Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
822
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
822 results for “systematic position”
Fig. 5 in Phylogenetic analysis and systematic position of two new species of the ant genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Southeast Asia
Fig. 5. Phylogeny and distribution of the Crematogaster borneensis-group, C. khmerensisi sp. nov., C. fruhstorferi, C. ssAUS5, C. mjobergi and the C. tetracantha-group. Closed circle indicates C. khmerensis sp. nov., closed square indicates C. pfeifferi sp. nov. It is noted that C. pfeifferi sp. nov. is not represented in the phylogeny.
Fig. 4. A–D in Phylogenetic analysis and systematic position of two new species of the ant genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Southeast Asia
Fig. 4. A–D. Crematogaster khmerensis sp. nov., worker. A. Body in lateral view. B. Full-face view of head. C. Dorsal view of mesosoma. D. Petiole and postpetiole in dorsal view. — E–H. — Crematogaster pfeifferi sp. nov., worker. E. Body in lateral view. F. Full-face view of head. G. Dorsal view of mesosoma. H. Petiole and postpetiole in dorsal view.
Fig. 3 in Phylogenetic analysis and systematic position of two new species of the ant genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Southeast Asia
Fig. 3. Posterior estimates of divergence time of 24 taxa on the phylogenetic tree. Blue bars depict the 95% highest posterior density (HPD). Estimations were performed with MCMCTree using the independent rate model.
Fig. 1. Bayesian majority rule consensus tree reconstructed for 90 in Phylogenetic analysis and systematic position of two new species of the ant genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Southeast Asia
Fig. 1. Bayesian majority rule consensus tree reconstructed for 90 taxa using five genes (ArgK, CAD, LWRh, Top1, Wg) in a MrBayes analysis. Above node numbers indicate posterior probability. Data were partitioned by PartitionFinder v.1.1.1 and analyzed using a best fit model for each gene and codon position, with 10 million generations and a burn-in of 25 %. Area enclosed by dashed lines is enlarged on Fig. 2.
Figs 28–30 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 28–30. Pupa of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 28. Dorsal view. 29. Lateral view. 30. Ventral view. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figs 26–27 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 26–27. Head of larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 in lateral view. 26. First-instar larva; arrows indicate the 5 stemmata. 27. Last-instar larva. Scale bars: 26 = 0.1 mm; 27 = 3 mm.
Figs 18–19 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 18–19. Habitus of first-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 18. Dorsal view. 19. Ventral view. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Figs 1–2 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 1–2. Habitus of last-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 1. Dorsal view. 2. Ventral view. Scale bar: 20 mm.
Figs 3–10 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 3–10. Head and fore leg of last-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 3. Head, dorsal view. 4. Head, ventral view. 5. Right maxilla, ventral view. 6. Left antenna, dorsal view. 7–9. Mandibles (7 = ventral view, 8 = dorsal view, 9 = mesal view). 10. Left prothoracic leg. Scale bars: 3–4 = 3 mm; 5, 7–9 = 2 mm; 6, 10 = 1 mm.
Figs 22–23. Thorax and abdominal segments 4–5 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 22–23. Thorax and abdominal segments 4–5 of first instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 22. Dorsal view. 23. Ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.
Figs 24–25. Abdominal segments 8–9 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 24–25. Abdominal segments 8–9 of first instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 24. Dorsal view. 25. Ventral view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
Figs 11–17. Thorax and abdominal segments 5 and 9 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 11–17. Thorax and abdominal segments 5 and 9 of last-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 11–12. Thorax (11 = dorsal view, 12 = ventral view). 13. Tergite 5. 14. Sternite 5. 15. Sternite 9. 16. Tergite 9. 17. Abdominal segment 9, posterior view. Scale bars: 3 mm.
Figs 35–36 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 35–36. Extremely fine setae on abdominal segments of pupa of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 35. Setae on tergites 4–5. 36. Setae on sternites 4–5. Scale bars: 3 mm.
Figs 20–21 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 20–21. Head of first-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 20. Dorsal view. 21. Ventral view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
Figs 31–34. Abdominal segment 9 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)
Figs 31–34. Abdominal segment 9, spherical protrusions and spiracles of pupa of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 31–33. Abdominal segment 9 (31 = dorsal view, 32 = lateral view, 33 = ventral view). 34. Spherical protrusions and spiracles on segments 4–6, lateral view. Abbreviations: sp = spiracle; lsp = lateral spherical protrusion; ssp = second spherical protrusion. Scale bars: 31–33 = 3 mm; 34 = 2 mm.
FIGURE 3 in Morphology and systematic position of Cingula tumidula G. O. Sars, 1878 (Gastropoda: Rissoidae)
FIGURE 3. Details of reproductive anatomy of Pusillina tumidula. A – D. female reproductive system of two specimens from Franz Joseph Land, 44 m, 79 º 53.4 ' N, 51 º 26.06 ' E, MMBI, no number: A, C. left side; B, D. right side; lobes and seminal receptacle are not visible on B; E. male cephalopodium with penis. BC— bursa copulatrix, L— lobes, probably function in sperm storage, LOG— Lower oviduct gland, PE— penis, SD— seminal duct, SR— seminal receptacle, T— tentacle, UOG— upper oviduct gland. Scale = 0.5 mm.
FIGURE 2 in Morphology and systematic position of Cingula tumidula G. O. Sars, 1878 (Gastropoda: Rissoidae)
FIGURE 2. Details of protoconch (A – D) and radula (E – F) of Pusillina tumidula. A – B. Eastern Barents Sea (Pechora Sea), 17.5 m, 69 ° 15.61 ' N, 57 ° 22.76 ' E, MMBI, no number; C. Franz Joseph Land, 44 m, 79 º 53.4 ' N, 51 º 26.06 ' E, MMBI, no number; D. White Sea, 85 m, 66 ° 20 ' N, 30 ° E (specimen with costae), ZIN 35667 / 2; E – F. Dalne-Zelenetskaya Bay, 59 m, 69 ° 07.92 ' N, 36 ° 05.45 ' E, MMBI, no number. Scales: A, C – D = 300 µm, В = 50 µm, E = 20 µm, F = 5 µm.
Рис. 1–4. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, общий виΔ. 1–2 – самки: 1 – гоΛотип, 2 – паратип; 3–4 – самцы: 3 – из окрестностей оз. МаркакоΛь (Казахстан), 4 – из Рахмановского Λесничества (Казахстан). Figs 1–4. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, general view. 1–2 – females: 1 – holotype, 2 – paratype; 3–4 – males: 3 – from the Markakol Lake vicinities (Kazakhstan), 3 – from the Rakhmanovskoe Forestry (Kazakhstan). in To the systematic position of Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides (Straneo, 1937) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from the Altai Mountains
Рис. 1–4. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, общий виΔ. 1–2 – самки: 1 – гоΛотип, 2 – паратип; 3–4 – самцы: 3 – из окрестностей оз. МаркакоΛь (Казахстан), 4 – из Рахмановского Λесничества (Казахстан). Figs 1–4. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, general view. 1–2 – females: 1 – holotype, 2 – paratype; 3–4 – males: 3 – from the Markakol Lake vicinities (Kazakhstan), 3 – from the Rakhmanovskoe Forestry (Kazakhstan).
Рис. 5–10. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, этикетки и генитаΛии самца. 5 – этикетки гоΛотипа; 6 – этикетки паратипа; 7 – энΔофаΛΛус, виΔ сΛева (экземпΛяр из Рахмановского Λесничества, Казахстан); 8–9 – меΔиаΛьная ΔоΛя эΔеагуса (экземпΛяр с Курчумского хребта, Казахстан): 8 – виΔ сΛева, 9 – виΔ сверху; 10 – правая парамера, виΔ сбоку (этот же экземпΛяр). Figs 5–10. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, labels and male genitalia. 5 – labels of the holotype; 6 – labels of the paratype; 7 – endophallus, left view (specimen from the Rakhmanovskoe Forestry, Kazakhstan); 8–9 – median lobe of aedeagus (specimen from the Kurchum Mountain Range, Kazakhstan): 8 – left view, 9 – dorsal view; 10 – right paramere, lateral view (the same specimen). in To the systematic position of Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides (Straneo, 1937) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from the Altai Mountains
Рис. 5–10. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, этикетки и генитаΛии самца. 5 – этикетки гоΛотипа; 6 – этикетки паратипа; 7 – энΔофаΛΛус, виΔ сΛева (экземпΛяр из Рахмановского Λесничества, Казахстан); 8–9 – меΔиаΛьная ΔоΛя эΔеагуса (экземпΛяр с Курчумского хребта, Казахстан): 8 – виΔ сΛева, 9 – виΔ сверху; 10 – правая парамера, виΔ сбоку (этот же экземпΛяр). Figs 5–10. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, labels and male genitalia. 5 – labels of the holotype; 6 – labels of the paratype; 7 – endophallus, left view (specimen from the Rakhmanovskoe Forestry, Kazakhstan); 8–9 – median lobe of aedeagus (specimen from the Kurchum Mountain Range, Kazakhstan): 8 – left view, 9 – dorsal view; 10 – right paramere, lateral view (the same specimen).
FIGURE 6 in Reassessment and systematic position of the sinistral snails of genus Hemiplecta from Thailand (Eupulmonata: Ariophantidae), with description of two new species
FIGURE 6 SEM images of radula. A-C. Hemiplecta retrorsa, CUMZ 5094 from Ranong Province, (A) central and inner lateral teeth, (B) outer lateral teeth, and (C) outer marginal teeth. D, E. Hemiplecta thailandica n. sp., holotype CUMZ 5095/1 from the type locality, (D) central and lateral teeth, and (E) lateral teeth and marginal teeth. F. Hemiplecta ligorica n. sp., paratype CUMZ 5087 from the type locality. Central tooth indicated by 'C'. Numbers indicate the tooth order from lateral to marginal end.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.