp;<strong>11,&nbsp;</strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.wpg2_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil stone content mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.wpg2_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil stone content model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.wpg2 R-square: 0.709 Fitted values sd: 1.25 RMSE: 0.803 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -4.0555 -0.3113 -0.0222 0.2378 4.5794 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|) (Intercept) -0.008606 1.361982 -0.006 0.995 regr.ranger 0.972265 0.004443 218.854 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.034649 0.006404 5.411 6.3e-08 *** regr.cubist 0.069589 0.005229 13.308 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.012756 0.796535 -0.016 0.987 regr.cvglmnet -0.056645 0.005509 -10.283 &lt; 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.8032 on 92785 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.7092, Adjusted R-squared: 0.7092 F-statistic: 4.525e+04 on 5 and 92785 DF, p-value: &lt; 2.2e-16 </code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to % use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>% = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo48/100

iSDAsoil: soil extractable Sulphur for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Sulphur (S) log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0&ndash;20 and 20&ndash;50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>.&nbsp;Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J.&nbsp;<em>et al.</em>&nbsp;African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30&nbsp;m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning.&nbsp;<em>Sci Rep</em>&nbsp;<strong>11,&nbsp;</strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.s_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable&nbsp;Sulphur mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.s_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Sulphur model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.s_mehlich3 R-square: 0.548 Fitted values sd: 0.423 RMSE: 0.384 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -2.5729 -0.2102 -0.0264 0.1694 5.0049 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|) (Intercept) 1.459208 4.154229 0.351 0.725 regr.ranger 0.937179 0.016167 57.967 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.002587 0.016252 0.159 0.874 regr.cubist 0.145396 0.010890 13.351 &lt; 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.672062 1.796642 -0.374 0.708 regr.cvglmnet -0.045157 0.011256 -4.012 6.04e-05 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.3841 on 37530 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.5481, Adjusted R-squared: 0.548 F-statistic: 9103 on 5 and 37530 DF, p-value: &lt; 2.2e-16</code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record