Find research datasets worth reusing

Data set: UAS-based optical- and thermal infrared remote sensing of the fumarole field of La Fossa cone, Vulcano Island (Italy), reveals the degassing and hydrothermal alteration structure

<p>This is the data set supporting the paper "Anatomy of a fumarole field; drone remote sensing and petrological approaches reveal the degassing and alteration structure at La Fossa cone, Vulcano Island, Italy" (DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1692" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/egusphere-2023-1692</a>).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Short description of the study:</strong> Hydrothermal alteration is common on actively degassing volcanoes and can lead to significant changes in the physical and chemical properties of the volcanic rocks, such as changes in permeability or rock strength. Despite the potentially far-reaching consequences of hydrothermal alteration for volcano stability, less is known about the detailed structures and dynamics of degassing and alteration systems. In this study, we use UAS-derived high-resolution data to analyze the fumarole field at La Fossa cone, Vulcano Island (Italy), aiming to better understand the structures and dynamics of volcanic degassing and alteration systems. By combining Principal Component Analysis, image analysis, and classification applied to high-resolution optical data and analysis of thermal infrared data, we resolve the detailed structure of the surficial degassing and alteration system based on optical and thermal anomalies. We identified characteristic anomaly patterns that indicate local degassing and alteration variability, and larger units of diffuse activity that, next to high-temperature fumaroles, contribute significantly to the total activity. We compared the observed anomaly patterns with the mineralogical and geochemical composition of representative rock samples, and with the surface degassing activity, and are able to provide the anatomy of the La Fossa fumarole field at great resolution. We show local alteration gradients, the presence of larger diffuse active complexes, and evidence for dynamic processes associated with the hydrothermal alteration. For more details, please read on: "<em>M&uuml;ller, D., Walter, T. R., Troll, V. R., Stammeier, J., Karlsson, A., De Paolo, E., ... &amp; De Jarnatt, B. (2023). Anatomy of a fumarole field; drone remote sensing and petrological approaches reveal the degassing and alteration structure at La Fossa cone, Vulcano Island, Italy.&nbsp;EGUsphere,&nbsp;2023, 1-45. </em>&nbsp;https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1692".</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Data set:</strong> We provide a UAS-based high-resolution dataset covering the whole La Fossa cone, including aerial Orthomosaic, Digital Elevation Model, and a Temperature Map derived from an airborne optical- and thermal infrared sensor (acquired in 2018 and 2019).&nbsp;</p> <p>The dataset is organized in 1) photogrammetric data, and 2) relevant processing results and related data. <strong>Filenames</strong> are written in bold letters and are a composite of the file type and the date (YYYYMMDD).&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>1)&nbsp; Photogrammetric data:&nbsp;</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Orthomosaic_20191114.tif</strong> is the in Agisoft Metashape processed orthomosaic of a 150 m (above fumarole field) optical overflight (DJI Phantom 4 Pro camera).&nbsp;</li> <li><strong>DigitalElevationModel_20191114.tif</strong> is the in Agisoft Metashape processed Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from the above-mentioned 150 m overflight.&nbsp;</li> <li><strong>Hillshade_20191114.tif</strong> is the 2.5-D representation of the DigitalElevationModel_20191114. Note, for viewing use a stretched (black to white) color scale.</li> <li><strong>TemperatureMap_20181115.tif</strong> is showing the apparent surface temperature for the La Fossa cone, acquired by a Flir Tau 2 thermal infrared camera at ~150 m (above fumarole field) flight altitude in the early morning hours (before sunrise) of 15 November 2018. Note that apparent temperatures shown may underestimate real in situ fumarole temperatures due to pixel-to-vent size ratios and atmospheric- or gas-plume distortion effects. Note further that the data has some processing artifacts, due to blind pixels of our IR camera system. For more detailed information or an updated data set please contact dmueller@gfz-potsdam.de.</li> <li><strong>T_20to40C.tif</strong> shows the diffuse thermally active surface at the fumarole field of the La Fossa cone (units a-g, see Fig. 4 in "Anatomy of a fumarole field...", https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1692). This raster shows the extracted pixels from TemperatureMap_20181115 in the range of 22 - 40 &deg;C.</li> <li><strong>T_higher40C.tif</strong> outlines the high-temperature fumarole locations of the La Fossa fumarole field (HTF, see Fig. 4 in "Anatomy of a fumarole field...", https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1692), based on the extracted pixels with temperatures &gt; 40 &deg;C from TemperatureMap_20181115.</li> </ul> <p>Shapefiles for temperatures &gt; 40 &deg;C representing the high-temperature fumarole locations (HTF) and for temperatures of 20 - 40 &deg;C representing diffuse active units, are attached at the end of the upload list and named <strong>T_higher40C_polygon</strong> and <strong>T_20_40C_polygon</strong> and consist of multiple files per shapefile with the file extensions .CPG, .dbf, .prj, .sbn, .sbx, .shp, .shp.xml, .shx.&nbsp;</p> <p>The coordinate system of the data sets is WGS84 EPSG:4326. For nadir projection use WGS 84 / UTM zone 33N - EPSG:32633. Note that the data might have horizontal and vertical offsets in the typical range of SfM-derived products with single-band GPS accuracy.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>2) Relevant processing steps and related data:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Step 1) Principal Component Analysis applied to Orthomosaic_20191114 results in the following 3 Principal Components (decorrelated variance representations of the initial RGB bands):&nbsp; <ul> <li><strong>1_PCA_PC1.tif </strong>1st principal component&nbsp;</li> <li><strong>1_PCA_PC2.tif</strong> 2nd principal component</li> <li><strong>1_PCA_PC3.tif</strong> 3rd principal component - highlights well the effects of concentrated and diffuse degassing, resulting in different alteration effects from a simple shift from reddish oxidized surface to gray, up to strong silicic alteration effects. This can be used to extract the data of interest, the hydrothermally altered surface, and to create a new alteration sub-dataset.&nbsp;</li> </ul> </li> <li>Step 2) Extraction of hydrothermally altered surface / alteration sub-dataset <ul> <li><strong>2_alteration_subdata_RGB.tif</strong> The alteration sub-data set&nbsp;was extracted from the original Orthomosaic_20191114 based on a mask obtained from Principal Component 3 (1_PCA_PC3) for values &gt; 85. The resulting raster data set is an extract of the original RGB data.</li> </ul> </li> <li>Step 3)&nbsp; PCA applied to 2_alteration_subdata_RGB will adjust to the reduced spectral range of the alteration sub-data set, provide a more sensitive variance representation, and highlight variability within the hydrothermally altered surface. <ul> <li><strong>3_PCA_PC1.tif</strong> 1st principal component of 2_alteration_subdata_RGB</li> <li><strong>3_PCA_PC2.tif</strong> 2nd principal component of 2_alteration_subdata_RGB</li> <li><strong>3_PCA_PC3.tif</strong> 3rd principal component of 2_alteration_subdata_RGB</li> </ul> </li> <li>Step 4) Unsupervised classification&nbsp; <ul> <li><strong>4_classification.tif</strong> is the unsupervised classification result of 3_PCA (all Principal Components), classified into 32 classes to achieve a high class resolution. When combining different classes, they form larger spatial units / surface types with similar spectral characteristics. This way, we divide the alteration surface into 3 surface types (see Fig. 4B in "Anatomy of a fumarole field..." DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2023-1692) representing different alteration gradients and important structural units. To achieve the same results, combine classes 1 -19 (surface type 3), 20 - 25 (surface type 2), 26 - 30 (surface type 1), and 31 - 32 for sulfur/fumarole plume. See Image <strong>optical_structure.jpg</strong> for comparison.&nbsp;</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>Note that Principal Components and Classification of Principal Components highlight data variability along the axes of highest data variance. Results have to be evaluated carefully and may be valid only locally. They are efficient for identifying variability in degassing and alteration areas, but at the same time may also highlight certain fractions of vegetation or settlements for instance. We evaluated the structure defined by our classification results by analyzing the thermal structure (<strong>thermal_structure.jpg</strong>) of the fumarole field and additional geochemical- and mineralogical investigations (XRD and XRF) of rock samples and by measuring the diffuse degassing from surface (see "Anatomy of a fumarole field..." DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2023-1692) to prove that the observed degassing/alteration units are true.</p> <p>To highlight alteration effects throughout the entire La Fossa cone, including the southern inner and outer crater rim, the alteration zones of La Forgia, or alteration on the outer flanks of La Fossa e.g. the 1988 Landslide, we provide the raster&nbsp;<strong>La_Fossa_alteration.tif&nbsp;</strong>and image <strong>La_Fossa_alteration.jpg (</strong>Note that the color scale for strong alteration (classes 31 - 32) was changed from white to purple for highlighting purpose).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In case of further questions about the dataset, please contact dmueller@gfz-potsdam.de.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>