Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in New Species Of The Genus Pachyrhynchus Germar (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae) From The Greater Mindanao Pleistocene Aggregate Island Complex (Philippines)

Fig. 2. Male genitalia of P. ilgas. A – aedegal body in lateral view; B – aedegal body in frontal view; C – sternite IX; D – tegmine. Scale 1mm.

Fig. 6 in New Species Of The Genus Pachyrhynchus Germar (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae) From The Greater Mindanao Pleistocene Aggregate Island Complex (Philippines)

Fig. 6. Lateral view of habitus; A – P. absurdus; B – P. orientalis; C – P. occidentalis; D – P. neoabsurdus. All females.

Fig. 3 in New Species Of The Genus Pachyrhynchus Germar (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae) From The Greater Mindanao Pleistocene Aggregate Island Complex (Philippines)

Fig. 3. Male genitalia of P. orientalis; A – aedegal body in lateral Fig. 4. Female genitalia of P. view; B – aedegal body in frontal view; C – sternite IX; D – tegmen. orientalis. Scale 1mm. Scale 1mm.

Fig. 1 in New Species Of The Genus Pachyrhynchus Germar (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae) From The Greater Mindanao Pleistocene Aggregate Island Complex (Philippines)

Fig. 1. Dorsal habitus of A- P. occidentalis, male; B – female; C – P. ilgas, male; D – P. orientalis, male; E – female; F – P. neoabsurdus, female.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Рис. 2. ВоΔопΛавающие и окоΛовоΔные виΔы птиц на берегах Ямуны: 1 — Anas crecca, Himantopus himantopus; 2 — Ardea alba, Egretta garzetta, Ardeola grayii; 3 — Himantopus himantopus; 4 — Himantopus himantopus, Recurvirostra avosetta; 5 — Phalacrocorax niger, Amaurornis phoenicurus; 6 — Platalea leucorodia, Mycteria leucocephala; 7 — Ardea cinerea; 8 — Anas poecilorhyncha Fig. 2. Waterfowl and shorebird species on the Yamuna River: 1 — Anas crecca, Himantopus himantopus; 2 — Ardea alba, Egretta garzetta, Ardeola grayii; 3 — Himantopus himantopus; 4 — Himantopus himantopus, Recurvirostra avosetta; 5 — Phalacrocorax niger, Amaurornis phoenicurus; 6 — Platalea leucorodia, Mycteria leucocephala; 7 — Ardea cinerea; 8 — Anas poecilorhyncha in Aggregation of the wintering birds on the Yamuna River in India

Рис. 2. ВоΔопΛавающие и окоΛовоΔные виΔы птиц на берегах Ямуны: 1 — Anas crecca, Himantopus himantopus; 2 — Ardea alba, Egretta garzetta, Ardeola grayii; 3 — Himantopus himantopus; 4 — Himantopus himantopus, Recurvirostra avosetta; 5 — Phalacrocorax niger, Amaurornis phoenicurus; 6 — Platalea leucorodia, Mycteria leucocephala; 7 — Ardea cinerea; 8 — Anas poecilorhyncha Fig. 2. Waterfowl and shorebird species on the Yamuna River: 1 — Anas crecca, Himantopus himantopus; 2 — Ardea alba, Egretta garzetta, Ardeola grayii; 3 — Himantopus himantopus; 4 — Himantopus himantopus, Recurvirostra avosetta; 5 — Phalacrocorax niger, Amaurornis phoenicurus; 6 — Platalea leucorodia, Mycteria leucocephala; 7 — Ardea cinerea; 8 — Anas poecilorhyncha

Figure 8 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 8. Golden proportion manifested in the shape of bird eggs: 1, 13, 25, 37, ovoid profiles; 2, 14, 26, 38, ovoid profile profiles for comparison with bird eggs. Bird eggs: 3 – Alectoris chukar; 4 – Glareola pratincola; 5 – Sturnus vulgaris; 6 – Sylvia nisoria; 7 – Milvus milvus; 8 – Buteo buteo; 9 – Falco cherrug; 10 – Lanius collurio; 11 - Perdix perdix; 12 – Garrulus glandarius; 15 – Sylvia communis; 16 – Perdix perdix; 17 – Numida meleagris; 18 – Alectoris chukar; 19 – Garrulus glandarius; 20 – Coccothraustes coccothraustes; 21 – Larus melanocephalus; 22 – Dendrocopos major; 23 – Picus canus; 24 – Jynx torquilla; 27 – Luscinia svecica; 28 – Oenanthe oenanthe; 29 – Turdus merula; 30– Picus canus; 31– Aquila pomarina; 32 – Perdix perdix; 33 – Lanius collurio; 34 – Anthus trivialis; 35 – Jynx torquilla; 36– Hieraaetus pennatus; 39 – Turdus philomelos; 40 – Oriolus oriolus; 41 – Ficedula albicollis; 42 – Dendrocopos leucotos; 43 – Delichon urbica; 44 – Coccothraustes coccothraustes; 45 – Garrulus glandarius; 46 – Corvus frugilegus; 47 – Turdus merula; 48 – Gallinula chloropus.

Figure 5 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 5. Comparison of geometric standards (1, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31) with profiles of real eggs: 2 – Athene noctua; 3 – Neophron percnopterus; 4 – Merops apiaster; 5 – Phylloscopus sibilatrix; 6 – Alcedo atthis; 8 – Falco vespertinus; 9 – Aegithalos caudatus; 10 – Merops apiaster; 11 – Ficedula hypoleuca; 12 – Jynx torquilla; 14 – Sterna hirundo; 15 – Buteo buteo; 16 – Falco cherrug; 17 – Upupa epops; 18 – Dendrocopos major; 20 – Picus canus; 21 – Perdix perdix; 22 – Phasianus colchicus; 23 – Corvus monedula; 24 – Coccothraustes coccothraustes; 26 – Limosa limosa; 27 – Pica pica; 28 – Luscinia luscinia; 29 – Corvus frugilegus; 30 – Alca torda; 32 – Uria aalge; 33 – Numenius arquata; 34 – Recurvirostra avosetta; 35 – Alca torda; 36 – Corvus corax.

Figure 3 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 3. Discrete variants of combinations of the lateral arcs of the ovoid profiles (matrices): a - 0.75D; b -1.0 D; c - 1.25D; d - 1.5D; e - 1.75D.

Figure 7 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 7. Construction of ovoid profiles with golden ratio: a - construction of ovoids with doubling of radii of circles; b - construction of ovoids with increasing of radii of circles by F=1,618; c - getting golden section by a combination of four circles; d - construction of ovoids with golden section by pentagons.

Figure 11 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 11. Schematics for calculating the complementarity indices of avian eggs: 1, 2, 9, 10 - scheme and geometric profile of eggs with a complementarity index close to unity (rc=ri=(L–D)/2); 3 – Podiceps cristatus; 4 – Cygnus olor; 5 – Egretta alba; 6 – Pelecanus crispus; 7 – Egretta garzetta; 8 – Mergus serrator; 11 – Anser anser; 12 – Casuarius casuarius; 13 – Porzana parva; 14 – Phalacrocorax carbo; 15 – Podiceps nigricollis; 16 – Ardea cinerea; 17, 18 - scheme and geometric profile of eggs with a complementarity index close to 1,333 (rc=ri=lipz=L/3); 19 – Pygoscelis papua; 20 – Nyctea scandiaca; 21 – Strutio camelus; 22 – Dendrocopos minor; 23 – Alcedo atthis; 24 – Buteo chemilasius; 25 – Jynx torquilla; 26 – Asio otus; 27 – Streptopelia decaocto; 28 – Merops apiaster; 29 – Asio flammeus; 30 – Aquila pomarina; 31 – Bubo bubo; 32 – Columba oenas; 33, 34 – scheme and geometric profile of eggs with a complementarity index greater than 1,5 (rc=ri/lipz˃1,5); 35 – Athene noctua; 36 – Otus scops; 37 – Otus brucei; 38 – Merops apiaster; 39 – Strix aluco; 40 – Pygoscelis papua; 41 – Alcedo atthis; 42 – Merops superciliosus; 43 – Milvus migrans; 44 – Asio flammeus; 45 – Strutio camelus; 46 – Hieraaetus pennatus; 47 – Strix aluco; 48 – Accipiter nisus.

Figure 2 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 2. Relationship between the ovoid constructs with the diagonals of the square and the double square.

Figure 6 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 6. Ovoid profiles (a) Erkoca, 2021; (b) Rojas, 2002; (c) Dixon, 1987; (d) Petrović et al., 2010.

Figure 10 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 10. Schemes of taking measurements to calculate wurfs for eggs of different types: a - true ovoids; b, c - symmetric and asymmetric pseudoovoids.

Figure 1 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 1. Geometric constructor figures for constructing ovoids: (a) Vesica piscis with circles inside, (b) A fragment of the matrix to obtain ovoids.

opencc-zeroAug 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: Resolution of the Aleiodes seriatus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1838) - aggregate in the western Palaearctic (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Rogadinae), with description of a new species.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Resolution of the Aleiodes seriatus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1838) - aggregate in the western Palaearctic (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Rogadinae), with description of a new species". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/d747aacc-514b-42fa-b8ef-d6384ce082c5">https://bionomia.net/dataset/d747aacc-514b-42fa-b8ef-d6384ce082c5</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/d747aacc-514b-42fa-b8ef-d6384ce082c5">https://gbif.org/dataset/d747aacc-514b-42fa-b8ef-d6384ce082c5</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Figure 22 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 22. Niphargus polymorphus sp. n., holotype. Pereopods III–IV, detail of pereopod IV dactylus. Retinacle of pleopod II. Uropods I–III. Telson.

Figure 18 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 18. Niphargus lourensis sp. n., holotype. Pereopods III–IV, detail of pereopod IV dactylus. Uropods I–III. Telson.

Figure 14 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 14. Niphargus dabarensis sp. n., holotype. Pereopods III–IV, detail of pereopod IV dactylus. Uropods I–III. Telson.

Figure 3 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 3. Distribution of characters ''antenna I-length'' (character 19, CI50.18, RI50.53; left) and ''gnathopod II article 6 size'' (character 39, CI50.33, RI50.7; right). Long antennae are considered as troglomorphic, whereas a large-sized gnathopod II is supposed to be a synapomorphy of ''Orniphargus'' (S. Karaman (1950c)).

Figure 10. N in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 10. N. dolichopus sp. n., holotype. Pereopods III–IV, detail of pereopod IV dactylus. Retinacle of pleopod II. Uropods I–III. Telson.