Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
52
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
52 results for “taxonomic catalog”
Supplementary material 3: World Spider Catalog Bibliographic Data: Treatments from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
List of journal/publisher by ranked by treatment count exported from the World Spider Catalog 14 October 2014 with total treatments by source, cumulative treatments, and cumulative proportion of treatments.
Supplementary material 2: World Spider Catalog Bibliographic Data: Publications from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Ranked list of journal/publisher exported from the World Spider Catalog 14 October 2014 with total articles by source, cumulative articles, and cucmulative proportion of articles.
Figure 2 in TaXonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: the intriguing copepod order Monstrilloida (Crustacea: Copepoda), taXonomy and diversity
Figure 2. Distinctive morphological characters of the Monstrilloid copepods described from Brazil: (A) Cymbasoma rochai male genital complex showing spiniform processes; (B) C. rochai female fifth leg and ovigerous spines; (C) Monstrilla careli female fifth leg, ventral view; (D) M. pustulata female forehead with integumental field of pustules; (E) same, fifth leg, ventral view; (F) M. satchmoi, bilobed female oral papilla, lateral view; (G) same, left antennule, dorsal view; (H) C. brasiliensis female fifth legs, ventral view; (I) same, right antennule, dorsal view; (J) M. bahiana male genital complex, lateral view; (K) same, ventral view showing lappets; (L) same male right geniculate antennule, dorsal view; (M) M. fosshageni male genital complex, semi-lateral view; (N) same, lateral view; (O) M. fosshageni male left geniculate antennule, dorsal view.
Figure 3 in TaXonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: the intriguing copepod order Monstrilloida (Crustacea: Copepoda), taXonomy and diversity
Figure 3. Distribution of species of the copepod order Monstrilloida: (A) Brazilian map showing the number of Monstrilloida species recorded from each state; (B) Monstrilloida species number by Brazilian marine ecoregions. State abbreviations: (AC) Acre, (AL) Alagoas, (AM) Amazonas, (AP) Amapá, (BA) Bahia, (CE) Ceará, (DF) Federal District, (ES) Espírito Santo, (GO) Goiás, (MA) Maranhão, (MG) Minas Gerais, (MS) Mato Grosso do Sul, (MT) Mato Grosso, (PA) Pará, (PB) Paraíba, (PE) Pernambuco, (PI) Piauí, (PR) Paraná, (RJ) Rio de Janeiro, (RN) Rio Grande do Norte, (RO) Rondônia, (RR) Roraima, (RS) Rio Grande do Sul, (SC) Santa Catarina, (SE) Sergipe, (SP) São Paulo, (TO) Tocantins.
Figure 5 in Expanding the taxonomic catalog of Brazilian meiofauna: diversity and distribution of the neglected phyla Tardigrada, Gastrotricha, and Kinorhyncha
Figure 5. Species richness estimation within (A) Tardigrada and (B) Gastrotricha families in Brazil. Dark dots represent the actual number of described species and gray dots the extrapolated number of species for families with a number of described species that allows extrapolation.
Figure 4 in Expanding the taxonomic catalog of Brazilian meiofauna: diversity and distribution of the neglected phyla Tardigrada, Gastrotricha, and Kinorhyncha
Figure 4. Temporal accumulation curve of species of (A) Tardigrada and (B) Gastrotricha and the number of endemic and not endemic species in Brazil. Solid lines depict the interpolated curves, representing the rate of species description over time, while dashed lines extend these curves to show extrapolated rates. The gray areas surrounding the curves signify the 95% upper and lower bound confidence intervals for the estimated species description rates. Actual counts of described species are denoted by dots.
Figure 1 in TaXonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: the intriguing copepod order Monstrilloida (Crustacea: Copepoda), taXonomy and diversity
Figure 1. Monstrilloid copepod species described from Brazil: (A) Cymbasoma rochai adult female, dorsal view; (B) Monstrilla careli adult female, lateral view; (C) same, dorsal view; (D) M. pustulata adult female, lateral view; (E) same, dorsal view; (F) M. satchmoi adult female, lateral view; (G) Caromiobenella brasiliensis adult female, ventral view; (H) same, dorsal view; (I) C. brasiliensis adult male, lateral view; (J) same, dorsal view; (K) Monstrilla bahiana adult male, dorsal view; (L) same, ventral view; (M) Cymbasoma rochai adult male, ventral view; (N) Monstrillopsis fosshageni adult male, lateral view. Illustrations modified from Suárez-Morales and Dias (2000, 2001), Dias and Suárez-Morales (2023), Suárez-Morales et al. (2020). Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Figure 1 in Expanding the taxonomic catalog of Brazilian meiofauna: diversity and distribution of the neglected phyla Tardigrada, Gastrotricha, and Kinorhyncha
Figure 1. Number of Tardigrada, Kinorhyncha and Gastrotricha species described or reported to Brazil by year (from 1936 to July 2023).
Figure 2 in TaXonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: Hydraenidae (Insecta: Coleoptera), diversity and distribution
Figure 2. Hydraenidae adult habitus, dorsal view: (A) Adelphydraena; (B) Hydraena; (C) Ochthebius; (D) Parhydraenida. Scale bars: 500 Μm.
Figure 4 in TaXonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: Hydraenidae (Insecta: Coleoptera), diversity and distribution
Figure 4. Accumulation curve of Hydraenidae species recorded from Brazil by year (1923–2022), based on the first record of each species to the country.
Figure 8 in TaXonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: Hydraenidae (Insecta: Coleoptera), diversity and distribution
Figure 8. Occupied distributions and suitability areas for Hydraenidae genera: (A) Adelphydraena spp. (n = 10 records); (B) Hydraena spp. (n = 52 records); (C) Ochthebius spp. (n = 25 records); (D) Parhydraenida spp. (n = 33 records). Dots represent specimen records for each genus.
Figure 2 in The taxonomic catalog of the Brazilian fauna: Dermaptera and Phasmatodea (Insecta), with commentaries on species list, types, authorship and distribution
Figure 2. Data on species authorship of Dermaptera: (A) demography in relation to nationality; (B) ranking of authors who described the highest numbers of earwig species, from first to last: Carlos Moreira in first place; Malcom Burr and Carl August Dohrn tied in second; Alan Brindle in third; Jean Guillaume Audinet-Serville, Alfredo Borelli, Samuel Scudder, Carl Stål, and Henrik Steinmann tied in fourth; Auguste de Bormans, William Kirby, and Joaquim Machado Filho tied in fifth.
Figure 5 in The taxonomic catalog of the Brazilian fauna: Dermaptera and Phasmatodea (Insecta), with commentaries on species list, types, authorship and distribution
Figure 5. Distribution of the publications of Phasmatodea species across time. Time gap* = period of time that had no descriptions of species; species cluster** = high amounts of species described clustered in a short period of time, between time gaps.
Figure 4 in The taxonomic catalog of the Brazilian fauna: Dermaptera and Phasmatodea (Insecta), with commentaries on species list, types, authorship and distribution
Figure 4. Distribution of the publications of Dermaptera species across time. Time gap* = period of time that had no descriptions of species.
Figure 3 in The taxonomic catalog of the Brazilian fauna: Dermaptera and Phasmatodea (Insecta), with commentaries on species list, types, authorship and distribution
Figure 3. Data on species authorship of Phasmatodea: (A) demography in relation to nationality; (B) ranking of authors who described the highest numbers of walking-sticks species, from first to last: Ludwig Redtenbacher, Salvador de Toledo Piza Jr., John O. Westwood, Karl Brunner-von Wattenwyl, and Raphael A. Heleodoro.
Figures 1–2 in Taxonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: Superorder Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda), taxonomic history, diversity and distribution
Figures 1–2. Number of primary types: (1) Types deposited in collections from the different world regions; (2) Types deposited only in Brazilian collections. (BR) Brazil, (AS) Asia, (EU) Europe, (LA) Latin America except Brazil, (NA) North America, (LD) Lost or not designated, (MNRJ) Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, (INPA) Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, (MZUSP) Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, (MZUFBA) Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Federal da Bahia, (UFMG) Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Figures 5–7 in Taxonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: Superorder Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda), taxonomic history, diversity and distribution
Figures 5–7. Number of species described or reported to Brazil: (5) Federative Units; (6) Hydrographic Regions; (7) Biomes. (AC) Acre, (AL) Alagoas, (AP) Amapá, (AM) Amazonas, (BA) Bahia, (CE) Ceará, (DF) Federal District, (ES) Espírito Santo, (GO) Goiás, (MA) Maranhão, (MT) Mato Grosso, (MS) Mato Grosso do Sul, (MG) Minas Gerais, (PA) Pará, (PB) Paraíba, (PR) Paraná, (PI) Piauí, (RJ) Rio de Janeiro, (RN) Rio Grande do Norte, (RS) Rio Grande do Sul, (RO) Rondônia, (RR) Roraima, (SC) Santa Catarina, (SP) São Paulo, (SE) Sergipe, (TO) Tocantins.
Figures 3–4 in Taxonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: Superorder Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda), taxonomic history, diversity and distribution
Figures 3–4. Species described or reported in Brazil: (3) Species by year of description; (4) Cumulative number of species.
Figure 3 in TaXonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: Hydraenidae (Insecta: Coleoptera), diversity and distribution
Figure 3. Number of Hydraenidae species recorded from Brazil by year (1923–2022).
Figure 1 in TaXonomic Catalog of the Brazilian Fauna: Hydraenidae (Insecta: Coleoptera), diversity and distribution
Figure 1. Known distribution of Hydraenidae species from Brazil.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.