Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
90
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
90 results for “typology”
Indicative distribution maps for Ecosystem Functional Groups - Level 3 of IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology
<p>This dataset includes the current version of the indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>Ecosystem Functional Groups</strong> - Level 3 of IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology (v2.1). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) and Keith et al. (2022).</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes for each functional group of ecosystems to enable any ecosystem type to be assigned to a group.</p> <p>Maps are indicative of global distribution patterns and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Most maps were prepared using a coarse-scale template (e.g. ecoregions), but some were compiled from higher resolution spatial data where available (see details in profiles). Higher resolution mapping is planned in future publications.</p> <p>We emphasise that spatial representation of Ecosystem Functional Groups does not follow higher-order groupings described in respective ecoregion classifications. Consequently, when Ecosystem Functional Groups are aggregated into<strong> functional biomes</strong> (Level 2 of the Global Ecosystem Typology), spatial patterns may differ from those of biogeographic biomes. Differences reflect the distinctions between functional and biogeographic interpretations of the term, “biome”.</p>
The soil province geodatabase of Italy, storing information of soil typological units and broad soil regions at the 1:1,000,000 and 1:10,000,000 scales
<p>The Soil Map of Italy at 1:1,000,000 scale, was the result of the work of Edoardo AC Costantini, Giovanni L'Abate, Roberto Barbetti, Maria Fantappié, Romina Lorenzetti, and Simona Magini affiliated to Research Centre for agrobiology and soil science (CREA-ABP), in collaboration with several regional institutions, universities and other research centers of the CREA - Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria. The map, was printed by S.EL.CA. of Florence. The map is an informative and educational work of general scientific interest, which updates the previous one edited by prof. Fiorenzo Mancini and collaborators in 1966 both in terms of knowledge and of the adopted methods. It was produced processing of all data within a geographical and soil geodatabase, collected by the CREA-ABP and other institutions collaborating in over ten years of work and using the latest international methods. The soil map shows the distribution of major soils in the country and constitutes a milestone in the process launched in 1999 as part of the project the Soil Map of Italy at a scale of 1: 250,000, funded by MIPAAF and implemented in collaboration with the regional institutions. Both broad soil regions and soil provinces (reference scale 1:10,000,000 and 1:1,000,000) are reported.</p> <p>Most small-scale soil maps report dominant typological units and allow only a partial appraisal of pedodiversity since territories with similar dominant soils can actually possess different pedodiversity. This is particularly true at the national scale, where a great wealth of soil information collected at more detailed scales is generalized.</p> <p>A methodology was set up, which aimed at preserving pedodiversity in upscaling soil maps by using geomatic techniques and the World Reference Base for soil resources (WRB). The main source of information was the soil system geodatabase of Italy, storing information of soil typological units and soilscapes at the 1:500,000 reference scale. Qualitative aggregation of soil taxa followed upscaling rules aimed at (i) maintaining the information about pedogenetic processes and (ii) grouping soilscapes showing recurrent patterns of soil forming processes. The upscaling methodology can be summarized in seven steps as follows: (1) soil forming processes selection, retrieved from soil typological units stored in the national database; (2) upscaling soil systems and creation of broad soil regions at 1:10,000,000 reference scale; (3) semantic upscaling of typological units to form taxa showing different soil forming processes; (4) ranking and associating soil forming processes; (5) geography upscaling of soil systems geometry to form polygons at 1:1,000,000 reference scale, called subregions; (6) ranking subregions according to their extension; (7) naming subregions by ranking the taxa according to the number of soil typological units.</p> <p>The soil subregion map reported 47 map unit and 148 taxa, belonging to 22 reference soil group of WRB and showing from one to four qualifiers. Each map unit had from 2 to 18 taxa, for a total of 317 occurrences. Thirty taxa had 3 or more occurrences, while the remaining took place in one or two subregions only.</p>
Data on the typology and stability of evidentiality in language contact situations
<p>This material contains the dataset from the <a href="https://version.helsinki.fi/gramadapt/evidentiality/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">gitlab repository</a> of the following MA thesis. Please cite the thesis when using the data.</p> <p>Hyvönen, Anu. 2024. <em>Typology and stability of evidentiality in language contact situations</em>. MA thesis, University of Helsinki. Openly available at <a href="https://helda.helsinki.fi/items/2ee41e80-0a04-4af4-8a90-a83598447b0e">https://helda.helsinki.fi/items/2ee41e80-0a04-4af4-8a90-a83598447b0e</a>.</p>
Building Stock and Building Typology of Kigali, Rwanda
<p> </p> <p>Dynamically changing urban agglomerations in emerging countries in the Global South experience rapid changes in their urban extent and morphology, due to a growth of population and migration, as well as socioeconomic developments. It is important to have access to updated information on the qualitative and quantitative status of settlements, in order to monitor and inform the housing sector, spatial and infrastructure planning, municipal revenue collection and budgeting, and the supply of social services. Very high-resolution (VHR) multispectral satellite images are one important, cost effective, source of regular, updated, data on urban land-use and built-up areas. The authors acquired a Pléiades satellite image from August 2015 for the central part of the capital of Rwanda, Kigali. Object-based image analysis (OBIA) and expert-based post-classification were then applied to derive building footprints and building heights, and to assign all buildings to nine building archetypes. In a second step, building footprint data from aerial images of the same area in 2008-2009 were analysed, to identify the change of the building stock in the respective period. In total, 165,625 built entities have been detected for 2008-2009 and 211,458 for 2015; this entails a 27.7% increase in the number of buildings. The dataset presented is a completely revised version of a dataset that was used for a published report on the housing supply in Kigali in 2018.</p>
Supplementary data for the article Linguistic system and sociolinguistic environment as competing factors in linguistic variation: A typological approach
<p>This material contains the dataset and the R-scripts from the <a href="https://version.helsinki.fi/gramadapt/linguistic-system-and-sociolinguistic-environment">gitlab repository</a> of the following article. Please cite the article when using the data.</p> <p>Sinnemäki, Kaius 2020. Linguistic system and sociolinguistic environment as competing factors in linguistic variation: A typological approach. <em>Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics</em> 6(2): 20190101. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2019-1010">https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2019-1010</a></p>
Dataset for the paper "Typology of partitives", Linguistics
<p>This is the raw dataset for the paper "Typology of partitives", accepted for publication in Linguistics</p>
Land cover, landscape metrics and typology of European cities for Urban Forest Ecosystem Services (UFES) evaluation
<p>The data refers to the paper "<em>Urban Forests as Regulating Ecosystems: Types and Ranking of European Cities</em>"</p> <p>The datasets provide a typology for 689 European urban areas, the land cover metrics and landscape metrics used to create the typology and the Urban Forest Ecosystem Services (UFES) indexes created from them.</p> <p>The typology of Urban Forest Ecosystem Services (UFES) presents 10 clusters of cities aggregated into 4 groups: Forest cities, Anthropogenic cities, Herbaceous cities and Standard European cities. The data can be used to support urban planning policies at local and regional scales; in urban forestry, urban form and ecosystem services work related at different spatial scales. The metrics used capture the spatial integration of different layers of natural, semi-natural and artificial land within functional urban areas.</p> <p> </p> <p>The datasets are a csv file (<code>Metrics.csv</code>) and a shapefile (<code>UFES.shp</code>) of polygons with attributes.</p> <ul> <li> <p><code>UFES.shp</code> attributes' are the following: FUA codes, country name, main city name, clusters and groups of FUAs resulting from the hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), the R color codes used in the article, the five UFES budget indexes as well as an aggregated global UFES index for each FUA.</p> </li> <li> <p><code>Metrics.csv</code> contains the FUA codes, the land cover and landscape metrics used in the HCA.</p> </li> </ul> <p> </p>
Typology of academic disciplines in the Modern China Biographical Database
<p>This table presents the bilingual typology of academic disciplines used in the Modern China Biographical Database. It is based mainly on the typology created by Yuan T'ung-li in his three bibliographical volumes about the doctoral dissertations by Chinese students in the United States, the United Kingdom, and continental Europe. We adapted this typology to include other disciplines that were present in historical sources.</p> <p><strong>Dataset Description: Typology of Disciplines (Level 2)</strong></p> <p><strong>Overview:</strong> This dataset provides a bilingual typology of academic disciplines, specifically focusing on Level 2 classifications. The terms are extracted from various Chinese sources, with English translations provided. It is structured hierarchically, connecting each Level 2 discipline to broader categories (Level 1 and Level 0), facilitating multilingual academic classification.</p> <p><strong>Structure:</strong> The dataset consists of the following key columns:</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Level 2 Discipline (English & Chinese):</strong> The specific sub-discipline classification.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Level 1 Discipline (English & Chinese):</strong> A broader category that groups multiple Level 2 disciplines.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Level 0 Discipline (English & Chinese):</strong> The highest-level classification representing major academic domains.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Level 1 Code:</strong> A numerical or coded identifier for Level 1 disciplines, supporting structured data processing.</p> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Purpose & Applications:</strong></p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Hierarchical Classification:</strong> Enables structured categorization of academic fields across multiple levels.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Multilingual Standardization:</strong> Supports bilingual terminology consistency in academic and research contexts.</p> </li> </ul> <p>Main sources:</p> <p> </p> <p>Yuan, T’ung-li. <em>A Guide to Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese Students in America, 1905-1960</em>. Washington, D.C.: Published under the auspices of the Sino-American Cultural Society, 1961.</p> <p>———. <em>A Guide to Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese Students in Continental Europe, 1907-1962</em>. S.l., 1964.</p> <p>———. <em>Doctoral dissertations by Chinese students in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, 1916-1961.</em> Uden sted og forlag, 1963.</p>
Uralic Typological database - UraTyp
<blockquote><p>Miina Norvik, Yingqi Jing, Michael Dunn, Robert Forkel, Terhi Honkola, Gerson Klumpp, Richard Kowalik, Helle Metslang, Karl Pajusalu, Minerva Piha, Eva Saar, Sirkka Saarinen and Outi Vesakoski (ms. 2021) Uralic typology in the light of new comprehensive data sets (submitted to Journal of Uralic Linguistics)</p></blockquote><p>The status of the manuscript will be updated here and at <a href="https://bedlan.net/">https://bedlan.net/</a>.</p>
Typology of academic degrees in the Modern China Biographical Database
<p>This table presents the bilingual typology of academic degrees used in the Modern China Biographical Database. It is based mainly on the data collected in historical sources.</p> <p>There are two levels:</p> <p>- Degree name: full name of the academic degree in English</p> <p>- Degree_Level_Eng: first level of classification and clustering of academic degrees in English</p> <p>- Degree_Level_ZhT: first level of classification and clustering of academic degrees in Chinese</p>
Demonstration Cases - Simulation data of energy consumption of residential building typologies
<p>The dataset is about the energy analysis for retrofit strategies of 5 building typologies and the EDEA project located in 3 climates zones in Europe: South (Madrid), Central (Berlin) and North (Helsinki).<br> The dataset includes:<br> (1) Open Document Spreadsheet (.ods) file with the results of Heating Consumption (kWh/m2·year) and Cooling Consumption (kWh/m2·year) for the five buildings, in three locations and for several scenarios:<br> - Locating external new insulation in walls and roof.<br> - Replacing Windows.<br> - Combination strategies: locating new insulation layers and replacing the existing windows.<br> - Installing solar protection devices.</p>
Supplementary material for: "Typology of Dementia-Specific Care Units: A Nationwide Survey Study in Germany"
<p>This is a dataset and R code of statistical software R version 4.2.1 (2022-06-23) to develop a typology focusing on dementia-specific care units in German nursing homes.</p> <p>The dataset is based on a national survey. For this purpose, 2020, a stratified, randomized sample of 134 care units was included. A telephone interview with facility managers and a standardized questionnaire were used to collect 28 organization-specific variables, which were analyzed as constituent variables for a typology. In addition, the dataset contains seven variables on nonpharmacological interventions (Drugs, Pain, Behavior, Training, Expert, DCM, Music), a variable on "Provider of the nursing home" (Provider) and the variable (sub-question) about "Admission criteria for residents contractually regulated with cost bearers" (Criteria) that were queried for the care units to analyze associations related to typology.</p>
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. al-Ḥasāʾ, Jabal al-Qāra (جَبَل ٱلْقَارَة). Pottery production, typology, 1970.
<p>[KSA QAR 1969.06] Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. al-Ḥasāʾ, Jabal al-Qāra. Pottery production, typology, 1970.</p>
Large Language Models are Easily Confused: A Quantitative Metric, Security Implications and Typological Analysis
<p>This repository contain datasets and results for the paper:</p> <p><strong>Large Language Models are Easily Confused: A Quantitative Metric, Security Implications and Typological Analysis</strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Github repository for the code: </strong></p> <p><a href="https://github.com/siebeniris/QuantifyingLanguageConfusion/tree/main">Quantifying Language Confusion GitHub repo</a></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>DATA</strong> include the following datasets:</p> <p>i) raw language graphs and</p> <p>ii) the calculated language similarities from the language graphs,</p> <p>iii) <strong>MTEI</strong>: the files from the <a href="https://github.com/siebeniris/vec2text_exp/tree/aaai">experimental results of multilingual inversion attacks</a>, and calculated language confusion entropy from the data;</p> <p>iv) <strong>LCB</strong>: the files from the <a href="https://github.com/for-ai/language-confusion?tab=Apache-2.0-1-ov-file#readme">language confusion benchmark</a> and calculated language confusion entropy from the data </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Results</strong> include aggregated results for further analysis:</p> <p>i) <strong>inversion_language_confusion</strong>: results from MTEI</p> <p>ii) <strong>prompting_language_confusion</strong>: results from LCB</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
CLDF dataset derived from the Johansson et al.'s "The typology of sound symbolism" from 2020
<p>Cite the source of the dataset as:</p> <blockquote> <p>Erben Johansson, N., Anikin, A., Carling, G., & Holmer, A. (2020). The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features, Linguistic Typology , 24(2), 253-310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2034</p> </blockquote>
Dataset for a typological study of adpossessive constructions
<p>This material contains the dataset and the scripts from the <a href="https://version.helsinki.fi/gramadapt/udw2020-adpossessive-constructions">gitlab repository</a> of the following article. Please cite the article when using the data.</p> <p>Sinnemäki, Kaius & Viljami Haakana 2020. Variation in Universal Dependencies annotation: A token-based typological case study on adpossessive constructions. In Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Miryam de Lhoneux, Joakim Nivre & Sebastian Schuster (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW 2020)</em>, 158–167. Barcelona (online): The Association for Computational Linguistics. Available at <a href="https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.udw-1.0">https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.udw-1.0</a>.</p>
Taxonomy, distribution and classification of ecosystem-types, integrating the recent IUCN function-based typology and local conceptualizations
<p>1. Introduction:</p> <p>This dataset is a work in progress. It compiles data gathered on ecosystem-types and their distribution based on a series of field studies led by the author, in Seychelles and West and Central Africa (Senterre 2014, Senterre & Wagner 2014, Senterre 2016, Senterre et al. 2017, 2019, 2020, 2021a, 2022). The aims of this dataset are:</p> <p>a. To share in an explicit and transparent way data on proposed taxonomies of ecosystems, i.e. conceptualizations of ecosystem-types, including explicit ecosystem names and management of synonymies.</p> <p>b. To develop ecosystem red listing based on transparent and falsifiable distribution raw data, combining distribution modeling (maps) and in situ observation of individual stand occurrences.</p> <p>c. To illustrate in detail how to deal with ecosystem data following the approach described in Senterre et al. (2021b) (i.e. "ecosystemology" approach).</p> <p>d. To integrate the above approach with the newly developed function-based typology of ecosystems (Keith et al. 2022), therefore contributing to bridging the persistent gap between the global and the local scales in ecosystem descriptions and classifications.</p> <p> </p> <p>2. Context and versions:</p> <p>This dataset was initially planned for publication on GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), as part of a project developed for the review of Key Biodiversity Areas in Seychelles: "Mainstreaming recent species and ecosystem distribution data into Key Biodiversity Areas assessments in Seychelles" (<a href="https://www.gbif.org/dataset/f513fe98-b1c3-45ee-8e14-7f2a5b7890bf">https://www.gbif.org/dataset/f513fe98-b1c3-45ee-8e14-7f2a5b7890bf</a>).</p> <p>In the first version of the GBIF dataset (<a href="https://www.gbif.org/dataset/f513fe98-b1c3-45ee-8e14-7f2a5b7890bf">https://www.gbif.org/dataset/f513fe98-b1c3-45ee-8e14-7f2a5b7890bf</a>), we proposed an analysis of the potential 'core' and 'extension' files available in GBIF for a publication of ecosystem-type names (and synonymies) and their corresponding occurrences recorded from field observations. This is an original analysis of taxonomic principles managed entirely at the scale of local observable objects, and their history of identifications or interpretations.</p> <p>Toward the end of the above-mentioned GBIF project, considering the limitations and gaps currently present in GBIF, it was decided to restrict the GBIF dataset to a simple 'metadata' entry and to publish the complete version of this dataset in Zenodo. This allows to include all tables needed, as well as all required fields without having to accommodate them within the limited GBIF structure (see metadata description on GBIF for more details). The fields of the tables published here are described in the GBIF metadata entry and in the ecosystemology paper (Senterre et al. 2021b).</p> <p> </p> <p>3. New development on typology aspects:</p> <p>In addition, considering that the new IUCN global typology of ecosystems is now published (Keith et al. 2022), we have reviewed in detail the possibility of integration of ecosystems conceptualized using our ecosystemology approach within the new IUCN typology. The result of this analysis is being considered for a publication, and this Zenodo dataset would then be published in full (i.e. including all typology aspects) as supplementary materials. In the meantime, I would be happy to discuss any of these aspects with whoever is interested.</p> <p> </p> <p>4. Access to ecosystem data for conservation actors:</p> <p>Finally, the actual data (published here) on ecosystem-types, their names, synonymies, classification, distribution, and red list status are compiled into a format that we designed to be useful to conservation actors in the form of interactive webpages (produced with R as shiny apps). This development is based on very limited resources, and the author is still quite new to R, so any help or feedback on ways to improve the scripts would be very much welcomed.</p> <p>The interactive page is available here (currently filtered to Seychelles' data only, although the dataset contains data beyond the Seychelles): https://shiny.bio.gov.sc/bioeco/</p> <p>The R scripts are available on Github: https://github.com/bsenterre/ecosystemology</p> <p> </p> <p>5. Tables contained in this dataset:</p> <p>a. Ecosystem taxonomy tables:</p> <p>ecoSpecies: Contains the list of all ecosystem-type names with their unique identifier.</p> <p>ecoOccurrences: Contains the list of individual stand occurrences, including ecosystem characters as standardized in Senterre et al. (2021b; i.e. virtual ecosystem specimen).</p> <p>ecoSpeciesProfiles: Contains basic metadata on ecosystem-types, such as their Red List evaluations.</p> <p>ecoIdentifications: Contains all the different interpretations/identifications (referring to the table ecoSpecies or to higher levels of classification, see below) made on the stands observed in the ecoOccurrences table.</p> <p> </p> <p>b. Ecosystem typology tables (TO BE ADDED LATER):</p> <p>IUCNL3: This is just a transcription, as is, of the IUCN global typology version 2.1.</p> <p>IUCNL3BIOCrossover: This table defines and comments correspondences between BIOL2 (the level 2 of the typology used by us) and the IUCN typology L3 (level 3).</p> <p>BIOL2: This is a variation based on the IUCN typology, here our level 2.</p> <p>BIOL3: This is a variation based on the IUCN typology, here our level 3.</p> <p>BIOL4: This is a variation based on the IUCN typology, here our level 4.</p> <p>ecoGenus: This is a general type of stand (thus excluding any regional ecosystem connotation), defined at a local scale and never combined with any geographic connotation (see ecosystemology paper: Senterre et al. 2021b).</p> <p>ecoFamily: This is a generalized version of the ecoGenus (i.e. still excluding any regional, sub-regional or geographic aspect).</p> <p>ecoOrder: This is a further generalized version of the ecoGenus (see also Senterre et al. 2020).</p> <p>lifeZone: This is a basic and incomplete list of life zones as defined following the Holdridge (1967) approach, with some additional elements proposed in Senterre et al. (2021b).</p> <p> </p> <p>6. Literature cited:</p> <p>Holdridge, L. R. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica.</p> <p>Keith, D. A., J. R. Ferrer-Paris, E. Nicholson, M. J. Bishop, B. A. Polidoro, E. Ramirez-Llodra, M. G. Tozer, J. L. Nel, R. Mac Nally, E. J. Gregr, K. E. Watermeyer, F. Essl, D. Faber-Langendoen, J. Franklin, C. E. R. Lehmann, A. Etter, D. J. Roux, J. S. Stark, J. A. Rowland, N. A. Brummitt, U. C. Fernandez-Arcaya, I. M. Suthers, S. K. Wiser, I. Donohue, L. J. Jackson, R. T. Pennington, T. M. Iliffe, V. Gerovasileiou, P. Giller, B. J. Robson, N. Pettorelli, A. Andrade, A. Lindgaard, T. Tahvanainen, A. Terauds, M. A. Chadwick, N. J. Murray, J. Moat, P. Pliscoff, I. Zager, and R. T. Kingsford. 2022. A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems. . Nature 610:513–518. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05318-4.</p> <p>Senterre, B. 2014. Mapping habitat-types within the Hummingbird site at Dugbe (Liberia, West Africa). Consultancy Report, Missouri Botanical Garden. P. 56. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32628.48003.</p> <p>Senterre, B. 2016. Habitat-type ground-truthing and assessment of ecosystem conservation value in the Bel Air Alufer mining site (Guinea, West Africa), with recommendations for improving the draft map of land cover types. Consultancy Report, Missouri Botanical Garden, A study conducted for Alufer Mining Limited. P. 54.</p> <p>Senterre, B., E. Bidault, and T. Stévart. 2019. Identification et évaluation des écosystèmes menacés du Mont Nimba. Rapport de consultance, Missouri Botanical Garden (MBG), Africa and Madagascar Department. P. 106. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13242.93129.</p> <p>Senterre, B., E. Bidault, T. Stévart, and P. P. Lowry II. 2020. Assessment of Key Biodiversity Areas in the Lofa-Gola-Mano & Nimba complexes (West Africa) using ecosystem criteria. Final Report, Missouri Botanical Garden. P. 146. 10.13140/RG.2.2.17934.89924.</p> <p>Senterre, B., E. Bidault, T. Stévart, M. Wagner, and P. Lowry. 2017. Mapping habitat-types in south-east Kouilou (Republic of Congo). Consultancy Report, Missouri Botanical Garden (MBG), Africa and Madagascar Department, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. P. 163.</p> <p>Senterre, B., R. M. Bristol, G. Gendron, and E. Henriette. 2021a. Fine-tuning conservation priorities in Seychelles at the landscape scale, using global KBA guidelines with both species and ecosystem criteria. Consultancy Report, United Nations Development Programme, GOS/UNDP/GEF Programme Coordination Unit, Victoria, Seychelles.</p> <p>Senterre, B., P. P. Lowry II, E. Bidault, and T. Stévart. 2021b. Ecosystemology: a new approach toward a taxonomy of ecosystems. . Ecological Complexity 47:100945. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2021.100945.</p> <p>Senterre, B., A.-H. Paradis, E. Bidault, T. Stévart, and P. P. Lowry II. 2022. Qualité et distribution des savanes montagnardes du Nimba. Rapport de consultance, Missouri Botanical Garden (MBG), Africa and Madagascar Department. P. 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13433.34401.</p> <p>Senterre, B., and M. Wagner. 2014. Mapping Seychelles habitat-types on Mahé, Praslin, Silhouette, La Digue and Curieuse. Consultancy Report, Government of Seychelles, United Nations Development Programme, Victoria, Seychelles. P. 119. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4558.6009.</p>
Euclide, the crow, the wolf and the pedestrian: distance metrics for linguistic typology - Dataset
<p>This repository contains the distance matrices and code for the paper "Euclide, the crow, the wolf and the pedestrian: distance metrics for linguistic typology"</p>
European river typologies fail to capture trends in diatom, fish, and macrophyte community composition
<p>This repository contains files related to the publication: "European river typologies fail to capture trends in diatom, fish, and macrophyte community composition".</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Supplementary data for the article "Head and dependent marking and dependency length in possessive noun phrases: a typological study of morphological and syntactic complexity"
<p>This material contains the Supplementary material (including the R-scripts) of the following article. Please cite the article when using the data.</p> <p>Sinnemäki, Kaius and Haakana, Viljami. 2023. Head and dependent marking and dependency length in possessive noun phrases: a typological study of morphological and syntactic complexity. <em>Linguistics Vanguard</em> 9(s1). 45-57. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0074">https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0074</a></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.