Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
70
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
70 results for “spatial sampling”
Temporal and spatial changes of the abundance and species composition of phytoplankton in the California Current from samples collected aboard CalCOFI cruises from summer 1996 through 2022.
The abundances of 385 taxonomic categories of phytoplankton (species where possible) are presented for the 26.5 -year period beginning with summer, 1996 and concluding with autumn 2022. There were four cruises per year. Samples were water samples collected from the second depth, which was designed to sample the mixed layer when a mixed layer existed, generally between 5m - 15m. Before counting, samples from single stations were pooled into four regions: NE (northern inshore), SE (southern inshore), Alley (the region of the California Current) and Offshore (Central Pacific). Pooled samples were enumerated with an inverted microscope. The species data are presented by seven major taxonomic categories followed by the sums of those major taxa. The species codes are defined in the table metadata.
MCR LTER: Coral Reef: Turbinaria CHN from a spatially explicit sampling campaign in lagoons of Moorea, French Polynesia
Nutrients are important for ecosystem structure and community dynamics. To quantify time-integrated patterns of nutrient regimes in tropical lagoon ecosystems, concentrations of nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon were measured from tissues of the macroalga Turbinaria ornata collected in lagoons around Moorea, French Polynesia in 2016, 2017, and annually starting in 2019. These sampling periods initially corresponded with distinct seasonal shifts in rainfall and wave forcing and later focused on the rainy season. Results showed that N enrichment was highest nearshore in fringing reef habitats, as well as in bays and at reef passes.
MeanDRS River Width Sampling: Data products corresponding to "Intrinsic spatial scales of river stores and fluxes and their relative contributions to the global water cycle"
<p><strong>Corresponding peer-reviewed publication</strong></p> <p>This dataset corresponds to all input and output files that were used in the study reported in:</p> <ul> <li>Wade, J., David, C.H., Collins, E.L., Denbina, M., Cerbelaud, A., Tom, M., Reager, J.T., Frasson, R.P.M., Famiglietti, J.S., Lee, T., Gierach, M.M. (In Review), Intrinsic spatial scales of river stores and fluxes and their relative contributions to the global water cycle.</li> </ul> <p>When making use of any of the files in this dataset, please cite both the aforementioned article and the dataset herein.</p> <p><strong>Summary</strong></p> <p>The Earth’s rivers vary in size across several orders of magnitude. Yet, the relative significance of small upstream reaches compared to large downstream rivers in the global water cycle remains unclear, challenging the determination of adequate spatial resolution for observations. Using monthly simulations of river stores and fluxes from the MeanDRS river routing dataset, we sample global rivers by a range of estimated river width thresholds to investigate the intrinsic spatial scales of the global river water cycle. We frame these scale-dependent river dynamics in terms of observational capabilities, assessing how the size of rivers that can be resolved influences our ability to capture key global hydrologic stores and fluxes.</p> <p>We aim to answer two questions:</p> <p>1. What is the intrinsic spatial resolution of global river dynamics?</p> <p>2. How can the spatial scale of river processes be used to inform efficient monitoring and modeling strategies of global river stores and fluxes?</p> <p><strong>Data sources</strong></p> <p>The following sources were used to produce files in this dataset:</p> <ul> <li>Mean Discharge Runoff and Storage (MeanDRS) dataset (version v0.4) available under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. <a href="../records/10013744">https://zenodo.org/records/10013744</a>. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10013744; 10.1038/s41561-024-01421-5</li> <li>MERIT-Basins (version 1.0) derived from MERIT-Hydro (version 0.7) available under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. <a href="https://www.reachhydro.org/home/params/merit-basins">https://www.reachhydro.org/home/params/merit-basins</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Software</strong></p> <p>The software that was used to produce files in this dataset are available at https://github.com/jswade/meandrs-width-sampling.</p> <p><strong>Data Products</strong></p> <p>The following files represent the primary outputs of the analysis. Each file class generally has 61 files, corresponding to the 61 global hydrologic regions (region ii).</p> <p><strong>Riv_coast.zip</strong> contains shapefiles of corrected and uncorrected MeanDRS river reaches that intersect with the global coast and are inferred to drain to the ocean.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>riv_coast.zip</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>cor:</strong> riv_coast_pfaf_ii_COR.shp</p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>uncor: </strong>riv_coast_pfaf_ii_UNCOR.shp</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Qout_rivwidth.zip </strong>contains csv files of the aggregate river discharge to the ocean (km<sup>3</sup>/yr) of under each tested river width sampling scenario for each of the 61 global hydrologic regions.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>Qout_rivwidth.zip: </strong>Qout_pfaf_ii_rivwidth.csv</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>V_rivwidth_low.zip</strong> contains csv files of the aggregate river storage (km<sup>3</sup>) for the low residence time scenario under each tested river width sampling scenario for each of the 61 global hydrologic regions.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_low.zip:</strong> V_pfaf_ii_rivwidth_low.csv</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>V_rivwidth_nrm.zip </strong>contains csv files of the aggregate river storage (km<sup>3</sup>) for the normal (medium) residence time scenario under each tested river width sampling scenario for each of the 61 global hydrologic regions.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_nrm.zip: </strong>V_pfaf_ii_rivwidth_nrm.csv</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>V_rivwidth_hig.zip </strong>contains csv files of the aggregate river storage (km<sup>3</sup>) for the high residence time scenario under each tested river width sampling scenario for each of the 61 global hydrologic regions.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_hig.zip: </strong>V_pfaf_ii_rivwidth_hig.csv</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Largest_rivs.zip </strong>contains files related to our analysis of the relative contributions of discharge to the ocean from the 10 largest global river basins.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>largest_rivs.zip</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>cat: </strong>cat_dis_top10_nxx.shp – dissolved catchments of reaches draining from the 10 largest basins</p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>csv:</strong> Q_df_top10.csv – total discharge contributed by each basin</p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>riv:</strong> riv_top10_nxx.shp – river reaches that drain the 10 largest basins</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Smallest_rivs.zip </strong>contains files related to our analysis of the relative contributions of discharge to the ocean from global rivers narrower than 100 m.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>smallest_rivs.zip</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>cat: </strong>cat_pfaf_pfaf_ii_small_100m.shp – dissolved catchments of narrow reaches draining to the ocean for each region ii</p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>csv:</strong> Q_df_top10.csv – total discharge to the ocean from each narrow river reach</p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>riv: </strong>riv_pfaf_ii_small_100m.shp – river reaches narrower than 100 m that drain to the ocean for each region ii</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Global_summary.zip </strong>contains files related to the global aggregation of our region-specific river width sampling estimates for discharge to the ocean and river storage.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>global_summary.zip</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>Qout_rivwidth: </strong>global summary files for discharge to the ocean (km<sup>3</sup>/yr) under river width sampling</p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_low:</strong> global summary files for total river storage (km<sup>3</sup>) for the low residence time scenario under river width sampling</p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_nrm:</strong> global summary files for total river storage (km<sup>3</sup>) for the normal (medium) residence time scenario under river width sampling</p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_hig: </strong>global summary files for total river storage (km<sup>3</sup>) for the hig residence time scenario under river width sampling</p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>cat_small_gl: </strong>cat_dis_global_small_100m.shp – global dissolved catchments contributing to all rivers narrower than 100 m that drain to the ocean</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Rivwidth_sens.zip </strong>contains files related to our supplemental analysis of the sensitivity of our width estimation approach to choice of input discharge dataset. Here, we compute estimated river widths using 3 versions of MeanDRS discharge outputs (VIC, CLSM, NOAH) and compare the results of river width sampling from those runs to that of the primary analysis. The file formats and explanations follow those presented above, with added information for the land surface model used to generate those discharge simulations.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>Rivwidth_sens.zip</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>riv_coast</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>Qout_rivwidth_VIC</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>Qout_rivwidth_CLSM</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>Qout_rivwidth_NOAH</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_low_VIC</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_nrm_VIC</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_hig_VIC</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_low_CLSM</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_nrm_CLSM</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_hig_CLSM</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_low_NOAH</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_nrm_NOAH</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_hig_NOAH</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>global_summary_VIC</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>global_summary_CLSM</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>global_summary_NOAH</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Cor_sens.zip </strong>contains files related to our supplemental analysis of the sensitivity use of corrected ensemble MeanDRS discharge and volume simulations as opposed to uncorrected ensemble simulations. Here, we repeat our primary analysis using only uncorrected simulations throughout, rather than performing river width sampling using corrected simulations. The file formats and explanations follow those presented above, with the files using uncorrected ensemble (ENS) discharge and storage values in contrast to the primary analysis.</p> <p><strong>· </strong><strong>Cor_sens.zip</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>Qout_rivwidth_ENS</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_low_ENS</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_nrm_ENS</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>V_rivwidth_hig_ENS</strong></p> <p><strong> o </strong><strong>global_summary_ENS</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Width_val.zip </strong>contains files related to our supplemental validation of river widths estimated from MeanDRS discharge simulations through comparison with optical measurements of widths from the Global River Widths from Landsat (GRWL) Databse (Allen & Pavelsky, 2018).</p> <p><strong>· Width_val.zip: </strong>width_validation_pfaf_ii.csv</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Known bugs in this dataset or the associated manuscript</strong></p> <p>No bugs have been identified at this time.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Allen, G. H., & Pavelsky, T. M. (2018). Global extent of rivers and streams. <em>Science</em>, <em>361</em>(6402), 585-588. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0636</p> <p>Collins, E. L., David, C. H., Riggs, R., Allen, G. H., Pavelsky, T. M., Lin, P., Pan, M., Yamazaki, D., Meentemeyer, R. K., & Sanchez, G. M. (2024). Global patterns in river water storage dependent on residence time. <em>Nature Geoscience</em>, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01421-5</p> <p>Lin, P., Pan, M., Beck, H. E., Yang, Y., Yamazaki, D., Frasson, R., David, C. H., Durand, M., Pavelsky, T. M., Allen, G. H., Gleason, C. J., & Wood, E. F. (2019). Global Reconstruction of Naturalized River Flows at 2.94 Million Reaches. <em>Water Resources Research</em>, <em>55</em>(8), 6499–6516. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025287</p> <p>Yang, Y., Pan, M., Lin, P., Beck, H. E., Zeng, Z., Yamazaki, D., David, C. H., Lu, H., Yang, K., Hong, Y., & Wood, E. F. (2021). Global Reach-Level 3-Hourly River Flood Reanalysis (1980–2019). <em>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</em>, <em>102</em>(11), E2086–E2105. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0057.1</p>
Synthetic data set "Synth1" for the paper "Adaptive Sampling of 3D Spatial Correlations for Focus+Context Visualization"
<p>Synthetic data set "Synth1" for the paper "Adaptive Sampling of 3D Spatial Correlations for Focus+Context Visualization".<br>Preprint of the paper available at: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03308">https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03308</a></p>
Figure 3. Critical stop lines for a sequential count plan for T. urticae. For a in Spatial distribution and sampling plan for Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) in bean crops
Figure 3. Critical stop lines for a sequential count plan for T. urticae. For a precision level of 10 and 25%.
Figure 2 in Spatial distribution and sampling plan for Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) in bean crops
Figure 2. Sample sizes required to achieve a given precision level of 10 and 25% at different mean densities of T. urticae per leaf.
Figure 1 in Spatial distribution and sampling plan for Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) in bean crops
Figure 1. Relationship between variance and mean density (all stages combined per leaf) of T. urticae samples collected from bean fields near Varamin vicinity, Tehran province, Iran. The red lines are the best-fitting lines of Taylor's power law.
Global Pasture Watch - Grassland sampling design derived by Feature Space Coverage Sampling (FSCS) at 1-km spatial resolution
<p>Sampling design used in the production of the <strong>global maps of grassland dynamics 2000–2022 at 30 m spatial resolution</strong> in the scope of the Global Pasture Wath initiative. The sampling desing was based in Feature Space Coverage Sampling and resulted in 10,000 sample tiles (1x1 km) distributed across the World, which were visual interpreted in Very-High Resolution imagery thorugh the QGIS plugin <a href="https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qgis-fgi-plugin/">QGIS Fast Grid Inspection</a>.</p> <p>FSCS steps include:</p> <ul> <li>Short vegetation mask that includes all pixels mapped as mosaic, shrubland, grassland, and sparse vegetation in at least one year from 1993 to 2021 according to <a href="https://www.esa-landcover-cci.org/">ESA/CCI global land cover</a> (<code>gpw_short.veg.mask_esacci.lc_p_1km_s_19920101_20201231_go_epsg.3857_v1.tif</code>),</li> <li>87 input raster layers (including vegetation indices, terrain, land temperature, climate and water variable),</li> <li>Principal Components Analysis (PCA) using all input layers,</li> <li>Selection of the 10 first components (explaining 75% of variance),</li> <li> K-Means with 10,000 clusters (targeted number of samples - <br><code>gpw_grassland_fscs.kmeans.cluster_c_1km_20000101_20221231_go_epsg.3857_v1.tif</code>)</li> <li>Calculation of euclidean distance (in the principal component space) of all 1-km pixels to the centre of each cluster,</li> <li>Selection of the pixel with the shortest distance for each cluster,</li> <li>Conversion of the selected pixels into sample tiles ()</li> </ul> <p>The file <code>gpw_grassland_fscs_tile.samples_1km_20000101_20221231_go_epsg.3857_v1.gpkg</code> provides the sample tiles and include the follow collumns:</p> <ul> <li><strong>X</strong>: Latitude in Web Mercator projection (EPSG:3857),</li> <li><strong>Y</strong>: Longitude in Web Mercator projection (EPSG:3857),</li> <li><strong>cluster_id</strong>: K-Means output ranging from 0—9999,</li> <li><strong>cluster_distance</strong>: Distance from the selected sample to the centre of the cluster,</li> <li><strong>cluster_size</strong>: Number o 1-km pixels inside the K-Means cluster, estimated using Web Mercator projection (<a href="https://epsg.io/3857">EPSG:3857</a>)</li> <li><strong>cluster_size_equal_area</strong>: Number o 1-km pixels inside the K-Means cluster, estimated using Goode Homolosine Land projection (<a href="https://epsg.io/54052">ESRI:54052</a>)</li> <li><strong>cluster_size_corr</strong>: Correction factor to adjust the area distortion due to Web Mercator projection, estimated by the difference in normalized propotional values of cluster_size and cluster_size_equal_area.</li> <li><strong>rf_n_pred</strong>: Number of pixels predicted by a RF model trained to estimate probability to select the pixel closer to the centre of the KMeans cluster. The RF models were trained individually per each cluster using the 10 first components derived by PCA (<code>gpw_comps_fscs.pca_m_1km_20000101_20221231_go_epsg.3857_v1.tar.gz</code>).</li> <li><strong>rf_samp_prob</strong>: Sampling probability based on RF model (<em>rf_n_pred / cluster_size</em>)</li> <li><strong>rf_samp_wei</strong>: Sampling weight estimated in Web Mercator projection.</li> <li><strong>rf_samp_wei_coor</strong>: Corrected sampling weight estimated in Goode Homolosine Land projection.</li> </ul> <h3>Related resources</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Maps of dominant grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890400">2000-2002</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890402">2003-2005</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890404">2006-2008</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890408">2009-2011</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890410">2012-2014</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890412">2015-2017</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890414">2018-2020</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890416">2021-2022</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of cultivated grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2022 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of natural/semi-natural grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2022 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Grassland reference samples based on VHR imagery (2000–2022):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11281157">GeoPackage files</a></li> <li><strong>Global machine learning models (Random Forest):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952806">Parquet and joblib python files</a></li> <li><strong>Reference sampling design derived by FSCV:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11391517">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Harmonized reference samples based on existing LULC dataset:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951976">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Source code for reproducibility:<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952867">GitHub release</a><strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>Mapping feedback tool:</strong><br><a href="https://geo-wiki.org">GeoWiki</a></li> <li><strong>Data catalogues:</strong><br><a href="https://stac.openlandmap.org/gpw_ggc-30m/collection.json?.language=en">OpenLandMap STAC</a> <a href="https://global-pasture-watch.projects.earthengine.app/view/ggc-30m">Google Earth Engine</a></li> </ul> <h3>Support</h3> <p>For questions of bugs/inconsistencies related to the dataset raise a GitHub issue in <a href="https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch">https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch</a></p>
Spanning Scales: The Airborne Spatial and Temporal Sampling Design of the National Ecological Observatory Network
<p>Supporting information, datasets, and R and JavaScript code for the the National Ecological Observatory Network’s Airborne Observation Platform (AOP) sampling design and publication, <em>"Spanning Scales: The Airborne Spatial and Temporal Sampling Design of the National Ecological Observatory Network"</em></p>
Data from: Fractal triads efficiently sample ecological diversity and processes across spatial scales
<p>The relative influence of ecological assembly processes, such as environmental filtering, competition, and dispersal, vary across spatial scales. Changes in phylogenetic and taxonomic diversity across environments provide insight into these processes, however, it is challenging to assess the effect of spatial scale on these metrics. Here, we outline a nested sampling design that fractally spaces sampling locations to concentrate statistical power across spatial scales in a study area. We test this design in northeast Utah, at a study site with distinct vegetation types (including sagebrush steppe and mixed conifer forest), that vary across environmental gradients. We demonstrate the power of this design to detect changes in community phylogenetic diversity across environmental gradients and assess the spatial scale at which the sampling design captures the most variation in empirical data. We find clear evidence of broad-scale changes in multiple features of phylogenetic and taxonomic diversity across aspect. At finer scales, we find additional variation in phylodiversity, highlighting the power of our fractal sampling design to efficiently detect patterns across multiple spatial scales. Thus, our fractal sampling design and analysis effectively identify important environmental gradients and spatial scales that drive community phylogenetic structure. We discuss the insights this gives us into the ecological assembly processes that differentiate plant communities found in northeast Utah.</p>
A Spatial Analysis of Food Insecurity and Body Mass Index with Income and Grocery Store Density in a Diverse Sample of Adolescents and Young Adults
<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Food insecurity occurs when a household lacks consistent access to food and is more prevalent in ethnic and racial minoritized populations. While there has been a proliferation of research linking food insecurity to obesity, these findings are mixed. It may be helpful to consider some additional geographic factors that may be associated with both factors including socioeconomic status and grocery store density. The purpose of the current study aimed to examine spatial relationships between food insecurity and SES/store density and BMI and SES/store density in a diverse sample of adolescents and young adults across two studies in a large, urban city. GIS analysis revealed that participants with the highest food insecurity (larger symbols) tend to live in the zip codes with the lowest median income. There did not appear to be clear a relationship between food insecurity and store density. Participants with the highest BMI tend to live in zip codes with lower median income and participants with higher BMI tended to live further away from downtown, which has the highest concentration of grocery stores in the city. Our findings may help to inform future interventions and policy approaches to addressing both obesity and food insecurity in areas of higher prevalence.</p>
Point sample database with spatial holdbacks for global forest edge model training
<p>Global point dataset sampling 50 biophysical parameters to train the global forest carbon edge model at https://github.com/springinnovate/carbon_edge_model/releases/tag/1.2.0</p> <p>Field schema:</p> <p>accessibility_to_cities_2015_30sec_compressed (Integer64)<br> altitude_10sec_compressed (Integer64)<br> baccini_carbon_data_2014_compressed (Integer64)<br> bio_01_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_02_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_03_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_04_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_05_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_06_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_07_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_08_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_09_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_10_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_11_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_12_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_13_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_14_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_15_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_16_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_17_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_18_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> bio_19_30sec_compressed (Real)<br> cec_0-5cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> cec_5-15cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> cfvo_0-5cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> cfvo_5-15cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> clay_0-5cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> clay_5-15cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> fc_stack_hansen_forest_cover2014_compressed (Integer64)<br> gf_0.4_masked_forest_ESACCI-LC-L4-LCCS-Map-300m-P1Y-2014-v2.0.7 (Real)<br> gf_1.45_masked_forest_ESACCI-LC-L4-LCCS-Map-300m-P1Y-2014-v2.0.7 (Real)<br> gf_5.0_fc_stack_hansen_forest_cover2014_compressed (Real)<br> gf_5.0_masked_forest_ESACCI-LC-L4-LCCS-Map-300m-P1Y-2014-v2.0.7 (Real)<br> hillshade_10sec_compressed (Integer64)<br> masked_forest_ESACCI-LC-L4-LCCS-Map-300m-P1Y-2014-v2.0.7 (Integer64)<br> night_lights_10sec_compressed (Real)<br> night_lights_5min_compressed (Real)<br> nitrogen_0-5cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> nitrogen_10sec_compressed (Integer64)<br> nitrogen_5-15cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> phh2o_0-5cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> phh2o_5-15cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> sand_0-5cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> silt_0-5cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> silt_5-15cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> slope_10sec_compressed (Real)<br> soc_0-5cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> soc_5-15cm_mean_compressed (Integer64)<br> tri_10sec_compressed (Real)<br> wind_speed_10sec_compressed (Real)</p>
French Guianan mammal and bird population densities with spatial-capture recapture, line transect distance sampling, and 'unmarked' density models
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Fractal triads efficiently sample ecological diversity and processes across spatial scales
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Spatial patterns of understory vegetation and soil in an Alaskan upland boreal forest fire chronosequence. Three sites located in Delta Junction Alaska. Soil sampled during summer 2007
In this study we used geostatistics to characterize the spatial heterogeneity of soil carbon and nitrogen pools, microbial respiration, microbial biomass, nitrogen mineralization, soil moisture, soil pH, depth of organic horizon and forest floor covers and understory vegetation abundances in three sites (1999, 1987 and 1920 wildfires) of a boreal forest chronosequence of Interior Alaska (near Delta Junction). Soil sampling and vegetation measurements occured during summer 2007.
Data from: Spatial and temporal patterns of environmental DNA detection to inform sampling protocols in lentic and lotic systems.
<p>The development of efficient sampling protocols for the capture of environmental DNA (eDNA) could greatly help improve accuracy of occupancy monitoring for species that are difficult to detect. However, the process of developing a protocol in situ is complicated for rare species by the fact that animal locations are often unknown. We tested sampling designs in lake and stream systems to determine the most effective eDNA sampling protocols for two rare species: the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog (<i>Rana sierrae</i>) and the foothill yellow-legged frog (<i>R. boylii</i>). We varied water volume, spatial sampling, and seasonal timing in lakes and streams; in lakes we also tested multiple filter types. We found that filtering 2 L versus 1 L increased the odds of detection in streams 5.42X (95% CI: 3.2-9.19X) in our protocol, from a probability of 0.51 to 0.85 per technical replicate. Lake sample volumes were limited by filter clogging and we found no effect of volume or filter type. Sampling later in the season increased the odds of detection in streams by 1.96X for every 30 days (95% CI: 1.3 - 2.97X) but there was no effect for lakes. Spatial autocorrelation of the quantity of yellow-legged frog eDNA captured in streams between 100 and 200 m, indicating that sampling at close intervals is important.</p>
The apparent exponential radiation of Phanerozoic land vertebrates is an artefact of spatial sampling biases
There is no consensus about how terrestrial biodiversity was assembled through deep time, and in particular whether it has risen exponentially over the Phanerozoic. Using a database of 38,711 fossil occurrences, we show that the spatial extent of the 'global' terrestrial tetrapod fossil record itself expands exponentially through the Phanerozoic, and that this spatial variation explains around 75% of the variation in known fossil species counts. Controlling for this bias, we find that regional-scale terrestrial tetrapod diversity was constrained over timespans of tens to hundreds of millions of years, and similar patterns are recovered for major subgroups, such as dinosaurs, mammals and squamates. The Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction, 66 million years ago, fundamentally disrupted terrestrial ecosystems, catalysing an abrupt increase in its aftermath. Nevertheless, this was followed by general stasis and recent diversity levels do not exceed those of the Paleogene. These findings parallel those recovered in analyses of local community-level richness, suggesting that tetrapod beta diversity has also not shown a general increase through time. Taken together, our findings strongly contradict past studies that suggested unbounded diversity increases over the last 100 million years.
Data for: The meta-analysis of the effects of spatial sampling bias correction on presence only species distribution models
<p>This dataset contains information extracted from 70 studies identified through a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature (Web of Science and SCOPUS databases both searched on the 13/02/2023) to evaluate the effect of spatial sampling bias correction methods in presence-only species distribution models.</p>
Visium Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics of Glioblastoma Samples
<p>This repository contains samples (Visium Spatially resolved Transcriptomics) of the project entitled: <strong>Epigenetic neural glioblastoma integrates into neuron-to-glioma-networks and predicts therapeutic vulnerability</strong></p>
Data and R code from: Global Phanerozoic biodiversity, can variation be explained by spatial sampling intensity
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.