Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,225
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,225 results for “taxonomic data”
Environmental, Taxonomic, and Stable Isotope Data from Aquatic Insects sampled from Beaver-Engineered Headwater Streams (Adirondack Park, NY; 2024).
This data package contains environmental and biological data from a field study examining aquatic insect assemblage composition and basal resource use in beaver-engineered headwater streams in Adirondack Park, New York. Data was collected from six streams across two watersheds; the Oswegatchie River Watershed and Upper Hudson River Watershed. Three streams were sampled within the Oswegatchie River Watershed; East Creek, Sucker Brook, and Chair Rock Creek located near the Cranberry Lake Biological Station in St. Lawrence County. Three streams were sampled from the Upper Hudson River Watershed; Big Sucker Brook, Little Sucker Brook, and Panther Brook located near SUNY ESF’s Newcomb Campus in Essex County. Site conditions were characterized using densiometer measurements of canopy cover, visual assessments of substrate composition, and river discharge measurements collected with an OTT MF Pro flow meter. Aquatic insect assemblages were sampled using multihabitat active sampling and Hester–Dendy and leaf-bag passive samplers, with specimens identified to genus and assigned to functional feeding groups. Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes were analyzed for a subset of insect taxa and three basal resource pools; coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM), fine particulate organic matter (FPOM), and periphytic algae. The Bayesian mixing model MixSIAR was used to estimate the proportional contribution of these primary sources to aquatic insect biomass. All data was collected between June and August 2024.
Silva SSU taxonomic training data formatted for DADA2 (Silva version 138)
<p>These DADA2-formatted training fasta files were derived from the Silva Project's version 138 release. See https://www.arb-silva.de/documentation/release-138/ for database and citation information. The Silva 138 database is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0); see file "SILVA_LICENSE.txt". The fasta files were generated and checked for consistency with version 132 using the R code in the R-markdown document "silva-v138.Rmd".</p> <p>Version 2 removes the dependence on preprocessed files from mothur, which results in a greater number of bacterial and archeal sequences. It also includes a new version of the assignTaxonomy training set that goes through the species level for use with longer amplicons obtained from long-read amplicon sequencing.</p> <p>If you use these files, please cite one or both of the Silva references below (or at the above link) and the DADA2 paper (reference below). I also recommend citing or linking to the Zenodo record for this specific version in your Methods or published source code to record the specific taxonomic database files used in your analysis.</p> <p><strong>NOTE:</strong><strong> </strong>These Version 2 files are intended for use in classifying prokaryotic 16S sequencing data and are not appropriate for classifying eukaryotic ASVs. The new method implemented within DADA2 for constructing these files only includes 100 eukaryotic sequences for use as an outgroup.</p> <p><strong>NOTE:</strong> These Version 2 files have a known problem in 10/883 families and 114/3838 genera. See https://github.com/mikemc/dada2-reference-databases/blob/main/silva-138/v2/bad-taxa.csv for a list of affected taxa and https://github.com/benjjneb/dada2/issues/1293 for more information.</p>
Metabarcoding data (number of reads per operational taxonomic unit) from a monitoring study of sandy beach meiofauna before and after sand nourishment (Ahrenshoop, Baltic Sea)
<p>We provide metabarcoding data (number of reads per operational taxonomic unit, OTU) determined from sediment samples collected on the sandy-beach water line of Ahrenshoop (Baltic Sea). Five sampling stations lay within the zone impacted by the sand nourishment between the boundary of the nature reserve in the north east and a site just north of the breakwater (AH01–AH05). An unaffected reference station was located south of Ahrenshoop (close to Niehagen) at the end of the road Pappelallee (PAP). Samples were collected at four dates. The first sampling was carried out before the sand nourishment took place (T0: 14 and 16 September 2021). Three samplings were realised after the impact: T1 (23 March 2022), T2 (27 September 2022), and T3 (28 March 2023). Latitude and longitude of each sampling location per station were recorded at each sampling date using a hand-held GPS application on a mobile phone. At the stations sampling locations varied over time. Prior to the sand nourishment the beach was narrow due to sand erosion in previous years. After the nourishment the additional extent of the beach was approximately 40 m at sampling date T1. Subsequently, progressive sand erosion forced the sampling locations (situated at the water line) further inland at T2 and T3.<br>Samples were taken from the beach-water interface (water line) in the middle of the area between two groynes. Plexiglass cores (inner core diameter 5.4 cm) were inserted vertically into the sediment down to 15 cm depth. Each core was sliced in 5 cm-layers (0–5, 5–10 and 10–15 cm). Sediment horizons were preserved in 96–99% ethanol. <br>Three cores (2 cores at T0) per sampling date were taken for metabarcoding analyses. The organisms were extracted by decantation over a 32-μm sieve. Genomic DNA was extracted from the filters using the DNeasy PowerSoil pro kit (Qiagen). Realtime-PCR was performed to amplify V1&V2, two hypervariable regions of 18S rDNA gene. The sequencing run was performed using the MiSeq Reagent Nanokit v2 (250 cycles paired end) on an Illumina MiSeq platform at the DZMB Metabarcoding lab in Wilhelmshaven, Germany. High-resolution amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were obtained and compared to the NCBI database to assign taxonomic information to each ASV. The target meiofauna ASVs were further classified into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 3% cut-off threshold using the statistical software R.</p> <p>Here, we present two Tables (as xlsx and tab-delimited files):<br>(1) the taxonomic description of the 843 OTUs and their assigned ID number;<br>(2) the number of reads per OTU per sample (including metadata for each sample: event; date; latitude; longitude; station, core and sample ID; sediment depth).</p> <p>The metabarcoding data are part of a larger ecological study on the influence of sand nourishment on meiofauna communities, which included grain-size and meiofauna abundances (see “related works”).</p> <p><strong>Comment: </strong>Our study is related to but not funded by the project ECAS Baltic: Strategies of ecosystem-friendly coastal protection and ecosystem-supporting coastal adaptation for the German Baltic Sea Coast <a href="https://deutsche-kuestenforschung.de/ecas-baltic.html">https://deutsche-kuestenforschung.de/ecas-baltic.html</a></p>
Global taxonomic occurrence grids using GBIF data for species distribution models.
<p>To achieve large geographic coverage, species occurrence databases that are composed of ad hoc species data collections such as that provided by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) are often used. A drawback to using these data is their geographic sampling bias, in which some regions are more intensively sampled than others, while other areas have very little to none reported sampling effort. Uneven sampling effort can mislead conclusions about biodiversity patterns and species distributions (Gotelli & Colwell, 2001; Lobo, 2008).</p> <p>Here we provide taxonomic occurrence grids to help mitigate the effects of sampling bias in species distribution modeling. These grids can be used to exclude areas of (a custom-defined) low sampling effort from the background when sampling for pseudo-absences’ (Phillips et al., 2009; Barbet-Massin et al.,2012). The occurrence grids have a 1 degree spatial resolution using WGS 84 as the geographic coordinate system. Each 1 degree grid cell contains the number of records present in GBIF corresponding to a specific taxonomic group: plants, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, birds and molluscs.</p> <p>To construct the occurrence grids, we used the 1- by 1-degree world latitude and longitude vector grid provided by ESRI (Redlands, California). It has a custom license which permits it reuse as long as ESRI is cited. It was downloaded from : <a href="https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f11bcdc5d484400fa926dcce68de3df7">https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f11bcdc5d484400fa926dcce68de3df7</a></p> <p>To map spatial sampling effort, the number of georeferenced occurrences corresponding to each taxonomic group contained by each 1- by 1-degree grid cell were counted. The grids were then converted to GeoTIFFs. The raster values correspond to the number of occurrences reported for the grid cells. For the purposes of the <a href="https://osf.io/7dpgr/">TrIAS project</a>, grid cells with fewer than 5 occurrences were removed. The TrIAS taxonomic occurrence grids are used as inputs to the TrIAS risk modelling and mapping workflow: https://github.com/trias-project/risk-modelling-and-mapping. Full (with all grid cells containing at least one occurrence) taxonomic occurrence grids are also provided.</p> <p>GBIF data for each taxonomic group were downloaded using the following criteria: “Basis of Record”: Observation, Machine Observation, Human Observation, Specimen, Material sample, Literature Occurrence, Unknown evidence., "HasCoordinate is true", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "TaxonKey is Amphibia", "Year 1975-2005".</p> <p><strong>Raster Attributes</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p>Attribute</p> </td> <td> <p>Description</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>OID</p> </td> <td> <p>numeric row ID</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Value</p> </td> <td> <p>the number of records contained in the grid cell</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Count</p> </td> <td> <p>the number of times the value appears in the raster</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>The extent of each taxonomic occurrence grid:</p> <ul> <li> <p>longitude -180.0; latitude -90.0 (southwest corner)</p> </li> <li> <p>longitude 180.0; latitude 90.0 (northeast corner)</p> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Files:</strong></p> <p>TrIAS taxonomic occurrence grids</p> <p>amphib_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>birds_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>mammals_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>molluscs_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>reptiles_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p> </p> <p>Raw taxonomic occurrence grids</p> <p>amphib_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>birds_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>mammals_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>molluscs_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>reptiles_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p><br> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Pond environmental and taxonomic data for Niwot Ridge and Green Lakes Valley, 2021 - ongoing.
This is a summary of basic environmental data and benthic macroinvertebrates from water in ponds in the vicinity of the Niwot Ridge LTER. Ponds were selected across a range of elevations, sizes, and positions relative to glacial, stream, and lake water sources. Ponds sampled occurred on Niwot Ridge and throughout the Green Lakes Valley.
Phenology data set of plants and birds and other taxonomic groups, as well as agrarian activities and abiotic phenomena from Latvia, 1970-2018
<p>A data set of phenological observations of plants, birds, as well as agrarian activities and abiotic phenomena from Latvia, 1970-2018 is presented. The data include limited number of observations of insects, amphibians, mammals, mushrooms, mollusks and fishes as well. The data was collected by voluntary observers (citizen scientists) and published as paper based yearly bulletins. It includes almost 48 000 individual observations of 159 different phenological phases from 103 locations in Latvia. Each entry is comprised of following fields:</p> <ol> <li>Station: name of the observation station</li> <li>Year: year of observation</li> <li>Season: season of observation as indicated in the primary publication</li> <li>Species: English name of the species observed or description of phenomena observed in case of abiotic occurrences</li> <li>Species Latin: Latine name of the species observed</li> <li>Taxonomic_group: taxonomic group of the species observed or grouping of non-biological phases (“Abiotic” for meteorological phenomena and “Agrarian” for agrarian activities)</li> <li>Phenophase: description of phenological phase observed</li> <li>BBCH: attributed BBCH code for phenological phase observed, where applicable</li> <li>Date: date of the first observation of the phase</li> <li>DoY: day of the year of the first observation of the phase</li> <li>Implausible: flag indicating of the reported date of phenological phase is highly implausible (TRUE) or realistic (FALSE)</li> <li>Wrong_order: flag indicating if the order of the reported phases at a given station and year is not realistic (TRUE) or realistic (FALSE)</li> </ol>
Data release for "OrchID: a Generalized Framework for Taxonomic Classification of Images Using Evolved Artificial Neural Networks"
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>Taxonomic expertise for the identification of species is rare and costly. On-going advances in computer vision and machine learning have led to the development of numerous semi- and fully automated species identification systems. However, these systems are rarely agnostic to specific morphology, rarely can perform taxonomic “approximation” (by which we mean partial identification at least to higher taxonomic level if not to species), and frequently rely on costly scientific imaging technologies.</p> <p>We present a generic, hierarchical identification system for automated taxonomic approximation of organisms from images. We assessed the effectiveness of this system using photographs of slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae), for which we implemented image pre-processing, segmentation, and colour and shape feature extraction algorithms to obtain digital phenotypes for 116 species. The identification system trained on these digital phenotypes uses a nested hierarchy of artificial neural networks for pattern recognition and automated classification that mirrors the Linnean taxonomy, such that user-submitted photos can be assigned a genus, section, and species classification by traversing this hierarchy.</p> <p>Performance of the identification system varied depending on photo quality, number of species included for training, and desired taxonomic level for identification. High quality photos were scarce for some taxa and were under-represented in the training set, resulting in imbalanced network training. The image features used for training were sufficient to reliably identify photos to the correct genus but less so to the correct section and species.</p> <p>The outcomes of this project include a library of feature extraction algorithms called <em>ImgPheno</em>, a collection of scripts for neural network training called <em>NBClassify</em>, a library for evolutionary optimization of artificial neural network construction called <em>AI::FANN::Evolving</em> and a planned web application called <em>OrchID</em> for identification of user-submitted images. All project outcomes are open source and freely available.</p> <p><strong>About this release</strong></p> <p>This release corresponds belongs with our response to the reviewers of PLoS One. At this stage of the review cycle the manuscript is assessed as 'minor revision'. Consequently, we don't anticipate making more releases until publication.</p>
Supplementary material 3: World Spider Catalog Bibliographic Data: Treatments from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
List of journal/publisher by ranked by treatment count exported from the World Spider Catalog 14 October 2014 with total treatments by source, cumulative treatments, and cumulative proportion of treatments.
Supplementary material 2: World Spider Catalog Bibliographic Data: Publications from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Ranked list of journal/publisher exported from the World Spider Catalog 14 October 2014 with total articles by source, cumulative articles, and cucmulative proportion of articles.
Supporting Data - Taxonomic reassessment of Tetrapygus niger (Arbacioida, Echinoidea): molecular and morphological evidence support its placement in Arbacia
<p>This dataset contains the accession numbers and links of the sequences of the specimens analyzed by this work, other sequences used for the analyses can be found in the original article. The species from which the sequences were extracted are: Tetrapygus niger Molina, 1782; Arbacia dufresnii Blainville, 1825; Arbacia spatuligera Valenciennes, 1846 and Coelopleurus floridanus A. Agassiz, 1872. The accession numbers for the Cytochrome Oxidase subunit I (COI) and 28S of the nuclear genome are presented separately.</p><p>In addition, the morphological data of Tetrapygus niger (Test diameter, test height and peristome diameter) presented in this study are shown, as well as their collectors, corresponding collection, country and locality.</p>
Supporting Data for "Exploring ChatGPT-4 for Transforming Taxonomic Data into OWL: Lessons Learned and Implications for Ontology Development"
<p>Data from the trials with ChatGPT to generate OWL files for taxonomic data from the GBIF Backbone Taxonomy.</p> <p>Updates of version 2: additional prompts from the experiments with Gemini and DeepSeek.</p>
First genetic data for the Critically Endangered Cuban endemic Zapata Rail Cyanolimnas cerverai, and the taxonomic implications
<p>Data associated with the publication First genetic data for the Critically Endangered Cuban endemic Zapata Rail <em>Cyanolimnas cerverai</em>, and the taxonomic implications.</p>
Data and script: Reduced enumeration effort, but not coarse taxonomic resolution, is sufficient to represent beta diversity patterns of stream benthic diatoms
<p>This is a dataset on benthic diatom communities sampled in 90 riffles (the local communities) within nine near-pristine subtropical streams (each stream represented a metacommunity) in southeast subtropical Brazil. </p> <p>In addition to the dataset, we also provide the R code used to investigate whether reduced enumeration efforts (i.e., subsets of counted valves per sample) and the identification to the genus level are sufficient to recover patterns in the species composition and in beta diversity of benthic diatom metacommunities.</p>
Environmental and taxonomic data along the Thames River - Lake St. Clair continuum in Ontario, August 2020 to September 2023.
Data for this research were collected from water samples obtained along the Thames River- Lake St. Clair continuum to determine differences in water quality and biodiversity between river and lake sites. Sampling began in Lake St. Clair in August of 2020 in Stoney Point Ontario. Samples were taken from the intake well of the water treatment plant. The intake pipe is located approximately 1km off-shore, at a depth of 1.9m. To address spatial differences, a second site was added in Lake St. Clair in Belle River, Ontario and a river site was added in Chatham, Ontario. Belle River samples were collected from the intake well at the water treatment plant, with the intake pipe located approximately 1km off-shore and at a depth of 3.1m. Chatham samples were collected from the surface of the Thames River as grab samples. Samples from both locations were collected weekly to monthly throughout June to October, 2021. To further increase spatial resolution, samples were collected from the mouth of the Thames River in Lighthouse Cove, Ontario, from June to October 2022, and from this site and another river site in Prairie Siding, Ontario, from June to October 2023. They were collected as grab samples from the surface of the water. Each site was sampled weekly to monthly.
TIPP 2.0.0 taxonomic profiling of the CAMI 2 Mouse Gut Toy data set, samples 0-63
<strong>Software: </strong>TIPP<br><strong>SoftwareVersion: </strong>2.0.0<br><strong>DataURL: </strong> https://data.cami-challenge.org/participate<br><strong>SoftwareURL:</strong> https://github.com/smirarab/sepp<br><strong>DockerImage:</strong> stefanjanssen/docker_profiling_tools:tipp<br><strong>IsBiobox:</strong> True<br><strong>BioboxYAMLFile:</strong> https://zenodo.org/record/3629567/files/biobox.yaml?download=1<br><strong>ReferenceDatabase:</strong> 2015<br><strong>ShortReadsUsed:</strong> True<br><strong>LongReadsUsed:</strong> False<br><strong>CommandsUsed:</strong> docker run \<br>--volume="/path/to/19122017_mousegut_scaffolds_yaml:/bbx/mnt/yaml:ro" \<br>--volume="/path/to/19122017_mousegut_scaffolds:/bbx/mnt/input:ro" \<br>--volume="/path/to/output:/bbx/mnt/output:rw" \<br>--volume="/path/to/output/metadata:/bbx/metadata:rw" \<br>--volume="/path/to/output/cache:/cache:rw" \<br>stefanjanssen/docker_profiling_tools:tipp
Bracken 2.5 taxonomic profiling of the CAMI 2 Mouse Gut Toy data set, samples 0-63
<strong>Software: </strong>Bracken<br><strong>SoftwareVersion: </strong>2.5<br><strong>DataURL: </strong> https://data.cami-challenge.org/participate<br><strong>SoftwareURL:</strong> https://github.com/jenniferlu717/Bracken<br><strong>DockerImage:</strong> cami/bracken:2.5<br><strong>IsBiobox:</strong> True<br><strong>BioboxYAMLFile:</strong> https://zenodo.org/record/3629567/files/biobox.yaml?download=1<br><strong>ReferenceDatabase:</strong> Kraken standard db built May 2019<br><strong>ShortReadsUsed:</strong> True<br><strong>LongReadsUsed:</strong> False<br><strong>CommandsUsed:</strong> docker run \<br>--volume="/path/to/19122017_mousegut_scaffolds_yaml:/bbx/mnt/yaml:ro" \<br>--volume="/path/to/19122017_mousegut_scaffolds:/bbx/mnt/input:ro" \<br>--volume="/path/to/output:/bbx/mnt/output:rw" \<br>--volume="/path/to/output/metadata:/bbx/metadata:rw" \<br>--volume="/path/to/output/cache:/cache:rw" \<br>cami/bracken:2.5
CAT 4.6 taxonomic binning of the CAMI 2 Mouse Gut Toy data set, gold standard pooled assembly
<p>Taxonomic binning of the gold standard pooled assembly<br> <strong>Software: </strong>CAT<br> <strong>SoftwareVersion: </strong>4.6<br> <strong>DataURL: </strong> https://data.cami-challenge.org/participate<br> <strong>SoftwareURL:</strong> https://github.com/dutilh/CAT<br> <strong>ReferenceDatabase:</strong> prebuilt 2018-12-12<br> <strong>Taxonomy:</strong> NCBI 2018-12-12<br> <strong>ShortReadsUsed:</strong> False<br> <strong>LongReadsUsed:</strong> False<br> <strong>CommandUsed:</strong> CAT contigs -c anonymous_gsa_pooled.fasta -d CAT_prepare_20181212/2018-12-12_CAT_database/ -t CAT_prepare_20181212/2018-12-12_taxonomy/ --tmpdir tmp --nproc 16</p>
PhyloPythiaS+ 1.4 taxonomic binning of the CAMI 2 Mouse Gut Toy data set, gold standard pooled assembly
<p>Taxonomic binning of the gold standard pooled assembly<br> <strong>Software: </strong>PhyloPythiaS+<br> <strong>SoftwareVersion: </strong>1.4<br> <strong>DataURL: </strong> https://data.cami-challenge.org/participate<br> <strong>SoftwareURL:</strong> https://github.com/algbioi/ppsp<br> <strong>DockerImage:</strong> cami/ppsp:1.4<br> <strong>IsBiobox:</strong> False<br> <strong>ReferenceDatabase:</strong> RefSeq 93, SILVA 132<br> <strong>Taxonomy:</strong> NCBI 2018-02-26<br> <strong>ShortReadsUsed:</strong> False<br> <strong>LongReadsUsed:</strong> False<br> <strong>CommandUsed:</strong> run_ppsp.py --pipelineDir ppsp_pipepline --inputFastaFile anonymous_gsa_pooled.fasta --databaseFile ncbi_taxonomy --refSeq refseq93 --s16Database SILVA_132 --mgDatabase reference_NCBI201502/mg5</p>
MetaPalette 1.0.0 taxonomic profiling of the CAMI 2 Mouse Gut Toy data set, samples 0-63
<strong>Software: </strong>MetaPalette<br><strong>SoftwareVersion: </strong>1.0.0<br><strong>DataURL: </strong> https://data.cami-challenge.org/participate<br><strong>SoftwareURL:</strong> https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1730624<br><strong>DockerImage:</strong> stefanjanssen/docker_profiling_tools:commonkmers<br><strong>IsBiobox:</strong> True<br><strong>BioboxYAMLFile:</strong> https://zenodo.org/record/3629567/files/biobox.yaml?download=1<br><strong>ReferenceDatabase:</strong> https://zenodo.org/record/1749272<br><strong>ShortReadsUsed:</strong> True<br><strong>LongReadsUsed:</strong> False<br><strong>CommandsUsed:</strong> docker run \<br>--volume="/path/to/19122017_mousegut_scaffolds_yaml:/bbx/mnt/yaml:ro" \<br>--volume="/path/to/19122017_mousegut_scaffolds:/bbx/mnt/input:ro" \<br>--volume="/path/to/output:/bbx/mnt/output:rw" \<br>--volume="/path/to/output/metadata:/bbx/metadata:rw" \<br>--volume="/path/to/output/cache:/cache:rw" \<br>--volume="/path/to/reference_database:/exchange/db:rw" \<br>stefanjanssen/docker_profiling_tools:commonkmers
Kraken 2.0.8 beta taxonomic binning of the CAMI 2 Mouse Gut Toy data set, gold standard pooled assembly
<p>Taxonomic binning of the gold standard pooled assembly<br> <strong>Software: </strong>Kraken<br> <strong>SoftwareVersion: </strong>2.0.8 beta<br> <strong>DataURL: </strong> https://data.cami-challenge.org/participate<br> <strong>SoftwareURL:</strong> https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/kraken2/<br> <strong>ReferenceDatabase:</strong> built 2019-05-22<br> <strong>Taxonomy:</strong> NCBI 2019-05-22<br> <strong>ShortReadsUsed:</strong> False<br> <strong>LongReadsUsed:</strong> False<br> <strong>CommandUsed:</strong> kraken2-build --standard --db kraken2db_std --use-ftp<br> kraken2 --db kraken2db_std --threads 16 --output 19122017_mousegut_scaffolds.kraken --report 19122017_mousegut_scaffolds.kreport anonymous_gsa_pooled.fasta<br> cat 19122017_mousegut_scaffolds | awk '{print $2 "\t" $3}' > 19122017_mousegut_scaffolds.cami</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.