Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
10
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
10 results for “technical debt management”
SANER 2022 - Industrial Track - Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Preliminary Study on Stack Exchange
<p>Dataset related to the paper Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Preliminary Study on Stack Exchange. </p> <p> </p> <p>Saner 2022 Industrial Track</p>
Preventing technical debt with the TAP framework for Technical Debt Aware Management
<p><br> This zip file contains twelve files and one folder to replicate and verify the study evaluating the TAP Framework (for Technical debt Aware Project management).</p> <p> * TDframework_ticket_rawdata_revised_anonymised.xlsx: <br> revised and anonymized raw data for tickets statistic containing two sheets for TD ticket and maintenance ticket</p> <p> * TDframework_survey_questions_and_SPSSvariable_definition.xlsx: <br> excel sheet with all survey questions in German and English language, SPSS variable names, and short names<br> <br> <br> * TDframework_survey_results.sav:<br> survey results already in SPSS format, variables with suffix "D" are dichotomized versions of the variables as explained in the paper.</p> <p> * TDframework_survey_results.xslx:<br> Excel-Export of TDframework_survey_results.sav<br> <br> <br> * MannWhitneyUTest.spv:<br> results of the Mann-Whitney U-Test, which show the significances of the hypothesis mentioned in the paper (Section 5.2.2)<br> <br> * MannWhitneyUTest.xslx:<br> Excel-Export of MannWhitneyUTest.sav<br> <br> * Correlations.spv<br> results of the Chi-square test for correlations and the significances mentioned in the paper (Section 5.2.3)<br> <br> * Correlations.xslx:<br> Excel-Export of Correlations.sav<br> <br> <br> * Management-Survey_2021_en.pdf:<br> - original survey with englisch translation of the questions<br> <br> * Management-Survey_2021_XXX.pdf:<br> results of the management survey from <br> - team manager of the observed unit (TMO), participant A<br> - team manager of the comparison unit (TMC), participant B<br> - unit manager of the observed unit (UMO), participant C<br> - unit manager of the comparison unit (UMC), participant C<br> UMC => no survey, but email conversation between author and UMC to get the answers for the comparison unit<br> <br> * Fig6_Cause-Effect-Diagram_arrow_details.xslx<br> details about sources for the arrows in this figure<br> <br> * folder "Case Study Protocol"<br> contains the case study protocol according to Runeson's guidelines.<br> </p>
Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Preliminary Study on Stack Exchange
<p>Dataset used in the work 'Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Preliminary Study on Stack Exchange'.</p> <p>Authors not presented due to double blind review.</p>
Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Preliminary Study on Stack Exchange
<p>Dataset used in the work 'Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Preliminary Study on Stack Exchange'.</p>
Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Study on Stack Exchange
<p>Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Study on Stack Exchange.</p> <p>Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development (JSERD) 2023.</p> <p> </p>
Additional Material for Paper: IT Managers' Perspective on Technical Debt Management
<p>This is the additional material for the Paper "IT Managers’ Perspective on Technical Debt Management" submitted to the Journal of Systems and Software.</p> <p>The folder contains the following files:</p> <p> </p> <ul> <li>Consent form - blinded.pdf / Consent form.pdf:<br> The consent form was used to gather the participants' consent to participate in this study.</li> <li>PreliminarySurvey.pdf:<br> The survey was sent to all participants in advance to gather basic statistical data.</li> <li>ParticipantsOverview.pdf / ParticipantsOverview.xslx<br> The overview of all participants was extracted from the preliminary survey. For anonymity reasons, we can not provide the country/language of the participants.</li> <li>InterviewGuide.pdf<br> The interview guide was followed by the interviewers, including all questions and the rationale for questions added before the 2nd iteration.</li> <li>CodeSystem.xlsx<br> All Codes were gathered from the interviews with a short explanation (in Excel to use the grouping function for a better overview).</li> <li>AnalyticMemos_Themes.pdf<br> All free memos were created during the study, including all themes that led to the main concerns described in the paper.</li> <li>Focusgroup-discussion_Themes_slides.pdf<br> The slides were created for the focus group discussion. The participants were introduced to the "main concerns" and asked to comment on these findings.</li> <li>V4C_model.drawio<br> This is the original drawio file of our V4C model, including all diagrams from the paper. Additionally, we provide the complete version of the visibility diagram, which had to be reduced in the paper due to the page limitation. Also, the file contains one more diagram with another example of the model's usage.</li> <li>V4Cmodel.pdf, V4Cmodel_example.pdf, VisibilityOfCausesConsequences.pdf; VisibilityCycles.pdf<br> All diagrams of the paper are in single PDF files.</li> <li>V4CTDmodel+example.pptx<br> A short presentation of the model and an example of its usage in PowerPoint format to immediately use.</li> </ul>
Establishing Technical Debt Management - A Five-Step Workshop Approach and an Action Research Study
<div> <div>The additional material for the paper "Establishing Technical Debt Management - A Five-Step Workshop Approach and an Action Research Study" comprises the following documents:</div> <div> </div> <div>* Guideline_to_Use_TD-SAGAT.docx (.pdf)</div> <div> A short guideline on how to use the TD-SAGAT method.</div> <div>* SAGAT_for_TD_from_Goals_to_Queries.pdf</div> <div> Determination of survey questions by following the SAGAT approach of following the hierarchy of goals, subgoals, decisions, requirements, and queries </div> <div>* WIKI page on technical debt.pdf</div> <div> The teams' wiki page on TD management written by the TD manager</div> <div>* AzureTDTickets_Template.pdf</div> <div> Screenshot of the backlog's TD item template as presented in the paper for better readability.</div> <div>* OverviewOfActionCycles_ExtendedTable5.xlsx</div> <div> Table 5 (Overview of actions cycles with workshop topics, TD activities, actions taken, and learning) as an Excel sheet with additional information on actions and learning, which we did not put into the paper</div> <div> </div> <div>* Workshops/workshop_slides/TDMGuide_<x>_Workshop.pptx</div> <div> Slides for each of the six workshops </div> <div>* Workshops/workshop_slides/TDMGuide_0_InitTalk_35Min_EN.pptx</div> <div> The initial one-hour introduction into the TD topic (~40 min. talk + 20 min. for a short discussion) </div> <div> </div> <div>* Workshops/workshop_flipcharts/WS<No.>_<explanation>.jpg</div> <div> Six anonymized flipchart photos to give an impression of the workshops, particularly of the kick-off workshop (other workshops made less use of flipcharts).</div> <div> Translations are directly included in the photos, except for ...</div> <div>* Workshops/workshop_flipcharts/WS1_Topic Cache - Translation.txt</div> <div> Translation of the German topic cache in an extra file, as there were too many topics to translate in the photo</div> <div> </div> <div>* Workshops/Workshop Agendas.pdf</div> <div>Agendas for the kick-off workshop and a general agenda for further workshops, each with a detailed agenda for workshop moderators and a rough agenda for participants.</div> <div> </div> <div>* Workshops/ TD_Energy_Matrix.xlsx</div> <div> Matrix where participants mark their own, the teams, and the companies' (assumed) level of willingness to invest in a TDM versus their (assumed) evaluation of TDM's importance. Used in kickoff workshop</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div>* Evaluations/Backlog_Evaluations_and_Figures.xlsx</div> <div>- Backlog data from the 5th workshop (for 6th workshop, we used the PowerBI Visualization instead)</div> <div>- Evaluation of this data comprising </div> <div>- priority calculations based on priority risk and </div> <div>- priority calculations based on priority risk based on ROI</div> <div> </div> <div>* Evaluations/Meetings_Overview_Observations_Evaluation_Figures.xlsx</div> <div>- Overview of all meetings plus information on length, participants, whether a video exists and was used for evaluation</div> <div>- Filled out observation protocols from different meetings</div> <div>- Summation, evaluations, and resulting figures</div> <div> </div> <div>* Evaluations/TD-SAGAT_Survey_and_SurveyResults_Figures.xlsx</div> <div>- Survey questions for TD-SAGAT plus results</div> <div>- Evaluation plus figures</div> <div> </div> <div>* Evaluations/Workshop_Survey_and_SurveyResults_Figures.xlsx</div> <div>- Survey questions for Workshops plus results</div> <div>- Evaluation plus figures</div> <div> </div> <div>* Evaluations/Kickoff_Survey_and_SurveyResults.xlsx</div> <div>- Survey questions for Kickoff Workshops (incl. questions on current TDM process) plus results</div> <div>- Evaluation in Workshop_Survey_and_SurveyResults_Figures.xslx</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div>* Visualizations/V<No.>_<adopted|mockup>_<explanation>.png</div> <div>- "adopted" visualizations are similarly presented in the paper in Fig. 2.</div> <div>- "mockup" visualizations were presented during the workshops but not adopted in this form. </div> <div>If a respective "adopted" visualization for this No. exists, the visualisation was replaced by a more suitable one. </div> <div>If no respective "adopted" visualization for this No. exists, the visualisation was discarded.</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div>* Visualizations/Dashboard <Manager|Team>.png</div> <div>- shows the dashboard mockups for the manager and the team, respectively. </div> <div>Visualizations presented in the dashboards that were not adopted by the team were removed or replaced by the improved visualizations in the final dashboard versions.</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div> </div> </div>
Technical Debt Awareness: Measuring the Success of Technical Debt Management Approaches
<p>The additional material for the paper "Technical Debt Awareness: Measuring the Success of Technical Debt Management Approaches" comprises the following documents:<br>(Sec_XX is refering to the paper's sections)<br>* Sec_II_Semi_SLR_papers.xlsx<br> All excluded and included papers of our smei-SLR whit resons for exclusion and extracted data for included papers.<br>* Sec_III_Literature review in Psychology.pdf<br> Types of Awareness found with their respective definitions<br>* Sec_III_Guideline_to_Use_TD-SAGAT.pdf<br> A short guideline on how the use the TD-SAGAT method.* Participant_and_Meetings.xslx<br> overview of all participants with role and years of experience <br> overview of all meetings, we used for analysis<br>* Sec_III_SAGAT_for_TD_from_Goals_to_Queries.pdf<br> Determination of survey questions by following the SAGAT approach of following the hierarchy of goals, subgoals, decisions, requirements, queries <br>* Sec_IV_Delphi_Surveys.pdf<br> List of all questions asked and explanations given during the Delphi panel study<br>* Sec_IV_Delphi_Ranking_of_metrics.xslx<br> resulting ranking from third Delphi survey <br>* Sec_V_Survey_and_Observation_Template.xlsx<br> Templates for: questions for surveys and TD-SAGAT survey plus empty observation protocol</p>
Replication Package for Automating Technical Debt Management: Insights from Practitioner Discussions in Stack Exchange
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Technical Debt on Agile Projects: Managers' point of view at Stack Exchange
<p>Technical Debt on Agile Projects: Managers’ point of view at Stack Exchange</p> <p>XXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software (SBQS '22), Nov 07--10, 2022, 2022, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.